RE: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat

2012-01-22 Thread John Milstone
Very interesting!

It's obvious that the water being released at the end of the video is at a 
*MUCH* higher pressure than the water/steam coming out of the rubber hose.  I 
guess that means that there are two separate containers of water.  According to 
Mats Lewan, that high-pressure stream continued for about 3 minutes(!), even 
though the video ended after about 1:20.

I recall reading that the pump used to pump water into the E-Cat was sensitive 
to back-pressure.  With the kind of pressure being displayed in that video, the 
pump probably couldn't pump any water at all into the E-Cat, which is another 
indicator that there are two separate containers of water.

It occurs to me that an easy experiment would be to take a pressure tank with a 
valve like the one at the bottom of the E-Cat, fill it half full of water, 
pressurize the container to various levels, then open the valve part-way 
(matching the video), and see how much pressure it takes to produce the same 
kind of stream.

Once the appropriate pressure is found, it would be easy to determine the 
maximum temperature for liquid water at that pressure, and from that, the 
amount of heat energy actually being stored in the water.



Eff Wivakeef
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:46:45 -0800
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhQIufkdL4feature=related  Fast forward to 
6:40 Huge blast of steam and hot water.
What is going on here?

RE: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat

2012-01-22 Thread Robert Leguillon
Horace Hefner did some excellent analysis on this subject, presuming that there 
is a check valve and/or flow restrictor at the output.

From the stability of the E-Cat temp, you can tell that it is at boiling 
temperature, with a mix of water and vapor. Simple steam charts will show you 
that the internal pressure of the E-Cat rises as high as 3 bar (134C=3 bar).
 http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/boiling-point-water-d_926.html

You are 100% correct that this back pressure will decrease the water added by 
the pump.

This is ask well trodden ground, so I'd recommend searching the archives.

Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:02:28 -0800
From: john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

Very interesting!
It's obvious that the water being released at the end of the video is at a 
*MUCH* higher pressure than the water/steam coming out of the rubber hose.  I 
guess that means that there are two separate containers of water.  According to 
Mats Lewan, that high-pressure stream continued for about 3 minutes(!), even 
though the video ended after about 1:20.
I recall reading that the pump used to pump water into the E-Cat was sensitive 
to back-pressure.  With the kind of pressure being displayed in that video, the 
pump probably couldn't pump any water at all into the E-Cat, which is another 
indicator that there are two separate containers of water.
It occurs to me that an easy experiment would be to take a pressure tank with a
 valve like the one at the bottom of the E-Cat, fill it half full of water, 
pressurize the container to various levels, then open the valve part-way 
(matching the video), and see how much pressure it takes to produce the same 
kind of stream.
Once the appropriate pressure is found, it would be easy to determine the 
maximum temperature for liquid water at that pressure, and from that, the 
amount of heat energy actually being stored in the water.

Eff Wivakeef
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:46:45 
-0800http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhQIufkdL4feature=related 


Fast forward to 6:40

Huge blast of steam and hot water.
What is going on here?

Re: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat

2012-01-22 Thread John Milstone
Yes, I remember reading Horace Hefner's analysis.

As I recall, he (as well as some others) have repeatedly questioned the very 
stability you mention.  It seems unlikely that the core can know how much 
energy to produce to keep the device exactly at the right temperature to just 
barely keep the water at the boiling point.

And, given the doubts about the accuracy of the placement and use of the 
temperature sensors, any conclusions based on temperature reading is suspect.  
Mats Lewan stated in November that Rossi has has supplied all temperature 
instruments (http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_eai_emails.php), so that's an 
open issue.

It would be interesting to actually know what the pressure of the water jetting 
out of the E-Cat at the end of that video really was.  I proposed a simple way 
of determining that, that's all.



 From: Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat
 

 
Horace Hefner did some excellent analysis on this subject, presuming that there 
is a check valve and/or flow restrictor at the output.

From the stability of the E-Cat temp, you can tell that it is at boiling 
temperature, with a mix of water and vapor. Simple steam charts will show you 
that the internal pressure of the E-Cat rises as high as 3 bar (134C=3 bar).
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/boiling-point-water-d_926.html

You are 100% correct that this back pressure will decrease the water added by 
the pump.

This is ask well trodden ground, so I'd recommend searching the archives.


Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:02:28 -0800
From: john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com


Very interesting!

It's obvious that the water being released at the end of the video is at a 
*MUCH* higher pressure than the water/steam coming out of the rubber hose.  I 
guess that means that there are two separate containers of water.  According to 
Mats Lewan, that high-pressure stream continued for about 3 minutes(!), even 
though the video ended after about 1:20.

I recall reading that the pump used to pump water into the E-Cat was sensitive 
to back-pressure.  With the kind of pressure being displayed in that video, the 
pump probably couldn't pump any water at all into the E-Cat, which is another 
indicator that there are two separate containers of water.

It occurs to me that an easy experiment would be to take a pressure tank with a 
valve like the one at the bottom of the E-Cat, fill it half full of water, 
pressurize the container to various levels, then open the valve part-way 
(matching the video), and see how much pressure it takes to produce the same 
kind of stream.

Once the appropriate pressure is found, it would be easy to determine the 
maximum temperature for liquid water at that pressure, and from that, the 
amount of heat energy actually being stored in the water.



Eff Wivakeef
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:46:45 -0800
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNhQIufkdL4feature=related  Fast forward to 
6:40 Huge blast of steam and hot water.
What is going on here?

Re: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat

2012-01-22 Thread Eff Wivakeef
Here is a chart of Boiling Point versus 
pressure. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/boiling-point-water-d_926.html
My guestimate for the pressure (judging by the sound and appearance of the 
geyser) is probably not more than 50 PSI.
If that guess is correct it means the water in the 'pressure cooker could be 
about 140 C.
That would make quite a good heat reservoir to draw on during the alleged 
unpowered test.
Presumably the vessel is quite separate from the water being pumped through the 
Ecat but is thermally coupled via a heat exchanger.

How much energy could be drawn from that heat reservoir?


Well, let's assume that at the start of the unpowered test the water in the 
reservoir is at 140 C and that at the end of the test it is at 110 C (thus 
allowing the output temperature to remain above 100C.
Delta T = 30 C 
Let's say that the volume of water is 20 Litres. (could be more)
Calories stored = 20,000 x 30 = 600,000 Calories = 0.7 Kwh  

Interesting!

.Notes
 The calorie, or gram calorie, is the quantity of heat required to raise the 
temperature of 1 gram of pure water 1°C; 

  Convert calories to Kwh   
http://www.calculateme.com/Energy/calories/ToKilowattHours.htm 

Re: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat

2012-01-20 Thread Jed Rothwell

Eff Wivakeef wrote:


The tap is opened and a GEYSER of steam under high pressure erupts.

WTF?|

Simple really, there is a  store of very hot pressurised hot water 
stored within the Ecat that has been heated by the electrical input 
power,


There is no electric power input. That water was heated by cold fusion.

- Jed



Re: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat

2012-01-20 Thread Eff Wivakeef
There is no electrical power input.
That water was heated EARLIER by the mains power source.
Simple really!



 From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Sent: Friday, 20 January 2012 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat
 

Eff Wivakeef wrote:


The tap is opened and a GEYSER of steam under high pressure erupts.


WTF?|


Simple really, there is a  store of very hot pressurised hot water stored 
within the Ecat that has been heated by the electrical input power, 
There is no electric power input. That water was heated by cold
fusion.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat

2012-01-20 Thread Yamali Yamali
If it was, then the entire power calculation is screwed up. With that kind of 
pressure the water wouldn't convert to steam (and the hose where the steam came 
out during the demo would have looked dramatically different - 3 bar would be 
enough to prevent boiling at the measured temperatures). Maybe Rossi uses water 
as the isolator for his heat storage - and that isolator water was what shot 
out of the valve at the end.




 Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Gesendet: 18:54 Freitag, 20.Januar 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:unpowered test of Ecat
 

Eff Wivakeef wrote:


The tap is opened and a GEYSER of steam under high pressure erupts.


WTF?|


Simple really, there is a  store of very hot pressurised hot water stored 
within the Ecat that has been heated by the electrical input power, 
There is no electric power input. That water was heated by cold
fusion.

- Jed