Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Hi all In reply to Jones Beene I cannot find via google search, the quoted text “A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations”, other than in the paper I linked, that you attribute to being something Ahern wrote. While I do not dispute that you have seen this text, or perhaps more likely something like it, I think it would help the community if you would quote your source, so that full context can be given. I do not dispute that Ahern may follow the same view as the author of the paper, but we must deal in evidence that we can see and judge ourselves. As you point out, a person may claim... something about themselves or others, and the claims may not hold up to inspection. On another matter Rossi seems to think the “discrete breathers” (DBs) are worth understanding and that particular paper should be read. Andrea Rossi June 17th, 2014 at 6:50 AM Andreas Moraitis: The physics of the so called discrete breathers are very interesting. Good paper, thank you for citing it to our Readers. Warm Regards, A.R. I too think the paper is worth reading. Kind Regards walker On 17 June 2014 19:31, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: From: Ian Walker Ahern is also not mentioned in the paper. Would you care to mention where you think the paper supports Ahern's view? OK. Dubinko starts out - the first sentence of his paper with this quote: “A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations”. This is the exact wording from Ahern, who does credit Fermi-Pasta-Ulam and goes into great detail in his prior publications on large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations. Dubinko is either not well-read on the relevant literature of LENR, or else he is trying to take credit for the work of others. So he is not supporting the Hydrino theory that Mills and blacklight power espouses. Dubinko may claim not to support it, but he bases the energy of his hypothetical DB (page 3) on “electrolytic reaction 2D++ 2e = D2+ 31.7 eV which can proceed during the course of absorption/desorption at the cathode surface” …and we must surmise that he knows this large amount of energy is not possible without ground state redundancy, i.e. to derive 27.2 eV+ 4.5 eV from standard chemistry is impossible, and since it is exactly as Mills suggests – he is supporting hydrino theory whether he acknowledges it or not. IOW- Dubinko seems to be deliberately creating a smoke screen, since he cannot have it both ways… and that may be why he seems to be using “31.7 eV” instead of breaking it down as 27.2 eV+ 4.5 eV, which instantly invokes Mills’ Rydberg levels. The paper does reference Swartz Yes, but only minimally. If I am not mistaken, Mitchell should be credited with much more than this, but I do not have the inclination to make a point by point argument. Walker, I suggest writing to Mitchell Swartz directly for his comment … if you really insist on defending Dubinko. Where is the novelty? Jones
Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Ahern has a patent on the subject : Method of maximizing anharmonic oscillations in deuterated alloys US 5770036 A http://www.google.com/patents/US5770036 For a condensed matter system containing a guest interstitial species such as hydrogen or its isotopes dissolved in the condensed matter host lattice, the invention provides tuning of the molecular orbital degeneracy of the host lattice to enhance the anharmonicity of the dissolved guest sublattice to achieve a large anharmonic displacement amplitude and a correspondingly small distance of closest approach of the guest nuclei. The tuned electron molecular orbital topology of the host lattice creates an energy state giving rise to degenerate sublattice orbitals related to the second nearest neighbors of the guest bonding orbitals. Thus, it is the nuclei of the guest sublattice that are set in anharmonic motion as a result of the orbital topology. This promotion of second nearest neighbor bonding between sublattice nuclei leads to enhanced interaction between nuclei of the sublattice. In the invention, a method for producing dynamic anharmonic oscillations of a condensed matter guest species dissolved in a condensed matter host lattice is provided. Host lattice surfaces are treated to provide surface features on at least a portion of the host lattice surfaces; the features have a radius of curvature less than 0.5 microns. Upon dissolution of the guest species in the treated host lattice in a ratio of at least 0.5, the guest species undergoes the dynamic anharmonic oscillations.
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
… check Ahern’s old patent from the nineties - US 5411654 “Method of maximizing anharmonic oscillations in deuterated alloys” From: Ian Walker I cannot find via google search, the quoted text “A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations”
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Wow. There must be an echo in cyberspace the past few days... :) -Original Message- From: Alan Fletcher Ahern has a patent on the subject : Method of maximizing anharmonic oscillations in deuterated alloys US 5770036 A http://www.google.com/patents/US5770036 For a condensed matter system containing a guest interstitial species such as hydrogen or its isotopes dissolved in the condensed matter host lattice, the invention provides tuning of the molecular orbital degeneracy of the host lattice to enhance the anharmonicity of the dissolved guest sublattice to achieve a large anharmonic displacement amplitude and a correspondingly small distance of closest approach of the guest nuclei. The tuned electron molecular orbital topology of the host lattice creates an energy state giving rise to degenerate sublattice orbitals related to the second nearest neighbors of the guest bonding orbitals. Thus, it is the nuclei of the guest sublattice that are set in anharmonic motion as a result of the orbital topology. This promotion of second nearest neighbor bonding between sublattice nuclei leads to enhanced interaction between nuclei of the sublattice. In the invention, a method for producing dynamic anharmonic oscillations of a condensed matter guest species dissolved in a condensed matter host lattice is provided. Host lattice surfaces are treated to provide surface features on at least a portion of the host lattice surfaces; the features have a radius of curvature less than 0.5 microns. Upon dissolution of the guest species in the treated host lattice in a ratio of at least 0.5, the guest species undergoes the dynamic anharmonic oscillations.
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Yep, in the Dot-com universe it's called Google Search. ;-) -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:36 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Wow. There must be an echo in cyberspace the past few days... :) -Original Message- From: Alan Fletcher Ahern has a patent on the subject : Method of maximizing anharmonic oscillations in deuterated alloys US 5770036 A http://www.google.com/patents/US5770036 For a condensed matter system containing a guest interstitial species such as hydrogen or its isotopes dissolved in the condensed matter host lattice, the invention provides tuning of the molecular orbital degeneracy of the host lattice to enhance the anharmonicity of the dissolved guest sublattice to achieve a large anharmonic displacement amplitude and a correspondingly small distance of closest approach of the guest nuclei. The tuned electron molecular orbital topology of the host lattice creates an energy state giving rise to degenerate sublattice orbitals related to the second nearest neighbors of the guest bonding orbitals. Thus, it is the nuclei of the guest sublattice that are set in anharmonic motion as a result of the orbital topology. This promotion of second nearest neighbor bonding between sublattice nuclei leads to enhanced interaction between nuclei of the sublattice. In the invention, a method for producing dynamic anharmonic oscillations of a condensed matter guest species dissolved in a condensed matter host lattice is provided. Host lattice surfaces are treated to provide surface features on at least a portion of the host lattice surfaces; the features have a radius of curvature less than 0.5 microns. Upon dissolution of the guest species in the treated host lattice in a ratio of at least 0.5, the guest species undergoes the dynamic anharmonic oscillations.
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
At 07:36 AM 6/18/2014, you wrote: Wow. There must be an echo in cyberspace the past few days... :) In 2011 Ahern Credited Keith Johnson with the idea. http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/SwartzColloqPart2.pdf I found two Johnson papers online : http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/mchenry/mchenry2/Publications/Mod._Phys._Let._3_1367-1.pdf (1989) http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/mchenry/mchenry2/Publications/Dynamic%20Jahn-Teller-1.pdf (1991, Invited paper) These both reference Johnson's 1983 and 1984 papers. Ahern definitely seems to have priority in the LENR area.
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
-Original Message- From: MarkI-ZeroPoint Yep, in the Dot-com universe it's called Google Search. ;-) Wow. There must be an echo in cyberspace the past few days... :) Actually, there is an old paper from the nineties, which did not turn up on Google search, and which covers the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam anhamonic material in much greater detail. The discrete breathers thing is LOL anyway, not so much in deriving from older ideas http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~flach/publications.DIR/2012/NOLTA_2012.pdf ...but for some strange reason. possibly related to a misspent youth in the sixties, I keep flashing on Jethro Tull.
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
RE: your misspent youth and Jethro Tull... The Pied-piper of Rock -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:00 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science -Original Message- From: MarkI-ZeroPoint Yep, in the Dot-com universe it's called Google Search. ;-) Wow. There must be an echo in cyberspace the past few days... :) Actually, there is an old paper from the nineties, which did not turn up on Google search, and which covers the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam anhamonic material in much greater detail. The discrete breathers thing is LOL anyway, not so much in deriving from older ideas http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~flach/publications.DIR/2012/NOLTA_2012.pdf ...but for some strange reason. possibly related to a misspent youth in the sixties, I keep flashing on Jethro Tull.
Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
An interesting new theory paper has been submitted to Cornell's Arxiv http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.3941.pdf Despite its not being entirely new (see Ahern, Johnson ...) it's well worth reading. In particular, it explains how discrete breathers can be created either above a specific temperature, or by an external stimulus. Also that they result in a quasi-particle with a high-temperature hot spot which propagates at half the speed of sound. It seems in other studies that these can collide with lattice discontinuities, so the actual NAE may be there. It doesn't explain how resultant gammas can be made to disappear, but Hagelstein/McKubre's work on photon/phonon coupling may provide the answer to that.
[Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Hi all An interesting new theory paper has been submitted to Cornell's Arxiv http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.3941.pdf Also submitted to the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Submitted to Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (16.06.2014) Low energy nuclear reactions driven by discrete breathers V.I. Dubinko NSC Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, Kharkov 61108, Ukraine A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations, a.k.a. intrinsic localized modes or “discrete breathers” (DBs). In particular, so called gap DBs, which can arise in diatomic crystals such as metal hydrides, are argued to be the LENR catalyzers. The large mass difference between H or D and the metal atoms provides a gap in phonon spectrum, in which DBs can be excited in the H/D sub-lattice resulting in extreme dynamic closing of adjacent H/D atoms required for the tunneling through nuclear Coulomb barrier. DBs have been shown to arise either via thermal activation at elevated temperatures or via knocking atoms out of equilibrium positions under non-equilibrium gas loading conditions, employed under radiolysis or plasma deposition methods. The DB statistics in both cases is analyzed and simple analytical expressions for the cold fusion energy production rate are derived as the functions of temperature, ion (electric) current and material parameters. For the first time to our knowledge, the derived expressions describe quantitatively the observed exponential dependence on temperature, linear dependence on the ion current as well as the role of external triggering and small dimensions of nuclear active particles. Keywords: anharmonic lattice vibrations, discrete breathers, quantum tunneling, nuclear fusion. Kind Regards Walker
Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Hi all This paper supports many of the concepts and views that Edmund Storms brought to vortex. I hope Edmund continues to follow the vortex and has read the paper. Kind Regards walker On 17 June 2014 12:21, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all An interesting new theory paper has been submitted to Cornell's Arxiv http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.3941.pdf Also submitted to the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Submitted to Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (16.06.2014) Low energy nuclear reactions driven by discrete breathers V.I. Dubinko NSC Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, Kharkov 61108, Ukraine A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations, a.k.a. intrinsic localized modes or “discrete breathers” (DBs). In particular, so called gap DBs, which can arise in diatomic crystals such as metal hydrides, are argued to be the LENR catalyzers. The large mass difference between H or D and the metal atoms provides a gap in phonon spectrum, in which DBs can be excited in the H/D sub-lattice resulting in extreme dynamic closing of adjacent H/D atoms required for the tunneling through nuclear Coulomb barrier. DBs have been shown to arise either via thermal activation at elevated temperatures or via knocking atoms out of equilibrium positions under non-equilibrium gas loading conditions, employed under radiolysis or plasma deposition methods. The DB statistics in both cases is analyzed and simple analytical expressions for the cold fusion energy production rate are derived as the functions of temperature, ion (electric) current and material parameters. For the first time to our knowledge, the derived expressions describe quantitatively the observed exponential dependence on temperature, linear dependence on the ion current as well as the role of external triggering and small dimensions of nuclear active particles. Keywords: anharmonic lattice vibrations, discrete breathers, quantum tunneling, nuclear fusion. Kind Regards Walker
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Walker, This paper is actually more of a mix of Mills, Ahern and Swartz. From Mills he gets the electron orbital energy - 27.2 eV plus the molecular bond energy, which powers everything. From Ahern he gets the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations (he also fails to credit Fermi-Pasta-Ulam) and from Swartz the H/D preference as well as other details. In short, there is not much which is new here, other than bringing together the ideas of others without giving them due credit. And in the end, he fails to explain how the gamma radiation from fusion magically disappears. I cannot see much to get excited about here. From: Ian Walker Hi all This paper supports many of the concepts and views that Edmund Storms brought to vortex. I hope Edmund continues to follow the vortex and has read the paper. Kind Regards walker On 17 June 2014 12:21, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all An interesting new theory paper has been submitted to Cornell's Arxiv http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.3941.pdf Also submitted to the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Submitted to Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (16.06.2014) Low energy nuclear reactions driven by discrete breathers V.I. Dubinko NSC Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, Kharkov 61108, Ukraine A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations, a.k.a. intrinsic localized modes or “discrete breathers” (DBs). In particular, so called gap DBs, which can arise in diatomic crystals such as metal hydrides, are argued to be the LENR catalyzers. The large mass difference between H or D and the metal atoms provides a gap in phonon spectrum, in which DBs can be excited in the H/D sub-lattice resulting in extreme dynamic closing of adjacent H/D atoms required for the tunneling through nuclear Coulomb barrier. DBs have been shown to arise either via thermal activation at elevated temperatures or via knocking atoms out of equilibrium positions under non-equilibrium gas loading conditions, employed under radiolysis or plasma deposition methods. The DB statistics in both cases is analyzed and simple analytical expressions for the cold fusion energy production rate are derived as the functions of temperature, ion (electric) current and material parameters. For the first time to our knowledge, the derived expressions describe quantitatively the observed exponential dependence on temperature, linear dependence on the ion current as well as the role of external triggering and small dimensions of nuclear active particles. Keywords: anharmonic lattice vibrations, discrete breathers, quantum tunneling, nuclear fusion. Kind Regards Walker
Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
I am pleased to provide an alternative to Ed's ideas as follows: One of the innovations that Rossi introduced into particle based LENR is the formulation of the 5 micron micro particle. This particle produces blackbody dipole resonance in the 400C temperature range. Now that Rossi has increased the operating temperature of his “Hot Cat” to about 1000C, this diameter size of this micro particle will have needed to be reduced by about a half to maintain blackbody resonance to correspond to the higher operating temperature of the reactor. In the reference paper, this blackbody resonance optimization is the function that the Discrete breathers is envisioned to address. Without using the micro particle architecture, blackbody resonance is near impossible to produce reliably, IMHO. Dipole motion is the power house that converts heat energy into electron motion. Micro particle resonance sizing is an all important factor in getting the most electron vibration out of the given ambient heat level of the reactor. Optimizing dipole motion is the first step in producing the key to LENR, Strongly Correlated Material, a condensed matter physics term used in type II superconductivity see http://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/viewtopic.php?f=10t=5429start=15#p112918 On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all This paper supports many of the concepts and views that Edmund Storms brought to vortex. I hope Edmund continues to follow the vortex and has read the paper. Kind Regards walker On 17 June 2014 12:21, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all An interesting new theory paper has been submitted to Cornell's Arxiv http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.3941.pdf Also submitted to the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Submitted to Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (16.06.2014) Low energy nuclear reactions driven by discrete breathers V.I. Dubinko NSC Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, Kharkov 61108, Ukraine A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations, a.k.a. intrinsic localized modes or “discrete breathers” (DBs). In particular, so called gap DBs, which can arise in diatomic crystals such as metal hydrides, are argued to be the LENR catalyzers. The large mass difference between H or D and the metal atoms provides a gap in phonon spectrum, in which DBs can be excited in the H/D sub-lattice resulting in extreme dynamic closing of adjacent H/D atoms required for the tunneling through nuclear Coulomb barrier. DBs have been shown to arise either via thermal activation at elevated temperatures or via knocking atoms out of equilibrium positions under non-equilibrium gas loading conditions, employed under radiolysis or plasma deposition methods. The DB statistics in both cases is analyzed and simple analytical expressions for the cold fusion energy production rate are derived as the functions of temperature, ion (electric) current and material parameters. For the first time to our knowledge, the derived expressions describe quantitatively the observed exponential dependence on temperature, linear dependence on the ion current as well as the role of external triggering and small dimensions of nuclear active particles. Keywords: anharmonic lattice vibrations, discrete breathers, quantum tunneling, nuclear fusion. Kind Regards Walker
Re: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Hi all In reply to Jones Beene on the matter of who the author is referencing: I agree the paper does not reference *Mills *other than in passing where the author states in the introduction: Numerous experimental data on low energy nuclear reactions assisted by the crystalline environment [1-3] leave little doubts about the reality of LENR, but a comprehensive theory of this phenomenon remains a subject of debates [2-4]. Some of the proposed models attempted to modify conventional nuclear physics by introducing various types of transient quasi-particles and structures such as Hydrino, Hydron, Hydrex etc. that were expected to lower the Coulomb barrier. Other, less radical, models pointed out at the possibility of screening of the Coulomb barrier by atomic electrons. Comprehensive review can be found in refs [2-4]. However, none of these models can explain even qualitatively all salient conditions required for the LENR, which have been summarized by McKubre et al [2] as follows... So he is not supporting the Hydrino theory that Mills and blacklight power espouses. *Ahern *is also not mentioned in the paper. Would you care to mention where you think the paper supports Ahern's view? *Storms* is referenced a couple of times: Page 6 The above mentioned results demonstrate that the increase of concentration of the highenergy light atoms with increasing temperature is attributed to the thermally-activated excitation of gap DBs in the sub-lattice of light atoms supporting essentially nonlinear localized vibrational modes. These findings are of primary importance for the concept of LENR driven by DBs, since they point out at the two ways of creation of the so called “nuclear active environment” (NAE, as defined by Storms [3]), which is associated with an environment supporting DBs in the present paper. The first way is thermal activation of DBs in the sub-lattice of D or H within the compound nanocrystal, in which the heavy component is represented by a suitable metal such as Pd, Pt, or Ni. This way seems to be the basic mechanism for the LENR observed e.g. in specially treated nickel surface exposed to hydrogen at high temperatures (see refs.76-79 in [3]). The second way is the DB excitation by external triggering such as the atomic displacements in the course of exothermic electrolysis at metal cathodes (majority of LENR experiments) or due to energetic ions, obtained by discharge in gas containing hydrogen isotopes (see refs. 48, 49 in [3]). Naturally, both mechanisms may operate simultaneously under LENR conditions, and this synergy should be reflected in a viable model of DB excitation, the construction of which is attempted in the next section. Page 10 Small size of PdD particles is required since the triggering of DB creation occurs due to the propagation of the vibrational energy from the surface (by quodons, focusons etc.) down to some depth, and the smaller is the particles the more atoms can be involved in the DB creation, i.e. become “nuclear active”. This is manifested in the model by the inversely proportional dependence of the power output on the particle size (see Fig. 12 (a)). Storms [3] underlies that “not all small particles are nuclear-active, other factors must play a role as well. From the point of view of the present model, this can be explained by a crucial role of impurity atoms that can strongly affect the phonon spectrum of PdD. Although impurity atoms are localized and their concentration may be low, they may change the phonon spectrum of the whole crystal and extend it into the DB range, which would suppress the DB formation and make the particle nuclear inactive (or vise versa!). This consideration may be a useful tool for the search of the “nuclear active environment” (NAE) by the way of doping the Metal-D or MetalH crystals with elements changing the phonon spectrum so that to mediate the DB creation. The paper does reference *Swartz:* Page 10 In the introduction we sited the problem formulated by McKubre et al [2] concerning the coupling of the adsorption/desorption reaction energy into modes of lattice vibration appropriate to stimulate D + D interaction. Indeed, in spite of a number of models trying to take into account the phonons, i.e. packets of wave-energy present in a lattice, as the LENR drivers (see e.g. refs to Hagelstein, Swartz, and F. S. Liu in [3]), one could not help feeling that something important was missing in the theory. Phonons were expected to move energy between nuclei, thereby creating enough localized energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier. But phonons are plane harmonic waves, essentially delocalized in the crystal, and the amplitude of atomic vibrations in harmonic range does not exceed ~0.1 Å [30], which is absolutely insufficient for the tunneling at any observable rate (Fig. 13), whatever the underlying mathematics is. In contrast to phonons, DBs, also known as intrinsic localized modes, are essentially localized atomic vibrations that have
RE: [Vo]:New Paper on LENR theory submitted to arxiv and Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
From: Ian Walker Ahern is also not mentioned in the paper. Would you care to mention where you think the paper supports Ahern's view? OK. Dubinko starts out - the first sentence of his paper with this quote: “A new mechanism of LENR in solids is proposed, which is based on the large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations”. This is the exact wording from Ahern, who does credit Fermi-Pasta-Ulam and goes into great detail in his prior publications on large amplitude anharmonic lattice vibrations. Dubinko is either not well-read on the relevant literature of LENR, or else he is trying to take credit for the work of others. So he is not supporting the Hydrino theory that Mills and blacklight power espouses. Dubinko may claim not to support it, but he bases the energy of his hypothetical DB (page 3) on “electrolytic reaction 2D++ 2e = D2+ 31.7 eV which can proceed during the course of absorption/desorption at the cathode surface” …and we must surmise that he knows this large amount of energy is not possible without ground state redundancy, i.e. to derive 27.2 eV+ 4.5 eV from standard chemistry is impossible, and since it is exactly as Mills suggests – he is supporting hydrino theory whether he acknowledges it or not. IOW- Dubinko seems to be deliberately creating a smoke screen, since he cannot have it both ways… and that may be why he seems to be using “31.7 eV” instead of breaking it down as 27.2 eV+ 4.5 eV, which instantly invokes Mills’ Rydberg levels. The paper does reference Swartz Yes, but only minimally. If I am not mistaken, Mitchell should be credited with much more than this, but I do not have the inclination to make a point by point argument. Walker, I suggest writing to Mitchell Swartz directly for his comment … if you really insist on defending Dubinko. Where is the novelty? Jones attachment: winmail.dat
