Sweet! I can see your messages again Al.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:10 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange queue(OT)
Your reply came back as yup, but no
I missed if anyone was making this tool available to the list? :)
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
If you get another drive a RAID 01 (or is it 10) would be a better choice in
my eyes
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Wade
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 5:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Optimize Exchange Pagefile
Anyone else receiving blank emails? The reply from Al (below Susans email) and
a couple of others I have got over the past couple of days have had empty
bodies.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks
Some suggestions:
Look into the differences between 2000 and 2003 AD integrated DNS. I believe
in 2000 they are stored in the domain partition and in 2003 they are stored
in the application directory partition.
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817470
that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Tue 4/18/2006 12:14 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NT 3.51 trust verification lies
Lol. Yeah, I am serious
Anyone experience the following
NT 3.51 to 2000 Native mode trust
Nltest validates the trust
GUI validates the trust
Cannot enumerate users of 3.51 domain from domainA
Can enumerate users of 3.51 from another 2000 native mode domain... domainB
Trust no longer validates to domainA after about 30
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Tue 4/18/2006 10:54 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] NT 3.51 trust verification lies
Anyone experience the following
NT 3.51 to 2000 Native mode trust
Nltest validates the trust
Any word on getting this info to those on
the list that cant make it to the show?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Holme
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006
1:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] View
Delegated Tasks?
being told that it's better to have one central admin account
I think you are being told by someone who will eventually, through some
means obtain a privileged account, and knows that his/her own self has a
very good chance of screwing something up or doing something unethical. In
cases like
Did someone link a new GPO or edit a GPO that affects the machine?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Visser
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 11:39 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Netlogon Service
Well if they did
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=300956
I had the same problem in the past
but luckily enough the lodctr /R worked for me. I would
take a look at this article
I remember in the past downloading a MMC that already had ADUC, GPO, DNS,
and other snapins in it. I thought it was called Active Directory Management
Tool, but I can't find it. Does anyone else recall this tool? Its name?
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ:
else?
What are the options in the Winlogon box? You should only have the choice
of the NetBIOS domain name or the local box (and any trusted domains).
To use the DNS name you need to use a UPN.
--Paul
- Original Message -
From: Douglas M. Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir
Ok, I am revisiting this because it is bugging the crap out of me.
2003 domain upgraded from NT 4.0
NetBIOS name: DOMINT
DNS Domain name: domain.com
Users can logon to the machine with DOMINT, but not DOMAIN from the drop
down. There are no NeutralizeNT4Emulator or NT4Emulator keys on either
I have to agree. It seems that once you
have finally dorked around for what seems forever and have it working,
something (whether it be a samba vulnerability or some other *nix change;
especially in Solaris) breaks it and you have to dork around again. Vintela
honestly took me less than 10
I am trying to figure out how one gauges their AD
experience. For example, I have designed, implemented and maintained an
AD/Exchange environment of 5000 users with 1000 workstations from the ground
up, alone. The environment is only 3 sites, with little complexity. I now work
for a
This may be more of an Exchange management
add-in, but it sure would be nice to be able to go into Exchange Tasks from
ADUC and do an export of a mailboxor is there some exmerge plug-in to do
this
Shouldn't expired accounts show up with a red X just like a disabled
account?
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
Title: Way OT: DC Server monitoring tools
Man, can someone tell me what I am doing
wrong here. I just cannot figure this out. Dont laugh; I am sure it is
something stupid.
adfind -default -rb ou=wsusclients,ou=xpclients
-f (objectcategory=computer)
I assume this should search for
1 Objects returned
D:\TOOLS
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Fri 2006-01-06 15:05
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax
Man, can someone tell me what I am doing wrong here. I just cannot figure
this out. Don't laugh; I am
: [ActiveDir] OT:
adfind syntax
What does the part at the bottom say...
the part that says
Best Match of:
That will tell you how much of the DN it
knows to be valid.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006
9:06
|---wsusclients
Cheers,
Jorge
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Fri 2006-01-06 16:12
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax
It tells me 'DC=domain,DC=com'
Of course with the correct domain for domain
PAM modules
Probably the easiest is the winbind pam
module. I cant tell you much more than that. And as someone else already said,
Vintela. Talk about making a task easybut it is kinda expensive
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent:
I have read the Time Service white paper from Microsoft and am still
confused. I have set the default domain GPO to use NT5DS under Configure
Windows NTP Client, and set an external time server (navobs1.oar.net,0x1)
for NTPServer. I have also set Enable Windows NTP Server to enabled. There
are no
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Wed 2005-12-28 16:30
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Time
Service
I have Run w32tm /config /update
/syncfromflags:MANUAL /manualpeerlist: navobs1.oar.net
and also verified HKLM\System\CCS\Services\w32time\Parameters
to what Ulf said:
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/11/20/111.aspx
Cheers,
Jorge
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Wed 2005-12-28 16:30
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Time Service
I have Run w32tm /config /update
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: 19 December 2005 21:44
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SFU
download...R2
Yeah, I tried last Friday, and just
assumed that it would be working by today, but no, still the 404 error.
From
Does anyone know why SFU is no longer available for download? I called
Microsoft and all they would tell me is that it is no longer available for
download but can be shipped via CD, which cost $6.95 shipping and handling.
Ticks me off since I just deleted my downloaded instance off my HD about a
Me also.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Klassen
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:29 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Dir web based management
Please add me to the list of those who wish a copy.
/windowsserversystem/sfu/downloads/default.mspx
Cheers - Stuart.
On 12/20/05, Douglas M. Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anyone know why SFU is no longer available for download? I called
Microsoft and all they would tell me is that it is no longer available for
download but can be shipped via CD, which
Does anyone know off the top of their head
the permissions required for delegation of disabling and enabling user
accounts, or have a link? Google is failing meor rather me failing
google
WP? Write permissions? Is that all the
group would need?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Williams
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005
8:48 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Delegate
disable/enable user accounts
delegate read/write permission on the
useraccountcontrol, you delegate control on all of the bits/flags
represented in that useraccountcontrol attribute. It may not be what you
want
Cheers,
Jorge
_
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens Douglas M. Long
Verzonden: di 6-12-2005 14:19
Aan
better check the effective permissions. The user had all kinds of
permissions. I then added another new user to the group that had been
delegated rights and that user only had the specific rights that it should
have.
Does this sound bogus?
_
From: Douglas M. Long [mailto:[EMAIL
It probably depends on what youre
doing during those 2 hours. If I were installing SP1 on a DC that had problems
rebooting/booting in the past, or has known HW issues, or for some odd reason
the machine is not on a UPS when installing a Service Pack, I think it would be
easier to move the
Well we knew he wasnt a good
techie. How to you think he became your boss. You cant get rid of him,
so promote him. J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Abagnale
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005
11:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject:
I just started with a company running AD 2003 and am a
little confused about something. The domain name is domain.com, but when
logging in there are two domains to select from. The second domain name is
totally different; lets call it domint. It seems that users can only log in
with the
Are you talking AD integrated DNS? If so, I would ask why move to BIND
(unless you are trying to get your DNS servers off of the same machine
as the DC, in which case I guess you would be looking at the cost
benefit of running a free OS)? Are there currently any problems? If not,
then why switch?
I also have had this problem on a specific DC. It has an intel
motherboard with integrated NIC and adaptec RAID controller. I don't
know if that has anything to do with it, but it may.
You have any similar HW in your machine?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Change AD Passwords
Iisadmpwd would be my solution. I wouldnt
even expect IE on a Mac to work. Are these all OS X machines? Why not support
Safari as the standard browser, or some other common browser that works. Seems
crazy to support a browser that is no longer developed.
Is possible to set a users password to expired with admod? I figured I
would be able to set useraccount control to 8388608 but either that is
not possible, or more likely I can't get the syntax correct.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ:
XADM: Requirements for Disabling the
Recipient Update Service
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=296479
Tony
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2005
6:22 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir
Is there any good documentation on AD attributes. The stuff
at msdn.microsoft.com seems pretty useless to me (or maybe I just dont have
a clue what they are specifying). I need to know if attributes need to be
specified, or if they are automatically populated (and if so, how or what
Do you just not have rights or do you not
even have connectivity?
There isnt much information about exactly
what you are doing and what has been done, to have a good explanation.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Friday,
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange 2003 SP1 bloat
Thought I would let you know how my
experience with this went:
Server 2003 SP1
Exchange 2003 SP1
2 x 2.8GHz HT Xeons
4GB RAM
Direct attached 5 X 73.4GB hard drives,
RAID5---IBM 6M controller
Both ran with the following syntax:
simply hired to push buttons. Our jobs as admins is tohelpour
management make gooddecisions and recover from stupid ones as well as
implement all of them, smart or stupid.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005
11:38 PM
didn't know that, eh? Maybe a good time
to move on to ...
4. Space Usage ...
Douglas M. Long quotes this anyone know where he got this information
from?
Run ESEUTIL with the /p switch to configure ESEUTIL to create the new
defragmented database on an alternate location (for example
] on behalf of Douglas
M. Long
Sent: Fri 8/19/2005 12:55 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
OT:Exchange 2003 SP1 bloat
This is
probably just me not comprehending this, but when you said
The confusion is that, there is also a /p option that can be provided to
defrag, like
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange 2003 SP1 bloat
Heres a question for everyone:
Your CIO decides it is cheaper to host an
application remotely at a site that you know nothing about (and for that reason
do not trust). He then decides on his own that he will just tell the network
guy
? (And
thus theactual data...) Many MS folks will recommend
that you consider splitting up stores when they hit the 35 - 50 GB range.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005
7:21 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
defrag! Bet you didn't know that, eh? Maybe a good time
to move on to ...
4. Space Usage ...
Douglas M. Long quotes this anyone know where he got this information
from?
Run ESEUTIL with the /p switch to configure ESEUTIL to create the new
defragmented database on an alternate location
OK, so I have scheduled a window this weekend to run an offline defrag
of the mailbox store. Now I am looking for the best way to do this, and
since this list seems to have more/better experience with Exchange than
the Exchange list, I am looking for comments.
Here are the steps I am planning on
to defrag you don't need the /p
switch.
Anyone got any comment?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: 17 August 2005 18:13
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange 2003 SP1 bloat
OK, so I have scheduled
] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Wed 8/17/2005 10:06 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange 2003 SP1 bloat
I guess I was thinking of using the /p switch because of a paragraph
Run ESEUTIL with the /p switch to configure ESEUTIL to create the new
defragmented
that it will run much faster on the newer 3.0 GHZ
Xeon's with Ultra 320 15,000 rpm Drives.
While your at it you may want to also run ISINTEG which takes even longer.
Jose :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Wednesday, August
What sort of DNS setup do you have? BIND? AD-integrated?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:10 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Weird issue going on
No not VPN,
They should have something here:http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:20 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Single Sing-On IBM
with Entourage? There was an issue there once upon a
time.
http://blogs.msdn.com/jeremyk/archive/2004/11/11/255705.aspx
http://www.e2ksecurity.com/archives/001308.html
Ah, here's teh official one, I think:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=889525
Cheers,
-BrettSh
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Douglas M
DNS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:28 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Windows 2000 VPN Server
I have a user using VPN on a Windows XP Box to VPN into a
I believe he means:
Right click on the mailbox-- Open other folder-- Other user's
folder...
With a user that you give review rights.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 6:40 PM
To:
in your mailbox.
the user has reviewer rights on the new calender.
i don't think thats what Hunter meant. if it were just the basic open
other users folder, i wouldn't be so furstrated.
thanks
On 8/11/05, Douglas M. Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe he means:
Right click on the mailbox
Is there a way to exclude users and DLs from
a query-based distribution list? Oris there a way to specify more than
one mailbox store in a single query-based DL?
of the correct way to specify a
user. I didn't bug that because I am still waiting to hear anything at all on
the other 15 or so Exchange bugs I have logged in the last year.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005
Title: DC replicating with deleted DSA object
Is there an easy way to change ownership
on all files and folders in a directory owned by userA?
I think I am having a stupid attack
;)
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
la part de Douglas M. Long
Envoyé: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:32 PM
À: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Objet: [ActiveDir] OT:
Change ownership
Is there an easy way to change ownership
on all files and folders in a directory
, CHEAP, SECURE: Pick Any TWO
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
On 8/8/05, Douglas M. Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easy way to change ownership on all files and folders in a
directory owned by userA?
I think I am having a stupid attack
Were there any comments to Joe's question about large deployments of
NDS? Are/were there any out there?
I am just interested because I still hear comments about how scalable it
is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent:
Title: [ActiveDir] DFS Client for Mac and UNIX
I feel pretty stupid asking this question
because I know it is something very simple that I am overlooking.
I have full control to a file or folder,
am the owner, but still cant edit permissions. The buttons are all
greyed out. It seems
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: File
properties
you have to go up the tree and set the
perms on the source of the inheritance or uncheck inheritance.
-Original Message-
From: Douglas M. Long
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005
12:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Title: [ActiveDir] DFS Client for Mac and UNIX
I take that back. The files in the share
are inherited. Nothing above that level in the tree is inheriting permissions
though
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Thursday, July 14
be causing this
problem. Share Perms must be *FULL
CONTROL* a *MODIFY*
(or read obviously) Share Perm will override NTFS Write
Permissions.
Dan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 9:52
AM
To: ActiveDir
2003 with SP1?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blair, James
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005
11:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Slightly OT:
Distributed Transaction Coordinator Service (MSDTC)
All,
On numerous of
I would take a look at this for kicks.
http://redmondmag.com/columns/article.asp?EditorialsID=1010
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa,
Johnny
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:14 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject:
If something is set to undefined in group policy, does it
get set to the Windows default all the time?
The reason I ask is because I had Microsoft
network server: Digitally sign communications (always) set to
enabled, then changed it to undefined. I was thinking this would leave all
.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas M. Long
Title: Change password web interface
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297121
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Stabl
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 3:35
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Change
Hopefully this will change now that it
seems there is a company a day releasing that customer information has been
compromised. Here in Ohio,
the state actually decided to sue DSW for such a thing (which is the first
legal action in the states, I think). I know how politics works, so who
, consider
the security implications of the domain accounts that are used and any
possible password exposure.
LMK if you need more detail, but this should get you going.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Monday, June 06
At first I thought cool. Now I am thinking this needs looked into more.
I just ran it on my XP machine (which I do manage my exchange servers
from) and it shows:
MS05-021: Vulnerability in Exchange Server 2003 and in Exchange 2000
Server can allow remote code execution
as an available patch.
I am trying to figure out the best way to re-image our labs (XP only)
without any interaction. Currently we are using Ghost 7.5, and it will
add the machine account to the domain, but doesn't actually join the
machine to the domain. This would be fine if the machines only needed
re-imaged twice a
Looks like WSUS is ready for production
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/updateservices/default.mspx
And here is some info for Exchange 2003 SP2
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2003/sp2/overview.mspx
winmail.dat
This may be a stupid question, but did you
make sure the NIS
server was running (along with the mapping service and other SFU services)? The
SFU 3.5 NIS service will not start automatically when I restart my server, just
wondering if you might have the same problem and havent noticed it. I
You
just need to register the nisprop.dll DLL on the XP
workstation. It will only work with a workstation/server that has the
Admin Tools/AD Users and Computers MMC installed.
The
DLL is located in your SFU\common directory on your domain
controller. Perform the following to get the
I am beginning to wonder what functionality I am missing with Exchange
2003. I have been running a domain of 1200 users for over a year without
a WINS server. Is it because we don't use Public folders? Any insight on
what issues this may be causing that I am not noticing?
I have wondered this for
Deji's link has the download that fixed problems like this that I have
had. It was actually the winsoxfix.exe Option^Explicit Software
Solutions if I remember correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burkes, Jeremy
[Contractor]
Sent:
Did you ask him if you could have the host
file on his machine that he MUST be using to browse the web with? DNS
untrustworthy vs host file bahaha
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan DeStefano
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:24
PM
To:
a
commercial product aimed at this problem vs. rolling your own solution.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:30
AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Solaris
typically has a cost associated
with it. That cost/benefit analysis might make it worth it to use a
commercial product aimed at this problem vs. rolling your own solution.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Tuesday, May 03
remember off hand.
~Eric
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005
11:13 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Solaris
authentication
Ignore this. I just did a little FAQ
reading
Kerberos in production. I dont know how they are
populating /etc/passwd but can find out.
Ive never used NIS against AD so
couldnt say whats going on here.
~Eric
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:26 PM
To: ActiveDir
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Ocra
The majority of my outlook clients connect
to our backup DC, and I am not sure why this is.
Main DC GC all
FSMO roles server
class
Backup DC GC desktop
class
They both have the same weight and
priority in the DNS.
The main DC is a much more
Anyone know if this is passed in plain text? If so, i dont see any advantage to
this versus the NIS server in SFU. Seems that the *nix community is making no
progress in the secure authentication arena if this is the case. Any ideas or
thoughts?
Are you using this as your guide?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=555126
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A.
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:48
AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SSL on
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Douglas M. Long
Envoyé : Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:03 PM
À : ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Objet : RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange Transaction logs
I am using BackupExec 10. I believe Michel answered my specific
question. I am
I kind of thought the idea of only having
one password policy per domain was that you are theoretically protecting the
domain admin accounts (when enforcing complexity) from an escalation type
attack from a user account. Or for that matter, protecting the
whole domain with more complex
collection of transaction logs, that
means you are not backing up Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 11:11 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange
processes. As a start read the Exchange Server 2003 Disaster Recovery
Operations Guide
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/2003/library/disre
copgde.mspx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Tuesday, April 12
to backup the
Exchange store to file and then include this file in your regular
backup.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: 12 April 2005 16:52
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange Transaction
This is a question possibly related to this. I just created a global
security group, added 871 users, and they all have grey hair as opposed
to the black hair that I see in every other security group. What does
this mean?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
