Re: [abcusers] Re: abc's biggest problem

2002-05-02 Thread Jack Campin
This ugly mess is the best I can do in BarFly to get those chords to line up with four crotchets in another voice while retaining the semibreve: V:1 A C4 Amy4 | V:2 GyGy Gy2G| and every additional voice would require quadratically more y's to sort the misalignments out. An

Re: [abcusers] Re: abc's biggest problem

2002-05-02 Thread John Walsh
Jack Campin writes: [ the difficulties of using y to align staves ] In theory a TeX-based system ought to obviate this kind of problem, as TeX uses elastic boxes, ugliness scores and heuristics to optimize its layout, and if an abc-to-TeX translator left TeX enough options that

Re: [abcusers] Re: abc's biggest problem

2002-05-01 Thread Atte Andre Jensen
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Jack Campin wrote: I think abc's biggest shortcomming is the fundamental of only being able to put a chord where there is a melody-note. I consider this a major bummer, and guess everybody (except me) writes stuff like | A AmC4 | Not me, I write | C A- Cdim

[abcusers] Re: abc's biggest problem

2002-05-01 Thread Jack Campin
I think abc's biggest shortcomming is the fundamental of only being able to put a chord where there is a melody-note. I consider this a major bummer, and guess everybody (except me) writes stuff like | A AmC4 | if your software supports non-printing rests (BarFly, Skink) you can write |

Re: [abcusers] Re: abc's biggest problem

2002-05-01 Thread Phil Taylor
Jack Campin wrote: In Barfly, x doesn't print but does play, like a z. So that example is in 5/4 with a rest and chord change on the 5th beat. Neither does the same thing using the y non-printing non-playing space work. Try lining it up with a parallel voice containing four crotchets and see