Jesse, I don't use AIX sorry so can't help you there but Paul Zarnowski talked about
his upgrade back in February which sounds similar to yours.
Checkout the following link for more info:
http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0402/236.html
Hope it helps.
Gordon Woodward
Wintel Server Support
Hi everyone,
I wonder if anyone can offer any advise about the following:-
We have a single TSM server with a gigabit interface. (x.x.1.102)
The major backup client is a Solaris machine running four Lotus Domino server
instances, each instance allocated it's own port on a quad ethernet card.
Hi,
TSM server 5.2.2.5 on Win2k .
I repeatadly get this error from Operational reporting at the same time
every day (almost... 3 out of 5 days.)
Application popup: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library : Runtime Error!
Program: C:\xyz\UTILS\tsm\console\tsmreptsvc.exe
This application has
Hi Henrik,
Eventhough I never encountered such problem, but it sounds like something
about APIs. Try installing BA Client again, the APIs of which are also used
while we are talking to TSM.
Operational reporting is normally installed on machines other than TSM
server, check to see if that other
I wonder if anyone can offer any advise about the following:-
We have a single TSM server with a gigabit interface. (x.x.1.102)
The major backup client is a Solaris machine running four Lotus Domino server
instances, each instance allocated it's own port on a quad ethernet card.
We have four
Hey Everyone!
I have been looking into tuning client and server parameters for when I
move to an AIX 5.2 TSM server at 5.2.2.5. I noticed that in an environment
with LTO2, the clients txnbytelimit should be 2097152. Is the TSM
Performance and Tuning Guide correct? Thanks!
Hello all,
I usually don't use this number, since I have a lot of retries due to
changing files and so on, and I would have a huge amount of
re-transmitted files. However, I've been testing (with LTO1, but I will
do it again with LTO2) and found out that you should not set this to a
number
5.1 will run on AIX; but I don't believe 5.2 will...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/19/2004 2:07:27 AM
Jesse, I don't use AIX sorry so can't help you there but Paul Zarnowski
talked about his upgrade back in February which sounds similar to
yours.
Checkout the following link for more info:
We have found success using:
txnbytelimit2097152 *Use for LTO, DLT and 9940 drives.
We use
txnbytelimit 25600 * Use for 9840 and 3590
Paul van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I usually don't use this number, since I have a lot of retries due to
changing files and so on,
Ok. Thanks! It's nice to hear that people are successfully using these
parameters!
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603
Fax:(717)302-5974
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSM_User
[EMAIL
Hello,
I am runing TSM 5.1.8.1 server on z/OS. We have many WIN2K servers
that just had their TSM client code updated to 5.2.2.0. from 5.1.6.x.
Many of them are getting the following messages. Allong with a lot of
the server being backed up correctly. I thought I had seen a discussion
on
== In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was another management requirement that all production servers be
backed up in full once per year and that snapshot be kept forever - there
is no reasoning with this, its one of those stupid mandates that applies to
Guy's
Can someone tell me the easiest way to copy a database tape and
then delete the record of it from TSM.
What I'm after is creating a copy of the database so that we can test
some recovery procedures off site
but want to be able to just wipe the tape at the end rather than return
I was wondering if anyone was multiplexing backups to a single tape.
Recently I attended a Veritas class, our other new backup system, (yes I
did ask to stay completely with TSM) and they really touted this as what
seemed like a very good means of backup. Unless you have the newer faster
Some considerations for long-term archive:
- Much of today's data, as it is used from day to day, exists in some
product-specific format. If you were to retrieve that data, say, 10 years
from now, would you have software capable of reading that data?
- Even if you archive the software, will
delete vol VOLUMEID discarddata=yes
should handle it. ...
-Original Message-
From: Mark Heynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Database tapes
Guy's
Can someone tell me the easiest way to copy a database tape and
For us, it is the beginning of the Sarbanes-Oxley overhaul. I ask those same questions to people all over my company and their response?
Well you (me) had better make sure that the data moves with whatever new Technoloogy comes in!
They don't care if we have the software capable of reading this
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gill, Geoffrey L.
I was wondering if anyone was multiplexing backups to a single tape.
Recently I attended a Veritas class, our other new backup
system, (yes I
did ask to stay completely with TSM) and they really touted
this
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Heynes
Guy's
Careful. There are some highly capable *women* on this mailing list as
well.
Can someone tell me the easiest way to copy a database tape and
then delete the record of it from TSM.
Just let your
My info is old, but my guess it hasn't changed much since I used to work for
a VAR and we sold both TSM and Veritas NetBackup:
Veritas multiplexes blocks from various backup clients on the tapes when
this is being done. It works, and is very effective. They basically used a
hacked version of
I havn't read the SBO requirements, but from our internal auditors, it looks
like we need to have a good business
best efforts to keep readable for whatever retention period we publicize.
In working with older tape technology in storing archive tapes, we found
that 20% of the tapes were not
For us, it is the beginning of the Sarbanes-Oxley overhaul. I ask those
same
questions to people all over my company and their response?
Well you (me) had better make sure that the data moves with whatever new
Technology comes in!
My personal (not necessarily that of IBM's) opinion: this
I haven't read the SBO requirements, but from our internal auditors, it
looks
like we need to have a good business
best efforts to keep readable for whatever retention period we
publicize.
In working with older tape technology in storing archive tapes, we found
that 20% of the tapes were not
The new release of NetBackup 5.0 has disk backup capabilities. They call is
a DSSU...Disk something Staging Unit. Backups can be directed to the DSSU
and are then de-staged to tape by the media server as time permits. It is
also cache'd on the DSSU, just like CACHE=YES on a storage pool. I don't
In our case, this is going to be used to back up and archive file servers -
NOT operating systems.
As for how to read/use the data, here's the directory structure:
\\toaster\is\documentation - contains docs, for instance
\\toaster\installs - contains setup files for all apps used in our
Speaking from having just moved from a client that for some bizarre reason
thought that moving from TSM to Veritas would be a good move, I can assure
you that you don't want to be part of that train wreck. Just the
crippling administrivia alone will give you permanent migraines. God help
you if
As someone who has migrated from Burroughs Medium Systems (B3900) to
Honeywell (DPS-8) to IBM (4381, 3090, 9672 - MVS, MVS-XA, MVS-ESA) to
IBM RS/6000, I have to agree with Andrew. Any long-term archiving
mandated by the business MUST include archiving of the data in an
UNLOADED format - either
Anyone out there using LANFree backups with clusters?
The environment is SQLServer in an ACTIVE-ACTIVE configuration. It's already
configured with the B/A client on each node and the TDP SQL agent scheduler
service as a cluster resource. If I add the storage agent to each node, up
and running not
That is the way I usually configure it. Works fine.
Paul Gondim van Dongen
MCSE
IBM Certified Deployment Professional -- Tivoli Storage Manager V5.2
VANguard - Value Added Network guardians
http://www.vanguard-it.com.br
+55 81 3225-0353
-Mensagem original-
De: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL
IMHO, if you must move from TSM to Veritas NetBackup, (typically a
bureaucratic or
economic reason, not technically based) just start using NetBackup
and stop using TSM. Then keep TSM running on a 'warm' server, and test
restores and migtating from tape to tape occasionally. You can pretty much
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Coats, Jack
delete vol VOLUMEID discarddata=yes
Er...no. A DELETE VOLUME command will not get rid of database backups.
Only a DELETE VOLHISTORY will.
--
Mark Stapleton
Thanks for your input Andy, yes these are all valid points.
The requirement that we have is to be able to go back to the time of a decision and
have available all pertinent information so that the same decision could be made
again. I don't know who the optimist was who wrote the requirement,
Hello All,
I wanted some input concerning TSM's DR module and its capabilities. I used BMR many
years ago as a DR solution and was planning on using it with TSM. I am currently
working with a Veritas Backup Exec guy who is touting the IDR agent that Veritas has
and was wondering what my
Hi J,
TSM's DR is primarily concerned with the TSM server restore in case it
crashes.
TSM is certified by Cristie BMR solution (www.cristie.co.uk) and is capable
of same features that Veritas IDR provides.
Kind Regards,
Muhammad SaDaT Anwar
Product Specialist
Systems Management Data Management
34 matches
Mail list logo
