[abcusers] Progress towards a new abc standard

2001-11-27 Thread James Allwright
For those who have wondered what got discussed by the abc standards committee, here is a summary of our discussion. The section numbers referred to can be found at http://abc.sourceforge.net/standard-propose/ James Allwright This is a summary of the new features proposed in the new abc

Re: [abcusers] Arbitrary-text syntax versus arbitrary-text semantics

2001-11-27 Thread James Allwright
Reading this post gave me a sense of deja vu. On Fri 23 Nov 2001 at 07:53PM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote: One of the arguments I keep hearing against a free-text tempo header is that there are already many ways of placing arbitrary text into a tune -- usually using the guitar chord notation,

Re: [abcusers] something really simple

2001-11-27 Thread Laura Conrad
James == James Allwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [about global header fields] James This is not a widely implemented feature of the abc standard and I James would personally like it to become deprecated. My reasoning is that James if you have global fields, you can't treat a

Re: [abcusers] Arbitrary-text syntax versus arbitrary-text semantics

2001-11-27 Thread Christoph Dalitz
Buddha Buck wrote: Chord notation is not free text. It is a chord. There may be no restriction to the syntax of a chord to be presented, but semantically, it's a chord. It is essential that the guitar chord syntax is not restricted. Consider eg. figured bass, which is the Baroque

Re: [abcusers] Arbitrary-text syntax versus arbitrary-text semantics

2001-11-27 Thread James Allwright
On Tue 27 Nov 2001 at 06:33AM -0500, Laura Conrad wrote: James == James Allwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: James yaps supports ! ! for musical instructions which seems to be the closest James thing to a text tempo field and, yes, you can give it its own font. Can you change

Re: [abcusers] something really simple

2001-11-27 Thread John Chambers
James Allwright writes: | They're in the 1.6 standard for other header fields: | | : Most of | : the information fields are for use within a tune header but in | : addition some may be used in the tune body, or elsewhere in the | : tune file. Those which are allowed elsewhere can be

Re: [abcusers] Arbitrary-text syntax versus arbitrary-text semantics

2001-11-27 Thread John Chambers
James Allwrite wrights: | Reading this post gave me a sense of deja vu. ... | In practical terms, I think we are talking about having different fonts | for different things in a printing program. I also think we have to assume | that a player can use context i.e. infer a meaning from a word,

Re: [abcusers] Arbitrary-text syntax versus arbitrary-text semantics

2001-11-27 Thread John Chambers
Christoph Dalitz wrote: | Buddha Buck wrote: | | Chord notation is not free text. It is a chord. There may be no | restriction to the syntax of a chord to be presented, but semantically, | it's a chord. | | It is essential that the guitar chord syntax is not restricted. | | Consider eg.

[abcusers] a request to developers

2001-11-27 Thread Jack Campin
I am about to release a CD-ROM with a large number of very carefully edited and documented tunes linked off a hypertext commentary (see http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/embro/). This is the work which all the ABC on my website is spinoffs from. I would like to include a choice of ABC applications

Re: [abcusers] something really simple

2001-11-27 Thread Jack Campin
: Most of : the information fields are for use within a tune header but in : addition some may be used in the tune body, or elsewhere in the : tune file. This is not a widely implemented feature of the abc standard and I would personally like it to become deprecated. My reasoning is that

[abcusers] tempo miscellanea

2001-11-27 Thread Jack Campin
Chord notation is not free text. It is a chord. There may be no restriction to the syntax of a chord to be presented, but semantically, it's a chord. And for some playback programs (Muse is one, I think) chord semantics is both precisely defined and used by the interpreter; Laurie