Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2002-01-08 Thread James Allwright
On Tue 08 Jan 2002 at 09:14AM -0500, Laura Conrad wrote: James == James Allwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: James Someone incorrectly writes: : James is adamant that abc2midi won't play a repeat unless there's : a balanced begin/end. James Damn! Take a

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread James Allwright
Someone incorrectly writes: : James is adamant that abc2midi won't play a repeat unless there's : a balanced begin/end. Damn! Take a day off work and someone decides to put nonsense words in your mouth! Just for the record, abc2midi does have code in there to guess the start of repeats

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread Laurie Griffiths
Message - From: Jack Campin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:58 AM Subject: Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats A somewhat trickier problem is that there's currently a fair amount of abc tunes that don't even use the initial repeat on second

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread jhoerr
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, James Allwright wrote: My point is that missing out a start repeat is bad notation; an anacrusis at the start of a piece generates ambiguity and I think you will be hard pressed to find a music textbook that legitimizes the process of missing off start repeats. From The

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-17 Thread Laurie Griffiths
Ah. I do apologise for maligning your software! L. - Original Message - From: Phil Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats Laurie Griffiths wrote: (I think there was (and may still

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread Jack Campin
A somewhat trickier problem is that there's currently a fair amount of abc tunes that don't even use the initial repeat on second and later sections. Some users seems to think that :| is a fine way to start a repeated section. This is also what many printed sources do, e.g.

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread Phil Taylor
Jack Campin wrote: Version 3 *should* produce an error warning, as there is an empty bar between lines 3 and 4; this is no different from writing the first two lines as Aee efg|edB dBG|Aee efg|edB A3 | |aaa gag|fgf eAA|Aee efg|edB A3:| which BarFly correctly flags as an attempt to write a

Re: [abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-16 Thread Laura Conrad
John == John Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John My conclusion is that there's no standard for this among printers, at John least in the British Isles and North America. The best advice for John anyone implementing an ABC player would be to expect all of these, John

[abcusers] Re: Initial repeats

2001-12-15 Thread John Chambers
David Barnert writes: | Laura Conrad wrote: | But it might not be a bad idea for printing programs to provide | an option to not print an initial |:. ... | | This certainly suggests that there is a compelling reason for abc | to require a |: at the beginning of a tune (if the first notes are |