Re: [Vo]:Beaudette book uploaded
On Aug 3, 2008, at 4:27 AM, R C Macaulay wrote: There is a great deal of interest in this conference by both distractors and supporters. The international component is obvious but yet to be fully defined. Richard A little more definition of an international component is in some of the news reports at: http://newenergytimes.com/news/news.htm On Aug 3, 2008, at 1:44 PM, R C Macaulay wrote: Perhaps Purdue University would volunteer some academians to fill the slots. Richard Oh, Richard and the Dime Box boys certainly do stir things up! I would expect a systematic difficulty for physicists obtaining visas might tend shift future scientific conferences away from the US. This would be an unfortunate consequence. Maybe Canada will eventually get some extra convention business out of this. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Beaudette book uploaded
There is a great deal of interest in this conference by both distractors and supporters. The international component is obvious but yet to be fully defined. Richard The ICCF-14 abstracts are still secret and/or incomplete. Conference starts in 8 days. Got to be the most incompetent/idiotic way of running a conference I've ever seen. s I expect there is a lot that does not yet meet the eye about the delay and reworking, maybe even a significant international incident. I'll try to be patient waiting for news ... mainly because I have no other choice! 8^) H
Re: [Vo]:Beaudette book uploaded
On Aug 3, 2008, at 4:27 AM, R C Macaulay wrote: There is a great deal of interest in this conference by both distractors and supporters. The international component is obvious but yet to be fully defined. Richard The international component was just defined by Ed as difficulty getting visas. On Aug 3, 2008, at 4:38 AM, Edmund Storms wrote: Steve, I suggest you consider that the visa problems as well as other issues might be a factor in not having a final agenda. I expect Steve Krivit and others might be able to more fully define the international issues for you. Difficulty obtaining visas for a conference on a fully discredited fringe subject seems to me to be extremely news worthy. 8^) Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Beaudette book uploaded
On Jul 18, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Charles Beaudette gave me permission to upload his entire book. I am going make a big announcement about this next week, as soon as I get through with this blizzard of ICCF-14 abstracts. Anyway, here is the book: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf This is ESSENTIAL READING for anyone interested in cold fusion. I urge you to buy the printed copy. There is a link to the on-line stores on the first page. - Jed Can we still expect a big announcement? I see some of the abstracts and program are provided at: http://newenergytimes.com/Conf/2008/ACS/ACS-2008-NET-Abstracts.pdf but nothing yet on the ICCF-14 site. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Beaudette book uploaded
Can we still expect a big announcement? I see some of the abstracts and program are provided at: http://newenergytimes.com/Conf/2008/ACS/ACS-2008-NET-Abstracts.pdf but nothing yet on the ICCF-14 site. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ HH - those be the ACS abstracts. The ICCF-14 abstracts are still secret and/or incomplete. Conference starts in 8 days. Got to be the most incompetent/idiotic way of running a conference I've ever seen. s
Re: [Vo]:Beaudette book uploaded
On Aug 2, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Steven Krivit wrote: Can we still expect a big announcement? I see some of the abstracts and program are provided at: http://newenergytimes.com/Conf/2008/ACS/ACS-2008-NET-Abstracts.pdf but nothing yet on the ICCF-14 site. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ HH - those be the ACS abstracts. Yep, I already apologized for that. I made a bad assumption based on the google search I did to find it. I must admit, I was surprised to see such familiar sounding stuff, but it just never dawned on me I was looking at the wrong conference altogether. I do things in such a hurry of late. I wish I hadn't even mentioned the abstracts because my real interest was in the big announcement. I'm very curious about that. Given the delay in releasing the abstracts, I'm even more curious, because they seem to be related, but don't know if there is any such linkage other than Jed's time. I truly didn't mean to be critical of the handling of the conference at all, except to use it as an excuse to prod a bit for the big announcement. The ICCF-14 abstracts are still secret and/or incomplete. Conference starts in 8 days. Got to be the most incompetent/idiotic way of running a conference I've ever seen. s I expect there is a lot that does not yet meet the eye about the delay and reworking, maybe even a significant international incident. I'll try to be patient waiting for news ... mainly because I have no other choice! 8^) Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
