At 3:53 PM -0400 10/21/02, Thach, Kevin said:
The person that installed our environment basically set up 6 Policy Domains:
Colodom, Exchange, Lanfree, MSSQL, Nocodom, and Oracle.
99% of the clients are in the Nocodom (non-collocated) domain, which has one
policy set, and one management class
:
Shared: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
tsm: XXYquery drive
Library Name Drive Name Device Type On-Line
--- ---
IBM-7337 DRIVE1 GENERICTAPE Unavailable Since
11/06/02 13:31:11
IBM-7337 DRIVE2 GENERICTAPE Yes
tsm: XXYquery devclass
Device
ACS Id:
Private Category:
Scratch Category:
External Manager:
Shared: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
tsm: XXYquery drive
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade from 5.3 to 5.5
hi, just a quick question ... (sorry if i'm hijacking)
for lanfree backups right after server upgrade storage agents have to
be upgraded, am i right ?
preferably to the same version or greater ?
thanks in advance
:27
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location: VAULT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): admin
Last Update Date/Time: 01/21/2008 20:28:37
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key Manager
The big gotcha here is that you cannot use the simultaneous write feature if
the backup is going lanfree.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Kelly Lipp
[l...@storserver.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:28 PM
To: ADSM
:29 Total number of objects failed: 0
04/29/2009 00:29:29 Total number of subfile objects: 0
04/29/2009 00:29:29 Total number of bytes transferred: 0 B
04/29/2009 00:29:29 LanFree data bytes: 0 B
04/29/2009 00:29:29 Data transfer time
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update Date/Time: 08/28/2009 09:02:59
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key Manager:
13:58:24 tsmserv01 : reclaim stgpool filepool thres=30
Read: 09/11/2009 17:34:13
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update Date/Time: 08/28/2009 09:02:59
Begin
:
Scratch Category:
WORM Scratch Category:
External Manager:
RSM Media Type:
Shared: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
Primary Library Manager:
WWN: 00900D2633661DA5
in that
group are migrated.
At least when the source pool is of type DISK, I'd guess that files will still
be ordered by filespace and node,
just like they are by filespace in the case of collocation by node.
4.- In case we have a lanfree backup with 4 parallel sessions , is CG
suitable for this TSM
Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): TSMMANAGER
Last Update Date/Time: 05/21/2010 08:27:59
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key Manager: None
From:
Richard Sims r
and
all goes quiet.
Yesterday the CE upgraded the TS3500 to the very latest, and within minutes
the Library begins refusing to mount tapes, with total disregard to the
presence or absence of SANDISCOVERY and potentially disastrous effect on
LANFREE backups. As I see it, from my TSM seat
Robert Ouzen wrote:
Hi to all
Did anyone as tips to improve performance with TDP for exchange 2010, my
backup is lanfree my old fashion EXCHSRV01_DB took 03:28 for 413 GB , the
Exchange 2010 with VSS feature EXCHSRVB_DB took 02:01 for 184 GB.
The backup is thru DE duplication
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): BATCH
Last Update Date/Time: 01/25/2011 21:03:44
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key Manager: None
What can I do??
Alex Sørensen
Server
numbers to go off of. You'd think Google would find some,
but my searches turned up nill.
As an aside, has anyone had performance problems with Quantum
libraries
and their built-in Fibre Switches?
OS is AIX 6, having the same performance from both TSM server, AIX and
Solaris 10 LanFree.
Thanks
] Exhange database backup with TDP
Ho to all
My database for Exchange 2010 grow very fast around 850GB , I backup it with
TDP for Microsoft exchange V6.1.3.1 and with Lanfree and Data Domain DE
duplication.
I still doing a full back up and take between 7-8 hours !
Any suggestion or experience
Del,
thanks for the clarification.
But, in a VM environment, you can do lanfree to tape with the 'backup vm'
command if you have a physical proxy server. Given the size of the db, you
probably won't mind also backing up the OS and applications.
On 27 jul. 2011, at 20:28, Del Hoobler wrote
Remember that LanFree is a licensed product. Even if it does work (which
it may very well), don't forget the licensing. Though it's a vmware shared
server, you may end up paying for the entire physical server.
Rick
From: Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 07/27
. Date Last Read: 09/12/10 02:04:41
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update Date/Time: 09/12/10 02:03:30
When I do a q drm
When I looked into this subject I found that lanfree supports:
- vtl
- physical tape
- file devices on GPFS (a san filesystem)
- file devices via Sanergy (nfs but with data being sent over fibre
channel)
- I found a specific comment that straight NFS for sharing File devices is
not supported
: 02/03/2012 04:02:19
Approx. Date Last Read: 02/03/2012 04:43:34
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update
. Date Last Read: 02/03/2012 04:43:34
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update Date/Time: 01/31/2012 13:09:15
Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update Date/Time: 01/31/2012 13:09:15
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key Manager:
Logical Block Protected: No
Thanks,
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project
Hi
In the case of a simple filesystem backup (BA), set the RESOURCEUTILIZATION
parameter in the client dsm.opt/sys file to allow for multiple mounts and set
the MAXIMUM MOUNT POINTS (maxnummp) in the Node config to allow for how many
drives you want to let them use.
I tend to set it like
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
Primary Library Manager:
WWN:
Serial Number:
AutoLabel: Yes
Reset Drives: Yes
Relabel Scratch:
Last Update by (administrator): OneCoolDude
:
Private Category: 300
Scratch Category: 302
WORM Scratch Category:
External Manager:
Shared: Yes
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
Primary Library Manager:
WWN
of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN
Last Update Date/Time: 10/18/2012 09:55:30
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key
TSM Storage Agent instance on a Client backup with
Lanfree as described in this article:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21326355
My second instance call TSM StorageAgent2 as this own dsmsta.opt and
devconfig.txt .
I am wondering how to load this new instance on a command
: 3622488810
Total LanFree Bytes : 0
Total Bytes Before Deduplication : 0
Total Bytes After Deduplication : 0
Files Compressed By : 0%
Deduplication Reduction : 0.00%
Total Data Reduction Ratio : 0.00%
The operation
version is: 6.2.3.1
My TSM server version is:5.5.5.2
My TSM Lanfree version is: 5.5.5.1
T.I.A Best Regards
Robert
as:
My TSM client version is: 6.2.3.1
My TSN TDP Exchange version is: 6.1.3.2
My TSM server version is:5.5.5.2 on AIX O.S
My TSM Lanfree version is: 5.5.5.1
Now I made all the configuration to backup it on a new environment
as: (Just change for now the version of the TSM server
of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): ROBERT
Last Update Date/Time: 12/29/2013 10:03:50
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key
to a tape pool and is lanfree.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Michael Prix
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 10:16 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Oracle rman - specify management class
Hello Steven
shared drives and 120x
LTO1's for each server non-shared in multiple DataDomains. I also have LANFree
clients that do not support redundant fabrics.
Thank you,
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike
De Gasperis
Approx. Date Last Written: 01/06/2015 22:27:18
Approx. Date Last Read: 01/08/2015 21:26:55
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update
Hi guys!
I have an ancient Linux node (RHEL4) running an unsupported (but latest)
lin_tape 1.66 and an also unsupported (but latest) TSM 5.5.4. LANfree backup
doesn't work anymore, but I can't find the reason why. Since the whole stack is
out of support there is no sense in opening a PMR...
I
unsupported (but latest) TSM 5.5.4. LANfree backup
doesn't work anymore, but I can't find the reason why. Since the whole stack is
out of support there is no sense in opening a PMR...
I started a trace to see why the client cannot mount tapes, here is a piece of
the output:
12:27:55.323 [29][output.c
LanFree/SAN
or Network.
3) Some RMAN backups run via cron and write direct to DataDomain via NFS. (no
TSM involvement)
Note - archive logs are pushed to TSM via scripts and run around the clock.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update Date/Time: 03/27/2015 04:16:15
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key Manager:
Logical Block Protected: No
But when
Approx. Date Last Read: 07/02/2015 05:16:24
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator):
Last Update Date/Time: 06/30/2015 18:17:40
and running Quantums own Filesystem called
NextFS or something like that, if I don't remember wrong.
NextFS is a great file system if you have large files such VTL or Media
Streaming files.
The only reason why I should sale a customer a VTL is if they wanna run a
LANFree backup to disk.
But because
) is basically a Linux OS and running Quantums own Filesystem called
NextFS or something like that, if I don't remember wrong.
NextFS is a great file system if you have large files such VTL or Media
Streaming files.
The only reason why I should sale a customer a VTL is if they wanna run a
LANFree
performance on a P570, when using
a virtual internal network with an high MTU size.
Jeroen
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
goc
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] lanfree / storage
Hi,
You can use a storage agent on another machine. Data will be sent over
the LAN to that machine, so its partial LANfree.
Regards,
k
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
goc
Sent: donderdag 5 maart 2009 11:53
To: ADSM-L
Using 3592/jaguar tapedrives with tsm 5.2 and 5.3.
LANFree backup of a SAP database (1.8TB) using the TDP for R3 writing to
1 tapedrive.
2 HBA's for disk and 2 HBA's for tape (2gbit). Tape and disk go via
different fabrics.
BKI1215I: Average transmission rate was 241.800 GB/h (68.779 MB/sec
:
Shared: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
Device class;
Device Class Name: MANUAL_DRIVE
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 0
Device Type: 4MM
Format: DRIVE
Est/Max Capacity (MB):
Mount Limit: 1
Mount Wait (min): 60
Mount Retention (min): 60
Label Prefix: ADSM
Library: MANUAL_4MM
to the server.
This is the place LANFREE comes into play.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gigabit Ethernet speed
From IBM support answered that our case is APAR IC44818: TSM SERVER MAY
CRASH OR INVALIDLY ISSUE DAMAGED FILE ERRORS WHEN READING DATA OFF OF A
SEQUENTIAL VOLUME
This bug will be fixed in 5.3.0.2
Till now the only workaround we found is to restore data lanfree. But
this is not tested
restoring or backing data with DB2, but I get
the
same poor performance when sending gig sized files from the file system.
Performance seems to be CPU bound, and each restore/backup session takes
100%
of one CPU. So, on a 400mHz machine I can get around 10-15mb/s lanfree and
on
the faster machines
With Exchange 2003 I can't remember if it is up to 4 storage groups per server
with 5 databases each or if its the other way around. Anyway, while I don't
condone using 1 TB pluse storage groups. Groups much larger than 200 GB are
going to exist out there.
I would just add that using LANFree
Write Pass Number: 1
Approx. Date Last Written: 05-01-2005 11:28:21
Approx. Date Last Read: 09-11-2004 11:43:48
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable
We have a server that is using Oracle/Rman/TDPO/LanFree backups. The node
is set to allow 2 mount points. Yesterday at the start of a backup TSM
threw out
an error saying that channel 2 could not be allocated because the node
had exceeded it's mount points:
10:56:29 ANR0539W Transaction
Richard
Thank you for the reply.
Our only way out was to kill the TSM StorageAgent process and restart
it. Lanfree backups then continued as normal. For some of the messages
and message text, there were a number of identical hits on the IBM
support site saying that this had happened in TSM
. Date Last Read : 07-06-11 15:53:01 EDT
Date Became Pending :
Number of Write Errors : 0
Number of Read Errors : 0
Volume Location : vault
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator) : ADMIN
Last Update Date/Time : 07-06-12 13:15:32 EDT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator) : ADMIN
Last Update Date/Time : 07-06-12 13:15:32 EDT
Begin Reclaim Period :
End Reclaim Period :
Drive Encryption Key Manager :
2) q content a00043 f=d
Output:
Date/Time : 08-04-03 14:03:09 EDT
than TSM DB.
Fourth question : In my opinion VTLs provide not too much possibilities, in
general VTLs aren't matures but it is ideal for lanfree backup. I don't like
too much VTL can manage all volumes, I prefer TSM does that. TSM is working for
many years and more or less works properly
a client is receiving this error while trying a db restore... It's a
lanfree client. I'm guessing I have to increase the commtimeout
parameter on the tsm server? Or the storage agent? Not sure which file
to modify on the storage agent?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
SAP Database? Urgent!
Hi
Assuming it are LANFree backups, via how many HBA's are you accessing your
drives (and disks)?
I think the HBA and or the SAN-switch will be the bottleneck (if you have
1Gbit/sec adapters/ports).
Let's say you will reach 80 MB/s via 1 HBA, that's 288.000 MB/h
170
ANE4961I (Session: 5836, Node: OPXFS_AS) Total
number of
bytes transferred: 1.23 GB
09/11/2003 03:46:52 ANE4971I (Session: 5836, Node: OPXFS_AS) LanFree
data
bytes:1.23 GB
09/11/2003 03:46:52 ANE4963I (Session: 5836, Node
ANE4971I (Session: 5836, Node: OPXFS_AS) LanFree
data
bytes:1.23 GB
09/11/2003 03:46:52 ANE4963I (Session: 5836, Node: OPXFS_AS) Data
transfer
time: 332.89 sec
09/11/2003 03:46:52 ANE4966I (Session: 5836, Node
path on the same run.
In cases where a 'no query restore' is not possible then you will need to
retrieve files that are not LAN accessible by disabling 'enable lanfree'
from your dsm.sys (dsm.opt in windows) file.
Customers typically run into this problem for performance reasons. Small
files do
: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
Primary Library Manager:
WWN:
Serial Number:
AutoLabel:
Last Update by (administrator): TECBLN
Last Update Date/Time: 09/19/03 13:05:43
Q DRIVE
John,
Server to server will only move data over the wan, there is no lanfree option at this
time.
If you are only using second site for backup then there is no need for TSM2 at all.
Just define your second site library and drives with an new device class and stgpools
on TSM1
Start a backup
DESCRIPTION: If a change/update is made to an*
* existing policy for a storage pool *
* and management class used for lanfree *
* backups or archives, the storage*
* agent will not recognize
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location: Fire Safe Storage Volume is MVS Lanfree
Capable : No Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN
Last Update Date/Time: 03/18/2004 13:06:48
Mike Bantz
Systems
:
SET STANAME EXCHANGE_SA
SET STAPASSWORD 21f11864ecc5337c2f08045b1b36e31f50
SET STAHLADDRESS 132.74.1.78
DEFINE SERVER ADSM HLADDRESS=132.74.1.48 LLADDRESS=1500
SERVERPA=216893d5d8fde6508e93e186f0498c787f
I check the connection on the Tsm server by running: validate lanfree
the syntax:
SET STANAME EXCHANGE_SA
SET STAPASSWORD 21f11864ecc5337c2f08045b1b36e31f50
SET STAHLADDRESS 132.74.1.78
DEFINE SERVER ADSM HLADDRESS=132.74.1.48 LLADDRESS=1500
SERVERPA=216893d5d8fde6508e93e186f0498c787f
I check the connection on the Tsm server by running: validate lanfree
STAPASSWORD 21f11864ecc5337c2f08045b1b36e31f50
SET STAHLADDRESS 132.74.1.78
DEFINE SERVER ADSM HLADDRESS=132.74.1.48 LLADDRESS=1500
SERVERPA=216893d5d8fde6508e93e186f0498c787f
I check the connection on the Tsm server by running: validate lanfree
exchsrv01_dbexchange_sa
Here
21f11864ecc5337c2f08045b1b36e31f50
SET STAHLADDRESS 132.74.1.78
DEFINE SERVER ADSM HLADDRESS=132.74.1.48 LLADDRESS=1500
SERVERPA=216893d5d8fde6508e93e186f0498c787f
I check the connection on the Tsm server by running: validate lanfree
exchsrv01_dbexchange_sa
Here the output:
tsm
Write Pass Number: 1
Approx. Date Last Written: 03/28/06 08:16:35
Approx. Date Last Read: 03/28/06 13:15:51
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable
that this particular node has 0 storage pools
capable of LAN-Free ... ? is this related to the paths ?
validate lan-free shows me only DISK pools :-S i little confused here
...
server AIX 5.2.0.6
TSM 5.3.3.1
stagent on HP-UX 11.11 v5.3.1.5
tsm: TSM01validate lanfree bscs mihael_sta ANR0387I Evaluating node
BSCS
stagent on HP-UX 11.11 v5.3.1.5
tsm: TSM01validate lanfree bscs mihael_sta
ANR0387I Evaluating node BSCS using storage agent MIHAEL_STA for LAN-free
data movement.
Node Storage Operation Mgmt Class Destination
LAN-Free Explanation
Name Agent Name
to the paths ?
validate lan-free shows me only DISK pools :-S i little confused here
..
server AIX 5.2.0.6
TSM 5.3.3.1
stagent on HP-UX 11.11 v5.3.1.5
tsm: TSM01validate lanfree bscs mihael_sta ANR0387I Evaluating node
BSCS using storage agent MIHAEL_STA for LAN-free data movement.
Node
a VTL
based LanFree.
I wish someone would make a VTL Head on a Unix box, there's just not the
I/O capacity in these Intel/AMD based linux VTL heads
Regards,
Charles Hart
UHT - Data Protection
David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
10/16
to
any of the VTL Heads (Dilligent / Falcon Store etc) become the
bottleneck.
I can see a stream to a 3592 or maybe an LTO3 drive do better than a
VTL
based LanFree.
I wish someone would make a VTL Head on a Unix box, there's just not
the
I/O capacity in these Intel/AMD based linux VTL heads
:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN
Last Update Date/Time: 13/03/07 11:33:06
They all have Estimated Capacity, Pct Util and Pct. Reclaimable
Space with a value of 0.0 and Volume Status: Empty. Can anybody
give me some idea why these tapes have
.
enablelanfree yes
LANFREECommmethod TCPIP
LANFREETCPPort 1500
or
LANFREECommmethod SharedMem
LANFREESHMPORT 1510
The stanza being used for dsmc LanFree is
SErvername MOUNT_SERVER
NODENAME zambezi-c
COMMmethod SHAREdmem
TCPPort 1500
Hi *SM'ers
I am looking into why our LTO1 / LTO2 performance is so terrible (50%
rated throughput on avg) during backup stgpools.
TSM 5.2.4
AIX 5.2
IBM 3584 library
LTO1 and LTO2 drives.
The drives hit their rated throughputs during LANFree backup.
We have 2 sites with the same devices, 3584
:00:16
Approx. Date Last Read: 07/20/04 13:20:20
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location: VAULT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
tsm: TSM1q content 006273
ANR2034E QUERY CONTENT: No match found
Number: 1
Approx. Date Last Written: 07/20/04 16:00:16
Approx. Date Last Read: 07/20/04 13:20:20
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location: VAULT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
tsm: TSM1q
:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location: VAULT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
tsm: TSM1q content 006273
ANR2034E QUERY CONTENT: No match found using this
criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.
2nd attempt at delete volume:
tsm: TSM1del
Number: 1
Approx. Date Last Written: 07/20/04 16:00:16
Approx. Date Last Read: 07/20/04 13:20:20
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location: VAULT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
tsm: TSM1q
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): WBOYER
Last Update Date/Time: 09/16/2005 10:53:56
Bill Boyer
Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Volume Location: VAULT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): WBOYER
Last Update Date/Time: 09/16/2005 10:53:56
Bill Boyer
Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
Location: VAULT
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update by (administrator): WBOYER
Last Update Date/Time: 09/16/2005 10:53:56
Bill Boyer
Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield -
??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
and reinstalling the TSM
services, making sure that those reg entries are totally removed after your
uninstall. My problem turned out to be a bug with the lanfree option and
tcpclientaddress option enabled and that was fixed in the 5.3.2 client
(IC44846). It might be worth a shot at the 5.3.2 client
up 6 Policy Domains:
Colodom, Exchange, Lanfree, MSSQL, Nocodom, and Oracle.
99% of the clients are in the Nocodom (non-collocated) domain, which has one
policy set, and one management class which has one backup copy group with
retention policies set to NOLIMIT, 3, 60, 60.
So, my problem
Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :
Objet : Re: Co-location
At 3:53 PM -0400 10/21/02, Thach, Kevin said:
The person that installed our environment basically set up 6 Policy Domains:
Colodom, Exchange, Lanfree, MSSQL, Nocodom, and Oracle.
99% of the clients
set up 6 Policy
Domains:
Colodom, Exchange, Lanfree, MSSQL, Nocodom, and Oracle.
99% of the clients are in the Nocodom (non-collocated) domain, which has
one
policy set, and one management class which has one backup copy group with
retention policies set to NOLIMIT, 3, 60, 60.
This is away
the original setting, therefore our
drivemapping on TSM is no longer valid in our lanfree environment.
sincerely,
Jason Livie
e-Business Process/Storage Team - Service Delivery
IBM Global Services - La Gaude
Tél.: 04 9211 5943 - email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
The person that installed our environment basically set up 6 Policy
Domains:
Colodom, Exchange, Lanfree, MSSQL, Nocodom, and Oracle.
99% of the clients are in the Nocodom (non-collocated) domain, which has
one
policy set, and one management class which has one backup copy group with
retention
: XXYquery library
Library Name: IBM-7337
Library Type: SCSI
ACS Id:
Private Category:
Scratch Category:
External Manager:
Shared: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
tsm: XXYquery drive
Library Name Drive
(devclass=file). The DBAs here are happy with that. ..Paul
At 06:14 PM 2/23/2009, Fred Johanson wrote:
The big gotcha here is that you cannot use the simultaneous write feature
if the backup is going lanfree.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads
Johanson wrote:
The big gotcha here is that you cannot use the simultaneous write feature
if the backup is going lanfree.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Kelly
Lipp [l...@storserver.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:28
to a different
library, right? And Mr. SAN, two desks down, says all physical connections
should be LANFree (and Liverpool just scored against Real Madrid on tape, so
I've got distractions). My reading of manuals is that the NAS can't use NT as
it is currently used. That's why I created
in mind, I don't like SANergy. IMNSHO it has been poorly
designed. Also, IMNSHO, LANfree is a lot of trouble in maintaining the
client. I'd first consider using 802.1Q VLAN tagging. Supported on all
operating systems, easy to configure and a lot cheeper. But, it's not
physical separations, so if you
to LANFree (currently it is set to Any), has anyone else seen
this issue before?
SAMPLE from TSM Log
Backup
09/21/09 08:08:30 ANE4991I (Session: 225141, Node: SERVER1_LF)
TDP
Oracle
AIX ANU0599 TDP for Oracle: (1310902): =()
ANU2526I
Backup details
:
WORM Scratch Category:
External Manager:
RSM Media Type:
Shared: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
Primary Library Manager:
WWN: 00900D2633661DA5
Serial
Category:
WORM Scratch Category:
External Manager:
RSM Media Type:
Shared: No
LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
Primary Library Manager:
WWN: 00900D2633661DA5
601 - 700 of 978 matches
Mail list logo
