Re: [zfs-discuss] bug id 6343667
About a month ago (Jun 2008), I received information indicating that a putback fixing this problem was in the works and might appear as soon as b92. Apparently this estimate was overly optimistic; Does anyone know anything about progress on this issue or have a revised estimate for the putback? Thanks. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] bug id 6343667
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Robert Lawhead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About a month ago (Jun 2008), I received information indicating that a putback fixing this problem was in the works and might appear as soon as b92. Apparently this estimate was overly optimistic; Does anyone know anything about progress on this issue or have a revised estimate for the putback? Thanks. This page: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6343667 Says the putback will be in SNV 94 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] bug id 6343667
If it ever does get released I'd love to hear about it. That bug, and the fact it appears to have been outstanding for three years, was one of the major reasons behind us not purchasing a bunch of x4500's. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] bug id 6343667
FYI, we are literally just days from having this fixed. Matt: after putback you really should blog about this one -- both to let people know that this long-standing bug has been fixed, and to describe your approach to it. It's a surprisingly tricky and interesting problem. Jeff On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 01:20:11PM -0700, Ross wrote: If it ever does get released I'd love to hear about it. That bug, and the fact it appears to have been outstanding for three years, was one of the major reasons behind us not purchasing a bunch of x4500's. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] bug id 6343667
Hello zfs-discuss, Is anyone working on that bug? Any progress? It's really PITA on x4500 when one wants/needs snapshots regularry and resilvering of bad disks can take many days... -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] bug id 6343667
On Jan 26, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello zfs-discuss, Is anyone working on that bug? Any progress? For bug: 6343667 scrub/resilver has to start over when a snapshot is taken I believe that is on Matt and Mark's radar, and they have made some progress. eric ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
