1.
SQLBOX (see patch earlier on the list) can send messages by injecting them
in an sql table. Never tested it's performance but for almost sure it is
faster than SMSBOX.
2.
Did you try using a persistant HTTP connection to SMSBOX? (not sure if it is
supported).
Rene Kluwen
Chimit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Bill Brigden
Sent: maandag 12 juli 2004 17:47
To: 'Albertas Mickenas'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sending SMS faster that via HTTP
Hi,
You say that HTTP can be too slow - on a system I manage, one of the
interfaces uses php/curl/mysql - grabbing messages from the database and
using the curl extensions to send to the kannel server (on another machine).
I normally see rates of at least 200 messages / sec - where the smpp
connections out of kannel become the limiting factor.
How fast do you need messages to be sent to kannel?
Regards,
Bill.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Albertas Mickenas
Sent: 12 July 2004 16:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sending SMS faster that via HTTP
Hello
i know how to confgiure kannel to provide HTTP sendsms functionality,
but when using it in a real life application, opening http connection
for every SMS can be too slow.
i know that i can specify multiple recipients for one message, but i'm
talking about a situation when i have to send many different texts to
different recipients.
is there a way to send SMS via kannel more directly, not using HTTP?
thanx in advance!
mic.
