[Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Dear Vortex Collective, Someone, without my authorization, leaked my email to Randy Hekman since today I got a spam from him. I am posting this here because given his recent comments on cold fusion, I suspect someone in one of the CF website gave him my email. Getting spam is bad, but getting one that I qualify as a neocon (and trying to not use Goldwin's law) pisses me off much more. So, just to make sure, I marked his email as a phishing scam rather than spam. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
On 2011-12-31 15:56, Daniel Rocha wrote: Someone, without my authorization, leaked my email to Randy Hekman since today I got a spam from him. I am posting this here because given his recent comments on cold fusion, I suspect someone in one of the CF website gave him my email. I received one too several hours ago. I suspect the same happened for all other active vortex-l users. Cheers, S.A.
[Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
Jean Mallove made some predictions some years back and missed the mark by a wide margin. I have been waiting a long time for something to happen. What see you next year? Frank Znidarsic
Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Last Chance - Submit Your Nominations NOW
Oh darn, excluded again! -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Fri, Dec 30, 2011 9:45 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Last Chance - Submit Your Nominations NOW Hi Frank, Nomination categories are: Solar, Wind, Biomass, Geothermal and Hydropower. No free energy or nuclear energy categories. On Dec 30, 2011, at 1:16 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: vote for me -Original Message- From: RenewableEnergyWorld.com no-re...@web.renewableenergyworld.com To: Frank Znidarsic Website Contact fznidar...@aol.com Sent: Fri, Dec 30, 2011 11:35 am Subject: Last Chance - Submit Your Nominations NOW Having trouble viewing this email - Click HERE Presented by the editors of RenewableEnergyWorld.com and Renewable Energy World North America magazine, these awards recognize the most outstanding projects, programs and technologies in the wind, solar, biomass, geothermal and hydroelectric technology sectors. Awards will be presented in the following categories: Projects of the Year — Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Bioenergy and Hydropower Innovation — Technology, Finance, Policy Leadership — Technology, Finance, Policy Readers' Choice — Readers get a chance to select one winner for the coveted Readers' Choice Award Submit Nominations Today — Click HERE! All winners in all categories will be announced LIVE at Renewable Energy World North America Conference Expo/Solar POWER-GEN Conference Exhibition in Long Beach, California on Feb 14-16, 2012. All Nominations Must Be Submitted By Midnight Eastern Time on December 31st, 2011. For more information visit: RenewableEnergyWorld.com/rea/awards/2012 You are invited to view this message because you are a registered reader of RenewableEnergyWorld.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails please click here to manage your subscription or send an email torem...@renewableenergyworld.com Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
I have a personal prediction. This year I will be sure about Rossi's or Defkalions motives. If by October 31st no 3rd party comes forward confirming and convincing skeptics about the ownership of a device, I will stop believe them both. 2011/12/31 fznidar...@aol.com Jean Mallove made some predictions some years back and missed the mark by a wide margin. I have been waiting a long time for something to happen. What see you next year? Frank Znidarsic -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
My predictions Jed will write a lot more good stuff Rossi will go into hiding Blacklight Power will say nothing Frank Znidarsic and Mary Hugo will get married Frank
[Vo]:Defkalion's New Theory
http://defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24t=640p=5074#p5074 Defkalion's secret to breaking the Coulomb-barrier is... (drum roll, please)..., Chuck Norris.
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Getting spam is bad, but getting one that I qualify as a neocon (and trying to not use Goldwin's law) pisses me off much more. So, just to make sure, I marked his email as a phishing scam rather than spam. Don't do that! He will get in trouble with Gmail. They will block him. The guy is running for office. That is very difficult in the U.S. It takes a lot of money and hard work. Someone working for him added your e-mail address to his list. Please cut him some slack. I see you use gmail, so just use ordinary gmail procedures to automatically delete his messages: Select message Select: More (top right of screen) Select: Filter messages like this, Create filter, Delete it - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Jed, I used the past. I had done it when I posted that message. I am sorry, but I don't like the US government or military morals. I don't support any of them because of all their horrible actions for the last 100 years (except for the WWII, until Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Supporting someone that wants to help this monster alive instead of changing for better it is asking me too much. 2011/12/31 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Getting spam is bad, but getting one that I qualify as a neocon (and trying to not use Goldwin's law) pisses me off much more. So, just to make sure, I marked his email as a phishing scam rather than spam. Don't do that! He will get in trouble with Gmail. They will block him. The guy is running for office. That is very difficult in the U.S. It takes a lot of money and hard work. Someone working for him added your e-mail address to his list. Please cut him some slack. I see you use gmail, so just use ordinary gmail procedures to automatically delete his messages: Select message Select: More (top right of screen) Select: Filter messages like this, Create filter, Delete it - Jed -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Supporting someone that wants to help this monster alive instead of changing for better it is asking me too much. No one is asking you to do anything. Some overworked volunteer campaign staff person added your name to a mailing list. You should tell them to remove your name, or take a moment to add the message to your gmail auto-delete file. What you should *not* do is report them to Google for phishing, because that will get them into trouble. All of their outgoing mail will be censored. It is tough to get Google to undo a block once they put it in place. Stop making a mountain out of molehill. I disagree with Hekman's politics but it would be a shame for you to torpedo the first political campaign in history that features support for cold fusion. Let's see how far he can go with that as his signature issue. - Jed
RE: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
Frank sez: My predictions Jed will write a lot more good stuff Rossi will go into hiding Blacklight Power will say nothing Frank Znidarsic and Mary Hugo will get married Err... Yugo? Frank, You have my deepest sympathies. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
RE: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
More than likely, the website just has some really decent tracking software. It wouldn't be all that surprising for the National GOP to outfit campaign websites with quality snooping software. If a website can hijack e-mail accounts on a single click, it's not that difficult to fathom that it could acquire an e-mail address for advertising reasons. Since A.S. had the same issue, I would presume it was auto-generated. I'd bet they're both using the same browser, FWIW, and the site is exploiting a common vulnerability. Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:07:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman From: jedrothw...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Supporting someone that wants to help this monster alive instead of changing for better it is asking me too much. No one is asking you to do anything. Some overworked volunteer campaign staff person added your name to a mailing list. You should tell them to remove your name, or take a moment to add the message to your gmail auto-delete file. What you should not do is report them to Google for phishing, because that will get them into trouble. All of their outgoing mail will be censored. It is tough to get Google to undo a block once they put it in place. Stop making a mountain out of molehill. I disagree with Hekman's politics but it would be a shame for you to torpedo the first political campaign in history that features support for cold fusion. Let's see how far he can go with that as his signature issue. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Spam is an insoluble problem I have studied it from 1994 and later systematically in the 488 weekly issues of my newsletter. I remember when Bill Gates still active at Microsoft has promised to liquidate spam in two years. He failed. I am contented with the spam filter of Gmail. But if a message comes from somebody unknown the best is to delete it. The Web is a very dangerous place. Terra incognita- hic hackers and spammers On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: More than likely, the website just has some really decent tracking software. It wouldn't be all that surprising for the National GOP to outfit campaign websites with quality snooping software. If a website can hijack e-mail accounts on a single click, it's not that difficult to fathom that it could acquire an e-mail address for advertising reasons. Since A.S. had the same issue, I would presume it was auto-generated. I'd bet they're both using the same browser, FWIW, and the site is exploiting a common vulnerability. -- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:07:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman From: jedrothw...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Supporting someone that wants to help this monster alive instead of changing for better it is asking me too much. No one is asking you to do anything. Some overworked volunteer campaign staff person added your name to a mailing list. You should tell them to remove your name, or take a moment to add the message to your gmail auto-delete file. What you should *not* do is report them to Google for phishing, because that will get them into trouble. All of their outgoing mail will be censored. It is tough to get Google to undo a block once they put it in place. Stop making a mountain out of molehill. I disagree with Hekman's politics but it would be a shame for you to torpedo the first political campaign in history that features support for cold fusion. Let's see how far he can go with that as his signature issue. - Jed -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
RE: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
Sympathy not required ... This is a brilliant strategic partnership g Since Wind energy is part of the aforementioned contest, this union with Hugo is a sure bet for FZ ... -Original Message- From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson Frank sez: My predictions Jed will write a lot more good stuff Rossi will go into hiding Blacklight Power will say nothing Frank Znidarsic and Mary Hugo will get married Err... Yugo? Frank, You have my deepest sympathies. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks attachment: winmail.dat
[Vo]:
I am very curious what will we read about this story on December 31, 2012. I wish the coming year should be as interesting as 2011, but the crop of certainties should be much greater. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-12/30/cold-fusion-rival Happy New Year, Vortexians! See you tomorrow on my Blog. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Daniel, It could be that Hekman is subscribed to the Vortex. He himself or his staff simply takes any email address from his MUA and spams them all. This is a very uneducated way of using the Internet. I hope for him there is a way to get off his spam list with instructions in the mail you received. If not you can sue him. Another common technique is spidering the web using search engines looking for email addresses close to his name or something related. Well if that is the case you can sue him with even more reason. mic 2011/12/31 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com: Dear Vortex Collective, Someone, without my authorization, leaked my email to Randy Hekman since today I got a spam from him. I am posting this here because given his recent comments on cold fusion, I suspect someone in one of the CF website gave him my email. Getting spam is bad, but getting one that I qualify as a neocon (and trying to not use Goldwin's law) pisses me off much more. So, just to make sure, I marked his email as a phishing scam rather than spam. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
In 1980, CBS launched a advertising campaign for their hit show Dallas featuring the catch phrase Who Shot JR. The last show of the season was going to reveal the culprit who shot JR. In England, where you can bet on just about anything, officials refused to allow people to bet on the outcome of this because it was not a random event and the outcome was already decided. Someone might read the script, or or one of screenwriters might place a large bet. Along the same lines, long ago I decided not to make predictions or bets on the future of cold fusion, because the script is already written. Events were largely a matter of choice. That is, free will. Rossi and many other researchers are sitting on results that they could reveal if they chose to, which would profoundly change the outcome, and the whole course of human history. On the other side, people in high places at the DoE or the APS choose to remain ignorant of this subject. Like Mary Yugo and Robert Park, they have made a decision to read nothing. Perhaps they want to maintain plausible deniability. Who knows? The point is, they can type LENR.org into a browser anytime. There is nothing stopping them. There are no longer barriers blocking access to information. Fifteen years ago, if you wanted to learn about cold fusion or some other technical subject, you had to go to a university library, or ask experts. You had to make an effort, and spend time and money. The physical reality of getting books and papers and the fact that these papers were only available in university libraries precluded easy access to information. It was easy to see that most people would not make the effort to learn about cold fusion, especially in view of the opposition to it and the nonsense in the mass media. Now, you type a few keystrokes and world of knowledge opens up. It is like the miracle described by Matthew 7:7: Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you . . . Now, the only thing stopping these people is their own mind. I will not try predict people's thoughts. Free will is a complicated subject. It may exist, or it may be an illusion we feel because we inhabit mammalian predator brains. Inhabiting the brain of an honey bee would feel very different, I suppose. Perhaps making a decision or coming up with a new idea is is the result of random processes. At the deepest level, these events may be governed by quantum mechanics, so they are completely random and cannot be predicted even in principle. Whatever the situation is, a decision by Rossi to allow a test, or a decision by the editor at a journal or Washington Post to allow the truth about cold fusion to be published are acts of human will. One decision by any one of hundreds of people could change the situation overnight, like a wind-blown snowball that triggers an avalanche. The situation is unstable and poised for catastrophic change. That does not mean a change is inevitable. Snow that might trigger an avalanche might also melt away peacefully. There is nothing in the known universe as complicated and unpredictable as the human mind. I try to influence people's thoughts actions but I do not try to predict them. The present and future of cold fusion is entirely governed by free will. In the past cold fusion could not be controlled. We did not know enough about it. It was still an open question as to whether it *could be* made practical. We did not know. Now, the scientific mysteries have been cleared up enough that we can be certain. The effect can be made practical. It can be commercialized. It can prevent global warming and save millions of lives. There is no longer any doubt about that. Whether that will happen or not is entirely a matter of choice. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Geez, folks. If your email address is open to the world, as it is on this email list, you will get tons of spam. You should never post your email address on the internet except in the form: maryyugo [at symbol] yahoo [dot] com so that a human has to interpret it. And it is best, for purposes like this mailing list, to create a new email address which is only for this purpose. It also cuts way down on clutter.
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
A good way to keep a large percentage of spammers away is greylisting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting. Simple and clever, if you can take time to understand it, because it stops the spam before, instead of junking it after it was transmitted. @Mary Yugo Your address is in the clear to anyone that receives vortex-l messages, I see it, but also many sites that mirror vortex-l messages see your address and put it on a web page. Usually the software managing a mailing list can do the hiding solving the problem once for all. But it is not the user fault: it is the spammer that is violating the law. Should we give away the freedom to use our real id, because of some criminal spammer? mic 2011/12/31 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com: Geez, folks. If your email address is open to the world, as it is on this email list, you will get tons of spam. You should never post your email address on the internet except in the form: maryyugo [at symbol] yahoo [dot] com so that a human has to interpret it. And it is best, for purposes like this mailing list, to create a new email address which is only for this purpose. It also cuts way down on clutter.
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote: Should we give away the freedom to use our real id, because of some criminal spammer? Unfortunately yes. It's not much freedom to lose. I suggest keeping your real email address strictly private. There is little or nothing that can be done to spammers who originate outside of developed countries which regulate such things and even there it's difficult. Not even unwanted text messages (that some people have to pay for) and calls to cellular telephones can be prevented entirely.
Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Rossi and many other researchers are sitting on results that they could reveal if they chose to, which would profoundly change the outcome, and the whole course of human history. I predict that in all likelihood, neither Rossi nor Defkalion will change anything about human history. If they continue behaving like Steorn, they will occasionally, and with increasing rarity, have news releases and perhaps additional inconclusive demonstrations and more unnamed customers and undocumented sales. There will be delays and clever but unconvincing explanations for those delays. It is highly improbable that any university will get a device to test. Aussie Guy will also probably be disappointed. The Xanthi Police Academy will continue to heat its facility by conventional means. Nobody will get a definitive tour of Defkalion's or Rossi's factories though poorly documented and inconclusive visits may be possible to labs for either outfit. The visitors, if this happens, will not be allowed independent tests. Again, all of this is predicated on a possible similarity to Steorn. On the other side, people in high places at the DoE or the APS choose to remain ignorant of this subject. Like Mary Yugo and Robert Park, they have made a decision to read nothing. Actually, I've read more than I ever expected to about Rossi and Defkalion and it was all unfortunately unconvincing. Perhaps they want to maintain plausible deniability. Absolute nonsense. If Rossi and Defkalion's stuff is real, everyone will know about it as soon as they allow the first proper independent test results to be released or the instant they make a device available for sale to anyone who can test it, show it and talk about it. It's really that simple. And it could have happened any time since Rossi started equivocating, deceiving and misdirecting a year ago.
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
I got my Hekman mail on an email address I DON'T use for vortex. Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com Shows up in several places, eg http://www.petitiononline.com/petitions/shen1986/signatures?page=714
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Well, I am waiting for Shenmue III for over 10 years. I love Shenmue! 2011/12/31 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com I got my Hekman mail on an email address I DON'T use for vortex. Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com Shows up in several places, eg http://www.petitiononline.com/petitions/shen1986/signatures?page=714 danieldi...@gmail.com -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]: wired.uk on defkalion
The subject line got stripped off the web version. Should be showdown year. (Pick your favorite movie ... High Noon?) - Original Message - http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-12/30/cold-fusion-rival Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: Spam is an insoluble problem I have studied it from 1994 and later systematically in the 488 weekly issues of my newsletter. I remember when Bill Gates still active at Microsoft has promised to liquidate spam in two years. He failed. . . . I have not gotten more than 1 or 2 spam messages per month since I switched to Gmail. I would say the problem has been solved. I do not know if Gates contributed to the solution. I do not think it is fair to call Hekman's messages spam. He (or a volunteer) sent them to people here because he knows we are interested in cold fusion. He is not advertising a product or service. Spam is sent indiscriminately to people who often have no use for the product being advertised. Hekman has done good things for cold fusion. I think we should thank Hekman for his past and present support. I would not support him politically because I disagree with his other policies, but I appreciate his work. I hope that people here do not get him in trouble with the Robots at Google, a.k.a. our new computer overlords. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
I just got ANOTHER from the address I use here. Ah well .. - Original Message - I got my Hekman mail on an email address I DON'T use for vortex.
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
Same here. this time I just put the subscribe and abused Goldwin's law when they asked me why I was subscribing. 2011/12/31 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com I just got ANOTHER from the address I use here. Ah well .. -- I got my Hekman mail on an email address I DON'T use for vortex. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
*unsubcribing 2011/12/31 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com Same here. this time I just put the subscribe and abused Goldwin's law when they asked me why I was subscribing. 2011/12/31 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com I just got ANOTHER from the address I use here. Ah well .. -- I got my Hekman mail on an email address I DON'T use for vortex. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Use magnetic fld to enhance effective mass of e-
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:11:45 -0800: Hi Mark, [snip] Robin: Thanks for the comments, and I see your chicken-n-egg argument... As I prefaced my comment about Horace's calcs, I'm not sure if this is relevant either... Please note that in many cases I am just doing a brain-dump in the hopes of triggering some creative thinking. :-) OTOH, I'm not so sure I agree that, as you say, ... in an ordinary magnet many (most?) of the atomic [magnetic] fields are aligned... Magnetic materials are composed of 'magnetic domains'; regions where the magnetic moments are more or less aligned in the same direction. However, adjacent domains are randomly oriented, diminishing the effect for the bulk material and, thus, the *external* magnetic field is *much less* than what one would find in an individual domain. I am curious... if one were to look at the individual atoms (10^6 to 10^9) in one of these 'magnetic domains', what percentage of the magnetic moments are parallel??? Google magnetic saturation. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:Use magnetic fld to enhance effective mass of e-
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:32:09 -0900: Hi Horace, [snip] In the process of changing their spin axes the particles can (in a non QM interpretation) precess, due to torque on the spin axis. When this happens the particles can radiate, and flip their spins into alignment. If they can radiate, wouldn't that imply that the ground state electrons of atoms in an externally applied magnetic field can radiate as they approach the nucleus? In a magnetic field the spins of (quantum) particles tend to be aligned either with the magnetic field, or opposed to it. If opposed, a particle will tend to eventually flip into a matching spin. Two particles can experience an attracting force if their poles are aligned N-S N-S However, if they are in orbitals, they align with opposed spin, like so: N S | | S N which is still an attracting mode. If they aligned in the opposing directions they would repel. This is partially the basis of the Pauli Exclusion principle. The spin axes of electrons tend to align with an orbital axis, not perpendicular to it. A pair of electrons sharing other quantum states in an atom will have one spin up and the other down, i.e opposed spins. They will have a magnetic attraction force, a negative potential, but one which at atomic size distances is nominal. At nuclear distances magnetic forces become very large. This tendency of particle spins to align in a magnetically attracting way, creating a potential energy, is called spin coupling. [snip] BTW, as Mark pointed out, the chicken-'n-egg reference was in relation to combining your theory with someone else's, not a criticism of your theory. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
2011/12/31 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com: Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: Spam is an insoluble problem I have studied it from 1994 and later systematically in the 488 weekly issues of my newsletter. I remember when Bill Gates still active at Microsoft has promised to liquidate spam in two years. He failed. . . . I have not gotten more than 1 or 2 spam messages per month since I switched to Gmail. I would say the problem has been solved. I do not know if Gates contributed to the solution. Gates with its sloppy operating systems is in part responsible for spam. :-) Don't be surpised, what people see as a viral attack is usually a mean to make the computers of unaware users the worst spammers medium. Actually the design flaws that allows viruses on MS platforms are taking more time and resources than cold fusion research with little results. If one takes into account what is the damage to ISPs bandwidth and Internet users' wasted time he would see how a defect in such a common software affects the World's GDP. :-) mic
Re: [Vo]:Someone leaked my email to Randy Hekman
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote: Gates with its sloppy operating systems is in part responsible for spam. :-) Don't be surpised, what people see as a viral attack is usually a mean to make the computers of unaware users the worst spammers medium. Actually the design flaws that allows viruses on MS platforms are taking more time and resources than cold fusion research with little results. If one takes into account what is the damage to ISPs bandwidth and Internet users' wasted time he would see how a defect in such a common software affects the World's GDP. :-) Question: What is the most common cause of death of experimental animals in laboratories? Answer: TaDa!
RE: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
I'll triple that... I can see it now... Not tonight, Frank, I have to post another repetitious rely on vortex! :-) Happy New Year to all, especially Frank and Mary! -Mark -Original Message- From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net] Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:09 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please Frank sez: My predictions Jed will write a lot more good stuff Rossi will go into hiding Blacklight Power will say nothing Frank Znidarsic and Mary Hugo will get married Err... Yugo? Frank, You have my deepest sympathies. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: Happy New Year to all, especially Frank and Mary! OXOX, YZ! Happy nuptials! HNY to all! T (bringing Frankincense and Myrrh)
RE: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
I predict that LENR will see enormous growth and even a see real publication in a peer reviewed journal. I think that transmutations will be nearly universally accepted, but environ of competing theories will be too fluid to balance. I predict that Rossi will not produce his own useful LENR device, unless he is brought onboard by a reputable company. He will be revealed to have exaggerated and misled investors as to the maturity of his product. Happy New Year, all. Now, out with the bubbly! Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:58:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please From: hohlr...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: Happy New Year to all, especially Frank and Mary! OXOX, YZ! Happy nuptials! HNY to all! T (bringing Frankincense and Myrrh)
Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
I predict I will spend another year alone. Happy New Year y'all. Harry On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: I predict that LENR will see enormous growth and even a see real publication in a peer reviewed journal. I think that transmutations will be nearly universally accepted, but environ of competing theories will be too fluid to balance. I predict that Rossi will not produce his own useful LENR device, unless he is brought onboard by a reputable company. He will be revealed to have exaggerated and misled investors as to the maturity of his product. Happy New Year, all. Now, out with the bubbly! Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:58:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please From: hohlr...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: Happy New Year to all, especially Frank and Mary! OXOX, YZ! Happy nuptials! HNY to all! T (bringing Frankincense and Myrrh)
Re: [Vo]:Jed and others 2012 predictions please
Not good Harry, change it somehow. Since Marry and I got engaged I am a whole lot happier. Not even Jones upsets me any more. I predict I will spend another year alone. Happy New Year y'all. Harry
[Vo]:How I propose to encode math in vortex discussions
(You'll have to visit the URL at the end to follow the post's links) For a surprisingly long time, communicating rich mathematical formulas has been difficult on the Web, in e-mail, or in plain text discussion groups. There are two tools that take the pain out of this process. Writing Codecogs offers a very nice equation editorhttp://codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php, with a complete set of WYSIWYG buttons that operate a workspace which builds an equation in LaTeX, while rendering a graphic image in real-time. The resulting image can be exported in various graphic formats, or the LaTeX can be copied to your clipboard. Reading Avital Oliver wrote a lightweight browser plug-in for Firefox which renders LaTeX equations, called TEX THE WORLD http://thewe.net/tex/. It has since been ported https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/mbfninnbhfepghkkcgdnmfmhhbjmhggnto Google Chrome. It scans every web page for equations between [; and ;] and renders them automatically. Together these make it possible to easily produce LaTeX formulas, already legible to scientific professionals and able to survive the plainest of ASCII environments, and to view them as rich formulas if rendered through a modern web browser. http://luminoustop.typepad.com/charles_hope_and_the_lumi/2012/01/how-to-read-and-write-mathematics-on-the-internet-including-web-based-e-mail-.html -- Never did I see a second sun Never did my skin touch a land of glass Never did my rifle point but true But in a land empty of enemies Waiting for the tick-tick-tick of the want A uranium angel Crying “behold,” This land that knew fire is yours Taken from Corruption To begin anew
