Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Well that sucks. I can totally imagine the ending, tho -- the one thing Abd was really, really poor at was shutting up. In any case, if a troll (Christian or not, sounds like that's what it was) provoked someone so badly that both the troll and the target were banned, that /certainly/ doesn't justify keeping /another/ troll on the rolls so they can try the same trick, this time in the political arena. Anyhow that's my feeling about it, but I've gotten a lot less patient with such stuff over the years. In any case this sub-discussion is totally unrelated to energy, free, possible, plausible, or otherwise, and so I will say nothing more about it. On 06/25/2016 03:49 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: It's about keeping standards... not justifying 2 wrongs. Abd was banned, I think, 3 years ago, when a Christian creationist was attacking Abd for being Muslim and Abd was defending his religion relentlessly, but providing historical facts and explaining things in context. The attack lasted for 2 or 3 weeks with a few hundreds of messages from both sides. In the end, both were banned. The attacker came back eventually, I don't remember what happened to him after, though. 2016-06-25 15:47 GMT-03:00 Stephen A. Lawrence>: And */Abd was banned??/* When was that? And why?
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
It's about keeping standards... not justifying 2 wrongs. Abd was banned, I think, 3 years ago, when a Christian creationist was attacking Abd for being Muslim and Abd was defending his religion relentlessly, but providing historical facts and explaining things in context. The attack lasted for 2 or 3 weeks with a few hundreds of messages from both sides. In the end, both were banned. The attacker came back eventually, I don't remember what happened to him after, though. 2016-06-25 15:47 GMT-03:00 Stephen A. Lawrence: > > And *Abd was banned??* When was that? And why? >
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
I dunno -- I looked back a ways and didn't see anything interesting from Che, and saw a bunch of trolling garbage. And */Abd was banned??/* When was that? And why? He was the most long winded poster I've encountered in a long time, and a bit tendentious, but his posts were generally on topic, carefully reasoned out, and, as far as I can recall, always respectful. (And why would /unbanning/ Abd provide grounds to /ban/ Che?) On 06/25/2016 02:29 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: I think he posted useful comments before and there was a trouble maker here before, way worse than this, bad mouthing Abd due his religion. So, unless _Abd is unbanned_, I cannot see fair grounds to ban Che. 2016-06-25 15:23 GMT-03:00 Stephen A. Lawrence>: Hallo, Bill! Sorry to bother you about this "Che" is a pseudonym with no information about the actual person behind it. That's not forbidden but it's not exactly smiled on either. "Che" mostly posts troll stuff and ad hominems. No surprise, given the choice of pseudonym, which is political rather than scientific. "Che" doesn't post physics, nor intelligent energy technology commentary in general. Again, no surprise, given the pseudonym. *"Che" should be kicked out of the group IMHO.*
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
I think he posted useful comments before and there was a trouble maker here before, way worse than this, bad mouthing Abd due his religion. So, unless Abd is unbanned, I cannot see fair grounds to ban Che. 2016-06-25 15:23 GMT-03:00 Stephen A. Lawrence: > Hallo, Bill! Sorry to bother you about this > > "Che" is a pseudonym with no information about the actual person behind > it. That's not forbidden but it's not exactly smiled on either. > > "Che" mostly posts troll stuff and ad hominems. No surprise, given the > choice of pseudonym, which is political rather than scientific. > > "Che" doesn't post physics, nor intelligent energy technology commentary > in general. Again, no surprise, given the pseudonym. > > *"Che" should be kicked out of the group IMHO.* > >
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Hallo, Bill! Sorry to bother you about this "Che" is a pseudonym with no information about the actual person behind it. That's not forbidden but it's not exactly smiled on either. "Che" mostly posts troll stuff and ad hominems. No surprise, given the choice of pseudonym, which is political rather than scientific. "Che" doesn't post physics, nor intelligent energy technology commentary in general. Again, no surprise, given the pseudonym. *"Che" should be kicked out of the group IMHO.* On 06/25/2016 09:41 AM, *Che wrote:* *WTF do you know about anything, eh? Typical knee-jerk crap*...
RE: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Ok, so who let the troll in… From: Che [mailto:comandantegri...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 6:41 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; Lennart Thornros Subject: Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info WTF do you know about anything, eh? Typical knee-jerk crap from people who in fact believe some corporation are going to shower their little LENR projects with oodles of cash at some point, and make them filthy rich.. So of course they support this bastard social-economic order, however bad it is for everyone else. C'mon admit it. That's the true end-goal, for many of you here. Worked for Rossi and the others, huh? On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: Che How did you become a pro? Reading a book? That goes a long way, but in the end it is like in science the experience of physical experiment is what counts. Then you will find there are many opinions and in my book they are all ok. Seldom are we 100% right. On Jun 24, 2016 21:30, "Che" <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: OT for vortex-l, but a short reply (since an off-hand slagging of 'communism' was prominent in a LENR article): No good marxist need learn any lessons from poor old East Europeans about 'communism'. We know from long, personal experience with you all, that 99% of you are clueless about it. All you people really have is your lived experience of 'Actually-Existing Socialism' -- i.e. stalinism -- and the willingness of westerners to use you for the propaganda value in having hated it (just to throw you away, after, when your services are no longer required...) All of which is pretty useless for the most part, for the World working-class. And completely and utterly wrong, need I add. So like I said: stick to LENR science. You're no good at the politics thing. Leave it to us pros. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Che, what do you want to know about Communism? my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style. Feel free to ask anything Peter On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably anything else political, for that matter. Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no personal experience. - Jed -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Lennart Thornroswrote: > Che > How did you become a pro? > Reading a book? > That goes a long way, but in the end it is like in science the experience > of physical experiment is what counts. > Then you will find there are many opinions and in my book they are all ok. > Seldom are we 100% right. > On Jun 24, 2016 21:30, "Che" wrote: > >> OT for vortex-l, but a short reply (since an off-hand slagging of >> 'communism' was prominent in a LENR article): >> >> No good marxist need learn any lessons from poor old East Europeans about >> 'communism'. We know from long, personal experience with you all, that 99% >> of you are clueless about it. All you people really have is your lived >> experience of 'Actually-Existing Socialism' -- i.e. stalinism -- and the >> willingness of westerners to use you for the propaganda value in having >> hated it (just to throw you away, after, when your services are no longer >> required...) >> >> All of which is pretty useless for the most part, for the World >> working-class. And completely and utterly wrong, need I add. >> >> So like I said: stick to LENR science. You're no good at the politics >> thing. Leave it to us pros. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Peter Gluck >> wrote: >> >>> Dear Che, >>> >>> what do you want to know about Communism? >>> my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style. >>> Feel free to ask anything >>> Peter >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell >>> wrote: >>> Che wrote: > Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or > probably anything else political, for that matter. > Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no personal experience. - Jed >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
WTF do you know about anything, eh? Typical knee-jerk crap from people who in fact believe some corporation are going to shower their little LENR projects with oodles of cash at some point, and make them filthy rich.. So of course they support this bastard social-economic order, however bad it is for everyone else. C'mon admit it. That's the true end-goal, for many of you here. Worked for Rossi and the others, huh? On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Lennart Thornroswrote: > Che > How did you become a pro? > Reading a book? > That goes a long way, but in the end it is like in science the experience > of physical experiment is what counts. > Then you will find there are many opinions and in my book they are all ok. > Seldom are we 100% right. > On Jun 24, 2016 21:30, "Che" wrote: > >> OT for vortex-l, but a short reply (since an off-hand slagging of >> 'communism' was prominent in a LENR article): >> >> No good marxist need learn any lessons from poor old East Europeans about >> 'communism'. We know from long, personal experience with you all, that 99% >> of you are clueless about it. All you people really have is your lived >> experience of 'Actually-Existing Socialism' -- i.e. stalinism -- and the >> willingness of westerners to use you for the propaganda value in having >> hated it (just to throw you away, after, when your services are no longer >> required...) >> >> All of which is pretty useless for the most part, for the World >> working-class. And completely and utterly wrong, need I add. >> >> So like I said: stick to LENR science. You're no good at the politics >> thing. Leave it to us pros. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Peter Gluck >> wrote: >> >>> Dear Che, >>> >>> what do you want to know about Communism? >>> my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style. >>> Feel free to ask anything >>> Peter >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell >>> wrote: >>> Che wrote: > Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or > probably anything else political, for that matter. > Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no personal experience. - Jed >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >>
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Che How did you become a pro? Reading a book? That goes a long way, but in the end it is like in science the experience of physical experiment is what counts. Then you will find there are many opinions and in my book they are all ok. Seldom are we 100% right. On Jun 24, 2016 21:30, "Che"wrote: > OT for vortex-l, but a short reply (since an off-hand slagging of > 'communism' was prominent in a LENR article): > > No good marxist need learn any lessons from poor old East Europeans about > 'communism'. We know from long, personal experience with you all, that 99% > of you are clueless about it. All you people really have is your lived > experience of 'Actually-Existing Socialism' -- i.e. stalinism -- and the > willingness of westerners to use you for the propaganda value in having > hated it (just to throw you away, after, when your services are no longer > required...) > > All of which is pretty useless for the most part, for the World > working-class. And completely and utterly wrong, need I add. > > So like I said: stick to LENR science. You're no good at the politics > thing. Leave it to us pros. > > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Peter Gluck > wrote: > >> Dear Che, >> >> what do you want to know about Communism? >> my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style. >> Feel free to ask anything >> Peter >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell >> wrote: >> >>> Che wrote: >>> >>> >>> Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably anything else political, for that matter. >>> >>> Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no >>> personal experience. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
OT for vortex-l, but a short reply (since an off-hand slagging of 'communism' was prominent in a LENR article): No good marxist need learn any lessons from poor old East Europeans about 'communism'. We know from long, personal experience with you all, that 99% of you are clueless about it. All you people really have is your lived experience of 'Actually-Existing Socialism' -- i.e. stalinism -- and the willingness of westerners to use you for the propaganda value in having hated it (just to throw you away, after, when your services are no longer required...) All of which is pretty useless for the most part, for the World working-class. And completely and utterly wrong, need I add. So like I said: stick to LENR science. You're no good at the politics thing. Leave it to us pros. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Peter Gluckwrote: > Dear Che, > > what do you want to know about Communism? > my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style. > Feel free to ask anything > Peter > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell > wrote: > >> Che wrote: >> >> >> >>> Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably >>> anything else political, for that matter. >>> >> >> Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no >> personal experience. >> >> - Jed >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Guys, what kind of comments are these.? I have marginal experience from socialistic states from travelling meeting people and participated in some deflection. Peter knows this area either he wants it or not. You might not like his ideas but he certainly have seen it. Because of his position he has also been able to see different formats of communism. As I know he has seen other government formats as well and has a better position to have opinion than most of us. Che, do not know your background but . . . . .. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Peter Gluckwrote: > Dear Che, > > what do you want to know about Communism? > my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style. > Feel free to ask anything > Peter > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell > wrote: > >> Che wrote: >> >> >> >>> Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably >>> anything else political, for that matter. >>> >> >> Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no >> personal experience. >> >> - Jed >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Dear Che, what do you want to know about Communism? my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style. Feel free to ask anything Peter On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwellwrote: > Che wrote: > > > >> Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably >> anything else political, for that matter. >> > > Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no > personal experience. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Chewrote: > Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably > anything else political, for that matter. > Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no personal experience. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably anything else political, for that matter. I suggest he stick closely to scientific matter, only. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Peter Gluckwrote: > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-22-2016-comment-re-lenr-and-evil.html > > it is more here than it seems at the first sight > > > peter > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
[Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-22-2016-comment-re-lenr-and-evil.html it is more here than it seems at the first sight peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com