2009/4/26 Roman V. Shaposhnik r...@sun.com:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 18:53 +0100, roger peppe wrote:
i wonder how many things would break if plan 9 moved to
a strictly name-based mapping for its mount table...
What exactly do you mean by *strictly* ?
i mean using pathnames rather
than using
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik r...@sun.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 12:54 +0100, maht wrote:
How difficult would it be to use rails or merb in plan9? Is it feasible?
Not Rails or merb or anything non Plan 9 but a few of us are building an
rc shell based system that
labels=$*
if(test $#labels -lt 1)
labels=(1 2 3 4)
rio.b -I -i'\
for(label in $labels)
window -miny 40 ''rio -i label ''$label
# give time to set all the labels
sleep 0.5
window -dy 39 ''winwatch -e
Hello,
Acme likes to place new windows itself. If you prefer to change the
layout of a window, you only need to drag the /layout box/ at the left
of the tag line and drop it somewhere else. The point where you drop it
selects the column where the window is to be placed now, as well as the
line
That's a lot of good actions attached to all the three buttons for
handling vertical layouts. How about adding similar actions to all the
three buttons for managing horizontal layouts to a column /layout box/.
good idea.
- erik
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 00:13 +0200, Uriel wrote:
My criticism was directed at how they are actually used in pretty much
every web 'framework' under the sun: with some hideously messy ORM
layer, they plug round Objects down the square db tables, and all of
it to write applications which
2009/4/27 Balwinder S Dheeman bsd.sans...@cto.homelinux.net:
That's a lot of good actions attached to all the three buttons for
handling vertical layouts. How about adding similar actions to all the
three buttons for managing horizontal layouts to a column /layout box/.
I had a patched
Seems logical, but I personally never felt a need for this.
To prevent line breaks I normally end up moving the windows to an
other, bigger column...
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Balwinder S Dheeman
bsd.sans...@cto.homelinux.net wrote:
Hello,
Acme likes to place new windows itself. If you
And as an added bonus... Erik will be in his time zone. So
if anyone wants to work out ride-share or car rental details
with him he won't (most likely) show up a day before.
have faith! i could also get the switch back to dst wrong.
- erik
P.S. So far it seems that werc wouldn't be able to manage
highly dynamic and volatile URI hierarchies as long as it
is run under anything but Plan9. Ironically it doesn't
seem to run there.
I use ~ patterns for URI matching on my site
http://ten.steponnopets.net/
it's a bit of a work
I use ~ patterns for URI matching on my site
what are ~ patterns?
- erik
Give or take that all the executables fail, I have enough MINGW
binutils from the NetBSD package to convince me that MINGW can be
built and no doubt some debugging will soon take care of the stumbling
blocks.
It is true that debugging is going to be hard without symbol
information (one
Test case:
draw a window... run rio
inside that thing draw another window and hide it.
now rezise the rio window.
now, the region where the window was seems to eat
mouse events, but the window is hidden.
Fix:
in rio.c:^resized, change this:
...
if(ishidden)
can anyone confirm this
yes. your patch properly resizes the hidden window
as well as fixing the bug.
and may make a patch?
i'll leave that up to you.
- erik
the p9p version of xcpu used to do something similar, but the old svn
repository is gone now so i can't verify. i see an old version of rx.c
in 9grid:/usr/andrey/src/xcpu/rx.c which does something similar to
what you want with threads, channels and procs but doesn't combine the
input.
it doesn't
before I write it.
I need a command that concentrates one socket to many (outbound) and
many to one (inbound)
But it needs to do a bit more.
On the inbound side, I need it to merge lines so that, e.g., a line from
11.1.1.1 and 11.1.1.2 if same, gets printed as
1-2: Mon may 8 2011
and if we
Hi all, Im new to the list. My interest in plan9 is to get it up and
running on some of my NeXT boxes(stations, non-turbo). Things are a
bit confusing for me when it comes to the current distro, but I do see
a howto for an older plan9 release. I also found this post in the
archives:
all that information is for the second edition. the third edition
involved a pretty substantial set of internal changes. things were
improved in almost every way, but one casualty was much of the
platform support in the cpu/terminal kernel. in particular, we don't
run on the NeXT boxes any more.
'kyle000' provokes an interesting question: what is the status of the 2e
registered licensees list I fuzzily remember?
I used to have the hard copy license from the back of the bubble envelope,
but it now lives in a galaxy far far away.
--lyndon
I happen to have the license in front of me, what do you want to know?
At 8:28 PM -0700 4/27/09, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
'kyle000' provokes an interesting question: what is the status of the 2e
registered licensees list I fuzzily remember?
I used to have the hard copy license from the back of
1) build mingw for plan9
Give or take that all the executables fail, I have enough MINGW
binutils from the NetBSD package to convince me that MINGW can be
built and no doubt some debugging will soon take care of the stumbling
blocks.
My apologies, this was meant to be private mail to
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote:
if you make clean
and then edit the top-level src/Makefrag file to add -m32
to the HOST_CFLAGS and then make 9vx/9vx
you are likely to get a working binary.
I'm just trying this now. I was missing stubs-32.h on FC9.
I had to do
I happen to have the license in front of me, what do you want to know?
I recall there was a registry of 2e license holders. For those of us
wanting to swap code restricted by the old Labs 2e license, it was the way
to determine if the proposed recipient was a valid license holder.
Again,
23 matches
Mail list logo
