Re: [Vo]:Solar neutrino scattering by the moon

[Eric Walker]

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Nigel Dyer  wrote:

No one seems to have considered this possibility, but it seems not
> unreasonable


This is an interesting line of speculation.  It might be worth raising it
at PhysicsForums or physics.stackexchange.com.  I would be interested in
knowing what mainstream physicists think of it.

This line of speculation is related to my thinking on how the EM Drive
might produce "propellantless" thrust.  If enough beta decays and electron
captures were being induced in the device, and the neutrinos were emitted
anisotropically, i.e., preferentially in one direction, that might produce
measurable thrust.

Eric

Re: [Vo]:Solar neutrino scattering by the moon

[Axil Axil]

All moon size bodies and above produce internal heat including the earth
and the Sun. Even Pluto that has a water volcano and a underground water
ocean that feeds that volcano.

I beleive that these celestial bodies produce this internal heat through
LENR based reactions. These LENR reactions will produce muon neutrinos.
These LENR reactions will produce neutrinos and will distort assumptions
about what neutrinos do, how neutrinos change their type, and how they
react.

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Nigel Dyer  wrote:

> We all know that neutrinos pass directly through things, even big things
> such as the earth.
>
> However it is also known that neutrinos interact with matter as a result
> of the Z boson or neutral current.  This results in small amounts of
> momentum transfer and people have looked at whether this is measureable,
> e.g. by making neutrinos bounce off things that they hit at a very shallow
> angle.
>
> If matter deflects neutrinos in this way then does this mean that
> neutrinos that pass through, for example, the moon will get very slightly
> deflected, in random directions, such that the moon ends up acting as a
> neutrino diffuser.  This will mean that if you are far enough away the moon
> will cast a neutrino shadow.  Is the earth/moon distance sufficiently far
> away such that we are in a solar neutrino shadow during a total eclipse?
>
> No one seems to have considered this possibility, but it seems not
> unreasonable
>
> Nigel
>
>
>

[Vo]:Solar neutrino scattering by the moon

[Nigel Dyer]

We all know that neutrinos pass directly through things, even big things 
such as the earth.


However it is also known that neutrinos interact with matter as a result 
of the Z boson or neutral current.  This results in small amounts of 
momentum transfer and people have looked at whether this is measureable, 
e.g. by making neutrinos bounce off things that they hit at a very 
shallow angle.


If matter deflects neutrinos in this way then does this mean that 
neutrinos that pass through, for example, the moon will get very 
slightly deflected, in random directions, such that the moon ends up 
acting as a neutrino diffuser.  This will mean that if you are far 
enough away the moon will cast a neutrino shadow.  Is the earth/moon 
distance sufficiently far away such that we are in a solar neutrino 
shadow during a total eclipse?


No one seems to have considered this possibility, but it seems not 
unreasonable


Nigel

[Vo]:LENR- INFO; ABOUT TECHNO-CALUMNIATION

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-19-2017-lenr-and-low-art-of-techno.html
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Kamen's New Segue

[MJ]

http://newatlas.com/urban-aeronautics-cityhawk-flying-car/49025/

On 19-Apr-17 14:45, Jones Beene wrote:


Wow and whoa. Notice about 1:47 in the vid there could be some lose 
ends, so to speak ...


https://youtu.be/kzYb68qXpD0

...have they rigged up some rope to keep the wings stabilized? Well 
that is a possible explanation. :-)


This concept, no matter how beautiful and intriguing -- will never 
happen... at least not until it can be completely robot controlled, 
and essentially "state controlled" which is to say, independent of the 
desires of the owner/driver.


The terrorism risk is too great... OTOH, it is a beautiful way to 
accomplish regime change.



On 4/19/2017 7:58 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:

http://www.aeromobil.com/= 

Well, he's one of the advisors.

Re: [Vo]:Kamen's New Segue

[Jones Beene]

Wow and whoa. Notice about 1:47 in the vid there could be some lose 
ends, so to speak ...


https://youtu.be/kzYb68qXpD0

...have they rigged up some rope to keep the wings stabilized? Well that 
is a possible explanation. :-)


This concept, no matter how beautiful and intriguing -- will never 
happen... at least not until it can be completely robot controlled, and 
essentially "state controlled" which is to say, independent of the 
desires of the owner/driver.


The terrorism risk is too great... OTOH, it is a beautiful way to 
accomplish regime change.



On 4/19/2017 7:58 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:

http://www.aeromobil.com/= 

Well, he's one of the advisors.

[Vo]:Kamen's New Segue

[Terry Blanton]

http://www.aeromobil.com/

Well, he's one of the advisors.