without using memoryefficientbackup.
Terveisin
Henrik Ahlgren
System Administrator
Itella Information Oy
Tietäjäntie 2
FI-02130 Espoo
GSM +358-50-3866200
Fax +358-9-47855600
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.itella.net/informationlogistics
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:02:18AM -0400, Richard Sims wrote:
One would think that the 64-bit client would operate with no tricks
needed to make it do what you expect, but no... See Technote 1259376.
Oh yeah, Richard Sims and adsm-l beats Google 10-0. Thank you, thank you
and once again thank
Well, the naive idea is to set MAXDATA to 0xF0. But it seems that
8 is the maximum, and the backup fails after using ~ 2 GB, like
before. Maybe I need to use LDR_CNTRL=LARGE_PAGE_DATA=Y or something?
Terveisin
Henrik Ahlgren
System Administrator
Itella Information Oy
Tietäjäntie 2
FI
nodes between TSM
instances without using too much tape media/network bandwidth/time/
effort?
--
Terveisin
Henrik Ahlgren
Technical Manager
Itella Information Oy
Tietäjäntie 2
FI-02130 Espoo
GSM +358-50-3866200
a move.
--
Terveisin
Henrik Ahlgren
Technical Manager
Itella Information Oy
Tietäjäntie 2
FI-02130 Espoo
GSM +358-50-3866200
On Dec 4, 2008, at 18:53 , Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
Are you mis-reading/writing that info?350GB takes 1-hour to
expire and
about the same to backup??
My 190GB DB used to take 48+ hours to run expire (350M objects) and
2-hours for a full backups! With recent cleanup/load balancing by
to rather buy more RAM and
increase the DB2 cache to speed up the database.
Currently I have RAM set at 24GB but its way cheaper doubling the RAM than
to buy 8 x SSD's
Currently I have 8 x SSD vs 6 x SAS 15K
--
Henrik Ahlgren
Seestieto
+358-50-3866200
if there's any other opinions let's hear it, the more opinions the
more wisdom...
Regards
Louw Pretorius
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Henrik Ahlgren
Sent: 22 November 2010 11:25
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re
Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU skrev: -
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Från: Henrik Ahlgren pa...@seestieto.com
Sänt av: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Datum: 11/22/2010 23:27
Ärende: Re: DB2: SSD vs more RAM
Yep, doing a 200 GB database with high-end and reduntant SLC NAND is definedly
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015, at 03:52 PM, Matthew McGeary wrote:
We use SSD arrays for both our database
and our active log. That said, unless you are using TSM deduplication
or node replication, SSD disks should not be required for good server
performance.
Standard 15K SAS drives are more than
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Robert Ouzen wrote:
I think I found the solution, to change on the backup copy group on the
management class mgtest1 the copy mode to absolute.
Run an incremental backup , the pst will be rebound and store to the
correct storage pool and put back the copy
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015, at 09:39 PM, Rick Adamson wrote:
ANR3350W Locally defined domain SQL_DOMAIN contains at least one node
and cannot be replaced with a definition from the configuration manager.
As per the admin guide I perform these steps:
1. Copy the domain.
2. Move all
Can someone explain why the Client Acceptor Daemon (dsmcad) opens
a random port ("ANS3000I TCP/IP communications available on port X")
when:
- SCHEDMODE is set to POLLING
- MANAGEDSERVICES is set to SCHEDULE
How do you configure a TSM client to *never* listen to *any* port, but
still using
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 07:42:55AM -0800, Robert Clark wrote:
> I think I'll be running some basic network performance tests
> first. The throughput I'm seeing doesn't appear to match people's
> glowing descriptions of how big the pipes are.
If you have a decent network (10 Gbit), your problem
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:40:46PM +0300, Efim wrote:
> CAD opens random port because the option WEBPORT has default value "0 0" and
> CAD randomly assign a free TCPport (the first parameter for CAD, the second
> for WEB client).
> I think it’s impossible to prevent this.
> As workaround you
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:34:43PM +, Vandeventer, Harold [OITS] wrote:
> The process is replicating a group that may have several members, 2
> up to 15 or 20; semi-random on how I assigned.
One reason to do this is that (at least on 6.3) the nodes are locked against
any changes (update node
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:00:46AM -0500, Mike De Gasperis wrote:
> You don't need to run the dsmcad technically speaking. You can just
> run a dsmc sched daemon or service.
Running the scheduler on-demand frees up the memory used by backup
jobs when it is no longer needed. Often the amount of
True, but systemd units work much better, especially if you need to run
multiple dsmcad instance for some reason. Systemd knows the PIDs of
every service without trying to guess using pidof klusges so service
restarts won't kill wrong processes. I don't know why TSM clients still
ship with only
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:45:58PM +, Taylor, Marc D wrote:
> We have been tasked to protect (i.e. backup) a local Eucalyptus installation.
> Anyone on the list doing anything similar with TSM? Backing up Eucalyptus
> doesn't seem to be a straightforward thing to do.
Well, what are you
Is the IBM Security Bulletin correct when it does not list Windows as a
vulnerable platform?
BTW, where can I find a more detailed description about what does this
mean exactly: "The Tivoli Storage Manager server fails to adequately
check the authorization of client sessions using the ASNODENAME
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 16:00 -0400, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Maybe IBM should start supplying CRC/checksum values?
Not only that, they should start PGP signing their software packages,
and promoting https download URLs instead of FTP. This is no longer the
90s.
Thanks. I think the reason why EXPIRE INVENTORY without NODES only seems
to expire a small amount of nodes is that it tries to continue where it
left the last time it stopped – if you happen to normally run expire
with DURATION= limitation. If TSM cancels the expire process
after duration is
00 has the problem) so an official patch has not been released so
> far.
>
> Search Google for IT17642.
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Henrik Ahlgren <pa...@seestieto.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The documentation for EXPIRE INVENTORY command says "
The documentation for EXPIRE INVENTORY command says "If you do not
specify either NODE or DOMAIN with value, data for all nodes is
processes". That is in fact how it works up to 6.3.6.100, but it seems
that there is a bug in 6.3.6 that causes it to only expire a handful of
randomly selected nodes,
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:02 +, Nachtwey, Bjoern wrote:
> the language can easily set to "en_US" by a PRESCHEDCMD, so the trick is to
> add just one line to the dsm.sys file:
>
>
>
> PRESCHEDCMD "export LANG=en_US"
That's a clever hack and it is surprising if it works. I would have
assumed
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 08:35:33AM -0500, Del Hoobler wrote:
> ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v7r1/Windows/x64/v716/
Please don't help the NSA by downloading binaries over inscure FTP!
https://public.dhe.ibm.com works.
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 16:08 +, Reese, Michael A (Mike) CIV USARMY 21
SIG BDE (US) wrote:
> I've been snagged by this on many occasions myself. The worst time was when
> 40 TB of data had to get backed up again because a system admin made a simple
> permission change at the root directory.
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
