Re: [abcusers] Ideas for microtonal music representation

2006-02-15 Thread Hudson Lacerda
Keenan Pepper escreveu: Is 'unsigned short int' your suggestion for ``NUM''? That sounds reasonable, but currently there are no restrictions on any of the number ranges. In the BNF specification (http://www.norbeck.nu/abc/bnf/abc20bnf.htm) they're all just 1*DIGIT, which means 1 or more

Re: [abcusers] Ideas for microtonal music representation

2006-02-14 Thread Philip Taylor
On 14 Feb 2006, at 04:00, Hudson Lacerda wrote: Philip Taylor escreveu: [...] For what it's worth, BarFly uses a single signed short to represent pitchbend, with a resolution of 1/256 semitone, and it's mapped log (if I understand that correctly). I mean: the linear mapping of integer

Re: [abcusers] Ideas for microtonal music representation

2006-02-14 Thread Keenan Pepper
On 2/14/06, Hudson Lacerda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Yep, I should be written that the *final* _quantised_ pitchbend is 1/4096 semitone resolution. Thus one can use (1 to 8192) / (1 to 8192) in 0-2 semitones range to access the full range step by step. Um, don't you mean (1 to 8192) /