[abcusers] accidentals in ()

2000-10-08 Thread Atte André Jensen
Hi Often you see "reminder accidentals", that are actually not neccesary. Since I don't know the exact term in english I give a quice example: At some point you have a Db (the tune is in Eb) and in the next bar you have a D natural. But to make sure it's actually played "D" and not "Db" you put

Re: [abcusers] accidentals in ()

2000-10-08 Thread Laura Conrad
"Atte" == Jensen Atte writes: Atte Anyway; how do I get the brackets 'round the accidental in abc? We've discussed this; there's a similar problem in early music, where the notation didn't always include accidentals that "everybody" would know to play, and modern editors want to put them

Re: [abcusers] O'Neill errors

2000-10-08 Thread Frank Nordberg
John Henckel wrote: At 01:36 PM 10/7/2000 +0200, you wrote: To make matters worse, *no* ABC program seems to support nested slurs. Thinks like |(GA({c}B) AGF)| occurs fequently in 1001, and that isn't possible in ABC at all. abcm2ps seems to support it just fine. It is

[abcusers] abcm2ps-1.5.5

2000-10-08 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
Hello everybody, I'm glad to announce this new release of abcm2ps, which includes many bug fixes (thank you, Frank, your little 'Fuga in G mol' helped a lot). Aside from bugs, this version now offers a same voice to be printed on many staves. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha

[abcusers] Re: O'Neill errors

2000-10-08 Thread DavBarnert
Frank wrote: A problem with the O'Neill tunes is that many of them doesn't seem to have a clearly defined tonal centre at all. Surely, you don't mean to say that this is "[a] problem with the O'Neill tunes." The problem is that we are using a protocol that doesn't deal well with such tunes.