Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2010-09-07 Thread Alex Fler
check fler.us
Solaris 10 iSCSI Target for Vmware ESX
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-14 Thread Brandon High
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:36 PM, kristof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A colleague told me IET is not longer an ongoing project, so it's obsoleted.

The latest release in Sourceforge was Mar 17, 2008. I think IET is still alive.

  see http://scst.sourceforge.net/

iSCSI-SCST is a fork of the IET code to work with SCST. The SCST
project *claims* their code is better. I haven't used either, and it
may very well be a better solution, but I'd recommend testing both to
see.


-B

-- 
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The good is the enemy of the best. - Nietzsche
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-11 Thread kristof
A colleague told me IET is not longer an ongoing project, so it's obsoleted. 

There's another new linux iscsi target:

ISCSI-SCST is a forked (with all respects) version of IET with updates to work 
over SCST as well as with many improvements and bugfixes.

see http://scst.sourceforge.net/
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-10 Thread Henk Langeveld
kristof wrote:
 Some time ago I experienced the same issue.
 
 Only 1 target could be connected from an esx host. Others were shown as 
 alternative paths to that target.
 
 If I'm reminding correctly I thought I read on a forum it has something to do 
 with the disks serial number.

Steffen Plotner summarised this well in
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/60452

An optional VPD is exposed, and esx ignores
the 'blank' serial/no, intended to tell the
host that no s/n exists.

 VMware Communities  VMTN  Archives 
  VMware Infrastructure Archives 
  ESX Server 3.x Configuration Archives  Discussions
  Nov 1, 2006
 Why does vmware think that 2 different LUNs are actually the same
 disk? Simple, they both have the same serial number. I have
 researched the problem and found that the SCSI specification
 exposes VPD (vital product data). One of those VPD is 0x83 which is
 the unit identification which IET implements and the specification
 requires it. The other page is 0x80 which is the disk serial number
 page, the specification says that this is optional, and IET sends
 back 4 0x20 codes which are spaces, the spec clearly says that's
 the way to tell the initiator that there is no serial number.


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-10 Thread kristof
thanks for pointing me to that article.

I see there is a solution (patch) for ietd.

Is there any solution for zfs zvols ?

Is Sun plannig any action to solve this issue?

K
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-07 Thread Mertol Ozyoney
Hi All ;

 

We are running latest Solaris 10 a X4500 Thumper. We defined a test iSCSI
Lun. Out put below

 

Target: AkhanTemp/VM

iSCSI Name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:72406bf8-2f5f-635a-f64c-cb664935f3d1

Alias: AkhanTemp/VM

Connections: 0

ACL list:

TPGT list:

LUN information:

LUN: 0

GUID: 01144fa709302a0047fa50e6

VID: SUN

PID: SOLARIS

Type: disk

Size:  100G

Backing store: /dev/zvol/rdsk/AkhanTemp/VM

Status: online

 

We tried to access the LUN from a windows laptop, and it worked without any
problems. However VMWare ESX 3,2 Server is unable to access the LUN's. We
checked that the virtual interface can ping X4500. 

Sometimes it sees the Lun , but 200+ Lun's with the same proporties are
listed and we cant add them as storage. Then after a rescan they vanish.

 

Any help appraciated 

 

 

Mertol

 


 http://www.sun.com/ http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif

Mertol Ozyoney 
Storage Practice - Sales Manager

Sun Microsystems, TR
Istanbul TR
Phone +902123352200
Mobile +905339310752
Fax +90212335
Email  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

attachment: image001.gif___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-07 Thread Jim Dunham

Mertol Ozyoney wrote:



Hi All ;


There are a set of issues being looked at that prevent the VMWare ESX  
server from working with the Solaris iSCSI Target.


http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6597310

At this time there is no target date when this issues will be resolved.

Jim




We are running latest Solaris 10 a X4500 Thumper. We defined a test  
iSCSI Lun. Out put below


Target: AkhanTemp/VM
iSCSI Name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:72406bf8-2f5f-635a-f64c- 
cb664935f3d1

Alias: AkhanTemp/VM
Connections: 0
ACL list:
TPGT list:
LUN information:
LUN: 0
GUID: 01144fa709302a0047fa50e6
VID: SUN
PID: SOLARIS
Type: disk
Size:  100G
Backing store: /dev/zvol/rdsk/AkhanTemp/VM
Status: online

We tried to access the LUN from a windows laptop, and it worked  
without any problems. However VMWare ESX 3,2 Server is unable to  
access the LUN’s. We checked that the virtual interface can ping  
X4500.
Sometimes it sees the Lun , but 200+ Lun’s with the same proporties  
are listed and we cant add them as storage. Then after a rescan they  
vanish.


Any help appraciated


Mertol

image001.gif
Mertol Ozyoney
Storage Practice - Sales Manager

Sun Microsystems, TR
Istanbul TR
Phone +902123352200
Mobile +905339310752
Fax +90212335
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-07 Thread Mertol Ozyoney
Thanks James ;

 

The problem is nearly identical with mine. 

 

When we had 2 LUN's vmware tried to multipath over them . I think this is a
bug inside VMWare as it thinks that two LUN 0 are same. I think I can fool
it setting up targets with different LUN numbers. 

After I figured out this, I switched to a single LUN , cleaned a few things
and reinitialized . For some reason VM found 200+ LUN's again but all with
single active path. 

 

I  started formatting the first one. (100 GB) It's been going one for the
last 20 minutes. I hope it will ever finish. Zpool iostat shows small
activity over disk. 

 

I think that vmware 3,02 have a severe bug.  I will try to open a case at
vmware . But there seems to be a lot of people on the web who had no
problems with the exact same setup. 

 

Mertol

 

 

 


 http://www.sun.com/ http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif

Mertol Ozyoney 
Storage Practice - Sales Manager

Sun Microsystems, TR
Istanbul TR
Phone +902123352200
Mobile +905339310752
Fax +90212335
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 07 Nisan 2008 Pazartesi 20:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

 

Mertol Ozyoney wrote:

 





Hi All ;

 

There are a set of issues being looked at that prevent the VMWare ESX server
from working with the Solaris iSCSI Target.

 

 
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6597310

 

At this time there is no target date when this issues will be resolved.

 

Jim

 





 

We are running latest Solaris 10 a X4500 Thumper. We defined a test iSCSI
Lun. Out put below

 

Target: AkhanTemp/VM

iSCSI Name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:72406bf8-2f5f-635a-f64c-cb664935f3d1

Alias: AkhanTemp/VM

Connections: 0

ACL list:

TPGT list:

LUN information:

LUN: 0

GUID: 01144fa709302a0047fa50e6

VID: SUN

PID: SOLARIS

Type: disk

Size:  100G

Backing store: /dev/zvol/rdsk/AkhanTemp/VM

Status: online

 

We tried to access the LUN from a windows laptop, and it worked without any
problems. However VMWare ESX 3,2 Server is unable to access the LUN's. We
checked that the virtual interface can ping X4500.

Sometimes it sees the Lun , but 200+ Lun's with the same proporties are
listed and we cant add them as storage. Then after a rescan they vanish.

 

Any help appraciated

 

 

Mertol

 


 http://www.sun.com/ image001.gif

Mertol Ozyoney 
Storage Practice - Sales Manager

Sun Microsystems, TR
Istanbul TR
Phone +902123352200
Mobile +905339310752
Fax +90212335
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

 

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

 

attachment: image001.gif___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI targets mapped to a VMWare ESX server

2008-04-07 Thread kristof
Some time ago I experienced the same issue.

Only 1 target could be connected from an esx host. Others were shown as 
alternative paths to that target.

If I'm reminding correctly I thought I read on a forum it has something to do 
with the disks serial number. 

Normally every single (i)scsi disk is represented with a serial number, but 
when we create zvols on zfs  and share them via iscsi, there is no unique 
serial number. Somebody explained the ciscso unique initiator (built-in to esx) 
is using this serial to differentiate between multiple targets. But since the 
serial is empty  esx thinks all those targets are the same disk.

If it's true I don't understand why they use this serial, since the iqn is a 
unique name for a target.

Or shouldn't (open)solaris set a unique serial number for every zvol?

K
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss