[zfs-discuss] different filesystem size after raidz creation

2007-06-14 Thread Ronny Kopischke
Hi,

after creation of a raidz2 pool with

# zpool create -f mypool raidz2 c1t1d0 c1t2d0 c1t3d0 c1t4d0 c1t5d0

the commands zpool list and df showing different sizes for the created fs

# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED   AVAILCAP  HEALTH ALTROOT
mypool  340G194K340G 0%  ONLINE -

# df -h
mypool 199G43K   199G 1%/mypool

What can explain this?


Thanks Ronny



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] different filesystem size after raidz creation

2007-06-14 Thread Eric Schrock
See:

6308817 discrepancy between zfs and zpool space accounting

- Eric

On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:22:35PM +0200, Ronny Kopischke wrote:
 Hi,
 
 after creation of a raidz2 pool with
 
 # zpool create -f mypool raidz2 c1t1d0 c1t2d0 c1t3d0 c1t4d0 c1t5d0
 
 the commands zpool list and df showing different sizes for the created fs
 
 # zpool list
 NAMESIZEUSED   AVAILCAP  HEALTH ALTROOT
 mypool  340G194K340G 0%  ONLINE -
 
 # df -h
 mypool 199G43K   199G 1%/mypool
 
 What can explain this?
 
 
 Thanks Ronny
 



 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


--
Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development   http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss