I. Oppenheim writes:
| These two concepts seem to be mutually exclusive,
| so I wonder which of these two concepts should be
| endorsed by the standard?
|
| BarFly seems to follow concept 2. Are there any
| ABC applications that follow concept 1?
Well, I recently typed up a transcription of the
So the question seems to be---
When combining voices and part notation, should the
voices be contained in a part, in which case the
following notation is correct:
P:A
K:C
[V:A1] C G C
[V:A2] E B E
P:B
K:Am
[V:B1] A E A
[V:B2] C G C
Or should the parts be contained in a voice,
in which
What should be the meaning of the following fragment:
P:A
[V:V1] C G C
[V:V2] E B E
P:B
[V:V1] A E A
[V:V2] C G C
Or differently put:
How, according to you, should P: and V: interact?
In itself that doesn't say enough as there is no header given.
If there a line in the header saying
Irwin Oppenheim wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jack Campin wrote:
P:A
[V:V1] C G C
[V:V2] E B E
P:B
[V:V1] A E A
[V:V2] C G C
So, would it be correct to state that P: resets the
music generator when encountered in the tune body, and
that the above example should thus be equivalent to the
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jack Campin wrote:
P:A
[V:V1] C G C
[V:V2] E B E
P:B
[V:V1] A E A
[V:V2] C G C
So, would it be correct to state that P: resets the
music generator when encountered in the tune body, and
that the above example should thus be equivalent to the
following:
P:A
K:C
[V:A1] C
Issue up to discussion.
What should be the meaning of the following fragment:
P:A
[V:V1] C G C
[V:V2] E B E
P:B
[V:V1] A E A
[V:V2] C G C
Or differently put:
How, according to you, should P: and V: interact?
Groeten,
Irwin Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~*
Chazzanut Online:
% Variant I
P:A
K:C
[V:A1] C G C
[V:A2] E B E
P:B
K:Am
[V:B1] A E A
[V:B2] C G C
No - there's no need to rename the voices.
There is no need to change the voice IDs;
I was in fact wondering if it should be legal,
i.e. if the music generator should build a fresh
list of the voices at
[Irwin Oppenheim]
P:A
[V:V1] C G C
[V:V2] E B E
P:B
[V:V1] A E A
[V:V2] C G C
So, would it be correct to state that P: resets the music generator
when encountered in the tune body, and that the above example should
thus be equivalent to the following:
P:A
K:C
[V:A1] C G C
[V:A2] E B
