Hi Guy,
took me a while to find the Article again, here it is:
312571 The Event Log Stops Logging Events Before Reaching the Maximum Log
Size
http://support.microsoft.com/?ln=enid=312571
It describes how you are able to configure a feature to automatically dump
the eventlog into a file if it
dear all, know this is real old hat' by now but just wanted to confirm issue of
permissioning for an ADMT migration of a small NT 4.0 account domain to a Windows 2000
domain.
a quoted requirement is that 'sourcedomain/domain admins' is added to
'targetdomain/administrators and vice-versa.
Hello,
I solved the problem by adding another DC on the network. And replicate with the master...
Thanks...
EstebanRobert Rutherford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dcdiag even :O)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert RutherfordSent: 23 August 2004
You are cordially invited to kiss my arse for using this forum as a political
soundboard. Duma-Nhieu
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MAI ANH TUAN
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 8:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
I SECOND THAT!!!
KEEP POLITICAL ISSUES OUT OF THE FORUM.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 13:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justice for Victims of Agent Orange
You are
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a Domain DFS root working between 2 Windows 2000
servers (Both Domain Controllers).
I proceeded as I usually do, but there is no way for this to replicate!
The event viewer is full of errors, such as this ones:
__
The File Replication
Ok, thanks guys. I had already unsubbed the offending email address shortly after his
post.
Please can we close this thread now.
-- Original Message --
From: George Arezina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:45
Christine
Most of the issues are covered in this KB:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q263532
Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Christine Easton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 07:37:28 -0400
I believe that I have read something like this before but
now that I need it, I cant find the answer.
I would like to be able to have a non-admin user with
permissions of nothing more than being able to add a computer to a domain. Is
this possible?
Thank you for your responses.
My bad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 7:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [LIST-OWNER] Justice.
Ok, thanks guys. I had already unsubbed the offending email address
Title: Message
Yes,
you can set permissions on individual accounts to permit only adding computers
to the domain. The way I've done it is to set the permissions on the OU
that will contain the computers. Open that OU's properties, go to the
Security tab, add the user's ID, then set the
Yep they need to have create object
rights for computer objects on whatever OU you want the machines placed.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004
8:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Joining
Computers
Is there a reason one shouldn't install service pack
2? I hear it messes up wireless network. Any truth to this?
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
Title: Message
Installing or not installing Windows XP Service Pack 2 is a matter of
personal choice at this time. Set up a test machine that you don't care
about formatting if needed, install Windows XP with SP2, and test your
applications, including wireless connectivity.
You
need to
Title: Message
It plays havoc with a number of main
stream applications so Id tread carefully: - http://www.desktoppipeline.com/29116549
It depends how big your user base is I
guess If you only have 20 or so users and a few apps then check them out
in a lab and then run with it if you
Does anyone know where I can get the adm to configure
the XP clients in active Directory?
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under
I am attempting to use RIS and am getting problem after
problem.
I posted a question about PXE and the NIC being used and was
informed that I would have to download and use RIS specific drivers for the
network card I am using.
Edwin, there are two different things you
have to do:
1)
you have to get the
drivers for the PXE boot, which you did, and
2)
you have to add the
drivers to the OS source. I see you have tried to do this, but sounds like its
still not finding them. It can be tricky getting them in the
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314479
heres a good article, it might fill
in what youre missing it discusses the $OEM$ path.
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP -
Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field
Platform Development
Applebee's International,
I am getting the
following error in Active Directory Replication Monitor:
Failure Code 8452Failure
ReasonThe naming context is in
the process of being removed or is not replicated from the specified
server.
Has anyone seen this.
Thanks for the help,
Raymond
Jette
Network
Title: site link costs and AD replication
Hi,
I'm bit curious about the following: what happens is a SUBSITE has a site link with HUBSITE1 and the same SUBSITE has also a site link with HUBSITE2. Both site links have the same schedules/interval/cost
Is the replication load "equally" devided
Jorge
We have seen the KCC on my DC in the Subsite will choose the best link at
that time, and will continue to use that site until the KCC runs again.
All traffic will replicate with the available DC in the Hubsite - whether
the server chooses hubsite1 or hubsite2. In our case we are doing
Title: Message
I've
seen that once before. In my case it was a DNS problem. Our child domain DCs are
DNS secondaries for our root domain. One child DC's DNS was not pulling the
parent zone.
Look
for event log errors saying that a certain DC was not resolvable in
DNS.
-Original
Hey Kevin - good to "read you" ;-)
just want to add, that you, Edwin, need to differentiate
where you want your non-admin user to place the computer account. The
method given by Kevin is only applicable to add computers to the default
computers container in the domain. Unless you're running
The File Replication Service cannot replicate f:\users because it
overlaps
the replicating directory f:\users.
are you trying to use a LOCAL drive as a link target in DFS and then
replicate data from this to a local drive on some other server (via
FRS)?
you should always use UNC path's for
actually, it all depends on how you run ADMT.
Often you'd want to split the requirements between user/group migration
and computer migration.
The rules for migrating users and groups are:
1. for the PES (Password export server) to work, the account used to
migrate the users must be a member of
Thanks !
This is exactly what I needed.
And if anyone is interested, here is an ADM I wrote to deploy the settings (works the same on W2K3):
(might wrap)
### Cut here
#if version = 3
CLASS MACHINE
CATEGORY !!System
CATEGORY !!EventViewer
#if version = 4
I just have a quick licensing question for SQL, SQL's per seat licensing
is for concurrent connection right?
Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
212.752.7300 - office
917.455.0110 - cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List info :
Hi,
In te DFS admin tool, I entered both UNC paths \\server1\users and
\\server2\users, wich are the shares of the 2 directories I want to
replicate, so I don't understand why that error...
Yours,
Filipe Joel de Almeida
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Just the opposite is true! Per-Server licensing would be where you tie a certain
number of CALs to the server and that many users/devices can connect to just that
server at any given time. These CALs cannot be assigned to any other SQL server while
they are tied to the original SQL server.
In
I know... should be renewed after 10 hours if I remember correctly.
It is a remote site I'll be visiting next week and will give a good look
at the logs when it happens.
When I actually think of it, logging in with cached creds does not use
Kerberos provider, so the user should not have any
So if I had a SQL Server, just one, and had 50 USER Cals with 200 users
but no more then 25 or 30 of the 200 users would be accessing the server
at any given time, then this would okay?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Salisbury
Sent:
for SID-History to work, the account used to migrate must be a member
of the domain admins group on the TARGET domain
Addition: on W2003 you have the extended right Migrate-Sid-History which
you can use to delegate the SidHistory permissions to a lower level Admin.
I've done this with limited
Hello all,
We are gearing up for a move of one of our remote sites.
This site contains one DC and one GC, and will be down for around two days.
What is the "Best Practice" procedure to handle replication issues
for a scheduled outage of 1-2 days?
Thanks in advance,
Jerry Fessenden
NO.
SQL does not support concurrent use licensing. It is per-seat licensing
or per-processor licensing.
You should read the link that Jeff provided.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:52
I looked over that link already. If I buy 50 PER USER Cals for 200
users to use then only a max of 50 at any given time can connect to SQL.
When they disconnect from SQL, they don't hold onto the license do they?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
That would allow up to 50 users to connect at any given time assuming that:
- You assign those 50 user CALs to the server
- You selected the per-Server license mode during the installation and specified 50
connections
If you get a second server, you would need to purchase more CALs or remove
Hi,
I know that there are some Perl gurus on this list,
one of whos name starts with a j and ends in oe
so I thought Id ask a tricky question.
Im writing a Perl script to monitor my replication
topology. One of the things I need to accomplish is to read the attribute
Yes, they do.
Any user that might ever access the SQL server needs a CAL (unless you
have a per-processor license).
If you have 200 users, you need 200 CALs. A per-processor license would
be cheaper.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I think that per-server licensing mode is gone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Salisbury
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:14 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question
That would allow up to 50
Not really. I had someone get a quote of SQL 2000 at a per processor
and it was $20K. A server license and 200 CALS would be cheaper.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL
Last time I installed SQL 2000 there was only an option for per seat or
per server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing
good point - but realize that it's somewhat of a risky business to grant
lower level admins the permissions to migrate-sid-history. Although I
agree with 2003 you at least have this option.
/Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Willem
That's enterprise edition. :-)
Standard edition is $5,000.
According to http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/faq.asp
The cutover point for enterprise edition is 80 CALs, for standard
edition it is 24 CALs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Take a look at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/sqlserverlicensing.asp, as well as
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/faq.asp
Per server is gone. It's per processor or per seat (user or device).
I'm not talking about the installation options (they may not have been
updated since SQL
My bad. Michael is correct. From the SQL Server 2000 Licensing FAQ
(http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/faq.asp):
Q. Do you still offer per-server (concurrency) CALs?
A. No. SQL Server 2000 is only available by means of a Server plus device CAL, Server
plus user CAL, or a Processor license.
True. Case in point: a large migration that is partially granted to an
external party. With this delegation we do not have to give them DA
permissions.
--
Regards, Willem
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier, Guido
Sent:
use strict;
use Win32::OLE;
use Data::Dumper;
my $strDcRDN = cn=nts0;
my $strSiteRDN = cn=Jasper-North;
my $objRootDSE = Win32::OLE-GetObject(LDAP://RootDSE;);
my $strConfigurationNC = $objRootDSE-Get(configurationNamingContext);
my $strNtdsSettingsPath = LDAP://cn=NTDS Settings, $strDcRDN,
No the drive F:\users is the local drive of that server that is shared as
\\server1\users.
If on the admin tool appears \\server1\users, how can I check and correct
the metadata?
I already tried to delete and re-create the DFS a dozen times, but didn't
work...
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] File Replication Services
document
:
Are they both using the same share name?
-Original Message-
From: Grillenmeier, Guido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] File Replication Services
did you previously mount that share as network drive F: ?
Brilliant! Obvious in hindsight. Thanks a lot.
--
Regards, Willem
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 9:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] read mS-DS-ReplicatesNCReason with
On the server1 the directory f:\users is shared as users, and in the
server2, the directory c:\users is shared as users...
The server where the error appears about f:\users, is the server that has
that directory
Filipe Joel de Almeida
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I am new to the list. We have a small company with less than 50 PCs and
about 5 servers. We currently have an NT 4.0 domain and will be rolling
out several new Windows 2003 servers and plan to migrate to an Active
Directory setup. I am looking for recommendations on the best books
Robbie Allen's Cookbook is a great starter. Some of the options are listed
here:
http://www.activedir.org/books.htm
Tony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bachelder
Sent: Dienstag, 24. August 2004 22:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm in a similiar environment. I used chapter 9 and 10 of the domain
migration cookbook. My Windows Server 2003 boxes were new hardware so I was
able to do everything during business hours. Mark Minasi's book is also a
pretty good resource.
Hey Tony,
Thanks very much. I looked at Robbie Allen's Cookbook at the book store
and it looked a bit deep or advanced for what I was looking for as a first
AD book. It was more of a specific steps rather than an overview or an
implementation guide.
Any other ones you might recommend first?
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the recommendation.
A lot of the info I found was for in place upgrades and like you we are
migrating to new machines so this looks like an excellent resource.
Thank you again,
Kevin
At 04:17 PM 8/24/2004, you wrote:
I'm in a similiar environment. I used chapter 9 and 10 of
Robert,
When I was looking at one of the chapters there was an ad in the margin for
a whole series of upcoming AD webcasts from Microsoft! Perfect
timing! Thanks again.
http://www.microsoft.com/seminar/events/series/adaug.mspx
Kevin
At 04:45 PM 8/24/2004, you wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the
Thanks
From: MAI ANH TUAN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Justice for Victims of Agent Orange
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 07:34:34 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mail.activedir.org ([64.245.160.7]) by
This goes without saying, but do this procedure in a test environment a
couple of times to figure out all the little quirks. Hopefully you will also
be able to migrate all your users without working any ot.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Do nothing. Unless you've been farking around with the domain tombstone lifetime, you
should start worrying in a couple months if you haven't reconnected by then.
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Fessenden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 8/24/2004
Yes they do. Every user who connects to SQL must have a CAL, regardless of whether or
not they're connected:
You have five users:
Bill
Bob
Mary
Jane
Sue
You own three user cals and one sequel box:
Your five users connect in this order:
Mary
Sue
Bob
Jane
Bill
The first three are
Might want to look at SBS for this, though with multiple servers it may or maynot be
appropriate.
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Bachelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 8/24/2004 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 05:22:51PM -0400, Edwin wrote:
Can anyone provide me with good documentation on RIS and software deployment
through GPO?
We currently use MS ADS and I don't like it and I believe it to be the cause
of problems. Aside from that, I think that I can benefit more
Just noticed that you've got conflicting lines in your config.
you have
OEMPreinstall = no
near the beginning and then
OEMPreinstall = yes
near the end. That might be part of the driver issue.
Roger
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:36:05AM -0400, Edwin wrote:
I am attempting to use RIS and am
66 matches
Mail list logo
