Re: [zfs-discuss] data wanted: disk kstats

2007-01-29 Thread Richard Elling

Robert Milkowski wrote:

Hello Richard,

Friday, January 26, 2007, 11:36:07 PM, you wrote:

RE We've been talking a lot recently about failure rates and types of
RE failures.  As you may know, I do look at field data and generally don't
RE ask the group for more data.  But this time, for various reasons (I
RE might have found a bug or deficiency) I'm soliciting for more data at
RE large.

RE What I'd like to gather is the error rates per bytes transferred. This
RE data is collected in kstats, but is reset when you reboot.  One of the
RE features of my vast collection of field data is that it is often collected
RE rather soon after a reboot. Thus, there aren't very many bytes transferred
RE yet, and the corresponding error rates tend to be small (often 0).  A 
perfect
RE collection would be from a machine connected to lots of busy disks which
RE has been up for a very long time.

RE Can you help?  It is real simple.  Just email me the output of:

I've sent you off list.


Thanks.


Will those results (total statistics, not site specific) be publicly
provided by you (here?)?


Sure.
 -- richard


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] data wanted: disk kstats

2007-01-28 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Richard,

Friday, January 26, 2007, 11:36:07 PM, you wrote:

RE We've been talking a lot recently about failure rates and types of
RE failures.  As you may know, I do look at field data and generally don't
RE ask the group for more data.  But this time, for various reasons (I
RE might have found a bug or deficiency) I'm soliciting for more data at
RE large.

RE What I'd like to gather is the error rates per bytes transferred. This
RE data is collected in kstats, but is reset when you reboot.  One of the
RE features of my vast collection of field data is that it is often collected
RE rather soon after a reboot. Thus, there aren't very many bytes transferred
RE yet, and the corresponding error rates tend to be small (often 0).  A 
perfect
RE collection would be from a machine connected to lots of busy disks which
RE has been up for a very long time.

RE Can you help?  It is real simple.  Just email me the output of:

I've sent you off list.

Will those results (total statistics, not site specific) be publicly
provided by you (here?)?

-- 
Best regards,
 Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://milek.blogspot.com

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss