RE: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[bobcook39923]

Brian—
 You need a sensitive gauss meter—one with a volts output to use the OS to 
monitor changes with an integrating function—maybe a software package  The 
fastest response you can afford .

A software that allows construction of magnetic fields, both H and B fields 
will be necessary.   I would contact National Instruments for  advice/help.  
Data package should include nuclear magnetic parameters as well as atomic 
properties and isomeric nuclear energy states and transition resonances.  NMR 
technology should be a good source of information.

Bob Cook


nt: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 3:44 AM
To: vortex-r...@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

This sounds like we are moving towards an understanding that should be testable.

I have:

1. signal generator
2. oscilloscope
3. Manelas billet (wrapped)
4. Manelas solenoid with nanopowdered iron filings as the core.
5. full electronics hardware equipment

I am looking for suggestions.
I like this crowd approach to moving the Manelas technology forward.
I will be happy to observe cooling.


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 1:43 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon 
 
I have tried to understand the wiki article on Superparamagnetism...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superparamagnetism 
Superparamagnetism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Superparamagnetism is a form of magnetism, which appears in small ferromagnetic 
or ferrimagnetic nanoparticles. In sufficiently small nanoparticles, 
magnetization can ...


It seems to me that the level of Superparamagnetism can be adjusted in such a 
way that a weak magnetic field can be applied to a ceramic magnet which is 
highly superparamagnetic to reduce that superparamagnetism and therefore the 
associated magnetic field of the magnet.

This technique is used to write and erase bits onto the surface of  a magnetic 
disk with a ceramic magnetic coating. The way this is done is to adjust the 
number of magnetic domains that are impressed into each and every  nano 
particle that make up the structure of the ceramic magnet surface through a 
specialized demagnetization process.

The way that the number of these magnetic domains are adjusted is done by 
demagnetizing the magnet using a magnetic field that includes a specific 
frequency. The magnetic domains within the nanoparticles become forever 
sensitive to that frequency.

When this weak magnetic field is applied, the magnet becomes demagnetized 
through random thermal vibration. When this alternating magnetic field  is 
removed, the magnetic field of the ceramic magnet returns.

This process is just what happens in the magnetic conditioning of the billet, 
and the subsequent application of the weak activation magnetic field. 
 
This case is summarized by this snippet from the article

>From this frequency-dependent susceptibility, the time-dependence of the 
>magnetization for low-fields can be derived:

{\displaystyle \tau {\frac {\mathrm {d} M}{\mathrm {d} t}}+M=\tau \chi 
_{b}{\frac {\mathrm {d} H}{\mathrm {d} t}}+\chi _{sp}H}


There is no time-dependence of the magnetization when the nanoparticles are 
either completely blocked ({\displaystyle T\ll T_{B}}) or completely 
superparamagnetic ({\displaystyle T\gg T_{B}}).

The condition we want to get to is when T = TB, that is when the nanoparticles 
are right on the cutting edge between magnetism and diamagnetism, so that a 
tiny magnetic field can turn them off or on.

I will add more detailed explanation if it looks like to you'll that there is 
something to this adjustment in the superpara-magnification of the ceramic 
billet to be sensitive to weak frequency-dependent magnetic fields. Opinions 
are welcome.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern  wrote:
Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. It is 
difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect phonons with 
magnons.

I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure as a 
Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA.  I 1988 I was tasked to 
understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered that MIT 
Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier. In fact, his 
1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to work on the 
cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983.

He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer conditions 
are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is coupled to 
vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and magnetism exists 
under very specific orbital topologies.

So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be coupled 
under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow well 
ferromagnetism.  Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling can lead 
to coherent behavior as well in  a ferromagnetic 

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Brian Ahern]

I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about them. I 
provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge,

Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy?



From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

>From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to 
>eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this coil 
>be setup, as show in the diagram below?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil
Bifilar coil - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely spaced, 
parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire which is 
made of two ...



[Inline image 2]


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern 
> wrote:

Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. It is 
difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect phonons with 
magnons.


I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure as a 
Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA.  I 1988 I was tasked to 
understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered that MIT 
Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier. In fact, his 
1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to work on the 
cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983.


He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer conditions 
are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is coupled to 
vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and magnetism exists 
under very specific orbital topologies.


So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be coupled 
under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow well 
ferromagnetism.  Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling can lead 
to coherent behavior as well in  a ferromagnetic system.


More needs tobe said but there is some new physics at work in the Manelas 
billet.



From: bobcook39...@gmail.com 
>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Chris Zell; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE


Chris-



I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a 
localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and potential 
energy in a resonant stable dynamic state.  It is primarily thought to be an 
electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in the lattice—primarily 
the valence electrons.  The nuclei oscillate around some mid position in the 
lattice and valence  electrons change their orbital spin states reflecting the 
motion of the nuclei.



Temperature of the crystal lattice is a measure of the amplitude of the nuclei 
special displacement around their mid position in the lattice.  If the crystal 
constitutes a coherent QM system, then all nuclei vibrate with the same 
amplitude and the crystal is at a single temperature.  If the amplitude 
(temperature) get to high, the crystal electronic bonds fail and the order of 
the crystalline coherent system is lost.



Magnetic fields change the nature of the potential/kinetic energy sharing.  A 
preferred direction in the crystal is created relative to the magnetic B field 
that exists within the crystalline coherent system.  The orbital spin energy 
states of the valence electrons are modified.  Large B fields can cause large 
changes in these orbital spin states.  If there are resonances between a 
nuclear orbital spin state of the coherent system and an electronic orbital 
spin state, it would seem possible that spin energy may be swapped, changing 
nuclear potential energy into PHONIC  energy of the crystalline coherent system.



A variable B field induced by a variable ambient H magnetic field will create a 
universe of differing spin energy states each with a small difference in it 
angular momentum.  If total angular momentum can be conserved, IMHO A 
TRANSITION WILL OCCUR.



It may be also possible that the transition is reversible.  In such case a 
reduction of the temperature—lower electron orbital energy—would be the result. 
 (Such a reversal suggests a new concept of temperature, one which shares 
potential and kinetic energy between nuclear entities and electrons. )



Bob Cook









Sent from Mail for Windows 10



From: Chris Zell
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 9:35 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK 

RE: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[bobcook39923]

A change in entropy (decrease) as measured by order of the various coherent 
nano systems would produce cooling of the aggregate system of nano particles.

Bob Cook

From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 3:04 AM
To: VORTEX; Jones Beene; Jean-Francois Leitner; jeff driscoll; Robert Yahn; 
mitch swartz; larry forsley
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about them. I 
provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge,
Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy?


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon 
 
>From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to 
>eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this coil 
>be setup, as show in the diagram below?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil 
Bifilar coil - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely spaced, 
parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire which is 
made of two ...



On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern  wrote:
Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. It is 
difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect phonons with 
magnons.

I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure as a 
Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA.  I 1988 I was tasked to 
understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered that MIT 
Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier. In fact, his 
1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to work on the 
cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983.

He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer conditions 
are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is coupled to 
vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and magnetism exists 
under very specific orbital topologies.

So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be coupled 
under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow well 
ferromagnetism.  Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling can lead 
to coherent behavior as well in  a ferromagnetic system.

More needs tobe said but there is some new physics at work in the Manelas 
billet.


From: bobcook39...@gmail.com 
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Chris Zell; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE 
 
Chris-
 
I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a 
localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and potential 
energy in a resonant stable dynamic state.  It is primarily thought to be an 
electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in the lattice—primarily 
the valence electrons.  The nuclei oscillate around some mid position in the 
lattice and valence  electrons change their orbital spin states reflecting the 
motion of the nuclei.  
 
Temperature of the crystal lattice is a measure of the amplitude of the nuclei 
special displacement around their mid position in the lattice.  If the crystal 
constitutes a coherent QM system, then all nuclei vibrate with the same 
amplitude and the crystal is at a single temperature.  If the amplitude 
(temperature) get to high, the crystal electronic bonds fail and the order of 
the crystalline coherent system is lost.    
 
Magnetic fields change the nature of the potential/kinetic energy sharing.  A 
preferred direction in the crystal is created relative to the magnetic B field 
that exists within the crystalline coherent system.  The orbital spin energy 
states of the valence electrons are modified.  Large B fields can cause large 
changes in these orbital spin states.  If there are resonances between a 
nuclear orbital spin state of the coherent system and an electronic orbital 
spin state, it would seem possible that spin energy may be swapped, changing 
nuclear potential energy into PHONIC  energy of the crystalline coherent 
system.  
 
A variable B field induced by a variable ambient H magnetic field will create a 
universe of differing spin energy states each with a small difference in it 
angular momentum.  If total angular momentum can be conserved, IMHO A 
TRANSITION WILL OCCUR. 
 
It may be also possible that the transition is reversible.  In such case a 
reduction of the temperature—lower electron orbital energy—would be the result. 
 (Such a reversal suggests a new concept of temperature, one which shares 
potential and kinetic energy between nuclear entities and electrons. )
 
Bob Cook
 
 
 
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
 
From: Chris Zell
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 9:35 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: 

RE: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[bobcook39923]

In addition the new order remains, since it is embodied in stable nuclear 
order.  Each nuclear transition produces cooling –less phonic energy of the 
coherent system. 

Bob Cook 

From: bobcook39...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 3:56 AM
To: Brian Ahern; VORTEX; Jones Beene; Jean-Francois Leitner; jeff driscoll; 
Robert Yahn; mitch swartz; larry forsley
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

A change in entropy (decrease) as measured by order of the various coherent 
nano systems would produce cooling of the aggregate system of nano particles.

Bob Cook

From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 3:04 AM
To: VORTEX; Jones Beene; Jean-Francois Leitner; jeff driscoll; Robert Yahn; 
mitch swartz; larry forsley
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about them. I 
provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge,
Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy?


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon 
 
>From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to 
>eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this coil 
>be setup, as show in the diagram below?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil 
Bifilar coil - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely spaced, 
parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire which is 
made of two ...



On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern  wrote:
Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. It is 
difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect phonons with 
magnons.

I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure as a 
Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA.  I 1988 I was tasked to 
understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered that MIT 
Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier. In fact, his 
1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to work on the 
cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983.

He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer conditions 
are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is coupled to 
vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and magnetism exists 
under very specific orbital topologies.

So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be coupled 
under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow well 
ferromagnetism.  Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling can lead 
to coherent behavior as well in  a ferromagnetic system.

More needs tobe said but there is some new physics at work in the Manelas 
billet.


From: bobcook39...@gmail.com 
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Chris Zell; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE 
 
Chris-
 
I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a 
localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and potential 
energy in a resonant stable dynamic state.  It is primarily thought to be an 
electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in the lattice—primarily 
the valence electrons.  The nuclei oscillate around some mid position in the 
lattice and valence  electrons change their orbital spin states reflecting the 
motion of the nuclei.  
 
Temperature of the crystal lattice is a measure of the amplitude of the nuclei 
special displacement around their mid position in the lattice.  If the crystal 
constitutes a coherent QM system, then all nuclei vibrate with the same 
amplitude and the crystal is at a single temperature.  If the amplitude 
(temperature) get to high, the crystal electronic bonds fail and the order of 
the crystalline coherent system is lost.    
 
Magnetic fields change the nature of the potential/kinetic energy sharing.  A 
preferred direction in the crystal is created relative to the magnetic B field 
that exists within the crystalline coherent system.  The orbital spin energy 
states of the valence electrons are modified.  Large B fields can cause large 
changes in these orbital spin states.  If there are resonances between a 
nuclear orbital spin state of the coherent system and an electronic orbital 
spin state, it would seem possible that spin energy may be swapped, changing 
nuclear potential energy into PHONIC  energy of the crystalline coherent 
system.  
 
A variable B field induced by a variable ambient H magnetic field will create a 
universe of differing spin energy states each with a small difference in it 
angular momentum.  If total angular momentum can be conserved, IMHO A 
TRANSITION WILL OCCUR. 
 
It may be also possible that 

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Bob Higgins]

The 3 most common uses for bifilar wire are: 1) to wind a transformer with
a primary to secondary coupling constant that is very near 1.0 (maximum),
2) to use the wire as a foreshortened balanced transmission line, and 3) to
create an unbalanced pair of coupled transmission lines with very high
coupling factor.

In the case of 1), high primary-secondary coupling transformer, by bifilar
wire allows the turns to be wound in lock-step for both the primary and
secondary.  Bifilar is used for making a 1:1 transformer.  If you want 1:2
or 2:1 transformer, then use trifilar wire.

Cases 2) and 3) are RF uses.  In the case of 2), the closely spaced wires
form a near 50 ohm balanced transmission line depending on the gauge.  When
wound on a ferrite, the electric and magnetic fields only penetrate a
fraction of a millimeter into the core and the velocity and impedance of
the transmission line are altered by the relative dielectric constant and
relative permeability of the material.  In the case of 3), the use is to
make broadband coupled transmission line transformers.  You will typically
find 3) in the cable TV splitters.

It would seem that the only practical mode of use in a low frequency
circuit is for case 1) - a high coupling primary-secondary 1:1
transformer.  There is nothing about this that fundamentally is related to
magnetocaloric excitation.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Brian Ahern  wrote:

> I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about
> them. I provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge,
>
> Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy?
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil 
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
>
> From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to
> eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this
> coil be setup, as show in the diagram below?
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil
> Bifilar coil - Wikipedia 
> en.wikipedia.org
> A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely
> spaced, parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire
> which is made of two ...
>
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern  wrote:
>
>> Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. It
>> is difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect phonons
>> with magnons.
>>
>>
>> I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure
>> as a Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA.  I 1988 I was tasked
>> to understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered
>> that MIT Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier.
>> In fact, his 1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to
>> work on the cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983.
>>
>>
>> He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer
>> conditions are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is
>> coupled to vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and
>> magnetism exists under very specific orbital topologies.
>>
>>
>> So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be
>> coupled under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow
>> well ferromagnetism.  Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling
>> can lead to coherent behavior as well in  a ferromagnetic system.
>>
>>
>> More needs tobe said but there is some new physics at work in the Manelas
>> billet.
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* bobcook39...@gmail.com 
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 1:56 PM
>> *To:* Chris Zell; vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE
>>
>>
>> Chris-
>>
>>
>>
>> I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a
>> localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and
>> potential energy in a resonant stable dynamic state.  It is primarily
>> thought to be an electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in
>> the lattice—primarily the valence electrons.  The nuclei oscillate around
>> some mid position in the lattice and valence  electrons change their
>> orbital spin states reflecting the motion of the nuclei.
>>
>>
>>
>> Temperature of the crystal lattice is a measure of the amplitude of the
>> nuclei special displacement around their mid position in the lattice.  If
>> the crystal constitutes a coherent QM system, then all nuclei vibrate with
>> the same amplitude and the crystal is at a single temperature.  If the
>> amplitude (temperature) get to high, the crystal electronic bonds fail and
>> the order of the 

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

http://www.rexresearch.com/sweet3/sweet3.htm

In the last paragraph under section Magnet Material, the Sweet cookbook
states that the output coil was bifilar in order to keep the output current
induced by the billet from distorting the sensitive magnet activation
fields induced by the activation coil that was located around the edge of
the billet. The activation coil was positioned in an identical way as the
conditioning coil and produced a magnetic field with the same
characteristics as the field produced by the conditioning coil.

The purpose of the activation coil is to produce a magnetic field that
drove the billet into a magnetically blocked state when that coil was
energized. When the activation coil was deenergized, the billet again
became magnetic,

The magnetic field has a precise form that must not be changed by any other
source of magnetism. Such a source might be the output pickup coil. This is
why the output coil cannot generate any magnetic fields. Such a field would
scramble the character of the magnetic field of the activation coil. For
this reason, the output coil was constructed from  bifilar wire.



On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Bob Higgins 
wrote:

> The 3 most common uses for bifilar wire are: 1) to wind a transformer with
> a primary to secondary coupling constant that is very near 1.0 (maximum),
> 2) to use the wire as a foreshortened balanced transmission line, and 3) to
> create an unbalanced pair of coupled transmission lines with very high
> coupling factor.
>
> In the case of 1), high primary-secondary coupling transformer, by bifilar
> wire allows the turns to be wound in lock-step for both the primary and
> secondary.  Bifilar is used for making a 1:1 transformer.  If you want 1:2
> or 2:1 transformer, then use trifilar wire.
>
> Cases 2) and 3) are RF uses.  In the case of 2), the closely spaced wires
> form a near 50 ohm balanced transmission line depending on the gauge.  When
> wound on a ferrite, the electric and magnetic fields only penetrate a
> fraction of a millimeter into the core and the velocity and impedance of
> the transmission line are altered by the relative dielectric constant and
> relative permeability of the material.  In the case of 3), the use is to
> make broadband coupled transmission line transformers.  You will typically
> find 3) in the cable TV splitters.
>
> It would seem that the only practical mode of use in a low frequency
> circuit is for case 1) - a high coupling primary-secondary 1:1
> transformer.  There is nothing about this that fundamentally is related to
> magnetocaloric excitation.
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Brian Ahern  wrote:
>
>> I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about
>> them. I provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge,
>>
>> Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy?
>> --
>> *From:* Axil Axil 
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
>>
>> From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to
>> eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this
>> coil be setup, as show in the diagram below?
>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil
>> Bifilar coil - Wikipedia 
>> en.wikipedia.org
>> A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely
>> spaced, parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire
>> which is made of two ...
>>
>>
>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then.
>>> It is difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect
>>> phonons with magnons.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure
>>> as a Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA.  I 1988 I was tasked
>>> to understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered
>>> that MIT Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier.
>>> In fact, his 1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to
>>> work on the cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983.
>>>
>>>
>>> He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer
>>> conditions are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is
>>> coupled to vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and
>>> magnetism exists under very specific orbital topologies.
>>>
>>>
>>> So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be
>>> coupled under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow
>>> well ferromagnetism.  Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling
>>> can lead to coherent behavior as well in 

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Bob Higgins]

This is starting to sound more and more like a combination of magnetic
amplifier and magnet.  These would be combined in such a way as to have a
small magnetic field from a control coil switch a large magnetic flux from
one location in the billet to another location on the billet.  The control
winding is driven to switch the flux back and forth at a high rate.  The
switched flux is picked up in one or more coils and rectified to provide a
DC output.  The output energy needs to be more than the energy used in the
control circuit.  The key to this is to understand the operation of the
magnetic amplifiers and figure out how to design a magnetic amplifier that
can switch the flux of a permanent magnet.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> http://www.rexresearch.com/sweet3/sweet3.htm
>
> In the last paragraph under section Magnet Material, the Sweet cookbook
> states that the output coil was bifilar in order to keep the output current
> induced by the billet from distorting the sensitive magnet activation
> fields induced by the activation coil that was located around the edge of
> the billet. The activation coil was positioned in an identical way as the
> conditioning coil and produced a magnetic field with the same
> characteristics as the field produced by the conditioning coil.
>
> The purpose of the activation coil is to produce a magnetic field that
> drove the billet into a magnetically blocked state when that coil was
> energized. When the activation coil was deenergized, the billet again
> became magnetic,
>
> The magnetic field has a precise form that must not be changed by any
> other source of magnetism. Such a source might be the output pickup coil.
> This is why the output coil cannot generate any magnetic fields. Such a
> field would scramble the character of the magnetic field of the activation
> coil. For this reason, the output coil was constructed from  bifilar wire.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Bob Higgins 
> wrote:
>
>> The 3 most common uses for bifilar wire are: 1) to wind a transformer
>> with a primary to secondary coupling constant that is very near 1.0
>> (maximum), 2) to use the wire as a foreshortened balanced transmission
>> line, and 3) to create an unbalanced pair of coupled transmission lines
>> with very high coupling factor.
>>
>> In the case of 1), high primary-secondary coupling transformer, by
>> bifilar wire allows the turns to be wound in lock-step for both the primary
>> and secondary.  Bifilar is used for making a 1:1 transformer.  If you want
>> 1:2 or 2:1 transformer, then use trifilar wire.
>>
>> Cases 2) and 3) are RF uses.  In the case of 2), the closely spaced wires
>> form a near 50 ohm balanced transmission line depending on the gauge.  When
>> wound on a ferrite, the electric and magnetic fields only penetrate a
>> fraction of a millimeter into the core and the velocity and impedance of
>> the transmission line are altered by the relative dielectric constant and
>> relative permeability of the material.  In the case of 3), the use is to
>> make broadband coupled transmission line transformers.  You will typically
>> find 3) in the cable TV splitters.
>>
>> It would seem that the only practical mode of use in a low frequency
>> circuit is for case 1) - a high coupling primary-secondary 1:1
>> transformer.  There is nothing about this that fundamentally is related to
>> magnetocaloric excitation.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Brian Ahern  wrote:
>>
>>> I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about
>>> them. I provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge,
>>>
>>> Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy?
>>> --
>>> *From:* Axil Axil 
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM
>>> *To:* vortex-l
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
>>>
>>> From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to
>>> eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this
>>> coil be setup, as show in the diagram below?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil
>>> Bifilar coil - Wikipedia 
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely
>>> spaced, parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire
>>> which is made of two ...
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Ahern 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then.
 It is difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect
 phonons with magnons.


 I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my
 tenure as a Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA.  I 1988 I was
 

Re: [Vo]:Mayer, Mills and hopping neutrons

[Jones Beene]

bobcook39...@gmail.com wrote:


Jones—

You mention a dense hydrogen isomer. What do you mean?  Hydrogen metal 
with all nuclei having the same spin direction?  Are you suggesting a 
dense molecular hydrogen?




Bob,

Most of the main proponents of dense hydrogen have different viewpoints 
about the physical structure and the packing of multiple units, ranging 
from the most dense - probably Holmlid's conception up to the least 
dense, which is metallic hydrogen (not particularly dense - would float 
on water).


A cluster of dense atomic particles is technically not molecular. The 
binding of individual units would be stronger with increasing density 
(due to inverse square or inverse cube laws) - far more than van der 
Waal/s /forces. Local magnetism could be involved. If the accumulation 
of particles exists only in two dimensions, the cluster is generally 
denser than a globular cluster in 3-space, and limited to fewer units.


Mills has been intentionally vague about density, claiming "dark matter" 
of extreme density at times, and a dense gas at other times (but still a 
gas). For Mills any one of 136 different steps is possible and 
presumably all are different. But in the case of any charged particle, 
such as the tresino of Mayer or Mills' hydrino-hydride, clusters of many 
units of like-charge are forbidden by electrostatic considerations.


The reason Mayer has stuck a chord with many of us who have followed and 
realized the flaws of Mills' theory is that Mayer's conception falls 
between the extremes, and importantly - it embraces QM, rather than 
shuns it, which is a huge mistake of Mills.


And lest anyone be confused on the issue of attribution, Mayer and Mills 
introduced their original work at about the same time - circa 1990.

[Vo]:LENR over-replication?

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-02-2017-lenr-imitation-limitation.html

peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

The nature of the magnetic field that activates the output of the billet
must precisely match the magnetic field that conditioned the billet when
the billet was demagnetized. The difference between these two fields must
be in their power.

It orded that the billet not be damaged and made useless, the activation
field must not exceed a maximum power level. The power source that drives
the activation coil should be preset to not exceed that maximum activation
coil driving current value. It is important to verified that the power
level of the activation power source is fixed, If the frequency generator
that produces the activation current is not fixed, then an experimental
process must be instituted to make sure that the activation power feed does
not exceed the maximum activation driving current.

As a first step in the experimental process, please verify that the
activation driver current produced by the frequency generator is fixed in
such a way that neither the frequency characteristics nor the power level
can be changed and in fact has not been changed from when the system was
working.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> http://www.rexresearch.com/sweet3/sweet3.htm
>
> In the last paragraph under section Magnet Material, the Sweet cookbook
> states that the output coil was bifilar in order to keep the output current
> induced by the billet from distorting the sensitive magnet activation
> fields induced by the activation coil that was located around the edge of
> the billet. The activation coil was positioned in an identical way as the
> conditioning coil and produced a magnetic field with the same
> characteristics as the field produced by the conditioning coil.
>
> The purpose of the activation coil is to produce a magnetic field that
> drove the billet into a magnetically blocked state when that coil was
> energized. When the activation coil was deenergized, the billet again
> became magnetic,
>
> The magnetic field has a precise form that must not be changed by any
> other source of magnetism. Such a source might be the output pickup coil.
> This is why the output coil cannot generate any magnetic fields. Such a
> field would scramble the character of the magnetic field of the activation
> coil. For this reason, the output coil was constructed from  bifilar wire.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Bob Higgins 
> wrote:
>
>> The 3 most common uses for bifilar wire are: 1) to wind a transformer
>> with a primary to secondary coupling constant that is very near 1.0
>> (maximum), 2) to use the wire as a foreshortened balanced transmission
>> line, and 3) to create an unbalanced pair of coupled transmission lines
>> with very high coupling factor.
>>
>> In the case of 1), high primary-secondary coupling transformer, by
>> bifilar wire allows the turns to be wound in lock-step for both the primary
>> and secondary.  Bifilar is used for making a 1:1 transformer.  If you want
>> 1:2 or 2:1 transformer, then use trifilar wire.
>>
>> Cases 2) and 3) are RF uses.  In the case of 2), the closely spaced wires
>> form a near 50 ohm balanced transmission line depending on the gauge.  When
>> wound on a ferrite, the electric and magnetic fields only penetrate a
>> fraction of a millimeter into the core and the velocity and impedance of
>> the transmission line are altered by the relative dielectric constant and
>> relative permeability of the material.  In the case of 3), the use is to
>> make broadband coupled transmission line transformers.  You will typically
>> find 3) in the cable TV splitters.
>>
>> It would seem that the only practical mode of use in a low frequency
>> circuit is for case 1) - a high coupling primary-secondary 1:1
>> transformer.  There is nothing about this that fundamentally is related to
>> magnetocaloric excitation.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Brian Ahern  wrote:
>>
>>> I do not understand the bifilar circuit, but Manelas really cared about
>>> them. I provided $1500 worth of bifilar magnet wire at 20 and 22 gauge,
>>>
>>> Can anybody suggest the relation to either cooling or excess energy?
>>> --
>>> *From:* Axil Axil 
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:46 AM
>>> *To:* vortex-l
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
>>>
>>> From this VTA cookbook, the output coil was said to be a bifilar coil to
>>> eliminate any magnetic influence from the output current. How would this
>>> coil be setup, as show in the diagram below?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil
>>> Bifilar coil - Wikipedia 
>>> en.wikipedia.org
>>> A bifilar coil is an electromagnetic coil that contains two closely
>>> spaced, parallel windings. In engineering, the word bifilar describes wire
>>> which is made of two ...
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 

Re: [Vo]:Mayer, Mills and hopping neutrons

[Jones Beene]

Speaking of Randell Mills and Brilliant Light Power, he was in Fresno CA 
of all places, today and pushing the Sun-Cell to farmers... and he says 
it will be in production "next spring"... right


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guwylydr1h8=1

I hope so, but we are still waiting for the Capstone turbine 
implementation of the hydrino - after a similar promise a decade ago, 
with many more duds in between, including the gigawatts in New Mexico.


This is a bit more credible than the past failed promises, but do not 
hold your breath...

Re: [Vo]:Mayer, Mills and hopping neutrons

[mixent]

In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:34:28 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Consider the particle described as the tresino of Mayer or 
>hydrino-hydride of Mills, which has a negative charge and a tight 
>radius. The critical issue is precisely when the dense hydrogen atom 
>picks up and sheds the extra electron ... and/or is that electron a 
>k-shell electron of a host atom.
>
Mills Hydrinohydride formation from Hydrino yields at most 70 eV, so it wouldn't
be a candidate for stealing a K shell electron from Potassium.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

RE: [Vo]:Mayer, Mills and hopping neutrons

[bobcook39923]

Jones—

You mention a dense hydrogen isomer.  What do you mean?  Hydrogen metal with 
all nuclei having the same spin direction?  Are you suggesting   a dense 
molecular hydrogen?

BOB COOK

From: Jones Beene
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 12:35 PM
To: Vortex List
Subject: [Vo]:Mayer, Mills and hopping neutrons


Interesting factoids which link Mayer to Mills via the Compton wavelength and 
Rydberg energy and dark matter. Ref: "Electromagnetic Composites at the Compton 
Scale" Mayer and Reitz. This has not been mentioned before, as far as I know, 
but combining some numbers we see: 
136 * 27.2 eV = 3,699.2 eV (3.7 keV)
Contrast that with Meulenberg's
511 keV/137 = 3.7 keV 
I'll come back to these numbers at the end but first, can we bury the neutron? 
When one retreats to fundamental observations in Nickel-hydrogen thermal 
anomalies, going back 27 years, there is almost certainly no neutron 
involvement (either real, virtual, hopping, cold, or ultra low momentum)... 
since after very long overunity runs (over one year for Thermacore) there was 
zero neutron activation in the apparatus. 
Neutron activation is easy to detect, even if few neutrons are emitted; 
therefore, when there is absolutely no activation, why not acknowledge the fact 
and drop the notion like hot potash? If we begin with the premise of zero 
neutrons and no beta decay, an intriguing possibility for thermal gain from 
fast electrons is still justified... and yes, it still looks like beta decay to 
the observer, due to the fast electron. Plus, the weak force may be involved in 
a unique non-nuclear way as a continuum in an electroweak unified force range.

But here it is, a secret hidden in plain view - the k-shell... or more 
precisely, the k-shell meets dense hydrogen with a common denominator of 3.7 
keV.
If the gain in LENR can be shown to involve k-shell disruption of a reactant - 
either lattice metals or especially potassium, then we have crossed a 
significant conceptual hurdle. The reactant has a small repository for two fast 
orbital electrons, yet with no apparent way to dislodge them... until dense 
hydrogen comes along. And this makes the gain chemical in nature - not nuclear. 
This is desirable, even if we need to call it "supra-chemical" to distinguish 
it from valence chemistry. 
Recently, a strong and narrow radiation band of around 3.56 keV attracted 
unprecedented attention in the international astrophysics and particle physics 
communities (and Vortex). The dark matter identity is still not settled but 
potassium k-shell fluorescence is a candidate, as is dense hydrogen, new 
neutrinos and a few others. We have several threads in the archives discussing 
the connection to dense hydrogen to dark matter. Can 3.56 keV emission line be 
reconciled with 3.7 keV of Mayer? 
Maybe. Gravitational red-shift is possible. Anyway, according to Mayer, the 
electron is bound to the proton at 3.7 keV in a dense hydrogen isomer. He comes 
across this value differently from Mills. This energy value comes from Mayer's 
model of Schrodinger/Compton... and makes as much sense as Mills progressive 
drop since it fits the K-shell electrodynamics of transition metals such as 
nickel and palladium and especially - potassium k-shell fluorescence. We have a 
known 3.7 keV line which means the location of gain is the potash inner 
orbital, a detail that any medieval alchemist would have suspected.

Consider the particle described as the tresino of Mayer or hydrino-hydride of 
Mills, which has a negative charge and a tight radius. The critical issue is 
precisely when the dense hydrogen atom picks up and sheds the extra electron 
... and/or is that electron a k-shell electron of a host atom. 

In a metal lattice, dense hydrogen can approach a nucleus but cannot fuse. 
Instead it may encounter an electroweak force which otherwise promotes beta 
decay but in this case is attenuated but can break up dense hydrogen and 
accelerate an electron out as if there had been a beta decay. But in fact, 
there was no real beta decay and nothing changed drastically in the host 
nucleus itself.
This dense-hydrogen identity is becoming a tidy little package now, merging 
Meyer, Mills and Meulenberg at 3.7 keV. Of course, it could all be coincidental.