RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open and could be fixed quickly ... And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on, they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to the AJP13 implementation in tomcat4.. Important point here. I was thinking that the mod_jk 1.2.0 release will cover only the native part, and so java side problems (ie in TC 4.x only) should be fixed in JTC/TC4 release ? 5647 Blo AJP13 connector will not pass authentication requests This was fixed time ago, marked as FIXED good 8217 Maj Documentation references workers. prefix will do.. good 9498 Nor org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler#doRead(Ajp13) does not always I will apply the fix the reporter proposes.. i will commit shortly please review.. thanks 5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL ;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ?? Still only in TC4/AJP implemtation ? 9478 Maj jk_nt_service's wrapper.properties does not accept spaces in Marked as FIXED, AFAIR the packaged install of tc4 should deal with service install, right? TC4 related 7814 Maj Sigsegv using mod_jk in Apache2.0 (Worker) under heavy load This was Fixed by Cotin days ago.. marked as FIXED.. Good 4380 Enh Multiple ISAPI redirectors on single IIS website this is a RFE.. i will mark it as LATER.. probably will implement it in JK2 ok 6457 Cri mod_jk causes segmentation fault with JkLogLevel != debug Probably is the same than #7841 7814 ? 9334 Nor Intermittent parsing error in Ajp13Request 9417 Blo ajp13 conector does not pass Query string corectly to tomcat 9832 Cri Tomcat 4 IIS redirector cannot cope with POST in SSL 8613 Maj POST request with invalid Content-Length header 8709 Maj ISAPI Filter failing to pass on DAV OPTIONS requests 4500 Nor isapi_redirect.dll does not pass Client certificate to tomca 5709 Nor HttpServletRequest.getHost returns web server address or nul 6399 Nor unknown protocol: https 7747 Maj File Upload Causes Tomcat-Apache to Block 6832 Nor Locale of the browser is ignored by the AJP13 connector Didn't happen with mod_jk 1.2.0 from cvs and tomcat 4.0.4 (from bin tarball) 7571 Nor DataInputStream readLong() Problem To review.. althought the majority are very basic erros that tc33 do not reveal.. Yes many didn't appears with tomcat 3.3.1 but at this time, TC 3.3.1 ajp code was still the one from inside jakarta-tomcat. Now it use code from JTC and we may have similar behaviour -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
GOMEZ Henri wrote: Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open and could be fixed quickly ... And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on, they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to the AJP13 implementation in tomcat4.. Important point here. I was thinking that the mod_jk 1.2.0 release will cover only the native part, and so java side problems (ie in TC 4.x only) should be fixed in JTC/TC4 release ? 5647 Blo AJP13 connector will not pass authentication requests This was fixed time ago, marked as FIXED good 8217 Maj Documentation references workers. prefix will do.. good 9498 Nor org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler#doRead(Ajp13) does not always I will apply the fix the reporter proposes.. i will commit shortly please review.. thanks 5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL ;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ?? Still only in TC4/AJP implemtation ? I have retested it with TC4. 9478 Maj jk_nt_service's wrapper.properties does not accept spaces in Marked as FIXED, AFAIR the packaged install of tc4 should deal with service install, right? TC4 related 7814 Maj Sigsegv using mod_jk in Apache2.0 (Worker) under heavy load This was Fixed by Cotin days ago.. marked as FIXED.. Good 4380 Enh Multiple ISAPI redirectors on single IIS website this is a RFE.. i will mark it as LATER.. probably will implement it in JK2 ok 6457 Cri mod_jk causes segmentation fault with JkLogLevel != debug Probably is the same than #7841 7814 ? 9334 Nor Intermittent parsing error in Ajp13Request 9417 Blo ajp13 conector does not pass Query string corectly to tomcat 9832 Cri Tomcat 4 IIS redirector cannot cope with POST in SSL 8613 Maj POST request with invalid Content-Length header 8709 Maj ISAPI Filter failing to pass on DAV OPTIONS requests 4500 Nor isapi_redirect.dll does not pass Client certificate to tomca 5709 Nor HttpServletRequest.getHost returns web server address or nul 6399 Nor unknown protocol: https 7747 Maj File Upload Causes Tomcat-Apache to Block 6832 Nor Locale of the browser is ignored by the AJP13 connector Didn't happen with mod_jk 1.2.0 from cvs and tomcat 4.0.4 (from bin tarball) 7571 Nor DataInputStream readLong() Problem To review.. althought the majority are very basic erros that tc33 do not reveal.. Yes many didn't appears with tomcat 3.3.1 but at this time, TC 3.3.1 ajp code was still the one from inside jakarta-tomcat. Now it use code from JTC and we may have similar behaviour -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
- Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:39 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? GOMEZ Henri wrote: Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open and could be fixed quickly ... And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on, they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to the AJP13 implementation in tomcat4.. Important point here. I was thinking that the mod_jk 1.2.0 release will cover only the native part, and so java side problems (ie in TC 4.x only) should be fixed in JTC/TC4 release ? 5647 Blo AJP13 connector will not pass authentication requests This was fixed time ago, marked as FIXED good 8217 Maj Documentation references workers. prefix will do.. good 9498 Nor org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler#doRead(Ajp13) does not always I will apply the fix the reporter proposes.. i will commit shortly please review.. thanks 5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL ;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ?? Still only in TC4/AJP implemtation ? I have retested it with TC4. 9478 Maj jk_nt_service's wrapper.properties does not accept spaces in Marked as FIXED, AFAIR the packaged install of tc4 should deal with service install, right? TC4 related 7814 Maj Sigsegv using mod_jk in Apache2.0 (Worker) under heavy load This was Fixed by Cotin days ago.. marked as FIXED.. Good 4380 Enh Multiple ISAPI redirectors on single IIS website this is a RFE.. i will mark it as LATER.. probably will implement it in JK2 ok 6457 Cri mod_jk causes segmentation fault with JkLogLevel != debug Probably is the same than #7841 7814 ? 9334 Nor Intermittent parsing error in Ajp13Request 9417 Blo ajp13 conector does not pass Query string corectly to tomcat 9832 Cri Tomcat 4 IIS redirector cannot cope with POST in SSL 8613 Maj POST request with invalid Content-Length header 8709 Maj ISAPI Filter failing to pass on DAV OPTIONS requests 4500 Nor isapi_redirect.dll does not pass Client certificate to tomca 5709 Nor HttpServletRequest.getHost returns web server address or nul 6399 Nor unknown protocol: https 7747 Maj File Upload Causes Tomcat-Apache to Block 6832 Nor Locale of the browser is ignored by the AJP13 connector Didn't happen with mod_jk 1.2.0 from cvs and tomcat 4.0.4 (from bin tarball) 7571 Nor DataInputStream readLong() Problem To review.. althought the majority are very basic erros that tc33 do not reveal.. Yes many didn't appears with tomcat 3.3.1 but at this time, TC 3.3.1 ajp code was still the one from inside jakarta-tomcat. Now it use code from JTC and we may have similar behaviour -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL ;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ?? Still only in TC4/AJP implemtation ? I have retested it with TC4. Could you give me more details about how you get : cipher_suite: key_size: ssl_session: BTW, I get scheme and secure : Request Information JSP Request Method: GET Request URI: /examples/jsp/snp/snoop.jsp Request Protocol: HTTP/1.1 Servlet path: /jsp/snp/snoop.jsp Path info: null Path translated: null Query string: null Content length: 0 Content type: null Server name: hgo1.slib.com Server port: 8093 Remote user: null Remote address: 172.31.1.85 Remote host: null Authorization scheme: null Locale: en_US Secure: true Scheme: https cipher_suite: null key_size: null ssl_session: null The browser you are using is Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
We have a serious problem with jk and apache2. Try running: ab -n 1 -c 100 http://localhost:8000/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp I have 59 [Tue Jun 18 18:07:14 2002] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] handler jakarta-servlet not found for: date.jsp Now, IMHO there is problem with map_uri_to_worker, cause it's not thread safe, and the time spend in it causes apache to recycle the request_rec prior the function returns. Now the problem arises only with high concurrent load. The solution is possible using a mutex surrounding the call to map_uri_worker. (I'm having a working one with the CRITICAL_SECTION), but will translate to apr if no one objects. MT. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: We have a serious problem with jk and apache2. Try running: ab -n 1 -c 100 http://localhost:8000/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp I have 59 [Tue Jun 18 18:07:14 2002] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] handler jakarta-servlet not found for: date.jsp Now, IMHO there is problem with map_uri_to_worker, cause it's not thread safe, and the time spend in it causes apache to recycle the request_rec prior the function returns. Now the problem arises only with high concurrent load. The solution is possible using a mutex surrounding the call to map_uri_worker. (I'm having a working one with the CRITICAL_SECTION), but will translate to apr if no one objects. Jk1.2 is not apr-based, but I think it's ok to add an HAS_APR flag, but leave the old mutex as fallback. I'm not sure I understand how request_rec gets recycled while we are in map_uri_to_worker - it is supposed to happen after the request completes. It's very weird - maybe there's another problem. Can we avoid a mutex in the critical path ? Does the same problem exists in jk2 ? Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18. lipanj 2002 19:26 To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: GOMEZ Henri Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? I'm not sure I understand how request_rec gets recycled while we are in map_uri_to_worker - it is supposed to happen after the request completes. It's very weird - maybe there's another problem. Can we avoid a mutex in the critical path ? Does the same problem exists in jk2 ? I've tried that with the Enter/Leave CriticalSection, but as I done more testing, I still occasionally get 1 or two handler jakarta-servlet not found, returning server error. I'll try to dig into that (at least I think I'm on the right track). The strangest thing that map_uri_to_worker occasionally returns NULL for the same uri. MT. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
-Original Message- From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18. lipanj 2002 19:39 To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Cc: 'GOMEZ Henri' Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18. lipanj 2002 19:26 To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: GOMEZ Henri Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? I'm not sure I understand how request_rec gets recycled while we are in map_uri_to_worker - it is supposed to happen after the request completes. It's very weird - maybe there's another problem. Can we avoid a mutex in the critical path ? Does the same problem exists in jk2 ? I've tried that with the Enter/Leave CriticalSection, but as I done more testing, I still occasionally get 1 or two handler jakarta-servlet not found, returning server error. I'll try to dig into that (at least I think I'm on the right track). The strangest thing that map_uri_to_worker occasionally returns NULL for the same uri. Can't believe it! We have a race condition beetwen the: Alias /examples /tomcat/webapps/examples and JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 If I comment out the Alias directive there is no more colision, and if I slow down the map_uri_to_worker putting the Sleep(100), then for the each request there is 'not found handler'. Any ideas how to solve that? MT. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: Can't believe it! We have a race condition beetwen the: Alias /examples /tomcat/webapps/examples and JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 If I comment out the Alias directive there is no more colision, and if I slow down the map_uri_to_worker putting the Sleep(100), then for the each request there is 'not found handler'. Any ideas how to solve that? How can it be ??? All processing for a request happens in a single thread, you can't have a 'race condition' when a single thread is processing the request. Mapping a request to a worker shouldn't modify any data that is accessed by other threads - we just access some static structures. That's very strange... Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
De: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 15 de junio de 2002 5:50 In TC33, there are for i_rdr: 8297 Blo inetinfo.exe error ; Also no resource found (error 404) 5411 NorJSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 Thanks Bill, lost them, marked as INVALID both.. Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 (after all I asked for this release) I'll check all open bugs in bugzilla and sort what are revelants to jk 1.2.0 and what to 2.0.0. Since mod_jk (and jtc) are now revelants to both tomcat3/tomcat4, what about creating a jtc entry in bugzilla to have all the jk(webapp) bugs ? Using Nacho query I found many more entries : 5647 Blo Hig All [EMAIL PROTECTED] REOP AJP13 connector will not pass authentication requests 9417 Blo Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW ajp13 conector does not pass Query string corectly to tomcat 6457 Cri Oth Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW mod_jk causes segmentation fault with JkLogLevel != debug 9832 Cri Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Tomcat 4 IIS redirector cannot cope with POST in SSL 7747 Maj Oth All [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW File Upload Causes Tomcat-Apache to Block 7814 Maj Oth Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Sigsegv using mod_jk in Apache2.0 (Worker) under heavy load 8217 Maj Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Documentation references workers. prefix 8613 Maj Oth Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW POST request with invalid Content-Length header 8709 Maj Hig PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW ISAPI Filter failing to pass on DAV OPTIONS requests 9478 Maj Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW jk_nt_service's wrapper.properties does not accept spaces in 4500 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW isapi_redirect.dll does not pass Client certificate to tomca 5709 Nor Oth All [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW HttpServletRequest.getHost returns web server address or nul 5975 Nor Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL 6399 Nor Oth All [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW unknown protocol: https 6832 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Locale of the browser is ignored by the AJP13 connector 7571 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW DataInputStream readLong() Problem 9334 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Intermittent parsing error in Ajp13Request 9498 Nor Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler#doRead(Ajp13) does not always 4380 Enh Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Multiple ISAPI redirectors on single IIS website Since there is many IIS related error, I'll need Nacho help here : - to mark invalid IIS bugs - Fix small bugs - Indicate bugs which will be posponed and handled in mod_jk 1.2.1 or mod_jk 2.0.0 Thanks for any help (Nacho, Bojan, Costin...) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
There are several bugs related to auth, I'll take a look. We must have all the bugs evaluated ( even with LATER ) before a formal release. OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 (after all I asked for this release) Great, thanks for volunteering ! ( we should also start looking for a volunteer for jk2 ! :-) Costin I'll check all open bugs in bugzilla and sort what are revelants to jk 1.2.0 and what to 2.0.0. Since mod_jk (and jtc) are now revelants to both tomcat3/tomcat4, what about creating a jtc entry in bugzilla to have all the jk(webapp) bugs ? Using Nacho query I found many more entries : 5647 Blo Hig All [EMAIL PROTECTED] REOP AJP13 connector will not pass authentication requests 9417 Blo Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW ajp13 conector does not pass Query string corectly to tomcat 6457 Cri Oth Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW mod_jk causes segmentation fault with JkLogLevel != debug 9832 Cri Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Tomcat 4 IIS redirector cannot cope with POST in SSL 7747 Maj Oth All [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW File Upload Causes Tomcat-Apache to Block 7814 Maj Oth Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Sigsegv using mod_jk in Apache2.0 (Worker) under heavy load 8217 Maj Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Documentation references workers. prefix 8613 Maj Oth Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW POST request with invalid Content-Length header 8709 Maj Hig PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW ISAPI Filter failing to pass on DAV OPTIONS requests 9478 Maj Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW jk_nt_service's wrapper.properties does not accept spaces in 4500 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW isapi_redirect.dll does not pass Client certificate to tomca 5709 Nor Oth All [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW HttpServletRequest.getHost returns web server address or nul 5975 Nor Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL 6399 Nor Oth All [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW unknown protocol: https 6832 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Locale of the browser is ignored by the AJP13 connector 7571 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW DataInputStream readLong() Problem 9334 Nor Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Intermittent parsing error in Ajp13Request 9498 Nor Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler#doRead(Ajp13) does not always 4380 Enh Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Multiple ISAPI redirectors on single IIS website Since there is many IIS related error, I'll need Nacho help here : - to mark invalid IIS bugs - Fix small bugs - Indicate bugs which will be posponed and handled in mod_jk 1.2.1 or mod_jk 2.0.0 Thanks for any help (Nacho, Bojan, Costin...) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57 OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 (after all I asked for this release) ;) Thanks for volunteering !!! I can test with tc33, but i didn't saw any tc33 bug in this query :).. And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on, they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to the AJP13 implementation in tomcat4.. Kevin? Costin? Coments on bugs: 5647 Blo AJP13 connector will not pass authentication requests This was fixed time ago, marked as FIXED 8217 Maj Documentation references workers. prefix will do.. 9498 Nor org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler#doRead(Ajp13) does not always I will apply the fix the reporter proposes.. i will commit shortly please review.. 5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL ;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ?? 9478 Maj jk_nt_service's wrapper.properties does not accept spaces in Marked as FIXED, AFAIR the packaged install of tc4 should deal with service install, right? 7814 Maj Sigsegv using mod_jk in Apache2.0 (Worker) under heavy load This was Fixed by Cotin days ago.. marked as FIXED.. 4380 Enh Multiple ISAPI redirectors on single IIS website this is a RFE.. i will mark it as LATER.. probably will implement it in JK2 6457 Cri mod_jk causes segmentation fault with JkLogLevel != debug Probably is the same than #7841 9334 Nor Intermittent parsing error in Ajp13Request 9417 Blo ajp13 conector does not pass Query string corectly to tomcat 9832 Cri Tomcat 4 IIS redirector cannot cope with POST in SSL 8613 Maj POST request with invalid Content-Length header 8709 Maj ISAPI Filter failing to pass on DAV OPTIONS requests 4500 Nor isapi_redirect.dll does not pass Client certificate to tomca 5709 Nor HttpServletRequest.getHost returns web server address or nul 6399 Nor unknown protocol: https 7747 Maj File Upload Causes Tomcat-Apache to Block 6832 Nor Locale of the browser is ignored by the AJP13 connector 7571 Nor DataInputStream readLong() Problem To review.. althought the majority are very basic erros that tc33 do not reveal.. Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega msg29089/bin0.bin Description: application/ms-tnef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57 OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 (after all I asked for this release) I can test with tc33, but i didn't saw any tc33 bug in this query :).. And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on, they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to the AJP13 implementation in tomcat4.. Kevin? Costin? I agree, most likely the bugs are on the java side - and probably they are minor. I think we should focus our efforts on org.apache.jk ( and coyote ), and use it in jk1.2 release ( for the java side ). The main reason is that I think the code is more maintainable, it is as stable as org.apache.ajp, and the bug fixes will help both 3.3 and 4.x. Henri ? You're the RM, what do you think ? Nacho - can you re-run your tests with o.a.jk ( instead of the original Ajp13Interceptor ) ? This will help both jk1.2 and jk2 releases. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
- Original Message - From: Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:06 PM Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 14 de junio de 2002 19:57 OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0 (after all I asked for this release) ;) Thanks for volunteering !!! I can test with tc33, but i didn't saw any tc33 bug in this query :).. In TC33, there are for i_rdr: 8297 Blo inetinfo.exe error ; Also no resource found (error 404) 5411 NorJSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3 I don't have access to an IIS server, so I can't comment on the validity of any of them. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
Did there is still opened bugs in mod_jk 1.2.0 (jtc/native) which could prevent us to make a release ? Appart the AP 2.0 error when worker didn't exist. = Server error! Error message: handler jakarta-servlet not found for: If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster Error 500 hgo1.slib.com Wed Jun 12 16:04:27 2002 Apache/2.0.36 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.36 OpenSSL/0.9.6 DAV/2 mod_jk/1.2.0 - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:20 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? +1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my systems for a really long time now. Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows? To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0'. I've posted the question on 2002-04-07. Hum, It's the bad error report when you specify a worker which didn't exist. I'm not sure if Costin fixed it... Bojan On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 23:26, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there platforms. Regards - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 16:11 Did there is still opened bugs in mod_jk 1.2.0 (jtc/native) which could prevent us to make a release ? I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 test hang tomcat AFAIK. we need some time to test jk 1.2 under IIS.. AFAIK there is some problems with file names, the given reg file, docs and binaries has different names for the dll, and they do not match, this problem it's the most reported one in tomcat-user against 4.0+jk1.2+IIS, the people do not realize that they need to change things to match the real names.. i dont know where is exactly the problem.. if anyone remember I'll try to solve it next days.. Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega msg28835/bin0.bin Description: application/ms-tnef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 test hang tomcat AFAIK. Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ? we need some time to test jk 1.2 under IIS.. You're the boss here ;) AFAIK there is some problems with file names, the given reg file, docs and binaries has different names for the dll, and they do not match, this problem it's the most reported one in tomcat-user against 4.0+jk1.2+IIS, the people do not realize that they need to change things to match the real names.. i dont know where is exactly the problem.. if anyone remember I'll try to solve it next days.. Ok -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 test hang tomcat AFAIK. Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ? Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with modjk1.1 should not upgrade ). This affects only iPlanet and IIS with tomcat3.3. Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, and if this is listed I'll fix it. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3 test hang tomcat AFAIK. Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ? Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with modjk1.1 should not upgrade ). This affects only iPlanet and IIS with tomcat3.3. Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, and if this is listed I'll fix it. Hum, what's should do the release manager ? Also could we tag jtc to jk_1_2_0_release but do tarball containing only jk/native ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, and if this is listed I'll fix it. Hum, what's should do the release manager ? Build the 'official' release, review the bugs and decide what bugs must be fixed, putting the release to a vote and making the announcements. And of course, make sure the stars are in the right position and all the software we depend on is released first and has all the fixes we need ( for jk that's not an issue yet ). Also could we tag jtc to jk_1_2_0_release but do tarball containing only jk/native ? When the official build is made, yes. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
Hum, what's should do the release manager ? Build the 'official' release, review the bugs and decide what bugs must be fixed, putting the release to a vote and making the announcements. May be we could team-up with Larry ? And of course, make sure the stars are in the right position and all the software we depend on is released first and has all the fixes we need ( for jk that's not an issue yet ). Also could we tag jtc to jk_1_2_0_release but do tarball containing only jk/native ? When the official build is made, yes. Ok Larry what about being RM for JTC/JK1.2.0 ? I'll help you on build unix (Linux i386, AIX), review BUGS and announce... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
Hi Henri, I haven't been very active of late with Tomcat 3.3.x due to being too busy with other things right now. I'm not sure when I would find the time for JTC RM duties at this moment. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:28 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? Hum, what's should do the release manager ? Build the 'official' release, review the bugs and decide what bugs must be fixed, putting the release to a vote and making the announcements. May be we could team-up with Larry ? And of course, make sure the stars are in the right position and all the software we depend on is released first and has all the fixes we need ( for jk that's not an issue yet ). Also could we tag jtc to jk_1_2_0_release but do tarball containing only jk/native ? When the official build is made, yes. Ok Larry what about being RM for JTC/JK1.2.0 ? I'll help you on build unix (Linux i386, AIX), review BUGS and announce... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 18:46 Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with modjk1.1 should not upgrade ). OK, i was only pointing to some problem i know of.., something to be at least documented.. i would not oppose, and if i would, i could try to fix it myself, no problem.. :) Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, and if this is listed I'll fix it. The silence can be masked :) Could we do some kind of collective RM for that relase? it's at least possible to do a release this way? Put up a list of tasks, another of bugs, vote and comment in what to do.. and simply do it.. Do we need a (benevolent) dictator for this? ( please take it as a comment, no negative feelings, but it seems to me , that to find a RM for that release could be hard, and seems it's an important release to someone, not me, i could help, but not take the role myself ) Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, and if this is listed I'll fix it. The silence can be masked :) Could we do some kind of collective RM for that relase? it's at least possible to do a release this way? Put up a list of tasks, another of bugs, vote and comment in what to do.. and simply do it.. Do we need a (benevolent) dictator for this? No, we need a benevolent worker :-) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 22:01 No, we need a benevolent worker :-) Just realized i was falling in my habitual naiveness.. :) The tasklist of the RM starts with collect open bugs, ok? We have the bugs reported by the query below in bugzilla, as opened bugs for JK, if anyone feels this lacks something.. feel free to add what you want.. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug _status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Tomcat+3pro duct=Tomcat+4component=Connector%3AJK%2FAJP+%28deprecated%29component= Connectors Adding the JNI problem reported by myself, could this be the list of actual open bugs against JK1.2.0? If yes, first task done...next please.. :) Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my systems for a really long time now. Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows? To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0'. I've posted the question on 2002-04-07. Hum, It's the bad error report when you specify a worker which didn't exist. I'm not sure if Costin fixed it... Bojan On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 23:26, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there platforms. Regards - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there platforms. Regards - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
Yes it could be a good idea because I can't have access to the CVS repository to generate a newer release of mod_jk under AIX 4.3.3. Thx -Message d'origine- De: GOMEZ Henri [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: lundi 10 juin 2002 15:26 A: Tomcat Developers List Objet: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ? Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there platforms. Regards - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
GOMEZ Henri wrote: Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and very little time). If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there platforms. Regards - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and very little time). If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? no --- jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk jk 1.2 = jtc/native jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there platforms. +1 ! The recent bug report about 'deadlock' turned out to be on the java side, and the fix is in. Regarding the binaries - I assume we'll all build against the latest released Apache1.3 and 2.0 ? Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and very little time). If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? no --- jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk jk 1.2 = jtc/native jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2 And jk1.0 = tomcat3.2/mod_jk. Regarding Solaris - have you tried after the changes on logger ? I suspect that was one issue ( with printf(%s, null ) problems ). I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again with more tests. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and very little time). If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you? no --- jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk jk 1.2 = jtc/native jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2 And jk1.0 = tomcat3.2/mod_jk. Regarding Solaris - have you tried after the changes on logger ? I suspect that was one issue ( with printf(%s, null ) problems ). I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again with more tests. I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a Fujitsu compiler, Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug). +++ error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init() uri:/jkstatus/* host =(null) uri=/jkstatus/* type=1 ctx=(null) prefix=/jkstatus suffix=(null) +++ So jk _1.2_ looks ok ;-)) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again with more tests. I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a Fujitsu compiler, Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug). +++ error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init() uri:/jkstatus/* host =(null) uri=/jkstatus/* type=1 ctx=(null) prefix=/jkstatus suffix=(null) +++ So jk _1.2_ looks ok ;-)) JF, /jkstatus is only present in native2 (jk 2.0), not in native (jk 1.2). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
GOMEZ Henri wrote: I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again with more tests. I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a Fujitsu compiler, Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug). +++ error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init() uri:/jkstatus/* host =(null) uri=/jkstatus/* type=1 ctx=(null) prefix=/jkstatus suffix=(null) +++ So jk _1.2_ looks ok ;-)) JF, /jkstatus is only present in native2 (jk 2.0), not in native (jk 1.2). Oops... I have forgotten to remove the mod_jk2 log... I have _not_ tested the possible (null) problem. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my systems for a really long time now. Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows? To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35 and mod_jk 1.2.0'. I've posted the question on 2002-04-07. Bojan On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 23:26, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there platforms. Regards - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
