Re: [zfs-discuss] How's zfs RAIDZ fualt-tolerant ???

2006-05-26 Thread David J. Orman
 RAID-Z is single-fault tolerant.  If if you take out two disks, 
 then you
 no longer have the required redundancy to maintain your data.  
 Build 42
 should contain double-parity RAID-Z, which will allow you to 
 sustain two
 simulataneous disk failures without dataloss.

I'm not sure if this has been mentioned elsewhere (I didn't see it..) but will 
this double parity be backported into Solaris 10 in time for making the U2 
release? This is a sorely needed piece of functionality for my deployment (and 
I'm sure many others.)

Thanks,
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] How's zfs RAIDZ fualt-tolerant ???

2006-05-26 Thread grant beattie
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:33:34AM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:

 RAID-Z is single-fault tolerant.  If if you take out two disks, then you
 no longer have the required redundancy to maintain your data.  Build 42
 should contain double-parity RAID-Z, which will allow you to sustain two
 simulataneous disk failures without dataloss.

Eric,

is raidz double parity optional or mandatory?

grant.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] How's zfs RAIDZ fualt-tolerant ???

2006-05-26 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:29:05AM +1000, grant beattie wrote:
 is raidz double parity optional or mandatory?

Backwards compatibility dictates that it will be optional.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss