To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] ability to create container objects not in ADUC
A container is not an OU.
-Original Message-
From: Olivarez, Sergio J Mr ANOSC/FCBS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:26:22
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ability
No ...I thought at one point you could, but, I'm not the GUI expert.
What are you trying to accomplish?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thommes, Michael M.
Sent:
If memory serves, it was a choice ... not a technical reason -
Locate the schema definition for the structural class in question within the
schema NC using ADSIEDIT.MSC or equiv. (in this case, a Container), bring up
its properties and set DefaultHidingValue to FALSE.
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
What kind of container? An OU is a container.
Thanks... ... ... ...
Sergio J. Olivarez - Contractor
GD-NS
-Original Message-
From: Thommes, Michael M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:11 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] ability
A container is not an OU.
-Original Message-
From: Olivarez, Sergio J Mr ANOSC/FCBS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:26:22
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ability to create container objects not in ADUC
What kind of container? An OU is a container
:23 PM
To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] ability to create container objects
not in ADUC
A container is not an OU.
-Original Message-
From: Olivarez, Sergio J Mr ANOSC/FCBS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:26:22
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE
: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ability to create container objects not in ADUC
However, the opposite is true. An OU *is* a container. Look at the schema
inheritance.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
