John Chambers wrote:
I've been seriously tempted to take what I have and try
to merge it with abcm2ps. That would probably be the most powerful
abc formatter around, at least for a few weeks.
Add some abctab2ps code too, and you'd have the ultimate abc2ps clone.
...
This is more
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:20:12 +0200, Frank Nordberg wrote:
FN
FN Add some abctab2ps code too, and you'd have the ultimate abc2ps clone.
FN
In fact that would be perfect!
I would appreciate very much, if the abilities of abctab2ps and abcm2ps could be
merged.
Markus
To subscribe/unsubscribe,
Markus == Markus Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Markus On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:20:12 +0200, Frank Nordberg wrote:
FN
FN Add some abctab2ps code too, and you'd have the ultimate abc2ps clone.
FN
Markus In fact that would be perfect!
Markus I would appreciate very much,
Phil Taylor writes:
|
| True. An additional problem is one which you yourself pointed out
| recently: users often write abc which is intended to be read only by
| human readers. In other words they are treating abc as a natural
| language. In this context any variation on abc syntax is OK as
Steve Mansfield wrote:
| Can I just sincerely apologise to everyone on the list
|
| (especially rjp, who will probably kill me at band practise tomorrow)
|
| for accidentally restarting the V: wars again?
No, we won't forgive you! It's about time that someone made this
mistake. Maybe we
John Chambers wrote:
Bryan Creer hath writ:
| I can see that we're going to end up having to write smart software
| which can figure out the right answer from anything which looks like abc.
|
| Or, alternatively, we can all work to the same standard and save ourselves a
| lot of trouble.
Fat
Phil Taylor said -
The standard is abc v1.6. There's also a proposed draft
standard which is still under discussion. Neither of them even
mentions multivoice abc. Does that mean that nobody is allowed
to post tunes which use the V: field to this group, which is
devoted to the discussion of the
Thanks to everyone who give some good advices for
displaying multible voices on one staff. The command
%%staves 1 (2 3) worked well with abcm2ps.
I thought I could be good to propose new features in
the abc format, for example, in the brackets for the
chords [], we could have symbolised
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, John Chambers wrote:
Modern GUIs are very well designed, for people with three hands. The
real problem has been how slow customers have been to make necessary
hardware upgrades to meet the requirements of the software.
Quite ;-)
--
Richard Robinson
The whole plan
Phil Taylor said -
The tune will work with Muse and abcm2ps with a minimal
amount of editing (just insert a return after every V:n field).
Why should users have to do that? How are they going to know that's what
they have to do? They may not be on this list. They may never have heard of
Bryan Creer hath writ:
| I can see that we're going to end up having to write smart software
| which can figure out the right answer from anything which looks like abc.
|
| Or, alternatively, we can all work to the same standard and save ourselves a
| lot of trouble.
Fat chance. Even if we try
Phil Taylor wrote -
All extensions start out as program-specific.
Why? Why shouldn't they start out as proposals for discussion and feedback
from other developers and even users? That way the idea might be improved on
and clashes avoided and the resulting definition included in the standard
Bryan Creer wrote:
Phil Taylor wrote -
All extensions start out as program-specific.
Why? Why shouldn't they start out as proposals for discussion and feedback
from other developers and even users? That way the idea might be improved on
and clashes avoided and the resulting definition
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:05:40 +0100, Phil Taylor wrote:
PT
PT To be honest, I don't think there is really an abc-only solution
PT for this kind of thing.
Dear Phil,
look at
http://home.t-online.de/home/Markus_Lutz/Susato26.gif
Its made with abcm2ps without any further editing, after having
Markus Lutz wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:05:40 +0100, Phil Taylor wrote:
PT
PT To be honest, I don't think there is really an abc-only solution
PT for this kind of thing.
Dear Phil,
look at
http://home.t-online.de/home/Markus_Lutz/Susato26.gif
Its made with abcm2ps without any
Frank Nordberg wrote:
To sum it up, both BarFly and abcm2ps seem to handle this particular job
fairly well - slightly better than I had expected, but there are still a
few problems:
1. As far as I know both programs are single platform applications:
BarFly is Mac only, and from Jean-Francois'
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:04:29 +0100, Phil Taylor wrote:
PT Frank Nordberg wrote:
PT
PT 2. The two programs require different ABC extensions, so you'll have to
PT post two different versions of the file.
PT
PT Not necessarily. abcm2ps doesn't have the middle= directive, so the
PT tune has to be
Eric Forgeot wrote:
One example
X:21
T:Branle
R:Branle
C:Tielman Susato
Z:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M:6/8
L:1/8
Q:1/4=110
K:C
V:1
cde def | cde d3 :: ede cde | f2 e d3 :|]
V:2
%%MIDI transpose -12
[G2e2] [ce] [B2g2] [Af] | [A2e2][ce] [G3d3] ::
[C2c2] [Cc] [F2a2] [Eg] | [D2f2] [Cg] [B,3g3] :|]
V:3
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:41:53 +0200, Frank Nordberg wrote:
FN Hard to say. The problem of merging voices with different rhythms onto a
FN single staff is a rather complex one. Both BarFly and abcm2ps has
FN merge functions. BarFly's is far too simple for this particular
FN exmple, and I don't
Frank Nordberg wrote:
For those who isn't sure what this is about, I've uploaded a pdf with
something similar to what I think Eric is looking for at:
http://www.musicaviva.com/temp/de-madrigale-a1gtr.pdf
and a midi at:
http://www.musicaviva.com/temp/de-madrigale-a1gtr.mid
Here's the original
20 matches
Mail list logo
