Re: [Vo]:Tesla Dumping Rare Earths

2023-05-01 Thread Terry Blanton
You never know with Musk

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/10/221024193256.htm

On Mon, May 1, 2023, 9:23 PM Jones Beene  wrote:

>  Terry Blanton wrote::
>
> > For what magnetic material?
>
> https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-elon-musk-magnet-mystery/
>
>
> /well - Possibly it is a big surprise - iron nitride !
>
> This material has been known for a long time (that there is a rare
> nano-phase of iron and nitrogen with spectacular magnetic properties) ...
> but it is very difficult to manufacture
>
> Here is a company trying to capitalize on this approach, but there are
> others
>
> https://www.nironmagnetics.com/.
>
>
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Tesla Dumping Rare Earths

2023-05-01 Thread Jones Beene
  Terry Blanton wrote:: 

 > For what magnetic material?
https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-elon-musk-magnet-mystery/

/well - Possibly it is a big surprise - iron nitride !
This material has been known for a long time (that there is a rare nano-phase 
of iron and nitrogen with spectacular magnetic properties) ... but it is very 
difficult to manufacture
Here is a company trying to capitalize on this approach, but there are others
https://www.nironmagnetics.com/.




[Vo]:Tesla Dumping Rare Earths

2023-05-01 Thread Terry Blanton
For what magnetic material?

https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-elon-musk-magnet-mystery/


Re: [Vo]:The LENR-CANR ChatGPT is ON LINE!

2023-05-01 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here we see the LENR-CANR.org bot going off the deep end with
hallucinations --

Hello! What can I do for you today?

In his research at China Lake, Melvin Miles used a copper jacket in one of
his calorimeters. Describe this.


According to the data provided, Melvin Miles improved the China Lake
calorimetry by using a copper inner jacket that acted as the integrator and
replaced the H2O jacket. An insulating box over the cell top and bath
greatly reduced the effect of changes in the room temperature. Furthermore,
the lead wires coming out of the cell were thermally staked to the bath
itself, thereby further reducing the effect of the room temperature. A
copper outer jacket contacted the bath and minimized bath level. These
improvements are illustrated in Figure 4 of the data provided.


What document is Figure 4 in?

Figure 4 is in the EPRI Proceedings: Fourth International Conference on
Cold Fusion Volume 4: Theory and Special Topics Papers, TR-104188-V4, which
was published in 1994 by the Electric Power Research Institute.

[There is no paper by Miles in Volume 4.]

Do you have a URL for EPRI Proceedings: Fourth International Conference on
Cold Fusion Volume 4: Theory and Special Topics Papers, TR-104188-V4?

Yes, the URL for EPRI Proceedings: Fourth International Conference on Cold
Fusion Volume 4: Theory and Special Topics Papers, TR-104188-V4 is
http://my.epri.com/portal/server.pt?Abstract_id=TR-104188-V4. [This URL was
provided by me. It is defunct.]

Do you have the title of the paper with Figure 4?

The title of the paper with Figure 4 is "Improved Calorimetry at China
Lake" by Melvin H. Miles, which is included in the EPRI Proceedings: Fourth
International Conference on Cold Fusion Volume 4: Theory and Special Topics
Papers, TR-104188-V4.

[There is no such paper anywhere in the literature, as far as I know. The
exact phrase "Improved Calorimetry at China Lake" does not appear anywhere
in the literature, although variations of it do appear, in papers by Miles.
For example, this reference p. 13 says:


https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesManomalousea.pdf

 *...* An *improved calorimeter* recently developed at *China Lake* that
can accomplish these tasks is described in the next section. In June of
1995, ...]


Re: [Vo]:The LENR-CANR ChatGPT is ON LINE!

2023-05-01 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton  wrote:


> BTW, do you use Dragon Speak still?
>

Not that often. It is good for writing long, formal documents. Not so much
for short messages. It is not good for editing papers, which is mostly what
I do these days.

I expect there will soon be AI versions of voice input transcription. Maybe
online? I expect they will blow Dragon Speak out of the water. They will be
far better. I say that for two reasons:

ChatGPT translation from Japanese into English is far better than Google
translate (https://translate.google.com). The Bots have generated a lot of
accurate linguistic data. I expect it is nothing like human knowledge of
grammar, but it works.

I have recently discovered that AI based online OCR programs are far
superior to desktop OCR programs such as Adobe Acrobat. I used Adobe
Acrobat OCR to make old documents such as ICCF3 "searchable." You can
export the resulting text to Microsoft Word or a text file. Recently
ChatGPT recommended I try the Amazon AWS Textract online OCR program. I
tried it. I did a file-compare of the AWS output compared to the Adobe
Acrobat output. AWS has many fewer OCR errors. I think you could correct
many voice input errors by using the AI linguistics-based methods, and the
pattern recognition algorithms. I think the pattern recognition algorithms
can be applied to audio track data in a way that is similar to images of
printed letters.


[Vo]:A though experiment and discussion that should be important in my view

2023-05-01 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Hi

First of all, the pre-history of the linked article exists at
different dark corners of the internet and most likely I'm not the original
person behind these ideas. But I find the thought experiment logical and
feel that I'm obligated to popularize the ideas as they seem coherent in
many ways. It is not dressed in QM or any fancy variant of them, but I
would expect that one would be able to derive e.g. QED from these models if
they were true. The whole idea is to model objects with streams of current
at the speed of light that do not interact differently than what our
intuition is. There are insanely beautiful formulations of Maxwell's
equations if we constrain our currents to such kinds. Helical paths have
been a recurring theme of explaining matter and the energy in the solenoid
has been in many researchers minds where the mass is located. What struck
me however is that focusing on the energy density a more natural principle
are that it should be invariant in all lorens transformed reference
systems. This enables us to postulate that space can not hold an unlimited
amount of energy density and there is an upper limit to it. This whole
nonlinear concept is also Lorenz invariant if we know postulated that the
energy density is constant in a point. A side effect from this is that in
spherical symmetric particles E=mc² which have some theoretical
implications. There is much more to say, but I link the article here. I
hope to be able to popularize this as I think it's a very interesting idea
and I wouldn't do my job as a fellow human not to share it although
typically if you do such stuff you will be labeled as a crackpot and
Einstein wannabe or whatnot. Personally I would like to spend a year in a
retreat with a group of smart people and expand on this in different
directions and create the proper academic trail, just like when QM was
developed by Niels Bohr and his fellows. At least this idea would then have
its proper attention even if it's a dead end.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O8gvLX-j0l3IrkXU6uiBOlQt-7dzbSVP/view?usp=sharing


Re: [Vo]:An AI Creation of Dune Images

2023-05-01 Thread Terry Blanton
Another AI warning

https://dnyuz.com/2023/05/01/the-godfather-of-a-i-leaves-google-and-warns-of-danger-ahead/

On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 5:21 PM H L V  wrote:

> Fire is beautiful and powerful but it is also dangerous. Fire seems to be
> alive.
> AI is like a new fire. I worry about naive people or pyros setting
> cognitive fires. We will need trained artists
> who understand how this new fire works on the mind.
>
> Harry
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:21 PM Terry Blanton  wrote:
>
>> Consider these are nascent programs.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 4:13 PM H L V  wrote:
>>
>>> Amazing ...but also read this exchange between the commenter Sprawl and
>>> the artists KromAI which was posted below the video.
>>> Harry
>>>
>>> The Sprawl
>>> 10 days
>>> Honestly, watching this video felt like a truly seismic moment for me.
>>> It made me realise something profound that I hadn't really realised before.
>>> For some reason with this video - because I've seen AI produced art before
>>> on YT but it didn't hit me like this did - I suddenly grasped what AI will
>>> do for the future of art. The power of AI really became apparent. And the
>>> implications terrify and entrance me. Can you tell me a little of how you
>>> curated these images? I want to know how much of your human eye was used to
>>> sift through bad images and pick the good ones, because that is directly
>>> related to how good at its job the AI is, and if you have to sift through a
>>> lot of rubbish to arrive at images like this then it's less impressive - so
>>> part of me is almost hoping you tell me that you did a lot of curation and
>>> cherrypicking, because then the implications for human artists and human
>>> art aren't quite so terrifying. Also, I'd love to know what parameters you
>>> need to set in order for the AI to spit out images like this. Do you just
>>> feed it a big dataset of Giger and Dune artwork and then press a button? Or
>>> do you have to set certain parameters, certain framing decisions, where
>>> certain objects are in the shot etc.? Amazing video, whatever your answers
>>> are. I'm genuinely shaken.
>>>
>>> KhromAI
>>> 10 days ago
>>> Hello The Sprawl, Thank you for your thoughtful comment. We're thrilled
>>> that our video had such a profound impact on you, giving you a glimpse into
>>> the future of AI and art. In creating these images, we used Midjourney, an
>>> AI image generation tool. We experimented with various complex prompts to
>>> generate the initial outputs, based on a dataset of Giger and Dune artwork.
>>> It took several attempts to achieve the desired images that aligned with
>>> our vision and some postprocessing in photoshop. Our human touch came into
>>> play when curating the final set of images for the video. We carefully
>>> selected the most suitable images from the AI-generated outputs. This
>>> process highlights the synergy between AI and human creativity, where AI
>>> serves as a tool to assist and inspire artists, rather than replacing them.
>>> We're glad you found our video amazing, and we appreciate your curiosity
>>> about the process. Feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or
>>> concerns. Thank you for your support!
>>>
>>> The Sprawl
>>> 9 days ago (edited)
>>>  @KhromAI  I really did find it amazing. For some reason - maybe because
>>> Giger's work sank into my subconscious at an early age with Alien(and I
>>> thought Villeneuve's Dune was visually extraordinary too) - this video was
>>> qualitatively different in its impact from any of the other, similar AI
>>> videos I've seen. Thanks for the explanation - that was what I suspected.
>>> It confirmed my beliefs about what artistic creation and good art really
>>> is, and to me it has to be some form of communication between conscious
>>> beings, with intents. If there's no intent behind something, if it's just a
>>> pattern that the wind blew in the sand, then it just doesn't qualify. It
>>> could be an extraordinarily beautiful pattern but it wouldn't count. And
>>> that's what a purely AI-generated piece of art would be: a pattern in the
>>> sand. Without at least some form of human curation it fails. It has no
>>> intention or meaning. So there's a part of me that's quite confident that
>>> art isn't in trouble. But this video still made me very uneasy. Something
>>> in my worldview wobbled a bit.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 3:45 PM Terry Blanton 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 In the style of H.R. Giger

 https://youtu.be/mcCZftSbges

 (5  min,)

>>>


Re: [Vo]:The LENR-CANR ChatGPT is ON LINE!

2023-05-01 Thread Terry Blanton
I was under the impression ChatGBT accepted voice inquiries.  Sorry.

BTW, do you use Dragon Speak still?

On Mon, May 1, 2023, 10:16 AM Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Terry Blanton  wrote:
>
> Ask your wife to make an inquiry in both languages.
>>
>
> I did an inquiry in both languages. The answer is pretty much the same
> when the subject is technical.
>
>
>
>>   I bet the English response implies a male Bot.
>>
>
> How can you tell? There is no difference between male and female dialects
> in English. In a novel there may be some slight differences in
> conversational English, but not expository writing. In Japanese there is no
> sex difference in formal expository writing, which is what ChatGPT
> responses are, except they are in formal diction instead of neutral, which
> is kind of weird. Informal writing has clear differences between sexes.
> Something like the lyrics to the Disney song "Let it Go" are conspicuously
> in the female dialect. The meaning of the words are different, as well:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-dqMG-Uycg
>
>
> https://fangirlisms.com/lyrics-and-translations/let-it-go-ari-no-mama-de-lyrics-translation/
>
> She sounds a bit like the heroine in a novel written in 1910.
>
> Japanese also has many regional accents and dialects. Some of the rural
> ones are practically incomprehensible. The news sometimes puts subtitles on
> the screen when they interview some old coot from the middle of nowhere in
> the far north. People use words and grammar from the 19th century, and even
> the 18th century. It resembles U.S. Gullah dialects, which I believe are
> the oldest living versions of English in the world. Male and female dialect
> distinctions are made in all regional dialects as far as I know, and they
> are along the same lines.
>
>


Re: [Vo]:The LENR-CANR ChatGPT is ON LINE!

2023-05-01 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton  wrote:

Ask your wife to make an inquiry in both languages.
>

I did an inquiry in both languages. The answer is pretty much the same when
the subject is technical.



>   I bet the English response implies a male Bot.
>

How can you tell? There is no difference between male and female dialects
in English. In a novel there may be some slight differences in
conversational English, but not expository writing. In Japanese there is no
sex difference in formal expository writing, which is what ChatGPT
responses are, except they are in formal diction instead of neutral, which
is kind of weird. Informal writing has clear differences between sexes.
Something like the lyrics to the Disney song "Let it Go" are conspicuously
in the female dialect. The meaning of the words are different, as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-dqMG-Uycg

https://fangirlisms.com/lyrics-and-translations/let-it-go-ari-no-mama-de-lyrics-translation/

She sounds a bit like the heroine in a novel written in 1910.

Japanese also has many regional accents and dialects. Some of the rural
ones are practically incomprehensible. The news sometimes puts subtitles on
the screen when they interview some old coot from the middle of nowhere in
the far north. People use words and grammar from the 19th century, and even
the 18th century. It resembles U.S. Gullah dialects, which I believe are
the oldest living versions of English in the world. Male and female dialect
distinctions are made in all regional dialects as far as I know, and they
are along the same lines.