Does anyone know if the vmware stuff, allows ba xxx w4 in the windows
debugger (obviously running on windows guest VM)?
ba xxx w4 = means break on address write w/in 4 bytes of the xxx, which is
a pointer. This kind of bp is set through a register directly on the CPU.
I know for a fact VS
, don't remember OTOH). By setting this attribute the AD
object turns into an AD tombstone, a change that can replicate normally
around to make the delete global.
Cheers,
Brett Shirley
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Ajay Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
I have a query
Is that possible to recover network object
I did not say that compiler options produced the increase in size. I said
someone guessed pretty close, and pasted all the guesses into one mail
thread (because people on this alias are so terrible at finding the tip of
the thread).
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Javier Jarava wrote:
We had to compile in bbisw.lib (Big Brother Is Watching). You might think
that's against your rights, but you signged them away when you accepted
the 5k larger eula.txt below (which you didn't read).
Cheers,
BrettSh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I've decided its funny when I use it.
Just b/c I know this
three-line program would be a MINIMUM of 170K.
Maybe it's because a GUI is now included, or somesuch??
Steve Egan
Purcell Systems
System/Network Administrator
desk 509 755-0341 x110
cell 509 475-7682
fax 509 755-0345
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Brett Shirley wrote:
We had to compile
What groups you are in, is a question that has different answers in
different contexts ...
Ask your domain's DC get one answer, ask another domain get a 2nd answer
(which one is relevant often depends on the domain of the computer you
logged onto / authenticated to), ask your workstation (local
second) issued by the database
cache manager to the database file or files.
This counter should be as low as possible. If it is not, it usually
indicates that the server needs more memory.
Teo
On 6/27/06, Brett Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you give me specifics on which performance
I suspect ... and winging it here ...
if you truly have a DC _that isn't a GC_ for the domain (domain2 I
believe) of the user object with the dangling manager link ... move IM for
domain2 to that DC ... wait four days for IM to make the rounds ... he
should [re?]generate a infrastructure update
Huh, I would've considered that on-topic ... esp. when threads start How
do I configure a Exchange mailbox blah blah ... right like we know about
Exchange?
Cheers,
-BrettSh
no warranties, yada, yada ...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Mark Parris wrote:
Off Topic i.e. the people on the list might know
Except when 99% of the common wisdom about something is wrong, like in the
case of ESE / JET Blue ... ;-)
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Greg Nims wrote:
It's funny how we quote wikis as definitive sources of information, when
they can be edited by anyone and everyone :)
Who
There are three types of mathematicians, those who
can count, and those who can't.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Laura A. Robinson wrote:
TRIPLE AAARGH!!!
10! 10!
I give up; I'm dain bramaged today.
_
From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Oh crap! Brian Puhl, you reading? Tony says E2k7 is a beta product, I
hope you didn't load that schema on our main forest? Too late to get it
backed out (via forest restore)?
Thanks for the heads up Tony,
BrettSh [msft]
P.S. - Does anyone think I'm as funny as I think I am ... probably not
Just tell your boss you didn't say the hour would be made up of
consecutive minutes. [1]
Cheers,
-BrettSh
[1] A line that was used on me when Windows Architect told me I'd be able
to solve my global sync object naming problem within a few hours. A
couple days of issues later, and after he spent
BTW, if you have snapshot based backup you _can_ backup and just restore
only the AD data (dit, log, and chk), and it will work w/o USN rollback
correctly. We used to run quick tests like that all the time, but ONLY
validated that the DS / AD didn't break. That doesn't make it supported.
BTW,
Maybe I can help w/ the ego (after all I consider trimming Dean's ego one
of my higher callings in life ;-) ...
Dean, you said you didn't mind if we continued to discuss this thread at
one point (a at the time highly volatile thread, which I decided to let
settle down), do you remember this
on mine ;0)
... uhhh, okey dokes :0/
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
t Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:12 AM
full of Bretts.
(www.cafepress.com there can be a Brett Store with Brett
merchandise)
Brett Shirley wrote:
Ego isn't wearing a t-shirt with your own picture on it, ego is
insisting
others wear a t-shirt with your picture on it ...
So was that it, Dean? Were you conceding my
Touching schema.ini would qualify as very not supported ...
-B
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Paul Williams wrote:
Setting FFL=2 automatically when building first DC in forestIt might be worth
looking at the %systemroot%\system32\schema.ini file again. I just had a
poke around in there after reading
Susan, how on earth could _you_ get a lingering object? Seems impossible
with only one DC, oh wait did you just forget to delete it?
From The Love,
-B
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:
Information about lingering objects in a Windows 2000-based forest
I've always followed a DSI[1] access model, it definately supercedes in
every way what RBS[resource], RBS[role], ABS, CBS, NBC, ABC can provide
...
[1] DSI = Defending Security Infrastructures
-B
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Matt Hargraves wrote:
Without going with an Access-Based Security (ABS)
Random thoughts on VM based DCs ...
1. There is a whitepaper on Virtual DCs on msft's site, I didn't see
it mentioned below, so I thought I'd mention it.
2. The whitepaper neglected to mention that you should turn off HD
caching on the host system.
3. of course diff-disks are absolutely not
If you give me specifics on which performance counters specifically don't
show up for 2003 that are there in 2000, I can look into it (could've been
removed on purpose, unintentionally removed, superceded by another
counter, or simply made squeaky).
Cheers,
BrettSh [msft]
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006,
Just curious, Al, where did you hear this from:
doing this. Online defrag can be a wonderful thing, and off-line is
typically recommended if online is not going to be able to finish
during it's run time.
Because I've never recommended that. online defrag actually saves off
where it
I think to go from 5000 users to a load metric (across organizations) is
ridiculous ... one orgs 5000 users do not generate the same load as
anothers 5000 users. Be careful about making comparisons like that. Just
my 2c.
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Al Lilianstrom wrote:
Myrick,
it, especially any of those undocumented featuresalthough I guess
writing a blog about them might make them documented.
Too soon to start blogging about longhorn AD stuff?
Phil
On 6/22/06, Brett Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't mind hearing specific things people would like
Very likely replication is not working for some reason ... there are a few
reasons it could not be working, some of them fixable, some of them not.
I suspect we should answer this question first ... what is the backup /
restore software you used?
Thanks,
BrettSh [msft]
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006,
This should give you a list of any other classes using non-standard naming
attributes. Send us the output.
Cheers,
BrettSh
FindNonStdNamingAtts.cmd:
@echo off
rem Somewhat brute force, should claim one non-standard naming
rem attribute msTapi-uid, but this provides a sort of yes, the
rem the
have to make sure all the other DC's computer accounts are deleted,
this fails auth so that they can't replicate. IIRC, ntdsutil from sp1
does delete the DC computer accounts, where as win2k3 RTM and before does
not.
Cheers,
BrettSh
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Brett Shirley wrote:
This should give you
Two things ...
Secondly, it isn't just security groups, has anyone been hired or quit?
Firstly, the whole thing isn't big server vs. small server ... it is
whether you have any AD replicas, that includes having two DCs for the
same domain (assuming neither is NT4, then these DCs replicate the
Do you have any schema extensions applied? Do you know if those schemas
added any LDAP naming attributes? If the 2nd question doesn't make sense
to you, I'll figure out a way you can query this, and send it to us.
Aside, it is generally not recommended to run restore database. In fact
this
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] How much of the DIT is cached in RAM ?
The dev who put it in, is what I like to call my boss ... he has no
child, I can
I added a bit more about Eric's GIGANTIC DIT here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/brettsh/archive/2006/06/12/631516.aspx
... feel free to post questions in the responses section ... or here.
Sorry the formatting on the table isn't the best.
Cheers,
BrettSh
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Brett Shirley wrote
] On Behalf Of
|Brett Shirley
| Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:11 PM
| To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
| Cc: Send - AD mailing list
| Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User Accounts
|
|
| Dean, I didn't understand this comment ...
| But, dude, seriously, you weren't aware that AD's ESE
|used a 32 bit
It is 1/2 a dozen of one, 1/2 a dozen of the other ...
We store forward links, but AD defines a table, with indices such that
we have an efficient way to lookup backlinks for a given object. Don't
have time right now to show you what I mean, but my Daddy says there are
24 usable hours in the
This means there is a physical corruption in the AD database. Does this
domain have replicas? If yes, just repromote another replica and then
demote this guy. If no, sometimes a offline defrag can save the
database. Otherwise, what is the backup situation for this domain? Don't
be tempted to
Is this joe joe or joe someoneelse? It occured to me, I've NEVER seen joe
joe's last name ...
-B
On Wed, 31 May 2006, McNicholas, Joe wrote:
off the top of my head
Is DFS running?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Lilianstrom
How is DFSR, FSM, SRM, and CLFS about AD or a supporting service?
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Bernard, Aric wrote:
Er...yes? Can you be more specific? A reason behind your question
could make for a better answer...
DFSR
PMC
FSM
SRM
MMC3.0
ADAM
ADFS
Enhanced subsystem
Just to be clear, the fix for USN rollback doesn't make restoring an image
a Microsoft supported mechanism. It's still not supported, just makes it
less likely (though not 100%) to hork DS / AD.
Cheers,
BrettSh [msft]
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Riley, Devin wrote:
We are preparing for our upgrade
://www.windowsserverfaq.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:57 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User Accounts
Hmmm, you've actually combined too many layers in my
Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Brett Shirley
| Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:11 PM
| To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
| Cc: Send - AD mailing list
| Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User Accounts
|
|
| Dean, I didn't understand
No you won't.
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Almeida Pinto, Jorge de wrote:
Very interested in hearing how as it depends on if the backup
tool triggers the actions needed (and therefore AD aware) or not. If
it is not, then the OS (DC) should detect this in some way...
jorge
it works?
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: 12 May 2006 16:32
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Image a DC?
No you won't.
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Almeida Pinto
What are you talking about, you don't need mushrooms, these responses have
as much content as any post I've seen from joe and Dean. ;-)
From The Love (esp. for Dean who's going to think I'm being an ass),
BrettSh
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Darren Mar-Elia wrote:
You need to consume special mushrooms
Does anyone have experience with this? I have some.
I can only speak to separating and backing up only the AD DB state without
registry, etc.
We used to use this method alot in testing AD, we had a little utility /
unit test called dsback.exe, that would just trigger AD's streaming backup
/
://www.windowsserverfaq.org/
Profile:
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F2F1214C811
D
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
|Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:47 AM
|To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Eric's quoting didn't come across in pine so well, so I've improved it by
using where he was quoting others ...
*Ahem* ... for the hex heads ...
ESE limits:
The underlying store (aka ESE or JET Blue) does not have a 4.2 billion row
constraint to the # of rows in a single table ... ESE will
I'm definately not responsible for purchasing of IT products at my
company, oh well guess I'm not influential enough to justify a free
subscription of the magazine.
Sigh.
-B
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Grillenmeier, Guido wrote:
wow, what a hurdle ;-)
From:
Dean on another fork identified where repadmin gets the GUIDs it can
resolve. It does a search in CN=Sites (maybe CN=Configuration) for all
DSA objects (aka nTDSDSA or NTDS Settings objects, retrieving the two
attributes Dean mentioned, and makes a table/cache to translate the names
to GUIDs. If
I wouldn't make a hard feature on such parsing, b/c it is not documented
and could change at Brett or (lets call him) Greg's willy nilly.
Oh and I just rememberd ... I should also note, isn't a 100% accurate to
use retired DSA signatures, we punted a bug in repadmin relating around
this, IIRC
That is not true, the schema and naming FSMOs also have extensive state
that is sensitive and critical, however the frequency of the updates is
significantly less, and thus less likely to cause an issue.
Having personally been on PSS cases for people who've f-d up thier forest,
because they
Sorry Doug, the mail system is broken ... you'll probably get mails
forever from this alias, it is unavoidable. Sorry for the inconvience.
-Brett
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Doug Ferguson wrote:
Unsubscribe
List info :
Al,
I always wished that Microsoft would support multiple file versions like
VMS did.
I'm just curious, if you have the time, for my own edification, what was
this VMS file system feature? Could you elaborate how it worked?
Cheers,
BrettSh [msft]
SDE - ESE
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Al
?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brett Shirley
Sent: Fri 1/13/2006 12:46 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...)
Al,
I always wished that Microsoft would support multiple file versions like
VMS did.
I'm
Ignoring the fairly over-discussed if every DC is a GC anyway, the
Infrastructure FSMO / Master (IM) can be on GC aspect ...
In the standard forest (if there is such a thing) with a mix of DCs and
GCs, the Infrastructure FSMO must be on a non-GC, for both win2k and
win2k3. There has been no
corruption... and sbsland freaks out. Either we do
indeed need to ensure we have a secondary DC or we need to park a second
copy of a system state offsite [say at the vap/var]
Brett Shirley wrote:
She replied offline, very likely a single bit flip, tragedy, they aren't
one release later (Longhorn
She replied offline, very likely a single bit flip, tragedy, they aren't
one release later (Longhorn), where this would've probably been
non-disruptively handled, logged, and possibly self-healed:
http://blogs.technet.com/efleis/archive/2005/01.aspx
Anyway, this kind of thing is usually
Note instead of repadmin /options *, look for GC flag, you can run
repadmin /viewlist gc:
Gives only all GCs in your forest ... something I thought would probably
be useless when I implemented it.
Cheers,
-BrettSh [msft - ESE - SDE]
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Almeida Pinto, Jorge de wrote:
to view
I can confirm, yes, you will only be able to deploy Exchange 12 on amd64
(well x64, i.e. including EMTWhatever) hardware.
Now, I must confess something ...
A bit over one and a half years ago (~Mar 2004, give or take a couple
months), there was this Focus 64 campaign, posters showed up everwhere
Cost debate ...
I've heard that on big Exchange servers that by a factor of 4 or 5 to 1,
the cost is mostly spent on big disk hardware (read as SAN). It is the
IOPS that cost. With a 4x drop in IOPS required, the same hardware will
be usable for more users/servers. Clearly the people who get
These are ESE (the database engine under DHCP) events.
Did you reACL anything like the root of the volume or the Windows
directory?
Anti-virus software installed, that is scanning that directory?
Are these events persistent, or sporadic?
Cheers,
BrettSh [msft]
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Ravi Dogra
Susan, SMTP isn't a client retrieval protocol (like POP), it's a mail
delivery protocol. IMAP, POP, and MAPI are your client retrieval
protocols. SMTP and (IIRC) MAPI are mail delivery protocols. MAPI doing
double duty. SMTP, IMAP, and POP are the open (i.e. standardized)
protocols. IMAP is
I'll ask him, I know him.
-B
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:
http://blogs.technet.com/bpuhl/contact.aspx
Ping the blog and see if he'll turn on comments.
Al Mulnick wrote:
Shame we can't comment it. I've seen similar and I note that people
Should be fixed.
-B
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Brett Shirley wrote:
I'll ask him, I know him.
-B
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:
http://blogs.technet.com/bpuhl/contact.aspx
Ping the blog and see if he'll turn on comments.
Al Mulnick
The proposal was no history, nor even a history of who modified it, merely
who made the current state of the AD be the way it is. In order to do
that, you must track the modifier (whether by backlink, GUID, SID, DN,
samAccountName, whatever) at the replication conflict level, ergo for each
Ulf, what Al (well the suggestion on the plate) is suggesting is taht the
something to centralize that info, _is_ AD replication. Implying the
data is in AD.
Cheers,
-Brett
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Ulf B. Simon-Weidner wrote:
| Wherever the information gets put, it should be a) done as
|the
Ignoring the 16 bytes at the beginning of the metadata for version and
attr count info, and garbage wasted space ... the metadata for a single
attribute is 48 bytes, adding the SID (28 bytes) would be an expansion of
57% on the _raw_ per attribute metadata size.
A sampling of a corporate DB
wrote:
Is that a yes you'll add it? Or no, ..and no bananas for you. answer?
Al
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:50 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir
narrow.
OK, I'm done.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Brett Shirley wrote:
Well, first you should _never_ ever view anything _I_ am musing as a
possible feature from the product group, I muse ALOT of stuff. PMs will
be feature groups spokespeople, I am a dev. This feature (in various
forms) has been
://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=885875
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 13:19
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] best practice?
I don't really have serious
uses.
So do we have a timeline on these blog entries? eg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 1:32 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
re: some virtualization and isolation of processes and threads ...
A CS teacher once told me that in general in computers whenever you hear
the word virtual, you can replace with slow ...
- virtual memory (yeah, yeah I'm really thinking of paging, not VM,
but I used a
Tom, what revision of the server OS was the WINS server? NT 4.0? Did you
ever determine if the WINS DB corruptions were being exposed at the
app/WINS level (esentutl /g succeeds) or ESE level (esentutl /g fails)?
esentutl /g (the svc/DB must be offline for this) is the (slightly
simplistic)
...
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:24 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Tom, what revision of the server OS
Someone told me offline, they think I'm wrong about WINS not being in
3.50. Hmmm, was it DHCP that didn't exist til 3.51? Maybe RPL? Maybe
WINS just wasn't JET Blue based until then? H, now I'm all curious.
Cheers,
-BrettSh [msft]
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Brett Shirley wrote
a Socialist because I am willing to buy a
burger for a friend and a good conversation. ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 11:29 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE
If you have any replicas of those servers, when you restore those VMWare
images, you will have corrupted your forest during restore.
-BrettSh [msft]
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Carroll Frank USGR wrote:
I am working my way
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:51 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Restore Problem
If you have any replicas of those servers, when you restore those VMWare
images, you will have corrupted your
Did you know strupr, can change it's behavior based on locale of the
process?
Deji, your issue is likely a specific bug ...
- There is a QFE, but you need to call msft to get it, ask for KB 902396
Note: this QFE causes some small number of indices to rebuild, so
the machine
files and folders. with no additional
explanation.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2005 10:47 p.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Sysvol and AV exclusions
You can not restore a ghost image _IF_ you have more than 1 DC in your AD
forest. Doing so can cause replicated inconsistencies and corruption, so
you should be very sure before you restore a ghost image of a DC. If this
is the only DC for a child domain in a forest with other domains, and
ghost
The articles should not be inconsistent.
The 822158 does mention 814263 (see bullet 2).
284947 - is how to detect and diagnose excessive FRS replication. Noting
it might be caused by Anti-Virus software. And mentioning how to recover.
It is not SYSVOL specific, it is FRS specific. But
IFM is an odd abbreviation of the Infrstructure Master role. I think IM
is more typical.
-B
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Grillenmeier, Guido wrote:
Andreas actually teased me with this at the second DEC in US (must have
been 2003 in Scottsdale, Arizona), as I also wondered why the IFM would
be
it had membership, completely dependent on the state of
being both a domain controller (or at least flagged in a way in the
directory to indicate such) and authenticated.
:o)
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:22 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Database Corruption
Both Steve, Hunter's, and your original advice is sound ... I think it is
very likely if you call PSS, they'll tell you to do Steve's, yours
I don't think that's right at all ... he's talking AD EDC group, nothing
to do with Exchange.
I'm just going to make this up* ... it's a piece of data on the DC's
computer account object that helps SAM determine if you deserve the EDC
group in your token. Maybe it is a bit in the
After reading joe's description, which sounds accurate to a non-expert
like myself, I am willing to raise my confidence in my answer from a
measly 12% to a full 17%.
Well, I agree with most of what joe said, except for the part about not
being able to look at the membership, you _sort of_ can as
Both Steve, Hunter's, and your original advice is sound ... I think it is
very likely if you call PSS, they'll tell you to do Steve's, yours, and
Hunter's advice in about that order.
My favorite disk sub-system diagnostics is jetstress, but dedicated disk
sub-system stressers are better, as they
In the event view, you know how you can click the fwlink page to get
help and support text for any given event?
So I found the support and help text (below) for EventID 101 (farther
below) for Windows NTDS ISAM and for general ESENT, and it's like about as
close to 100% wrong as you can get.
] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:13 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OMG, the most aweful ESE event info ever!!! ...
In the event view, you know how you can click the fwlink page to get
help and support text for any given event?
So I
Wow, I meant to say, I can _not_ promise immediate action ...
It depends upon the severity of the bad text ...
Cheers,
BrettSh
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Brett Shirley wrote:
Yes. I can promise action immediately though.
I've seperated my action plan into 4 phases ...
Now: cleanup of crap
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:27 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange 2003 SP1 bloat
I am actually a programmer for ESE (you know the database under Exchange,
once know as JET Blue ... ) ... yes, it may come
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:37 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Replication Topology
You're trying to weasel your way out of taking responsibility for your
misunderstanding
I am actually a programmer for ESE (you know the database under Exchange,
once know as JET Blue ... ) ... yes, it may come as a shock to some of you
that building 7 garage door operator is not my only job duty at msft ...
Anyway, I'd like to clear up some confusion and mistatements ...
1. The /p
requirement?
Item 3, step 3: are ALL indices recreated and tables moved? I was
under the presumption (perhaps mistaken) that some were discarded.
Thanks,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Thursday
Dean, what did you mean by the last line, indicated here?
The IM process itself does not create phantoms, if it were
exclusively responsible for that task, all group modifications
referencing non-local-domain members would require origination
against the IM -- this is not the
of object references (i.e.
link pairs).
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:24 AM
To: ActiveDir
the phantom necessary, and AD creates the phantomn if it doesn't exist.
Cheers again,
-B
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Brett Shirley wrote:
Yeah, that's what I thought you might mean ... that's not true.
The process of injecting a phantom is carried out by the directory service
itself. It's in the AD's
define the dblayer as part of the
directory ... its purpose is to abstract such specifics.
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent
Auth restore is a perfectly normal way to end up with phantoms, w/o
replication problems having been present.
Delete parent X (including children, and grandchildren).
Auth Restore children.
Children and grandchildren will be in Lost+Found ...
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Tom Kern
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:20 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] user dump
And repadmin.
BrettSh
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Phil Renouf wrote
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
