Re: [DAS] What's next for Tuscany DAS ?
Beta 2 sounds right given that this is just sync'ing up with SDO version 1.0. On 9/5/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds good to me. On 9/6/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0 release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple days, and if we make it on time, we could still have a chance to include DAS in the SCA 1.0 release (planned for middle of September). As for naming, I was thinking to make this a beta2 release. Thoughts ? On 8/27/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in TUSCANY-961. One observation here - Generated code shows usage of deprecated method FactoryBase.getProperty (Type, int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes needed in xsdtojava generator in SDO? Any suggestions? Regards, Amita On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things that we want to do next for DAS. I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage. As for our history with SCA integration, we have started efforts around Data Services/Declarative DAS (implementation.das) and Data Feeds (implementation.data), and this is probably another area we would like to continue to work going forward. I also think we should continue to improve our user documentation and distribution infrastructure to make our release cut easier. Below is a summary list of items and JIRAs that are related to these possible items : - TUSCANY-986 - DAS integration with SDO 2.1 APIs - TUSCANY-961 - DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup failure - Refactoring DAS to allow multiple implementatons As for timeframe, maybe it would be good to have a release in the next couple weeks, to support SDO 1.0 and be available to the SCA release, so we can have the integration story with SCA available. This is just of brain dump of where my thinking is at the moment, I'm sure everyone has their own thoughts about things we should tackle. It would be good to get to them all on the table :-) Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DAS] What's next for Tuscany DAS ?
Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0 release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple days, and if we make it on time, we could still have a chance to include DAS in the SCA 1.0 release (planned for middle of September). As for naming, I was thinking to make this a beta2 release. Thoughts ? On 8/27/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in TUSCANY-961. One observation here - Generated code shows usage of deprecated method FactoryBase.getProperty(Type, int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes needed in xsdtojava generator in SDO? Any suggestions? Regards, Amita On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things that we want to do next for DAS. I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage. As for our history with SCA integration, we have started efforts around Data Services/Declarative DAS (implementation.das) and Data Feeds (implementation.data), and this is probably another area we would like to continue to work going forward. I also think we should continue to improve our user documentation and distribution infrastructure to make our release cut easier. Below is a summary list of items and JIRAs that are related to these possible items : - TUSCANY-986 - DAS integration with SDO 2.1 APIs - TUSCANY-961 - DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup failure - Refactoring DAS to allow multiple implementatons As for timeframe, maybe it would be good to have a release in the next couple weeks, to support SDO 1.0 and be available to the SCA release, so we can have the integration story with SCA available. This is just of brain dump of where my thinking is at the moment, I'm sure everyone has their own thoughts about things we should tackle. It would be good to get to them all on the table :-) Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DAS] What's next for Tuscany DAS ?
sounds good to me. On 9/6/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0 release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple days, and if we make it on time, we could still have a chance to include DAS in the SCA 1.0 release (planned for middle of September). As for naming, I was thinking to make this a beta2 release. Thoughts ? On 8/27/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in TUSCANY-961. One observation here - Generated code shows usage of deprecated method FactoryBase.getProperty (Type, int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes needed in xsdtojava generator in SDO? Any suggestions? Regards, Amita On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things that we want to do next for DAS. I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage. As for our history with SCA integration, we have started efforts around Data Services/Declarative DAS (implementation.das) and Data Feeds (implementation.data), and this is probably another area we would like to continue to work going forward. I also think we should continue to improve our user documentation and distribution infrastructure to make our release cut easier. Below is a summary list of items and JIRAs that are related to these possible items : - TUSCANY-986 - DAS integration with SDO 2.1 APIs - TUSCANY-961 - DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup failure - Refactoring DAS to allow multiple implementatons As for timeframe, maybe it would be good to have a release in the next couple weeks, to support SDO 1.0 and be available to the SCA release, so we can have the integration story with SCA available. This is just of brain dump of where my thinking is at the moment, I'm sure everyone has their own thoughts about things we should tackle. It would be good to get to them all on the table :-) Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DAS] What's next for Tuscany DAS ?
I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in TUSCANY-961. One observation here - Generated code shows usage of deprecated method FactoryBase.getProperty(Type, int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes needed in xsdtojava generator in SDO? Any suggestions? Regards, Amita On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things that we want to do next for DAS. I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage. As for our history with SCA integration, we have started efforts around Data Services/Declarative DAS (implementation.das) and Data Feeds (implementation.data), and this is probably another area we would like to continue to work going forward. I also think we should continue to improve our user documentation and distribution infrastructure to make our release cut easier. Below is a summary list of items and JIRAs that are related to these possible items : - TUSCANY-986 - DAS integration with SDO 2.1 APIs - TUSCANY-961 - DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup failure - Refactoring DAS to allow multiple implementatons As for timeframe, maybe it would be good to have a release in the next couple weeks, to support SDO 1.0 and be available to the SCA release, so we can have the integration story with SCA available. This is just of brain dump of where my thinking is at the moment, I'm sure everyone has their own thoughts about things we should tackle. It would be good to get to them all on the table :-) Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
