Re: [WSG] site feedback

2009-11-12 Thread Oliver Boermans
Hi Marvin

2009/11/12 Marvin Hunkin startrekc...@gmail.com:
 here'sthe current version and hopefully the final version.
 now from a accessibility view point, and a layout and content viewpoint.
 what do you think?

It has a plain and unsophisticated look but there’s a certain honesty
that comes with that may prove to be appropriate to the business of
selling fresh produce.

I believe the home page would benefit from a descriptive paragraph
which introduces the business and what Joe has to offer, This would
make the most sense near the top of the home page with the first
image. A summary of the content that appears on the history page would
be appropriate. I’d include a read more link to the history page at
the end of this text. Actually I would suggest you rename the history
page to 'About Joe’s'.

The banana icons used on the main navigation are too complex to be
used on every link. Their repetition draws attention away from the
links themselves rather than helping people visually distinguish
between them. If you are willing to do some additional work, I would
suggest you only place the icon in front of the link to the current
page. The best way to distinguish this link from the others is to not
have it linked at all. Instead of the [a] use a [span] or [strong] for
emphasis. This will also provide a usability improvement by preventing
the confusion that is created when one follows links to a page already
loaded.

Are the specials going to change? If so you’ll need to be careful to
prevent too much text being added to the description of each special.
This is a potential problem because you are setting the height of the
specials divs – additional content may be obscured if it doesn’t fit
in this height. If this content is going to be regularly changed ask
this list about alternative layout techniques you could use to avoid
this problem.

One more point regarding the navigation. Personally I don’t think it
is necessary to repeat the navigation at the top and bottom of the
page. The 'Top of page' link ought to be adequate for those looking
for the navigation in the footer. It would be better I think to split
the navigation into two sets to provide the most important links in
the site more emphasis. Very few visitors to the site will be looking
for Copyright or Credits information so take these out of the
navigation at the top of the page and put them in the footer.
Similarly, as Nathanael suggested, the links to other Fruit and Veg
sites is another candidate for the footer unless you really see this
being a core reason people will visit Joe’s web page.

I hope you find my criticisms constructive.
Ollie
@ollicle


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Kathleen R Dery

Hello,

I have a .box on my lists.  All of them have round corners except the  
one on feedback page.  I was able to get the corner on the bottom- 
right round last night at one point, but when I moused over it, it  
changed.  Not that corner is not round at all.  I am chasing errors,  
but have not found it yet.


Will someone help?

Thanks!!

Kathleen
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/feedback_6.html
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/main.css


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread purencool

It work fine in Firefox 3.5. It might be a browser quirk.

Kathleen R Dery wrote:

Hello,

I have a .box on my lists.  All of them have round corners except the 
one on feedback page.  I was able to get the corner on the 
bottom-right round last night at one point, but when I moused over it, 
it changed.  Not that corner is not round at all.  I am chasing 
errors, but have not found it yet.


Will someone help?

Thanks!!

Kathleen
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/feedback_6.html 


http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/main.css


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Weakley

Hi Katherine,

This is a case of the specificity, or the weight of one selector  
winning over another selector.


You initially apply a rule using this selector:
#navigation ul a { }

You then apply a new rule for the :hover pseudo-class, using this  
selector:

#navigation a:hover { }

The third rule you apply is aimed at the last link in your navigation,  
where the class of feedback is applied. This only takes place when  
you also have the id of feedback applied to the body element.

#feedback #navigation .feedback a { }

The first rule's selector has a weight of: 0-1-0-2 (no inline styles,  
one ID, no classes and two elements)
The second rule's selector has a weight of: 0-1-1-1 (no inline styles,  
one ID, one pseudo-class and one element)
The third rule's selector has a weight of: 0-2-1-1 (no inline styles,  
two IDs, one class and one element)


As you can see, this third rule has much more weight than the two  
rules above so it wins out - the :hover rule will not be applied in  
this case. There are a number of solutions, but the quickest is to  
write a new rule just for this case, making sure the selector is  
specific enough, and has enough weight:

#feedback #navigation .feedback a:hover { }

Does this all make sense?

I have a simple presentation about specificity and the cascade online  
here if it helps:

http://www.slideshare.net/maxdesign/css-cascade-1658158

Thanks
Russ


On 13/11/2009, at 4:29 AM, Kathleen R Dery wrote:


Hello,

I have a .box on my lists.  All of them have round corners except  
the one on feedback page.  I was able to get the corner on the  
bottom-right round last night at one point, but when I moused over  
it, it changed.  Not that corner is not round at all.  I am chasing  
errors, but have not found it yet.


Will someone help?

Thanks!!

Kathleen
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/feedback_6.html
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/main.css




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] .box in IE won't go away

2009-11-12 Thread Kathleen R Dery

Hello,

I am going to reframe my question for clarity:

There is a browser difference in rendering one of my round cornered  
boxes on the bottom of my feedback page.  In IE7 PC, it breaks up.   
The same box on other pages work fine.  Maybe there is an error in  
coding, but I am trying to remove it in IE only by using another  
stylesheet with a conditional comment on that page in question.


http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/feedback_6.html
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/main.css
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/ie.css

Regards,
Kathleen

I am using this code, but the box remains in IE7:

!--[if IE]
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=ie.css media=screen /
![endif]--

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Kathleen R Dery
Yes, I reframed the question again in the forum.  It only happens in  
IE.  I am trying to remove it in IE only with a conditional comment.   
Still it persists.  Thanks!

Kathleen


It work fine in Firefox 3.5. It might be a browser quirk.

Kathleen R Dery wrote:

Hello,

I have a .box on my lists.  All of them have round corners except  
the one on feedback page.  I was able to get the corner on the  
bottom-right round last night at one point, but when I moused over  
it, it changed.  Not that corner is not round at all.  I am chasing  
errors, but have not found it yet.


Will someone help?

Thanks!!

Kathleen
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/feedback_6.html
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/main.css


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Kathleen R Dery

Thanks Russ;

I have no problem with hover.  My nav and all other links hover fine.   
I am confused.  Does this affect my box?


I reframed my question to the forum.

Thanks for the feedback!  You are kind.

Kathleen
On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Russ Weakley wrote:


Hi Katherine,

This is a case of the specificity, or the weight of one selector  
winning over another selector.


You initially apply a rule using this selector:
#navigation ul a { }

You then apply a new rule for the :hover pseudo-class, using this  
selector:

#navigation a:hover { }

The third rule you apply is aimed at the last link in your  
navigation, where the class of feedback is applied. This only  
takes place when you also have the id of feedback applied to the  
body element.

#feedback #navigation .feedback a { }

The first rule's selector has a weight of: 0-1-0-2 (no inline  
styles, one ID, no classes and two elements)
The second rule's selector has a weight of: 0-1-1-1 (no inline  
styles, one ID, one pseudo-class and one element)
The third rule's selector has a weight of: 0-2-1-1 (no inline  
styles, two IDs, one class and one element)


As you can see, this third rule has much more weight than the two  
rules above so it wins out - the :hover rule will not be applied in  
this case. There are a number of solutions, but the quickest is to  
write a new rule just for this case, making sure the selector is  
specific enough, and has enough weight:

#feedback #navigation .feedback a:hover { }

Does this all make sense?

I have a simple presentation about specificity and the cascade  
online here if it helps:

http://www.slideshare.net/maxdesign/css-cascade-1658158

Thanks
Russ


On 13/11/2009, at 4:29 AM, Kathleen R Dery wrote:


Hello,

I have a .box on my lists.  All of them have round corners except  
the one on feedback page.  I was able to get the corner on the  
bottom-right round last night at one point, but when I moused over  
it, it changed.  Not that corner is not round at all.  I am chasing  
errors, but have not found it yet.


Will someone help?

Thanks!!

Kathleen
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/feedback_6.html
http://198.189.180.32/ma-ftp/media-arts/DMA_C111/dery/site/main.css




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Kepler Gelotte
 Will someone help?

I think the problem is related to the different default margin/padding
values that different browsers default to. Try replacing this in your css
file:

/* --larger flexible rounded corner box--- */


.box_two {
width: 400px;
background: #da9c73 url(bottom-left.gif) no-repeat left bottom;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_outer {
background: url(bottom-right.gif) no-repeat right bottom;
padding: 0 0 5% 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_inner {
background: url(top-left.gif) no-repeat left top;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_two ul {
background: url(top-right.gif) no-repeat right top;
padding: 5% 5% 0 5%;
margin: 0;
}


Best regards,

Kepler Gelotte
Neighbor Webmaster, Inc.
156 Normandy Dr., Piscataway, NJ 08854
www.neighborwebmaster.com
phone/fax: (732) 302-0904




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] Nathalie Lapierre is out of the office

2009-11-12 Thread Nathalie Lapierre

I will be out of the office starting  13/11/2009 and will not return until
16/11/2009.

If your request is urgent you can contact the Web Content Group No: on 8253
(2)0499. I will checking messages throughout the day.


Please consider our environment before printing this email.

WARNING - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in 
error, please delete and inform us by return email. Because emails and 
attachments may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other 
defects and may not be successfully replicated on other systems, you must be 
cautious. Westpac cannot guarantee that what you receive is what we sent. If 
you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email by Westpac, please 
contact us immediately.

It is also important to check for viruses and defects before opening or using 
attachments. Westpac's liability is limited to resupplying any affected 
attachments.

This email and its attachments are not intended to constitute any form of 
financial advice or recommendation of, or an offer to buy or offer to sell, any 
security or other financial product. We recommend that you seek your own 
independent legal or financial advice before proceeding with any investment 
decision.

Westpac Institutional Bank is a division of Westpac Banking Corporation, a 
company registered in New South Wales in Australia under the Corporations Act 
2001 (Cth). Westpac is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the 
Financial Services Authority and is registered at Cardiff in the United Kingdom 
as Branch No. BR 106. Westpac operates in the United States of America as a 
federally chartered branch, regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the 
Currency.

Westpac Banking Corporation ABN 33 007 457 141.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Henderson
Kathleen R Dery wrote:
 [...]
 I am puzzled because the boxes for the lists on other
 pages are fine with my CSS.  It is just the feedback page with the
 links, the bullets, and the external link icons.
 

This is a good example where using a *logical* debugging process can
help immensely, especially when working with CSS and potential browser
bugs, and even if you aren't a CSS expert. 

Based upon your statement above, have you confirmed that the feedback
page is in fact ok by removing all the aforementioned content to
confirm? Strip it back to the basic template with an empty content
column and only your list with the rounded corners and see what happens.
If everything is ok, then add the links, bullets etc back in one at a
time until you are able to re-create the problem. Once you know which
item is the offender, you can better deal with it.

FWIW I see the rounded corners just fine in FF 3.015 and FF 3.5.


HTH
Mark


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Kathleen R Dery
Thanks Kepler!  I do think it has to do with browser-specific margins  
and padding also.  However, when I tried your CSS, there were two  
problems:  The filenames for the box parts are supposed to have an  
underscore.  I fixed that after trying the code the first time.  The  
results from both times of trying the CSS you provided are a square- 
cornered box.  I am puzzled because the boxes for the lists on other  
pages are fine with my CSS.  It is just the feedback page with the  
links, the bullets, and the external link icons.


Thanks again!
On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Kepler Gelotte wrote:


Will someone help?


I think the problem is related to the different default margin/padding
values that different browsers default to. Try replacing this in  
your css

file:

/* --larger flexible rounded corner box--- */


.box_two {
   width: 400px;
   background: #da9c73 url(bottom-left.gif) no-repeat left bottom;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_outer {
   background: url(bottom-right.gif) no-repeat right bottom;
padding: 0 0 5% 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_inner {
   background: url(top-left.gif) no-repeat left top;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_two ul {
   background: url(top-right.gif) no-repeat right top;
padding: 5% 5% 0 5%;
margin: 0;
}


Best regards,

Kepler Gelotte
Neighbor Webmaster, Inc.
156 Normandy Dr., Piscataway, NJ 08854
www.neighborwebmaster.com
phone/fax: (732) 302-0904




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] Call for Papers: Round Table conference 2010, May 23-25, Auckland, New Zealand

2009-11-12 Thread Moira Clunie
The Round Table on Information Access for People with Print Disabilities
http://e-bility.com/roundtable  is a trans-Tasman organisation formed
in 1981 to facilitate collaboration between organisations and
individuals interested in information access issues. The Round Table
comprises over 30 organisation members in Australia and New Zealand,
including major accessible format producers, libraries, educators and
consumer groups.

One of the major activities of the Round Table is an annual conference
for information sharing and learning. For the first time in 2010, this
conference will be held in Auckland, New Zealand.

When: 23-25 May 2010

Where: Heritage Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand


Call for Papers


The full Call for Papers is now available on the conference blog at:
http://roundtable2010.wordpress.com/call-for-papers/

The theme for Round Table's Annual Conference in 2010 is Think Globally,
Act Locally. The conference will consider:

*   What are we achieving in the global context through
international groups like the International Council on English Braille
http://www.iceb.org/ , the DAISY Consortium http://daisy.org/ , the
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions
http://www.ifla.org/en/lpd and the Global Library initiative
http://www.daisy.org/projects/global-library/ ?
*   What local initiatives have been successful in our communities?
How can these be expanded to other regions?
*   What are the issues and opportunities for the print disability
community in a world where publishing is moving beyond print?
*   How are service organisations meeting the changing information
access needs of individuals and diverse communities?
*   How does access to information empower individuals to
participate in society? Where are the biggest gaps in information
access?

The theme will be explored through a mix of speakers, panel discussions
and workshops.


Be part of Round Table 2010


*   Sponsor part of the conference - email the Conference Convenor
at mclu...@rnzfb.org.nz for more information
*   Be part of the Trade Exhibit  - email the Conference Convenor at
mclu...@rnzfb.org.nz for more information
*   Attend conference as a delegate - join the Round Table mailing
list http://e-bility.com/roundtable/mailinglist.php  or keep an eye on
the conference blog http://roundtable2010.wordpress.com/  for more
information as it becomes available.

 

 

#
This email, including any attachments, is intended solely for the addressee(s).
It is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, 
you must not copy, disclose, distribute or otherwise use it or the information 
in it.  
Please notify the sender at once and delete it from your system immediately.  
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily 
represent those of the Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind.  The 
Foundation does not 
accept responsibility for any viruses or other malicious code that may be 
transmitted with this email.
#

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


Re: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Kathleen R Dery

Thanks, that is practical advise.  I will try it.

Kathleen
On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Mark Henderson wrote:


Kathleen R Dery wrote:
[...]

I am puzzled because the boxes for the lists on other
pages are fine with my CSS.  It is just the feedback page with the
links, the bullets, and the external link icons.



This is a good example where using a *logical* debugging process can
help immensely, especially when working with CSS and potential browser
bugs, and even if you aren't a CSS expert.

Based upon your statement above, have you confirmed that the feedback
page is in fact ok by removing all the aforementioned content to
confirm? Strip it back to the basic template with an empty content
column and only your list with the rounded corners and see what  
happens.

If everything is ok, then add the links, bullets etc back in one at a
time until you are able to re-create the problem. Once you know which
item is the offender, you can better deal with it.

FWIW I see the rounded corners just fine in FF 3.015 and FF 3.5.


HTH
Mark


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] .box breaks up on feedback page.

2009-11-12 Thread Kepler Gelotte
 The filenames for the box parts are supposed to have an underscore

Ah, sorry about that. I changed the filenames to test locally. You also need
to add 'images/' before the filename as in your original as well. So it
should be:


/* --larger flexible rounded corner box--- */


.box_two {
width: 400px;
background: #da9c73 url(images/bottom_left.gif) no-repeat left bottom;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_outer {
background: url(images/bottom_right.gif) no-repeat right bottom;
padding: 0 0 5% 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_inner {
background: url(images/top_left.gif) no-repeat left top;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

.box_two ul {
background: url(images/top_right.gif) no-repeat right top;
padding: 5% 5% 0 5%;
margin: 0;
}


Best regards,

Kepler Gelotte
Neighbor Webmaster, Inc.
156 Normandy Dr., Piscataway, NJ 08854
www.neighborwebmaster.com
phone/fax: (732) 302-0904





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] site feedback

2009-11-12 Thread Marvin Hunkin
hi.
does it look a lot better now.
take a look.
let me know.
if this site is basically finished.
cheers Marvin.





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***