I can't understand why I've read so many emails on this topic.
ABC quite clearly differentiates between slurs and ties (which
is more than stave notation does), but some player somewhere
interprets ^F-|F as (^F|=F). So? Mend the player. This is the
abcusers group, not the software developers'
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Phil Headford wrote:
I can't understand why I've read so many emails on this topic.
ABC quite clearly differentiates between slurs and ties (which
is more than stave notation does), but some player somewhere
interprets ^F-|F as (^F|=F). So?
The whole thing started with
In reply to the message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, we've got frequency and duration covered. Now all
that's missing is a way to express amplitude and timbre,
but since the ABC standard never really supported dynamics
or instrument definitions, I don't see that we need to go
that far.
Muse uses sound card to play ABC.
Has for ages. I'd be very surprised indeed if it's the only one. I have
always presumed that all of those player programs use the sound card.
Do you mean plays as wave sound rather than MIDI?
Laurie
- Original Message -
From: Phil Headford [EMAIL
Laurie == Laurie Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Laurie Muse is only £20 and does it in one, but are there not free ones?
abc2midi in combination with a MIDI player. I'm pretty sure there's
some kind of MIDI player that comes with Windows; I use the version of
Cakewalk that came with
--- Funzionario E.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as a last resort, you may consider writing your ABC source
code using abcpp #defines. As it happens, I wrote it to
circumvent abc2midi's idiosyncrasies.
This is what I would do:
It is a logical step, but IMHO it will lead to different versions
On Wed 06 Feb 2002 at 12:26PM +0100, Atte Andre Jensen wrote:
James Allwright, will you please reconsider changing the behavior of
abc2midi so that it interprets ^F-|F as ^F-|^F and not ^F|=F, since it's
widely agreed here on the list that that would be the prober way of
understanding
At 07:04 PM 2/1/2002 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can argue about ^F-|F till the cows come home. Jack Campin's proposal
for the Q: command seemed to reach some sort of satisfactory conclusion and
then vanished. John Chambers has proposed all sorts of interesting ideas.
Until you have
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, James Allwright wrote:
It would also be nice to find a written standard to support the
interpreation, since the only definition I can find says nothing about
ties and so implies that the accidental is necessary.
I just took a look at the draft standard, and it doesn't
Erik writes:
| --- Funzionario E.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| as a last resort, you may consider writing your ABC source
| code using abcpp #defines. As it happens, I wrote it to
| circumvent abc2midi's idiosyncrasies.
| This is what I would do:
|
| It is a logical step, but IMHO it will
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, [iso-8859-1] Erik Ronström wrote:
I think I'd get your point anyway.
I don't think you do get my point. It seems self-evident to me that ABC
is pseudo-staff notation. You have made it clear *that* you disagree, but
not *why*. Where else do you think ABC got the concepts
Bob Archer wrote:
| At 04:09 AM 2/6/2002 UTC, John Chambers wrote:
| What seems to have happened is more or less consistent with the past
| work on abc. The (semi-official) standards committee started with the
| idea that what it needed was a clear formulation of abc version 1.6
| as a
Laura Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
abc2midi in combination with a MIDI player. I'm pretty sure there's
some kind of MIDI player that comes with Windows; I use the version of
Cakewalk that came with my soundcard.
Yeah, Media Player (in its various flavours) comes with all versions of
At 12:52 PM 02-06-2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, [iso-8859-1] Erik Ronström wrote:
I think I'd get your point anyway.
I don't think you do get my point. It seems self-evident to me that ABC
is pseudo-staff notation. You have made it clear *that* you disagree,
One of those other Johns wrote:
| On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, James Allwright wrote:
|
| It would also be nice to find a written standard to support the
| interpreation, since the only definition I can find says nothing about
| ties and so implies that the accidental is necessary.
|
| I just took a
Atte wrote:
| On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, John Chambers wrote:
| | snip I'm not up to
| | date with the work on the standard, is there still a commission
| | working on what to include in the standard? I really think this work is
| | extremely important if abc is to have any future.
|
| What seems
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Buddha Buck wrote:
So you would agree with the following text
[snipped]
Yes.
See the section on beaming... Beaming is meaningless outside
of staff notation.
I disagree. Beaming is used in staff notation to indicate musical
rhythm. In the face of M:, beaming may
ÐÂÓ¯ÀûÕâÒ»¶ÎµÄ·¢Õ¹´ó¼ÒÓÐÄ¿¹²¶Ã£¬ÓÐЩ³ÉÔ±¿Ï¶¨»ñµÃÁ˲»·ÆµÄ»Ø±¨£¬µ«ÊÇÓÐЩ»¹ÊÇ
¿ÅÁ£ÎÞÊÕ£¬µ«ÊÇ»ñµÃÁ˲»·ÆµÄ»Ø±¨Ò²ºÃ£¬»¹ÊÇ¿ÅÁ£ÎÞÊÕÒ²ºÃ£¬ÏÖÔÚ²¢²»´ú±íÈκÎÈ˵Ä
³É¹¦¡£ÒòΪÓÐЩÈ˲¢Ã»ÓÐÕæÕýÀí½âÎÒÃÇÕâÌ×ϵͳµÄÔË×÷ʵÖÊËùÔÚ£¬Ò»¿é´ÅÌúµÄ´ÅÐÔÊÇ
18 matches
Mail list logo
