RE: [Vo]:DARPA Nanotech Project - $34 million investigating cold fusion and excess heat was found

2012-07-12 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
Excellent find Akira!!

Very interesting how they completely avoided the usual terms, CF or LENR, in 
describing it... probably to avoid the exact thing that happened to Hagelstein.

Anyone who dismisses the overwhelming evidence now is either ignorant, or 
pathologically skeptical, or part of the misinformation campaign...

Wonder if the work of this DARPA program could be used to beat into submission 
the skeptics on Wikipedia...

Thanks,
-Mark

-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa [mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:DARPA Nanotech Project - $34 million investigating cold fusion 
and excess heat was found

Hello group,
This is via nextbigfuture.com, thread subject included.

It appears that DARPA is spending $34 million to research LENR (among other 
things) in a project on nanoscale materials, although they don't directly state 
so. They managed to generate excess heat for 2.5 days. 
Follow this link for more details:

http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/07/darpa-nanotech-projects-nanoscale.html

What's interesting is the involvement with the Italian Department of Energy. 
Note this accomplishment for year 2011:

 - Continued quantification of material parameters that control degree of 
 increase in excess heat generation and life expectancy of power cells in 
 collaboration with the Italian Department of Energy. Established ability to 
 extend active heat generation time from minutes to 2.5 days for 
 pressure-activated power cells..

And what is planned for 2012:

 - Establish scalability and scaling parameters in excess heat generation 
 processes in collaboration with the Italian Department of Energy.

The original document is available here:
http://www.darpa.mil/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147484865ei=ggz-T9OQHoLjrAG8vIGMCQusg=AFQjCNF5FYEcO9HPUxK1Hsr1vV-q1KmmPQ

The relevant section starts from page 50.

Cheers,
S.A.




RE: [Vo]:DARPA Nanotech Project - $34 million investigating cold fusion and excess heat was found

2012-07-12 Thread Alan J Fletcher
Hmm ... $35M is a trickle from Darpa ... but how many billion 
butterfly's tears does that represent?




RE: [Vo]:DARPA Nanotech Project - $34 million investigating cold fusion and excess heat was found

2012-07-12 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
Not only that, but it's been going down each year...
2011   2012  2013
16.74511.6505.500   (in millions of $)

But, they may have more efforts buried under different program
headings...this budget is 336 pages.

-mark

-Original Message-
From: Alan J Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:59 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DARPA Nanotech Project - $34 million investigating cold
fusion and excess heat was found

Hmm ... $35M is a trickle from Darpa ... but how many billion butterfly's
tears does that represent?




Re: [Vo]:DARPA Nanotech Project - $34 million investigating cold fusion and excess heat was found

2012-07-12 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:

Hmm ... $35M is a trickle from Darpa ... but how many billion butterfly's
 tears does that represent?


We should speak very quietly.  DARPA are our folks.  Somehow, doing
whatever they do, however they do it, they brought us the Internet.  I
don't want to get them into trouble.

It's fun to highlight some line items in the paragraph that was quoted:

   - developing devices and structures to enable controllable photonic
   devices at multiple wavelengths
   - engineering palladium microstructures with large deuterium loadings to
   study absorption thermodynamics and effects
   - enabling real-time detection as well as analysis of signals and
   molecules and origin of emergent behavior in correlated electron devices
   - developing stabilization and scale-up methods to fabricate high
   pressure crystal structures at low pressures.

Maybe the line items are related, or maybe they are not.

Eric