Can a man not attend an E12 training course without the list descending into
chaos the moment he leaves :-)
When I saw the post from Robert Lundh my initial thought was that I would have
preferred it if he had checked with me first. Generally however I was ok with
it because he was posting
Maybe it's just me but what does ADC mean below? I always thought it
meant 'AD connector' [exchange component].
Does it simply mean 'another DC' ?
If so, check that all subnets are assigned with the correct site and
that DCs are found in the correct sites.
ADUC can take some time to open if
Title: Monitoring for lingering objects
Scenario:
W2k3 forest in w2k3 FFL
Strict replication consistency enabled
Let's assume that a lingering object manifests itself via some method
I know how to reduce the impact of the lingering object
I know how to remove lingering objects
Neil,
Is this covered by eventId 1988?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:55:09
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Monitoring for lingering objects
Scenario:
W2k3 forest in w2k3 FFL
Strict replication consistency enabled
Yeah - just found it minutes after posting :)
Event 1388 for loose and 1988 for strict consistency checking.
Thanks Mark and sorry for posting a lame question :)
neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
Sent: 28 April 2006 10:26
On 4/27/06, Thommes, Michael M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried IPV6 yet? Production? Or just testbed? Any gotchas?
What kind of infrastructure (eg, switches) is needed to support it? How
does AD play in this sandbox?
On a similar note - is anyone here using 'jumbo' frames on
Mike:
My understanding is that AD does not and will not support IPv6 until
the Longhorn server release. In addition, the MS IPv6 stack does not
support all features of IPv6 at this time. For example, it only
supports AH IPSec packets and not ESP IPSec packets.
- John Boling
On 4/27/06, Thommes,
Odd. I may have been afflicted with the Joe email malady. I'll have
to investigate
Is everyone seeing the same thing? Please drop a note off-line if you
can read this on the list and it's blank ;)
On 4/27/06, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al, what did you do? All of your posts are no
When I try to enabel trusted for
delegationoption for an account I have created, I recieve this
error.
Your security settings
do not allow you to specify whether or not this account is to
be trusted for delegation
What can I do to solve this?
Adriao Ramos
Mylo,
Thanks for the information!
I have setup ADAM utilizing a custom web UI utilizing AZman for a small project before, but I have concerns about scalabilty. The issues are not with the ADAM instance at all, but the UI that is needed to manage ADAM. ADSIedit is great for someone who
Yes. I loaded it two nights ago. Pretty cool. First build Ive
found comfortable to use (old POS box no aero).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 12:44 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE:
That’s a very good point. Does anyone
know of any 3rd parties which improve the ADAM administrative UI “experience”?
J. Fitzgerald (Fitz)
Stewart
Systems Architect
IRM/OPS/ENM
Worldwide Information
Network Systems
USAID/DoS IT
Infrastructure Collaboration Program
[EMAIL
Gil,
I hear that all the time, plus Hey Rocky, where's Bullwinkle? Hee hee hee.
Anyway, for people like me who couldn't see Dean and joe and all the rest of
youse guys even if I had the Hubble telescope, because you're so far out
there, and who go to bed each night praying, Dear God, thank
Gil,
I hear that all the time, plus Hey Rocky, where's Bullwinkle? Hee hee hee.
Anyway, for people like me who couldn't see Dean and joe and all the rest of
youse guys even if I had the Hubble telescope, because you're so far out
there, and who go to bed each night praying, Dear God, thank
Since it is "LDAP" I did look at some "friendlier" admin tools, but none really hit the mark for me. I believed that group looked at Softerra's tool, and there is the web based PHP LDAP manager, and also the C# LDAP manager tool. You can Live search the names or I can post the links here if you
Hi guys,
A environment: up 600 sites
the links: 128 kbps (64 is reserved for a QoS for one service)
datacenter link: 4mb
Each site have 5 up to 8 computers (all computers are stand alone and
workstations)
all sites have comunication with de datacenter (VPN)
In this scenario, how can I deploy a
Title: Message
I doubt a root domain would represent 'harm' in your terms,
but then again, harm may mean different things to different
people.
From anarchitectural stance, harm means a whole lot
more.What about added admin overhead; additional hardware costs, support
and maintenance;
Can someone please tell me where I can find the Default
Query Policy that you can place on to NTDS Connections within sites? I wanted
to find out what that does. Thanks
Justin A. Salandra
MCSE Windows 2000 2003
Network and Technology Services Manager
Catholic Healthcare System
Will Technet Subcribers get this copy like
we did with build 5231 and 5308?
Does 5308 have it in it?
Justin A. Salandra
MCSE Windows 2000 2003
Network and Technology Services Manager
Catholic Healthcare System
646.505.3681 - office
917.455.0110 - cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suspect you'll want to talk with the Tivoli reps to see what they
can do for you. As for management of the identities and third
parties, I suspect that a roll-your-own approach is just as good as
anything until you have more requirements. There are a ton of vendors
that can help with that -
Neil,
In some ways they may be even more harmful. Network outages have their own fixes, hardware failures have replacements, deleted data (should) have backups.
Solutions for bad process and policy due to architecture decisions? Not as cut and dry, and could be most costly in the long run as
If I recall from a drunken conversation at DEC with Dean it is accessable
using Adsiedit and it is parameters control how many records are searched in
AD, the ones you don't touch. I think if it is not set, it uses it anyway.
I will go away and quantify my statements though.
Mark
You mean this one
adfind -config -f name="default query
policy"
See Slide 58 of the Dean and joe show PPT located at http://www.jadonex.comfor a little more
info.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
If the machines are standalone then AD is pretty much out of the picture for
managing them...
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myke
Sent: Friday, April
I concur, it is very much improved even over 5342. Loaded
considerably faster, runs smoother, just gorgeous with glass. eg...
though I would really like to have glass windows as well as glass borders. Only
place I know you can't get glass windows. :) Actually I want glass windows
and also
Joe - I sent you an
e-mail, I figured maybe going to this list might get more input on this question
as well:
If I wanted to run an oldcmp -report 120 -users -sort cn -f
"((objectcategory=person)(objectclass=user))" -format csv -delim
,
and then send it out
to our remote administrators
Can a man not attend an E12 training course without the list descending
into chaos the moment he leaves :-)
Absolutely not Murray!
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'll probably want to give MS a call and have a detailed discussion on
this. Read the Branch Office Deployment Guide, too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myke
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Happy Friday to you all. Sorry for the OT - I am looking for a Cisco
network routing or just general network routing mailing list. Any
suggestions? I did search as well.
Thanks,
...D
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List
Build a (single domain) AD.
Deploy an appropriate site and repl model
Create appropriate GPOs
Build all machines into the domain
neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myke
Sent: 28 April 2006 15:16
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
If you didn't learn about oldcmp
on this list, how in the world did you learn about it? I practically developed
it on this list. :)I think some of the thoughts about where the lists go
is in part just due to growth. It is just like all of the other OT stuff that
floats through here that
Should be fine but more info on things like object volume, replication
churn, DC/GC placement, etc would help...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myke
Sent:
Have you tested MCE on it? 5342 MCE on a beefy box is like
useless
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:39 AM
To:
cisco-nsp mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
It covers more than just routing...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny
Sent: Friday,
cisco-nsp on puck.nether.net is excellent ... if you have a specific
question I can take a shot...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny
Sent: Friday, April 28,
When elevating a DC to be a GC and say there are 3 domains, located say located
on 3 continents. Is the GC that already exists in each domain authorative in
the elevation of the DC to a GC or does each DC contact a DC in the relevant
domain for the GC information?
Make sense?
Mark
List info
You can try cisco@groupstudy.com
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
On 4/28/06, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy Friday to you all. Sorry for the OT - I am looking for a Cisco
network routing or just general network routing mailing list. Any
suggestions? I did search as well.
It's also viewable using Ntdsutil
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;315071How to view and set LDAP policy in Active Directory by using Ntdsutil.exe
Thanks
Mike
On 4/28/06, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean this one
adfind -config -f name=default query policy
See
works nice...but still no Xbox 360 support :(
I want to test that piece :)
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Vista - Windows DefenderDate: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:15:52 -0400From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Have you tested MCE on it? 5342 MCE on a beefy box is
Hey all,
I am having a debate and wondering if the following is true:
1)You must upgrade your 2003 servers to SP1 before going to R2.
2)You can upgrade a existing 2003 server to SP1 and then load the components
from R2 onto it from R2 disk 2.
Or
3)Must you load the R2 disk 1 2003 Operating
From
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;910204sd=rssspid=3198
When a domain controller is selected to host the global catalog, the KCC on the domain controller that is being promoted uses its discretion to build connection objects from source domain controllers that host the
I've got a parent-child domain setup here and I have child domain GCs which repls the parent domain NC from another child domain NC. Now I dont know if its possible to make a GC using a DC of the other domain thats not a GC. In a hypothetical setup where all sites were not fully routed this could
Yes you have to have SP1,
Either way will work. If you installSP1 first then you will only need use Disc 2. If you don't have SP1 installed you need to use both disks which will install SP1 for you.
I would install SP1 even if you were not planning to install R2 at this time.
If you are
Your scenario 2 works, and our TAM says there is no problem doing it. I
have upgraded a couple of servers this way.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta,
Nathaniel V CTR USAF NASIC/SCNA
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 12:18 PM
To:
My understanding is there is no difference between 1/2 and 3. The R2
Disk one IS W2k3+SP1, so whether you load that or the naked SP gets you
to the same point. You can't even run the R2 setup however until you're
at SP1.
-fitz
703-866-7473
703-626-5741 (cell)
-Original Message-
From:
Anyone know what constitutes domain
controller discretion?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of mike kline
Sent: 28 April 2006 18:31
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GC
Promotion
From
It means if you kiss...You don't tell.
:~)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
ParrisSent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:11 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC
Promotion
Anyone know what
constitutes domain controller discretion?
If you are asking if there is anything special about Disk 1 of the R2
install set, then the answer is no. Whether you install Windows 2003
Server SP1 from the R2 set or you have 2003 SP1 already installed, it
makes no difference.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Yes a GC promotion can/will source readonly NCs from another GC, it does not
have to go back to a DC that maintains a writeable replica. If the DC is
already replicating with a DC that is also a GC, it is likely that it will
start pulling the additional NCs from that GC.
joe
--
O'Reilly
I thought that if there is a writable NC in the same site, it would try
to use that, but maybe that's just for PAS replication.
Wook
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 11:55 AM
To:
If someone would just
write some XBOX 360 Admin tools for Active Directory we would have a whole giant
pool of amazing AD Admins. The way my brothers and cousins master those games it
would be amazing to see them go after AD that way.
Haven't tried the MCE
stuff yet but was going to play
I read your post
as
You need good policy and
procedures and actually adhere to them.
I 100% agree, doesn't
matter if you have 1 domain or 30 domains (and that could be 29 full or empty or
any combination domains).
I recently had to sit in
on a meeting to listen to some folks discuss a
True, but only the default. If you create additional
policies NTDSUTIL will not help you with them. However creating and using
additional policies is such an incredibly unusual thing in my opinion I probably
shouldn't even mention it.
In fact look into my eyes...you are getting
very
And I look and see that I received it. Glad you like oldcmp
btw... :)
First
off, you don't need the -f option with the user filter in there, the -users will
take care of that for you.
Second
off, no there is no mechanism in it right now to allow you to exclude accounts
based on a text
I have some curiosity in
this realm...
What would everyone
consider good things and requirements for an ADAM management tool. Even
assuming, cough, GUI.
joe
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I suppose you can use DN from that modified file and feed it to dsmod.exe or admod.exeOn 4/28/06, Rimmerman, Russ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe - I sent you an
e-mail, I figured maybe going to this list might get more input on this question
as well:
If I wanted to run an oldcmp -report 120
Title: Monitoring for lingering objects
I guess you could schedule a run of gcchk which will find
possible lingering objects.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
I wondered the same thing. I thought 1 DC, 2 AD Connector Servers and
Exchange... Head for the hills!
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Points taken.
Thanks
Just one rehash-
Due to the adminSDHolder, account operators cannot modify other account operators.
But why should this be true as well for modifying their own properties?
Why shouldn't an account op change his/her phone # or address or displayname etc?
Is it just due to
ME !
Jerry Welch
CPS Systems
US/Canada: 888-666-0277
International: +1 703 827 0919 (-5 GMT)
IP Phone (Skype): Jerry_Welch ( www.skype.net )
IP Phone (VOIP):Jerry_Welch ( www.voipstunt.com )
VOIP to Landline: callto:+1-703-827-0919
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
This is a good thread, I should have kept up with it. :)
I think some of the problem is resulting from language interpretation. When
I visualize AD in regards to the topics in this thread I think of it sort of
like
---
| |
| AD |
| |
---
| |
| DBLAYER
Justin A. Salandra
MCSE Windows 2000 2003
Network and Technology Services Manager
Catholic Healthcare System
646.505.3681 - office
917.455.0110 - cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Salandra, Justin
A.
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 4:16
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I am not quite sure what
question that response was intended to answer
Was that, you would like
a good ADAM management tool? If so, describe that tool. If Murray isn't happy,
we can take it offlist. I can do this through personal email or spin up a forum
on my website for it. I am
Heck, just give a user the ability to
create and otherwise manage objects – users, groups, the basics. Name, etc.
Nothing fancy, just not the command-line-ishness of ADSIEDIT.
-fitz
703-866-7473
703-626-5741
(cell)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ACL is modified and all of the answers for what people
can and can't do in AD is a story well told by theACL of the object in
question.
The adminSDHolder ACL on my test domain (I don't think I
have touched it) looks like
G:\TEMPadfind -default -f name=adminsdholder
Correct, definitely another option.
However consider what I wrote in my previous note, do you
want to go through this check every time? Maybe the answer is yes, but that one
time it gets dropped somehow and you have to explain why you were told 10 times
over the last24 months that it
Is there an attribute that's generallysafe to use, or
are you suggesting we request an OID from Microsoftand make our own
boolean "ourcompanyServiceAccount" attribute?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Friday, April 28, 2006 2:44 PMTo:
Joe,
Good question. I would assume something similar to ADUC (dsa.msc) where you can use a standardized interface to manage users and the associated attributes.
The problem I suppose is that ADAM can be utilized for many custom scenarios, that it would be hard to have a "standard" interface.
You work this out?
To me, if I had to pose a guess, it is a combination of
replication latency combined with token updates. Tokens don't update for
interactive auths. They can get updated for remote work. I previously sent a
rather long and probably dry email about this to the list you may
Do you have any sort of anti-virus scanning your outbound
email--specifically Norton 10--on your server? This could be causing
problems with sending emails. The same thing happened to us some time
ago and that was the issue.
On 4/28/06, Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[edit]
Is
We use "employeeType" with values of
EMPLOYEE
CONTRACTOR
VENDOR
SERVICE
OTHER
ADMIN
Jef
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cleanup of AD accountsDate: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:04:42 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Is there an attribute that's generallysafe to use, or are you
I don't consider storing the PW in a tombstone a particularily high risk
I agree with Guido here. I expect I wouldn't think twice about doing this if
it came up. When you reanimate even if you set pwdLastSet to be recovered it
won't be. It won't be stripped on the tombstoning process, it will be
Dynamic IP or you are on a IP blocking range perhaps?
Set up a special AOL/Yahoo SMTP connector.. bounce the email through
your ISP's smarthost.. those two email address ranges are a pain.
Salandra, Justin A. wrote:
Justin A. Salandra
MCSE Windows 2000 2003
Network and Technology
This is old, I sort of apologize. This is a topic some of us have debated in
circles over on the MVP / MS Private Security List Server multiple times as
well. It is always fun because the opinions are all over. I have some
thoughts for it.
1. A passphrase is just like a password only you have
Do you have access to connect? If you do you can nominate
yourself to test said functionality.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef Kazimer
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:17 PM
I do option 2 for existing installs that need it and option 3 for
anything that needs a rebuild excuse or is fresh.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta,
What is it youre going to put on the command prompt background
anyway? A semi transparent playboy centerfold to look at while you program?
Im downloading 5365 now since I busted my MCE Im
either going to fix it with that or revert to SP2.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I dont see anything on NANOGusually a good
barometer for this sort of thing.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 4:37 PM
To:
I have Trend Micro Scan Mail and it is configured the same way it has
always been for the past 2 years and only yesterday this started.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederic
Woodbridge, III
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 5:25 PM
To:
I don't understand what you mean by my ISP's smart host?
I use a static natted address for my mail server.
I know how to create a new SMTP Connector, but why should I have to do
this just for AOL and Yahoo all of a sudden?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
What kind of aggregate mail volume are you doing? I've seen some weird
throughput bugs in Scanmail in high volume environments.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
If they suddenly see you as a bad IP.
Have you checked to see if you are on a SORBs list?
Salandra, Justin A. wrote:
I don't understand what you mean by my ISP's smart host?
I use a static natted address for my mail server.
I know how to create a new SMTP Connector, but why should I have to
Who do you purchase your transit from (aka who is/are your ISP(s)) where
you work? Tell me offlist if need be.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin
We do a lot of e-mail each day, not sure of specific numbers. But Trend
Micro is set to scan all messages and to also scan the SMTP traffic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:41 PM
To:
Also I am getting on the delay notifications a Status of 4.7.7
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FW: Sending mail to AOL and Yahoo
I am not on any blacklist. I did a search on 147 known RBLs and I am
not listed on any
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Google Groups: microsoft.public.exchange2000.win2000:
You have me salivating
What is the program name? I do not see it under the availiable programs listing.
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Vista - Windows DefenderDate: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:00:32 -0400From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Do you have access to
Just curious
Does the Vista MCE allow Divx playback for the extender?
The MCE Transcoder is a life saver to play Divx and Xvid on the Xbox 360 MCE-E.
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Vista - Windows DefenderDate: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:03:07 -0400From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
Thanks it was 4.4.7. If the problem is with AOL and Yahoo then there is
nothing that I can do right?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 11:39 PM
To:
You are not going to believe this, but the fix to this was to increase
the DNS packet size on my pix firewall from 512 K to 1024 K. Once I did
that all traffic started to go through for AOL and Yahoo.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I'm not surprised... we're seeing MTU packet issues ever since 05-019
and other security fixes.
Salandra, Justin A. wrote:
You are not going to believe this, but the fix to this was to increase
the DNS packet size on my pix firewall from 512 K to 1024 K. Once I did
that all traffic started to
The difficulty with building a tool like this is that it is a huge leap to
go from a low level editing tool like ADSI Edit to a high level, task-based
UI like ADUC. The problem is that it is nearly impossible to infer the
semantic meaning of attributes in the directory in a generic way such
93 matches
Mail list logo
