Em 6 Dec 2004, Jack Campin escreveu:
The code:
(6abc``def
is (normally) interpreted as 6 notes in the time of 2 notes.
I know. It shouldn't be, that's nothing like normal musical practice.
Really, you are correct.
[snip]
Here are the results of my attempts to get round this. (It's
Hello.
The code:
(6abc``def
is (normally) interpreted as 6 notes in the time of 2 notes.
Try use a more precise syntax for tuplets, like:
(6:4abc``def
which stands for 6 notes in the time of 4 notes;
or the complete form:
(6:4:6abc``def
which stands for a proportion of 6 notes in
Do you use MS Windows, isn't it?
Look at:
http://www.xemacs.org/
http://www.xemacs.org/Download/index.html
(for XEmacs)
and
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ntemacs.html
(GNU Emacs).
Also get and read the emacs tutorials. The keystrokes are very different
from MS-Windows
Em 25 Oct 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
My program would reject (ignore) any part specification longer than one
letter.
Your proposal could lead to ambiguous part specifications, if one name
matched part of another name.
Remo's proposal avoids the ambiguity by distinguishing the
