Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-16 Thread Bernard Hill
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Bernard Hill writes: Surely a performer wants to know what the writer meant? And lack of repeat starts means there is no information as to how the tune was to be played, eg whether the whole tune repeated or just to the

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-14 Thread Bernard Hill
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jack Campin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Surely a performer wants to know what the writer meant? And lack of repeat starts means there is no information as to how the tune was to be played, eg whether the whole tune repeated or just to the previous double or repeat

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-14 Thread John Walsh
Bernard Hill writes: Surely a performer wants to know what the writer meant? And lack of repeat starts means there is no information as to how the tune was to be played, eg whether the whole tune repeated or just to the previous double or repeat bar. imo notation which is incorrect should

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-11 Thread Bernard Hill
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wil Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes The problem is, that although it's just bad abc is literally true, there are many cases where large bodies of tunes (order of a hundred in a single file) are written in this way. It comes down to why and how the tunes were

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-11 Thread Wil Macaulay
Bernard Hill wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wil Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes The problem is, that although "it's just bad abc" is literally true, there are many cases where large bodies of tunes (order of a hundred in a single file) are written in this way. It

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-11 Thread Bernard Hill
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wil Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Actually as a performer and software author who has an interest in old manuscripts, I want to see how the tune was notated, and then I'll make up my own mind want I mean when I play the tune. Lack of repeat starts means the

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-11 Thread Jack Campin
Surely a performer wants to know what the writer meant? And lack of repeat starts means there is no information as to how the tune was to be played, eg whether the whole tune repeated or just to the previous double or repeat bar. imo notation which is incorrect should be flagged by software

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-10 Thread Wil Macaulay
The problem is, that although it's just bad abc is literally true, there are many cases where large bodies of tunes (order of a hundred in a single file) are written in this way. It comes down to why and how the tunes were notated: sometimes you want to use 'bad' notation because that's the

Re: [abcusers] Re: End of 2nd time bar

2003-07-10 Thread I. Oppenheim
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Wil Macaulay wrote: If you want to notate a thousand tunes (cf O'Neill's or Henrik's collections) you probably aren't going to spend the time carefully adjusting note spacings on each one, We're dealing here not with detailed note spacings, but with essential structural