I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in TUSCANY-961.
One observation here -
Generated code shows usage of deprecated method FactoryBase.getProperty(Type,
int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes needed in
xsdtojava generator in SDO?

Any suggestions?

Regards,
Amita

On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things
> that we want to do next for DAS.
>
> I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our
> core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple
> DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage.
>
> As for our history with SCA integration, we have started efforts
> around Data Services/Declarative DAS  (implementation.das) and Data
> Feeds (implementation.data), and this is probably another area we
> would like to continue to work going forward.
>
> I also think we should continue to improve our user documentation and
> distribution infrastructure to make our  release cut easier.
>
> Below is a summary list of items and JIRAs that are related to these
> possible items :
>
> - TUSCANY-986 - DAS integration with SDO 2.1 APIs
> - TUSCANY-961 - DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup failure
> - Refactoring DAS to allow multiple implementatons
>
>
> As for timeframe, maybe it would be good to have a release in the next
> couple weeks, to support SDO 1.0 and be available to the SCA release,
> so we can have the integration story with SCA available.
>
> This is just of brain dump of where my thinking is at the moment, I'm
> sure everyone has their own thoughts about things we should tackle. It
> would be good to get to them all on the table :-)
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to