Re: [abcusers] RE: ABC transcrivers ID

2001-09-03 Thread Simon Wascher
Hello, Richard Robinson wrote: (...) I dunno. Personally, since I need such a numbering scheme, I'm using a %%ID: line, on the grounds that it won't conflict with any accepted usages; and when I get that sorted out and it reaches my web-collection I'll use another such '%%' line for

Re: [abcusers] RE: ABC transcrivers ID

2001-09-03 Thread Anselm Lingnau
Simon Wascher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think its quite clear that it is impossible to enforce whatever numbering scheme to all abc format users, so the only question is if we can find a solution that is based on an agreement of a large number of abc collection owners (and programmers) an

[abcusers] RE: ABC transcrivers ID

2001-09-02 Thread Forgeot Eric
I remember fantasising, a couple of years ago, about a usenet-style network of intercommunicating, self-updating abc tune-servers. To avoid the necessity of having a grand guru or an Abc office center authorizing personnal identification number, I propose we could think of a logical code

Re: [abcusers] RE: ABC transcrivers ID

2001-09-02 Thread Richard Robinson
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, [iso-8859-1] Forgeot Eric wrote: I remember fantasising, a couple of years ago, about a usenet-style network of intercommunicating, self-updating abc tune-servers. To avoid the necessity of having a grand guru or an Abc office center authorizing personnal identification