Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 2

[a.ashfield]

Frank Acland has compiled further details of the QuarkX that came out of 
Rossi's replies to questions.


E-Cat QuarkX Q Compilation
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/06/15/e-cat-quarkx-qa-compilation/

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 2

[a.ashfield]

This is the best explanation I have seen so far.  From MFMP
https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/1199701140060583

E-Cat X operating parameters claimed following recent test.

Whilst there is very little credible data shared in the 'report' on the 
E-Cat X, information has been released all the same which you can read 
about here:


http://goo.gl/qNQioI

This is what MFMP volunteer Bob Greenyer had to say...

"From my half-formed understanding...

Photons emitted can be

1. Thermal (IR /THz)
2. Visible (The stuff you can see from red up to blue light)
3. Invisible (UV, EUV, Soft X-Rays, X-Rays, 'Gammas')

The proportion of the type of photon will depend on the transition 
elements used, their relative geometry / crystalline structure / cluster 
size, their level of thermal excitement and the drive signal applied.


The mix of Group 1 alkaline metal will help determine the activity as 
would control field strength. Group 1 metals can also influence the 
yield of electrons.


The direct electricity generation would come from charged particles, 
possibly from Alphas from p + 7Li reaction (that is the principal 
thermal photon generator), but I believe, direct electricity comes 
principally from Auger electrons - the stimulation photons of which I 
have described in previous videos come from two processes. If these 
processes are driven to emit photons of high enough energy to create 
Auger electrons, there will be less visible light and more electrons 
that will allow direct production of electricity. The rate of 
electricity production will be directly limited by the geometry and 
internal structure of the emitter and the proportional amounts of metal 
types in it.


Given the reported operating temperature and hard limit of Auger 
electron yield from a particular element, I would expect that the 
principle transition metal used is NOT nickel in the claimed device - 
since Nickel could possibly yield approximately 60% electrons, 40% X-Rays.


Even if the principal element was Palladium, I would expect it to be 
approximately 80% electrons, 40% X-Rays


Therefore, I conclude that the principle transition metal used is 
Platinum and this sets the upper limit of approximately 10% direct 
electric yield. It would also mean that when driven to produce direct 
electricity in preference to heat/visible light, it would yield more 
high energy photons and it would create a 'bluer' light output. 
Essentially it would produce more X-Rays and so this author re-iterates 
his assertion that this is why it is called E-Cat X. In addition, the 
melting point of Platinum at 1,768ºC is favourable to a wide range of 
operating temperatures. The size of the device would be appropriate if 
working with such an expensive material.


This will help you get the concept. https://goo.gl/jSsqYQ 

(Note Lithium is the smallest element that will yield Auger electrons 
and will yield essentially 100% and no x-rays.)


I would suggest that the claimed device is a surface modified platinum 
wire or other substrate as the high temperature conductor. This provides 
incredibly efficient direct, controllable heating and field. The surface 
would contain platinum - perhaps as open cell rhombic dodecahedron 
clusters (if stable at the desired temperature). The rhombic 
dodecahedron clusters could be formed by the previously described 
nickel/platinum synthesis process and rapid fused to the substrate wire 
through joule heat pulse when the wire is immersed in the powder. I 
would suggest that there is added Lithium, and additional Caesium in 
very small quantities and Protium. This together would constitute the 
reaction matrix.


The reaction matrix so described above would be stimulated directly in 
the same basic fashion as a Celani wire, allowing for precise control 
over the system and direct monitoring of temperature through a substrate 
conductor resistance function. Additionally, an external metallic shell 
in combination with the internal conductor could provide HT differential 
for both accelerating the yield of electrons(-)/protons(+)/alphas(+) and 
thermalising photons away from the generator - if coated on the inside 
with an appropriate nano material, it could downshift incident high 
energy photons into photons with more suitable energies. There could be 
a light transparent material between the main reaction matrix and the 
metal sheath to contain the reaction environment or the outer metal 
could provide this function. The geometry would need to be such that 
converting nano particles are stable at the required operating temperature.


Bob Greenyer"

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 2

[Daniel Rocha]

I think finally Rossi is ready for a COP of infinity! Just collect the
visible part with energy cells and input.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 2

[Daniel Rocha]

*solar collectors

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 2

[a.ashfield]

ECAT QuarkX preliminary report
Report Disclaimer:

THIS IS NOT A THIRD PARTY REPORT AND ALL THE MEASUREMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE 
BY ANDREA ROSSI AND HIS TEAM. THEREFORE THESE RESULTS CANNOT BE 
CONSIDERED AT ANY EFFECT OTHER THAN AN INTERNAL PROCESS CONTROL, NOTHING 
MORE.


DESCRIPTION OF THE QUARK X:

Cylinder made with proper material:

Dimensions:
length 30 mm
diam  1 mm
Energy produced: 100 Wh/h
Energy consumed: 0.5 Wh/h
Light produced (percentage of the energy produced): 0-50%
Electric energy produced: 0-10%
Heat produced: 0- 100%

Light, energy and heat can be modulated to modulate the percentages 
within the limits above listed, provided the combined percentages must 
total 100%.


Extremely interesting is the blue light, the analysis of which has 
resolved theoretical problems related to the roots of the effect.


Temperature on the surface of the QuarkX: more than 1,500*C
Note: 2 other QuarkX put in analogous situation gave the same results.

Further disclaimer:

THIS IS NOT A THIRD PARTY REPORT. IT IS AN INTERNAL REPORT RELATED TO 
MEASURES MADE BY LEONARDO CORPORATION


End of the report.

Description of the photo:

Photo of the heat exchanger pipe that contains the QuarkX: the light 
spot is through a light eye holed in the pipe. The blue halo from the 
hole has been analyzed and has made possible to understand the 
theoretical roots of the effect: the QuarkX is inside the pipe .


http://ecat.com/news/ecat-quark-x-preliminary-report-findings

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 2

[Axil Axil]

Holmlid said the his experiments first show the production of the D-meson
which contains a strange strange quark. The only why that is can happen is
that a monopole magnetic field screens the strong force in the protons and
neutrons, These sub atomic particles then decay producing free quarks and
thus produce mesons.

See for theory

http://www.ectstar.eu/sites/www.ectstar.eu/files/talks/QCD-TNT-III_Shibata.pdf

The D-mesons decay into kaons then muons then electrons. Rossi has alway
indicated that an electrostatic field builds up inside his reactors. In his
newest reactor, this build up must be very vigorous.

The muons must also catalyze fusion.



On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 9:33 AM, a.ashfield  wrote:

> Part 1 was about the 1 MW plant and has scrolled off the archive page.  I
> propose Part 2 to cover the QuarkX reactor.
> Rossi says the two week test is about over and has promised some details
> on Monday.
>
> Meanwhile I'm curious to know if others more expert in nuclear physics
> than I am have any idea how the QuarkX can produce electricity.  This was
> not covered in the 2 week test above so I'm not expecting any info about
> that.
> Looking at Holmlid's claims of muons from his experiments with heavy
> Deuterium I wonder if this might be the way.  Muons are charged so if the
> Quark produces them it might be possible to harvest electricity from them.
>  Any ideas?
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 2

[Jed Rothwell]

a.ashfield  wrote:


> Rossi says the two week test is about over and has promised some details
> on Monday.
>

That's grand.

Ask him for some details on the 1-year test. I think 3 days of data and a
schematic of the instruments should be enough. He says he cannot publish
the ERV report, but surely he can provide a small sample of the data from
the test.

- Jed