[abcusers] ABC 2.0 vs. ABCPlus 2.0

2004-03-11 Thread Tom Satter
to write a parser that is going to be obsolete before I even start. Is there a group concensus on this? Thanks, tom -- tom satter - or just plain old tom (303) 543-7623 (home) (303) 499-4100 (work) To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

[abcusers] ABC 2.0 spec questions/suggestions - voice overlay

2004-03-12 Thread Tom Satter
if there are more than three measures with voice overlays in one line. What do you all think? tom -- tom satter - or just plain old tom (303) 543-7623 (home) (303) 499-4100 (work) To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

[abcusers] ABC 2.0 spec questions/suggestions - line continuations

2004-03-12 Thread Tom Satter
lines to do it: I:implicit_line_breaks = no K:D [V:S] ccAb ccA2|fdab [V:A] ccAb ccA2|fdab K:G [V:S] xdE2|c4 c4 |! [V:A] xdE2|c4 c4 |! This would give you one line with two voices with a key change in the middle of the second measure. tom -- tom satter - or just plain old tom (303) 543

Re: [abcusers] ABC 2.0 spec questions/suggestions - line continuations

2004-03-15 Thread Tom Satter
ccA2|fdab [V:*] K:G [V:S] xdE2|c4 c4 |! [V:A] xdE2|c4 c4 |! which is explicit and less error-prone than having to repeat meter and key changes in every voice. tom Jean-Francois Moine said: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:02:21 -0700 (MST), Tom Satter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Doing

Re: [abcusers] ABC 2.0 spec questions/suggestions - voice overlay

2004-03-15 Thread Tom Satter
Jean-Francois Moine said: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:29:05 -0700 (MST), Tom Satter wrote: [snip] ( - start a voice overlay - reset time back to previous start point ) - end a voice overlay abcm2ps has '(..)', but there is a parsing problem on the closing parenthesis. Now, in the absolute

Re: [abcusers] Re: ABC 1.x continuations (was ABC 2.0 draft)

2004-03-15 Thread Tom Satter
, or flag them as parse errors or warnings? For simplicity, I'm leaning towards simply ignoring them. --Steve Bennett To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html -- tom satter - or just plain old tom (303) 543-7623 (home) To subscribe/unsubscribe, point

Re: [abcusers] ABCp proof of concept

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Satter
of the message removed to save space) Either way that we go, I would be happy to write the hooks to make the parser work with Python. tom -- tom satter - or just plain old tom (303) 543-7623 (home) To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

RE: [abcusers] ABCp proof of concept

2004-09-07 Thread Tom Satter
structures that I use. So far, I have been able to parse all of the ABC files in my small test suite (about 10 ABC files, including a couple of very large files). You can find the code as it stands right now at: http://www.purecode.com/~tsatter/python/ tom -- tom satter - or just plain old

Re: [abcusers] Overlay operator

2004-11-10 Thread Tom Satter
very difficult to read, and that's why I never used it. Regards. Hudson Lacerda P.S. In the file sample3.abc (from abcm2ps) there are some , but (using that program) they have the same effect of the simple . I cannot understand it neither. -- tom satter - or just plain old tom (303) 543

Re: [abcusers] how well supported is the overlay operator

2004-11-13 Thread Tom Satter
the () syntax but has not released a new 2.0 spec since the time that we had that discussion. tom -- tom satter - or just plain old tom (303) 543-7623 (home) To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html