Re: MS Word Suite 2003
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:05 AM, PMCwrote: > my name is chris.I received word from my webmail company that the PHP 5.3 is > moving to PHP 5.5 and that XP and 2003 (word suite 2003 is no longer in toto > being supported). > Does your latest version of open office resemble 2016's version of MS Word > Suite or does it resemble another version of MS word suite like 2003 that I > like or: 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016? > I know many that do not like Microsoft Word Suites of 2010 and up to the > current but there is not much they can do about it. > If I make open office my default word suite will it open every email from > anyone that sends me documents using Windows 2016 meaning all documents? > Would you consider answering what for you here would probably be viewed as a > stupid question, but for me is valid.I loved the simplicity of the 2003 and > all the next versions got more complicated with bells and whistles for the > home user who still loves a the word suite? > With open office can I keep the version that I have or should I download your > current one? > thank you for your time. My server is changing the PHP on 11-30-15 so I do > need your answer or input. > pmc > I might be missing it but, what does php have to do with office? You know, you can just download it in a few minutes and see for yourself. You can make it your default text app. -- Registered Linux User: #480675 Registered Linux Machine: #408606 Linux since June 2005 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
MS Word Suite 2003
my name is chris.I received word from my webmail company that the PHP 5.3 is moving to PHP 5.5 and that XP and 2003 (word suite 2003 is no longer in toto being supported). Does your latest version of open office resemble 2016's version of MS Word Suite or does it resemble another version of MS word suite like 2003 that I like or: 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016? I know many that do not like Microsoft Word Suites of 2010 and up to the current but there is not much they can do about it. If I make open office my default word suite will it open every email from anyone that sends me documents using Windows 2016 meaning all documents? Would you consider answering what for you here would probably be viewed as a stupid question, but for me is valid.I loved the simplicity of the 2003 and all the next versions got more complicated with bells and whistles for the home user who still loves a the word suite? With open office can I keep the version that I have or should I download your current one? thank you for your time. My server is changing the PHP on 11-30-15 so I do need your answer or input. pmc
RE: Norton Antivirus Quarantines Open Office English Language Pack
Tim, I am posting this response to the public users@ openoffice.apache.org where others may be interested in the same situation and have further suggestions. I will forward this message to you privately, since your original message was to a private list. I performed the same download on Windows 10. I did not receive any warnings from the Internet Explorer 11 download security check. I also downloaded the Digital Signature file at < http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.2/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe.asc>, the secure location for the signature at the Apache Software Foundation. I used signature-verification software (GnuPG for Windows) to confirm that language-pack .exe is the file that was signed, without any discrepancies. I used the cryptographic signature check because it is the most difficult to forge and it will fail if there were any alterations after the signature file was computed. Verification of the signature also confirms that there was no file corruption during download. And it verifies that the signature was produced by one of the Apache OpenOffice release managers using their personal secret key to produce it. Antivirus software will sometimes make false positive determinations. Without seeing the exact message from your Norton Antivirus software, I do not know the basis that it’s programmer used for deciding to quarantine the file. However, some antivirus software uses “reputation” to determine whether a file should be assumed guilty until considered innocent. If there have not been many separate downloads of the English US language pack (since downloading the full installation is typical), that may be what happened. And if Norton did not give a name for a specific malicious content, it may likely have been a reputation misfire. SUGGESTION: In your Antivirus Options, see if you can have quarantined files not be automatically deleted. Also, see if you can have downloads only be quarantined after checking with you first. This will allow you to decide whether you want to allow a particular download and use other methods to determine a file’s authenticity when the download is something you know to be from an usually-reliable source. That and other measures all give you more work to do to distinguish between false positives and actually-malicious software, unfortunately. It is difficult to do much about this at the project itself, although there might be improvements that could be made in how Apache OpenOffice programs and updates are made available. Personally, I don’t expect that any time soon. - Dennis From: tim Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 06:22 To: secur...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Norton Antivirus Quarantines Open Office English Language Pack I was surprised that my Norton antivirus software quarantined and removed file http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.2/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe/download
RE: Norton Antivirus Quarantines Open Office English Language Pack
I forgot something important. Modified version below. - - - - - - Tim, I am posting this response to the public users@ openoffice.apache.org where others may be interested in the same situation and have further suggestions. I will forward this message to you privately, since your original message was to a private list. I performed the same download on Windows 10. I did not receive any warnings from the Internet Explorer 11 download security check. I also downloaded the Digital Signature file at < http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.2/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe.asc>, the secure location for the signature at the Apache Software Foundation. I used signature-verification software (GnuPG for Windows) to confirm that language-pack .exe is the file that was signed, without any discrepancies. I used the cryptographic signature check because it is the most difficult to forge and it will fail if there were any alterations after the signature file was computed. Verification of the signature also confirms that there was no file corruption during download. And it verifies that the signature was produced by one of the Apache OpenOffice release managers using their personal secret key to produce it. Antivirus software will sometimes make false positive determinations. Without seeing the exact message from your Norton Antivirus software, I do not know the basis that it’s programmer used for deciding to quarantine the file. However, some antivirus software uses “reputation” to determine whether a file should be assumed guilty until considered innocent. If there have not been many separate downloads of the English US language pack (since downloading the full installation is typical), that may be what happened. And if Norton did not give a name for a specific malicious content, it may likely have been a reputation misfire. SUGGESTION: In your Antivirus Options, see if you can have quarantined files not be automatically deleted. Also, see if you can have downloads only be quarantined after checking with you first. This will allow you to decide whether you want to allow a particular download and use other methods to determine a file’s authenticity when the download is something you know to be from an usually-reliable source. That and other measures all give you more work to do to distinguish between false positives and actually-malicious software, unfortunately. It is difficult to do much about this at the project itself, although there might be improvements that could be made in how Apache OpenOffice programs and updates are made available. CORRECTION: When the Windows downloads are signed in a manner that is automatically verified by Windows itself, this problem may disappear. That work is underway. There may be further improvements that might be made at some future time. - Dennis From: tim Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 06:22 To: secur...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Norton Antivirus Quarantines Open Office English Language Pack I was surprised that my Norton antivirus software quarantined and removed file http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.2/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.2_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe/download - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: MS Word Suite 2003
On 19-Nov-15 03:05, PMC wrote: my name is chris.I received word from my webmail company that the PHP 5.3 is moving to PHP 5.5 and that XP and 2003 (word suite 2003 is no longer in toto being supported). Does your latest version of open office resemble 2016's version of MS Word Suite or does it resemble another version of MS word suite like 2003 that I like or: 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016? I know many that do not like Microsoft Word Suites of 2010 and up to the current but there is not much they can do about it. If I make open office my default word suite will it open every email from anyone that sends me documents using Windows 2016 meaning all documents? OpenOffice will open Word documents attachments to emails. It is not a mailing tool. Would you consider answering what for you here would probably be viewed as a stupid question, but for me is valid.I loved the simplicity of the 2003 and all the next versions got more complicated with bells and whistles for the home user who still loves a the word suite? If you love the simplicity of MS Office 2003 than you have to ask yourself is OpenOffice that much simpler? OpenOffice works different from MS Word and working with Styles in OpenOffice, which is more structured, requires some time before you master this concept. With open office can I keep the version that I have or should I download your current one? thank you for your time. My server is changing the PHP on 11-30-15 so I do need your answer or input. The fact that you provider change doesn't mean that you can't use Office 2003 they only say they don't support it. pmc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: mailing labels
At 21:19 14/11/2015 +, Karen Cook wrote: How do I add another page of labels to the document I have started? Are you using the official way to create labels (File | New > | Labels)? If so, create your page image - with the field names you require - but don't select the required records yet from the data source. Now go to File | Print... (yes: that may seem perverse!) and in response to the challenge "Do you want to print a form letter?", select Yes. Now you will see the data source display again and can make your selection of records, possibly requiring more than one page of labels. You may find that the document produced has alternate pages blank. If so, this is because OpenOffice is accounting for the possibility that your printer may be set up to print double-sided. (You will want the backs of your labels to be blank!) If you are using a single-sided printer, you can suppress this by removing the tick at Tools | Options... | OpenOffice Writer | Print | Other | Print automatically inserted blank pages. You will discover this when you create test prints on waste paper before actually printing on your label stock. I trust this helps. Brian Barker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Falschrechner
On 18.11.2015 08:24, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Und ja, man kann echte Begrenzuungen einer verwendeten Programmiersprache > klar von > Sachverhalten unterscheiden die nur auf Implementierungsentscheidungen > zurückgehen. > "Implementierungsentscheidungen" sind immer eine Abwägung. Natürlich kann man in jeder Programmiersprache (Du hast es ja für Calc quasi "bewiesen") Routinen einbauen, die ein genaueres Rechnen mit Dezimalzahlen ermöglichen. Nur ist dies nicht nur Programmieraufwand, sondern die Ausführung dieser Routinen ist auch Rechenaufwand und kostet letztendlich Rechenzeit (oder anders ausgedrückt, es verlangsamt die Programmausführung). Dann stellt sich natürlich die Frage nach Aufwand und Ertrag. In wieviel Prozent der Fälle führen die Routinen tatsächlich zu relevant genaueren Ergebnissen und in wieviel Prozent der Fälle ist das dem Nutzer dann noch egal (entweder aus Ignoranz oder weil der errechnete Wert eh' jenseits aller Mess- oder sonstigen Genauigkeiten liegt)? Ich glaube daher, dass man zu dem Ergebnis gelangen kann, dass man denen, die auf genauere Berechnungen Wert legen, eigene diesbezügliche Vorsorge zumuten kann und muss. Gruß Michael My computer has no brain; so I have to use my own. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 4.1.2 spread
On 19-Nov-15 08:05, Charles Ferguson wrote: Greetings! I am running a 2 sheet project on Open Office 4.1.2. When I try to run Page preview for sheet 1 it generates the Page preview for sheet 2! When I run page preview for page 2 it generates the page preview for page 2 and can therefore print sheet 2. I am unable to print sheet 1 I have tried to correct but to no avail Select the area you want to print and go to Format --> Print Range ... Define, repeat it on both pages Can you help solve? Many thanks McLean Ferguson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.2 spread
Greetings! I am running a 2 sheet project on Open Office 4.1.2. When I try to run Page preview for sheet 1 it generates the Page preview for sheet 2! When I run page preview for page 2 it generates the page preview for page 2 and can therefore print sheet 2. I am unable to print sheet 1 I have tried to correct but to no avail Can you help solve? Many thanks McLean Ferguson
Re: Confirm
Confirm what? I received your email as shown below. The best job goes to the person who can get it done without passing the buck or coming back with excuses. ~~ Napoleon Hill -Original Message- From: Joan CarlinTo: users Sent: Wed, Nov 18, 2015 4:00 pm Subject: Confirm Sent from my iPhone - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Confirm
There was no msg in your "msg" so please try again. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Joan Carlinwrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
previously saved file
Is there anyway to find a previously saved version of a Writer file? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Confirm
Sent from my iPhone - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Norton Antivirus Quarantines Open Office English Language Pack
I have been provided the full Norton report where it is using, as expected, "reputation" and nothing about the files themselves to suggest that there is a Medium Risk to using the file. I recommend that users *always* look at the details available on what a risk assessment is based on. If that is the basis for a warning from an AntiVirus, please consider these adjustments: [ ... ] > SUGGESTION: In your Antivirus Options, see if you can have quarantined > files not be automatically deleted. Also, see if you can have downloads > only be quarantined after checking with you first. This will allow you > to decide whether you want to allow a particular download and use other > methods to determine a file’s authenticity when the download is > something you know to be from an usually-reliable source. [orcmid] You can also allow the quarantine (but don’t delete anything). After looking at the explanation in the Antivirus history, then decide if you want to accept the file anyhow. Here is a typical report, in a NAV product’s recent history. Below is the explanation on which the Medium Risk WS.Reputation.1 finding is based. Note that it is entirely because (1) the file is new and (2) few users of the antivirus (hundreds) have use it so far. There is nothing surprising here about the en_US Language Extensions for Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 on Windows. Most en_US downloads are of the full en_US installation, which already has the en_US Language Extensions. The en_US language extensions are intended for users of different language versions that want to be able to switch in and out of the English interface and related extensions.