RE: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-16 Thread ByteDreams
Perhaps designing for 480x640 then instead of 640x480...;) 


ByteDreams


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnyB
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 12:43 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

 we aren’t designing for 600 * 480 anymore!

Well, maybe we'll begin again shortly - new PDAs are comming to the market
with VGA (480x640) resolution... :P

--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com

Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-16 Thread JohnyB
Perhaps designing for 480x640 then instead of 640x480...;) 
:DD
Actually, noc necessarily - these VGA gadgets can operate in landscape 
mode...

--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-15 Thread Felix Miata
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
 
 Mani Sheriar wrote:
 
 Thanks, Charles!  Just to put in my two cents about the “wasted space”
 issue

 In general, I actually prefer fixed layouts to fluid.  I have a wide
 monitor and when divs take up all the available space on it they are
 often unwieldy to read, not to mention less attractive.

 I have 21 1600x1200 - full width certainly can be too wide to read,
 especially if the text is small. However fluid 75% I think is good.

Fixed width sites are an ugly PITA. Enter Keywords, WHO'S ONLINE 
LOGIN FORM look really stupid split to two lines:
http://calicovial.no-ip.com/mrmazda/lrhp2.png
-- 
The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing,
but to us who are being saved, it is the power of God.
1 Corinthians 1:18 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Timberlake
I like it.  It is nice, but I don't really like the colors.  Green
like that really just dosen't appeal to me.


On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:53:12 +1100, Jixor - Stephen I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Charles Martin wrote:
 
  Beautiful concept... I just would like to see the main column expand
  to the width of the available space... Have to do a lot of scrolling
  to reach the bottom... but just beautiful.
 
 Just to have a bit of a go at most Zen designs, maybe.
 
 It just wouldn't look as nice if it was wider, its a standard
 characteristic of the zen designs that they are very narrow. However I
 think in the case of the garden that is fine because its about showing
 off css, not usability.
 
 Zen is this rare case where the goal is to make it as pretty as possible
 with regard for usability fairly optional (I mean obviously you couldn't
 take it to the extreme. I just mean little things, like width, colour
 combinations, etc.)
 
 No offense intended.
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread Charles Martin
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
It just wouldn't look as nice if it was wider, its a standard 
characteristic of the zen designs that they are very narrow. However I 
think in the case of the garden that is fine because its about showing 
off css, not usability.
You're right. :)  Guess all the wasted space on the right side was 
bugging me, but you're right about its purpose to show off what you can 
do with CSS. :)

Just a personal preference, but it is awesome looking.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread JohnyB
Just a personal preference, but it is awesome looking.
Not only your personal preference...
As a showcase of some key features of CSS technology it's OK even if 
it's not so usable, not em-sized etc.

Actually I think the colors are great, I love this combination of this 
tint of green with that pink...

--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread David Laakso
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:34:18 -0600, Mani Sheriar [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

Hi All,
Take a gander at it here: http://www.manisheriar.com/zengarden2/
Mani Sheriar
Mani,
On a lighter note: I suppose if you were really twisted, and wanted to  
freak 'em out, you could make it ugly as sin, readable at 1280, scalable  
in IE, makin' sense in accessibility mode or with images and/or page  
colors disabled, and employing more of the available real estate, among  
other things...

~dL

--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread Mani Sheriar
Thanks, Charles!  Just to put in my two cents about the “wasted space”
issue …

In general, I actually prefer fixed layouts to fluid.  I have a wide
monitor and when divs take up all the available space on it they are
often unwieldy to read, not to mention less attractive.

The exception, I guess, is when there is a LOT of content, and it is
broken up into columns within the fluid div.  But, in general, I have to
resize my browser window because I prefer to read shorter lines and
scroll. (And I don’t like having to resize my browser window.)

Anyway, I’m sure we can’t satisfy everyone because we all have different
resolutions and screen sizes and preferences and whatnot.  Hey, at least
we aren’t designing for 600 * 480 anymore!



Jixor - Stephen I wrote:

It just wouldn't look as nice if it was wider, its a standard
characteristic of the zen designs that they are very narrow. However I
think in the case of the garden that is fine because its about showing
off css, not usability. 

You're right. :) Guess all the wasted space on the right side was
bugging me, but you're right about its purpose to show off what you can
do with CSS. :)
Just a personal preference, but it is awesome looking.


Mani Sheriar
Sheriar Designs | www.ManiSheriar.com
925|914.0741
 
 



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread JohnyB
we arent designing for 600 * 480 anymore!
Well, maybe we'll begin again shortly - new PDAs are comming to the 
market with VGA (480x640) resolution... :P

--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread pixeldiva
The design is lovely, but unfortunately, in ie5.5, your footer is
stuck to the left hand side of the screen, rather than where it should
be following on from the main column above.

pix
http://www.pixeldiva.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread Charles Martin
Mani Sheriar wrote:
In general, I actually prefer fixed layouts to fluid.  I have a wide
monitor and when divs take up all the available space on it they are
often unwieldy to read, not to mention less attractive.
 

Actually, I had forgotten about that, but you're right. I've seen it 
mentioned before that shorter lines are easier to read without losing 
your place. I guess it was that part of me that was rebelling because of 
the wasted space (for example. cnn.com where wasted space is unheard 
of). Just so used to seeing the page filled up that I forget it is more 
aesthetically pleasing to not have to take in a whole bunch of content.

Anyway, Im sure we cant satisfy everyone because we all have different
resolutions and screen sizes and preferences and whatnot.  Hey, at least
we arent designing for 600 * 480 anymore!
Can we get a huge AMEN on that?
_
Charles Martin
http://www.webcudgel.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread Jixor - Stephen I
Mani Sheriar wrote:
Thanks, Charles!  Just to put in my two cents about the wasted space
issue 
In general, I actually prefer fixed layouts to fluid.  I have a wide
monitor and when divs take up all the available space on it they are
often unwieldy to read, not to mention less attractive.
 

I have 21 1600x1200 - full width certainly can be too wide to read, 
especially if the text is small. However fluid 75% I think is good.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-13 Thread Mani Sheriar
Hi All,

I have made another CSS Zen Garden design ... after doing my first one I
just couldn't help myself - I was bit by the bug! (By the way, the
second time around was sooo much easier!)

Anyway, I was wondering if any of you might care to check it out and
offer me any feedback on the design, especially if there are any
problems on certain browsers. (But nice feedback about how much you like
it and how well it works is always welcomed too.) ;~)

Take a gander at it here: http://www.manisheriar.com/zengarden2/ 

Thanks a bunch!

Mani Sheriar
Sheriar Designs | http://www.ManiSheriar.com
925|914.0741
 
 



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-13 Thread Jixor - Stephen I
Mani Sheriar wrote:
Hi All,
I have made another CSS Zen Garden design ... after doing my first one I
just couldn't help myself - I was bit by the bug! (By the way, the
second time around was sooo much easier!)
Anyway, I was wondering if any of you might care to check it out and
offer me any feedback on the design, especially if there are any
problems on certain browsers. (But nice feedback about how much you like
it and how well it works is always welcomed too.) ;~)
Take a gander at it here: http://www.manisheriar.com/zengarden2/ 

Thanks a bunch!
Mani Sheriar
Sheriar Designs | http://www.ManiSheriar.com
925|914.0741
 

One suggestion would be to add space around the bottom of the main 
container to match the space at the top. Maybe even add another flower 
background image to the bottom or bottom corner? But these are just 
style suggestions, nothing technically (css/browser) wrong with the 
current design (that I can see).
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-13 Thread Charles Martin
Beautiful concept... I just would like to see the main column expand to 
the width of the available space... Have to do a lot of scrolling to 
reach the bottom... but just beautiful.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-13 Thread Jixor - Stephen I
Charles Martin wrote:
Beautiful concept... I just would like to see the main column expand 
to the width of the available space... Have to do a lot of scrolling 
to reach the bottom... but just beautiful.

Just to have a bit of a go at most Zen designs, maybe.
It just wouldn't look as nice if it was wider, its a standard 
characteristic of the zen designs that they are very narrow. However I 
think in the case of the garden that is fine because its about showing 
off css, not usability.

Zen is this rare case where the goal is to make it as pretty as possible 
with regard for usability fairly optional (I mean obviously you couldn't 
take it to the extreme. I just mean little things, like width, colour 
combinations, etc.)

No offense intended.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**