Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi Carlos,
Thank you for your feedback. I will do it accordingly.
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
Server Storage Support Team
MIMOS Berhad
From: Carlos Martín Sánchez [mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 6:28 PM
To: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
That IP looks good (202.45.142.114). It might be a bug that can be affected by
the ruby version.
Since this is a 4.2 version and the leases were completely redone for new
versions, maybe the best thing to do is comment out the whole vnet section in
fsck.rb, lines 920-1066.
Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.orghttp://www.OpenNebula.org |
cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebula
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.mymailto:anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi Carlos,
Below is the last few lines of output before it throwing the error. How do I
proceed to troubleshoot on this.
row[:ip]: 3391983169
doc:
LEASEIP3391983169/IPMAC_PREFIX512/MAC_PREFIXMAC_SUFFIX3391983169/MAC_SUFFIXUSED1/USEDVID1371/VID/LEASE
row[:ip]: 3391983218
doc:
LEASEIP3391983218/IPMAC_PREFIX512/MAC_PREFIXMAC_SUFFIX3391983218/MAC_SUFFIXUSED1/USEDVID1372/VID/LEASE
Exception `ArgumentError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ipaddr.rb:481 - address family
mismatch
address family mismatch
Error running fsck version 4.2.0
The database will be restored
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
Server Storage Support Team
MIMOS Berhad
From: Carlos Martín Sánchez
[mailto:cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 10:49 PM
To: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
I don't know what can be causing the error. Can you to add the following lines
right before line 929 in /usr/lib/one/ruby/onedb/fsck.rb?
warn
warn row[:ip]: #{row[:ip]}
warn doc: #{doc.to_s}
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/release-4.2/src/onedb/fsck.rb#L929
Maybe that will show if there is something wrong with that IP that is throwing
the error.
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.orghttp://www.OpenNebula.org |
cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebula
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.mymailto:anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi Carlos,
What is your ruby version?
== ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux]
Are all of your leases IPv4?
== Yes, all IPv4
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
From: Carlos Martín Sánchez
[mailto:cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:55 PM
To: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
What is your ruby version?
Are all of your leases IPv4?
Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.orghttp://www.OpenNebula.org |
cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebula
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.mymailto:anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi All,
When I run using debug mode, I see this message.
….
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sequel-3.46.0/lib/sequel/dataset/actions.rb:151:
warning: instance variable @row_proc not initialized
VNet 25 has used lease 10.1.66.8 (VM 858) but it is free
Exception `ArgumentError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ipaddr.rb:481 - address family
mismatch
address family mismatch
Error running fsck version 4.2.0
The database will be restored
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
From: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 7:34 PM
To: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: RE: Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi All,
I restored the mysql database and run the onedb fsck, still the process
terminate with “Error running fsck version 4.2.0” but the messages of the
inconsistency is less.
Appreciate the expert help on this.
Note: We are still using 4.2 because we have our own apps integrated with it.
We already have plan to setup another ONE with version 4.10
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
MIMOS Bhd
From: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 3:36 PM
To: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: RE: Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi All,
When I run onedb fck, got the following messages but ended with error.
[oneadmin@server 101]$ onedb fsck -f -S localhost -u oneadmin -d opennebula
MySQL Password:
MySQL dump stored in
Re: [one-users] Official Debian packages
Jaime Melis jme...@opennebula.org writes: Hmm, writing the question seems to gives my answer, it looks like the cherry-picking of master commits on the one-version branches are the reasons of the merge conflicts. Yes... that's the way we usually do it: by cherry picking the commits. Ok, I'll broke everything to rebase on master then. Unfortunately we don't think there's an easier way. Personally, I prefer to use DaggyFix[1][2] over cherry-picking. This requires to base the commits on the oldest supported release and then merge them everywhere needed, which can be seen as a lot of work, but not that much different from doing cherry-picking ;-) I think DaggyFix is more GIT friendly and respect the context as explain in an article I just found[3]. For example, here is the GIT graph to apply a foo-bar patch (issue #42): o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-M₃ - master \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ o-o-o-o-M₂ /- prod/4/master (integration branch for version 4) \ \ \ / / \ \ \ o-o---+ - prod/3/42-foo-bar (short living branch) \ \ \ / \ \ \ o-o-o-o-M₁ - prod/3/master (integration branch for version 3) \ \ \ o-o-o-o-o-o-o-M₀ - prod/2/master (integration branch for version 2) \ \ / \ o-o-o-o - prod/2/41-fix-something \ o-o-o-o-o-o - prod/1/master (integration branch for version 1) in this example: - version 1 is not supported anymore - version 2 is supported but not concerned by #42: foo-bar A temporary branch is created based on version 3 named prod/3/42-foo-bar and the commits are done here. I use do to prefix my branch names by the name of the release branch it first apply to, it help to sort them when doing “git branch” ;-) Then, this 42/foo-bar branch is merge back into version 3 integration branch (commit M₁), to prepare a new release 3.X. This 42/foo-bar branch is merge into version 4 integration branch (commit M₂) if it apply to it like in my example. Finally, this 42/foo-bar branch is merge into the main development branch (commit M₃) if it apply to it like in my example. This is based on the “successful Git branching model[4]” I extended with the packaging branches. I hope it will help you, it took me time to find some kind of best practice I agree with, like “Is it better to rebase or merge?[5]”. Regards. Footnotes: [1] by mercurial http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/DaggyFixes [2] by monotone http://wiki.monotone.ca/DaggyFixes/ [3] https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1595636 [4] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ [5] http://www.randyfay.com/node/91 -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] wrong gateway detected by vm-context
We should probably take out the code that generates the gateway as it only gives problems: https://github.com/OpenNebula/addon-context-linux/blob/master/base_rpm/etc/one-context.d/00-network#L68-L73 Concerning the GATEWAY_INTERFACE, this variable contains a number or the ETHnum that appears in the context file. In fact it is not the name of the interface as with the new naming scheme it can be called with a different name, for example en3p8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_Network_Device_Naming Cheers On Fri Feb 13 2015 at 1:49:42 PM Madko madk...@gmail.com wrote: I have found the solution. GATEWAY_IFACE must be set, but in upper case. I don't know why. Any idea? If I put GATEWAY_IFACE=eth1 (eth1 is the real name) it doesn't work, but GATEWAY_IFACE=ETH1 works... Le Fri Feb 13 2015 at 10:03:33, Madko madk...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi, It seems vmcontext scripts try to guess the gateway IP as soon as any interface has a gateway set. Here is my case: one vm with eth0 to internal admin network, and eth1 to wan. Only eth1 has a gateway set. When init script vmcontext start, it found out that there is a gateway (but on eth1), and so is_gateway function on eth0 seems to returns true. After that the gateway is guessed with NETWORK_ADDRESS.1 but I don't know why? here is my context: ETH0_IP='192.168.199.109' ETH0_MAC='02:00:c0:a8:c7:6d' ETH1_DNS='10.156.255.245' ETH1_GATEWAY='10.156.0.1' ETH1_IP='10.156.24.93' ETH1_MAC='02:00:0a:9c:18:5d' ETH1_MASK='255.255.224.0' ETH1_NETWORK='10.156.0.0' Here is the ifcfg-eth0 written by vmcontext init script: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IPADDR=192.168.199.109 GATEWAY=192.168.199.1 ifcfg-eth1 is good and has its gateway correctly set. Here is my vnet template where no gateway is set (same problem if I remove the empty GATEWAY key): VIRTUAL NETWORK TEMPLATE BRIDGE=br0 DESCRIPTION=réseau admin vm GATEWAY= PHYDEV= ROLE=admin VLAN=YES VLAN_ID=199 is it a bug? Attached here is the vmcontext network script log best regards, Edouard ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Getting an HTTP-Error: 500 when executing oneacct -g group
Compile our own OpenNebula will break the package system maintenance. You can forget use yum or any other package management system. You can forget about the updating scripts associate to the package for automatically migrate and adapt the database schemes to updated versions Compile our own OpenNebula in a production infrastructure means return to the Dark Ages from a sysadmin point of view... for EVERY site with this issue... In the easy way, OpenNebula staff should use a fixed version of libxmlrpc-c and so distribute a fixed package of OpenNebula. Other possibility is that libxmlrpc-c become a dynamically linked library instead statically linked one. In this way each site could use a fixed version of libxmlrpc-c Regards. On 17/02/15 11:15, Esteban Freire wrote: Hi Carlos, Thank you very much for letting us know, we need to think it deeply :) Just one question, which are the pros and cons of compiling oned? It is a serious thing for us since the infrastructure is on production and I am not sure if it will break future updates trough yum/rpm and also, if we could break something in current ON installation at CESGA. Personally, I don't like this decision but it is my humble opinion and in any case, we need to discuss about it. Thanks in advance, Esteban On 02/17/2015 11:05 AM, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: Hi, I forgot to add that if you want to test the new libxmlrpc version yourself, it's not that difficult to compile oned with the 'xmlrpc' scons option: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/integration/references/compile.html Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:39 AM, RubEn DIez LAzaro rd...@cesga.es mailto:rd...@cesga.es wrote: Hi: I Does not know really if some recent version of libxmlrpc-c fix this bug... bug the patch seems to be into some branch http://sourceforge.net/p/xmlrpc-c/code/2520/ I don't pretend to confuse you with how we discover this bug, but in short it appears when executing some accounting software by Boris Parak for the Federate cloud of the EGI project I hope the patch i link help to clarify the situation. Best regards. On 12/02/15 22:53, Alejandro Feijóo wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi to all. As Esteban say, we have a planned updated to last stable opennebula release the Wednesday 18th, but i think we can wait if the libxmlrpc-c is updated in the next days or maybe weeks. I think we can wait because the new ON not have critical changes (we have pached one-flow yet) and make 2 updates in the same month can be a problem for our costumers... (we use oneflow in a lot of critical services and is a problem make 2 scheduled stops) But if the change is programated to 4.12 we going to update and patch it (I think Ruben have a special love story paching software hehe) Again, a lot of thanks. El 12/02/15 a las 19:32, Esteban Freire escribió: Hi Carlos, Thank you very much for checking it :) About if it should be fixed in 1.33.14, I hope Rubén answer to this tomorrow since it is the one looking at this issue. When do you think we could test this? Sorry for the question/hurry but we are failing accounting due to this issue in FedCloud (EGI). In principle, we are going to update to last ON version next Wednesday 18th. Thanks in advance, Esteban On 02/12/2015 07:23 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: Hi, I'm not directly involved in the packaging, but as far as I can tell, OpenNebula 4.8 comes with libxmlrpc-c version 1.33.6. If I understand correctly, the problem you report should be fixed in 1.33.14? I've checked and the current super stable version is 1.33.16 [1]. We will see if the static library can be updated without breaking anything [2]. Regards. [1] http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/change_super_stable.html [2] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3594 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] datastore layout question
Hi Steve, Normally If I have to use NFS based shared hosting then I mounted /var/lib/one directly on all nodes instead of mounting datastores seperately. Else recently I configured multiple OpenNebula Nodes with local /var/lib/one directory added one Node just for backup and sync only datastores of all nodes on that backup node. So that I can easily live migrate VMs to that backup Node from any node. It worked well for me. Pros: 1. Speedy managing instances as it uses local storage. 2. Live Migration works 3. Very Low cost compare to Fiber infrastructure 4. No need for separate Network storage as backup node can work as OpenNebula Host. Cons: 1. It cannot be realtime sync but you set cron for every minute 2. Need to monitor syncing. Regards Neelesh Gurjar On 2015-02-16 09:35, Steven Timm wrote: My one4.8 installation is set up with NFS-based shared image store #102 and local-based system datastore #100 instantiated in local disk on each VM host. Thus far it seems that I am forced to set up the datastore path as /var/lib/one/datastores/dsno So that means I have to NFS export datastore #102 to all VM nodes with exactly that path (/var/lib/one/datastores/102) and then as long as the /var/lib/one/datastores path is there on the VM host the directory /var/lib/one/datastores/100 will be made when the first VM is launched. All of this works just fine but it does mean that I have to be careful every time I reset the cloud to make sure that the image datastore is created as datastore #102. If I ever end up changing the number for whatever reason I will have to change all the mount points all across the cluster. Has anyone ever figured out a better way to deal with mounting a shared NFS data store? Steve Timm -- Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 t...@fnal.gov http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/ Office: Wilson Hall room 804 Fermilab Scientific Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities Quadrant., Experimental Computing Facilities Dept., Project Lead for Virtual Facility Project. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Official Debian packages
Hi, Should I rebase[2] all my branches on master directly and then follow the OpenNebula releases or is there a path to merge master and one-4.10? Hmm, writing the question seems to gives my answer, it looks like the cherry-picking of master commits on the one-version branches are the reasons of the merge conflicts. Yes... that's the way we usually do it: by cherry picking the commits. Unfortunately we don't think there's an easier way. -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Getting an HTTP-Error: 500 when executing oneacct -g group
Hi Carlos, Thank you very much for letting us know, we need to think it deeply :) Just one question, which are the pros and cons of compiling oned? It is a serious thing for us since the infrastructure is on production and I am not sure if it will break future updates trough yum/rpm and also, if we could break something in current ON installation at CESGA. Personally, I don't like this decision but it is my humble opinion and in any case, we need to discuss about it. Thanks in advance, Esteban On 02/17/2015 11:05 AM, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: Hi, I forgot to add that if you want to test the new libxmlrpc version yourself, it's not that difficult to compile oned with the 'xmlrpc' scons option: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/integration/references/compile.html Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:39 AM, RubEn DIez LAzaro rd...@cesga.es mailto:rd...@cesga.es wrote: Hi: I Does not know really if some recent version of libxmlrpc-c fix this bug... bug the patch seems to be into some branch http://sourceforge.net/p/xmlrpc-c/code/2520/ I don't pretend to confuse you with how we discover this bug, but in short it appears when executing some accounting software by Boris Parak for the Federate cloud of the EGI project I hope the patch i link help to clarify the situation. Best regards. On 12/02/15 22:53, Alejandro Feijóo wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi to all. As Esteban say, we have a planned updated to last stable opennebula release the Wednesday 18th, but i think we can wait if the libxmlrpc-c is updated in the next days or maybe weeks. I think we can wait because the new ON not have critical changes (we have pached one-flow yet) and make 2 updates in the same month can be a problem for our costumers... (we use oneflow in a lot of critical services and is a problem make 2 scheduled stops) But if the change is programated to 4.12 we going to update and patch it (I think Ruben have a special love story paching software hehe) Again, a lot of thanks. El 12/02/15 a las 19:32, Esteban Freire escribió: Hi Carlos, Thank you very much for checking it :) About if it should be fixed in 1.33.14, I hope Rubén answer to this tomorrow since it is the one looking at this issue. When do you think we could test this? Sorry for the question/hurry but we are failing accounting due to this issue in FedCloud (EGI). In principle, we are going to update to last ON version next Wednesday 18th. Thanks in advance, Esteban On 02/12/2015 07:23 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: Hi, I'm not directly involved in the packaging, but as far as I can tell, OpenNebula 4.8 comes with libxmlrpc-c version 1.33.6. If I understand correctly, the problem you report should be fixed in 1.33.14? I've checked and the current super stable version is 1.33.16 [1]. We will see if the static library can be updated without breaking anything [2]. Regards. [1] http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/change_super_stable.html [2] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3594 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, RubEn DIez LAzaro rd...@cesga.es mailto:rd...@cesga.es mailto:rd...@cesga.es mailto:rd...@cesga.es wrote: HI: The distro is Scientific Linux release 6.4 (Carbon) and ONE is installed from repo (it seems be the repo for CentOS 6) [root@cloud yum.repos.d]# cat opennebula.repo [opennebula] name=opennebula
Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
That IP looks good (202.45.142.114). It might be a bug that can be affected
by the ruby version.
Since this is a 4.2 version and the leases were completely redone for new
versions, maybe the best thing to do is comment out the whole vnet section
in fsck.rb, lines 920-1066.
Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi Carlos,
Below is the last few lines of output before it throwing the error. How do
I proceed to troubleshoot on this.
row[:ip]: 3391983169
doc:
LEASEIP3391983169/IPMAC_PREFIX512/MAC_PREFIXMAC_SUFFIX3391983169/MAC_SUFFIXUSED1/USEDVID1371/VID/LEASE
row[:ip]: 3391983218
doc:
LEASEIP3391983218/IPMAC_PREFIX512/MAC_PREFIXMAC_SUFFIX3391983218/MAC_SUFFIXUSED1/USEDVID1372/VID/LEASE
Exception `ArgumentError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ipaddr.rb:481 - address
family mismatch
address family mismatch
Error running fsck version 4.2.0
The database will be restored
--
*Regards,*
Anandharaj
Server Storage Support Team
MIMOS Berhad
*From:* Carlos Martín Sánchez [mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org]
*Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 10:49 PM
*To:* Anandharaj Subramaniam
*Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org
*Subject:* Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
I don't know what can be causing the error. Can you to add the following
lines right before line 929 in /usr/lib/one/ruby/onedb/fsck.rb?
warn
warn row[:ip]: #{row[:ip]}
warn doc: #{doc.to_s}
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/release-4.2/src/onedb/fsck.rb#L929
Maybe that will show if there is something wrong with that IP that is
throwing the error.
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
http://twitter.com/opennebula
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi Carlos,
What is your ruby version?
è ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux]
Are all of your leases IPv4?
è Yes, all IPv4
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
*From:* Carlos Martín Sánchez [mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:55 PM
*To:* Anandharaj Subramaniam
*Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org
*Subject:* Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
What is your ruby version?
Are all of your leases IPv4?
Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
http://twitter.com/opennebula
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi All,
When I run using debug mode, I see this message.
….
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sequel-3.46.0/lib/sequel/dataset/actions.rb:151:
warning: instance variable @row_proc not initialized
VNet 25 has used lease 10.1.66.8 (VM 858) but it is free
Exception `ArgumentError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ipaddr.rb:481 - address
family mismatch
address family mismatch
Error running fsck version 4.2.0
The database will be restored
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
*From:* Anandharaj Subramaniam
*Sent:* Monday, December 29, 2014 7:34 PM
*To:* users@lists.opennebula.org
*Subject:* RE: Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi All,
I restored the mysql database and run the onedb fsck, still the process
terminate with “Error running fsck version 4.2.0” but the messages of the
inconsistency is less.
Appreciate the expert help on this.
Note: We are still using 4.2 because we have our own apps integrated with
it. We already have plan to setup another ONE with version 4.10
--
Regards,
*Anandharaj*
MIMOS Bhd
*From:* Anandharaj Subramaniam
*Sent:* Monday, December 29, 2014 3:36 PM
*To:* users@lists.opennebula.org
*Subject:* RE: Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi All,
When I run onedb fck, got the following messages but ended with error.
[oneadmin@server 101]$ onedb fsck -f -S localhost -u oneadmin -d
opennebula
MySQL Password:
MySQL dump stored in /var/lib/one/mysql_localhost_opennebula.sql
Use 'onedb restore' or restore the DB using the mysql command:
mysql -u user -h server -P port db_name backup_file
Host 20 is in Cluster 101 host id list, but it should not
VM 373 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 401 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 522 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 531 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 585 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 612 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 655 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
Re: [one-users] SET Hostname VM
Hi, If you mean the OpenNebula VM name, it is automatically set to vmtemplate_name-vm_id. It can be changed when the template is instantiated in the Sunstone wizard, or with the --name option in the cli. Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org 2015-02-10 11:54 GMT+01:00 barbieri vincenzo vincenzo.barbi...@vbarbieri.com: Hi I do not have to change it on the hypervisor, but when I launch the installation via OpenNebula -- *Da:* Carlos Martín Sánchez [cmar...@opennebula.org] *Inviato:* martedì 10 febbraio 2015 10.26 *A:* barbieri vincenzo *Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org *Oggetto:* Re: [one-users] SET Hostname VM Hi, 2015-02-09 14:18 GMT+01:00 barbieri vincenzo vincenzo.barbi...@vbarbieri.com: Hi I am creating a vm with the installation from scratch, but I can not set the name is always set to one-vid . Please help me The name of the VM in the hypervisor cannot be changed. Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by *E.F.A. Project* http://www.efa-project.org, and is believed to be clean. Click here to report this message as spam. http://antispam.vbarbieri.priv/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=9ECC7100077.A28D1token=f37814bd24724d52ce1fcadff29b6214 Le comunicazioni Internet non sono sicure e quindi Vbarbieri non accetta alcuna responsabilita' per il contenuto di questo messaggio. Sebbene vbarbieri abbia attivato programmi anti-virus, non accetta responsabilita' per qualsiasi tipo di danno che possa derivare dal trasferimento di virus.Qualsiasi punto di vista od opinione espressa sono esclusivamente quelli dell'autore e non rappresentano necessariamente quelli di Vbarbieri . Le risposte a questo messaggio elettronico possono essere controllate da Vbarbieri per ragioni di sicurezza, operative o aziendali. Nel rispetto delle disposizioni di legge e regolamento applicabili, Vbarbieri si riserva il diritto di monitorare le comunicazioni elettroniche attraverso apposite attivita' di monitoraggio finalizzate all'identificazione e alla prevenzione della diffusione accidentale e/o fraudolenta di informazioni. Qualsiasi uso non autorizzato di questo messaggio elettronico o dei suoi allegati e' proibito e potrebbe costituire un reato. Se non siete il destinatario desiderato di questa mail, qualunque comunicazione, copia, distribuzione oqualunque azione od omissione in relazione ai dati in essa contenuti e' illecita, e siete pregato di informare immediatamente il mittente utilizzando l'opzione Rispondi nel vostro software di postaelettronica e di distruggere il messaggio e tutti i suoi allegati. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] LVM over iSCSI or NFS for OpenNebula
Hi, - I can create VMs successfully but very very slow performance. Are you using virtio drivers? I also recommend playing with the 'cache' parameter. How well does it perform compared with I/O operations in the hypervisor? Is the storage the problem here or the Virtualization layer? - Also when I created VM on node1 and try to migrate it other vm it does not work as logical volume of that VM on node2 is inactive. have you set up cLVMd? I think for your setup the best approach is: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/administration/storage/fs_lvm_ds.html Or something like GFS2. cheers, Jaime On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:08 PM, ngur...@neeleshgurjar.co.in wrote: Hi, I am setting up OpenNebula on 2 nodes and 1 storage on 1Gb Network. - installed Nexenta Community Version on Storage and created iSCSI LUN. - Access those LUNs on both nodes and created Volume Group on it. - Configured LVM Block Datastore in OpenNebula. - I can create VMs successfully but very very slow performance. - Also when I created VM on node1 and try to migrate it other vm it does not work as logical volume of that VM on node2 is inactive. What do you recommend for this type of setup for Shared Storage LVM, NFS? Please note that I need to use 1GbE copper due to budget limitations. Regards Neelesh Gurjar ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Jaime Melis Senior Infrastructure Architect at OpenNebula Systems (formerly C12G Labs) jmelis@opennebula.systems | @OpenNebula -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of OpenNebula.Systems S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse@opennebula.systems and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. OpenNebula's thanks you for your cooperation. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] about firewall
Hi, you are right, we don't have this. I just created this in order to document http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3602 Answering your specific question: What is not clear is about the tm driver. An ssh connection is open from oned admin server to the hypervisors, to run the clone/cp/etc actions. I need to know if the hypervisor will in those actions initiate some SSH connection back to the oned admin server? (we are using ssh, shared, and lvm drivers). We want to block this king of traffic (ssh to oned admin server from the nodes). The ssh connection to the frontend from the nodes **is** required. It's used in actions like undeploy or stop. In any case as you say, creating a reference guide for the connections in OpenNebula would come in very handy. cheers, Jaime On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Madko madk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any documentation about the ports and network traffic in use with OpenNebula? To go in production we need to have a firewall between our oned admin server and the hypervisors nodes. So I need to know if there is any network traffic to be initiated (state NEW) from the hypervisor nodes to the oned admin server? So far I found the UDP port 4124 for collectd, with metrics comming from the hypervisors. What is not clear is about the tm driver. An ssh connection is open from oned admin server to the hypervisors, to run the clone/cp/etc actions. I need to know if the hypervisor will in those actions initiate some SSH connection back to the oned admin server? (we are using ssh, shared, and lvm drivers). We want to block this king of traffic (ssh to oned admin server from the nodes). To sum up, here is what we know for sure: oned 4124/udp = nodes oned = 22/tcp nodes We need to know what traffic and who initiate it. I don't see anything about it in the documentation. If anyone has this information that would be of great help. Untill then I will try to find it out myself by playing with iptables. Best regards ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] LVM over iSCSI or NFS for OpenNebula
On 2015-02-17 02:58, Jaime Melis wrote: Hi, - I can create VMs successfully but very very slow performance. Are you using virtio drivers? I also recommend playing with the 'cache' parameter. How well does it perform compared with I/O operations in the hypervisor? Is the storage the problem here or the Virtualization layer? I am using KVM hypervisor. I also used Chachefilesd but while launching vms it takes long time. Also poor writing speed inside the vm. - Also when I created VM on node1 and try to migrate it other vm it does not work as logical volume of that VM on node2 is inactive. have you set up cLVMd? I think for your setup the best approach is: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/administration/storage/fs_lvm_ds.html [2] Or something like GFS2. No I did not configure CLVMd or GFS as it needs fencing device. Regards Neelesh Gurjar cheers, Jaime On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:08 PM, ngur...@neeleshgurjar.co.in wrote: Hi, I am setting up OpenNebula on 2 nodes and 1 storage on 1Gb Network. - installed Nexenta Community Version on Storage and created iSCSI LUN. - Access those LUNs on both nodes and created Volume Group on it. - Configured LVM Block Datastore in OpenNebula. - I can create VMs successfully but very very slow performance. - Also when I created VM on node1 and try to migrate it other vm it does not work as logical volume of that VM on node2 is inactive. What do you recommend for this type of setup for Shared Storage LVM, NFS? Please note that I need to use 1GbE copper due to budget limitations. Regards Neelesh Gurjar ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org [1] -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Jaime Melis Senior Infrastructure Architect at OpenNebula Systems (formerly C12G Labs) jmelis@opennebula.systems | @OpenNebula -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of OpenNebula.Systems S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse@opennebula.systems and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. OpenNebula's thanks you for your cooperation. Links: -- [1] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org [2] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/administration/storage/fs_lvm_ds.html ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Official Debian packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jamie and Daniel, I perfectly understand the problems with Debian official packaging guidelines. I asked this, because at the moment I'm collaborating with Devuan, an upcoming Debian fork which is aimed to not have systemd mandatory. Could be interesting for you, in the near future, to have official packages for this distro? Cheers, Alberto Il 17/02/2015 8:53 am, Jaime Melis ha scritto: Hi Alberto, I can confirm what Daniel said. We have no current plans of updating the offical Debian package of OpenNebula. Debian packaing guidelines are very strict and as Daniel mentioned it's a very big job. Daniel, I apologize, but somehow I was not aware of #3129. I will update the ticket now. regards, Jaime -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU4wZfAAoJEAzproFXfBTIVTMP/ikHyyCGKeyZtEIWRLZXaGi8 tlve4syO0xqhRCJz6vHjodaPjFoBPGFf33uoJfJUj9RurMIaxuL6ry6bAc3cSil0 2MEDcOlbM2q6J778BHzLUN5viFJ0lx+bTElD75WmEO0MYjV0dhxnW/h7gw5R4Laa DXs6qSuIrcjlxLAz3+C7PiRuo8E7cxNA59x9/20WbLMEwcTeF8jpGbK70LZbxehv ZKU7RteWx+vo1MQ+9VZTQpLAvYqqO6Cv03SFTnQlIdEZZqNJTtRdo97lR4XSHXQO 9E+KW9ZZ4Jw8oR/dsPzLmDClz9STeqGAFhZsZXcDoPrrxAJv7kWNvcRD/QiXWm6E MHNeaIoF1ILy4Hzcat3jjYDHOvCeqBIwE1VsG7DdueuYzRgVFREM0rhKvjgWxD7C uFnC3gesNyILGMHEcfBjozIjCkjDxmRSKC3dq+SmsGdmIO6A7W9DHSPUL91hSfq3 P0Enn0odAGfw9G59OwSjsVnb/lFS85lL5JK2pxKnWKnr8kBazUZ/YGr7+yz69D/w cNvrquOTGi6cdJxjc3tgCUwxwKAY2KFEDLSd/1pW1KYak7Yj3jqfyqvWgy2EXIWO bTURrWb4ihfp8rqdRnCRrNbwZMzqjTUfOSQekenRu8gIg4kQosORQf7DxrpLtLwV +C9nghRVk7QD8ROaIi3N =5AYH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Official Debian packages
Jaime Melis jmelis@opennebula.systems writes: Hi Alberto, I can confirm what Daniel said. We have no current plans of updating the offical Debian package of OpenNebula. Debian packaing guidelines are very strict and as Daniel mentioned it's a very big job. Daniel, I apologize, but somehow I was not aware of #3129. I will update the ticket now. Thanks, I have one issue with OpenNebula branches. I based my work on the 4.10 package[1] to compare the original package content with mine. Now, I would like to follow master and derive the packaging based on OpenNebula version, but I have a lot of conflicts when I merge master into my packaging branch. The base idea is to have one packaging branch following OpenNebula master branch. On a new release, a “release dedicated” packaging branch is derived from the master packaging branch to follow the OpenNebula release. Should I rebase[2] all my branches on master directly and then follow the OpenNebula releases or is there a path to merge master and one-4.10? Hmm, writing the question seems to gives my answer, it looks like the cherry-picking of master commits on the one-version branches are the reasons of the merge conflicts. Any hints? Footnotes: [1] http://downloads.opennebula.org/packages/opennebula-4.10.1/ [2] so changing history -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Official Debian packages
Hello Alberto, yes, of course. But due to resources we can only try and help out people from the community like yourself or Daniel who want to collaborate in creating these packages. We can assist and try to change this around in the codebase to make things easier for package maintainers. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Alberto Zuin - Liste li...@albertozuin.eu wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jamie and Daniel, I perfectly understand the problems with Debian official packaging guidelines. I asked this, because at the moment I'm collaborating with Devuan, an upcoming Debian fork which is aimed to not have systemd mandatory. Could be interesting for you, in the near future, to have official packages for this distro? Cheers, Alberto Il 17/02/2015 8:53 am, Jaime Melis ha scritto: Hi Alberto, I can confirm what Daniel said. We have no current plans of updating the offical Debian package of OpenNebula. Debian packaing guidelines are very strict and as Daniel mentioned it's a very big job. Daniel, I apologize, but somehow I was not aware of #3129. I will update the ticket now. regards, Jaime -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU4wZfAAoJEAzproFXfBTIVTMP/ikHyyCGKeyZtEIWRLZXaGi8 tlve4syO0xqhRCJz6vHjodaPjFoBPGFf33uoJfJUj9RurMIaxuL6ry6bAc3cSil0 2MEDcOlbM2q6J778BHzLUN5viFJ0lx+bTElD75WmEO0MYjV0dhxnW/h7gw5R4Laa DXs6qSuIrcjlxLAz3+C7PiRuo8E7cxNA59x9/20WbLMEwcTeF8jpGbK70LZbxehv ZKU7RteWx+vo1MQ+9VZTQpLAvYqqO6Cv03SFTnQlIdEZZqNJTtRdo97lR4XSHXQO 9E+KW9ZZ4Jw8oR/dsPzLmDClz9STeqGAFhZsZXcDoPrrxAJv7kWNvcRD/QiXWm6E MHNeaIoF1ILy4Hzcat3jjYDHOvCeqBIwE1VsG7DdueuYzRgVFREM0rhKvjgWxD7C uFnC3gesNyILGMHEcfBjozIjCkjDxmRSKC3dq+SmsGdmIO6A7W9DHSPUL91hSfq3 P0Enn0odAGfw9G59OwSjsVnb/lFS85lL5JK2pxKnWKnr8kBazUZ/YGr7+yz69D/w cNvrquOTGi6cdJxjc3tgCUwxwKAY2KFEDLSd/1pW1KYak7Yj3jqfyqvWgy2EXIWO bTURrWb4ihfp8rqdRnCRrNbwZMzqjTUfOSQekenRu8gIg4kQosORQf7DxrpLtLwV +C9nghRVk7QD8ROaIi3N =5AYH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
