Re: Backing up desktops/workstations

One idea might be to adopt a 2-pronged approach. On the client side, use USMT (for Microsoft, I'm not sure what you would use for Linux or other platforms) to have the Client PCs submit an archive file up to a network share. This way, you don't have to worry about TSM schedules for all the

Re: VE 6.4 Testing - think thin

Hello Wanda Have you verified that the account you're using on vCenter has all the necessary permissions/roles? http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21497028 Best regards, Michael Ryder Senior Systems Infrastructure Administrator Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Information

Re: Strange TSM diskpool performance issue

Stefan: I've seen this on other applications besides TSM, and in those cases it was all about tuning the application, after all efforts were made to make sure the hardware wasn't the bottleneck. How much memory does your SCSI controller have for cache? Are each of your arrays on separate SCSI

Re: Backup failing due to snap shot issue

Have you... as the warnings suggested... reviewed the Windows Microsoft Application event log on the client server? Did you see any useful messages? Here is some troubleshooting help directly from IBM:

Re: TSM VE backup of Orcale Windows server

Andy: VE uses Microsoft VSS (Volume Shadow copy Service), which was not available with Windows 2000. Oracle VSS Writer is only available with Oracle 9i or later. On Windows 2003 and newer, and Oracle 9i and alter, we have no trouble with hot-backups of Oracle systems where we have the Oracle

Re: TSM VE backup of Orcale Windows server

version of this process has worked for more than 10 years, now we need to convert it to virtual. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ryder, Michael S Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:25 AM

Re: How do you backup Active Directory 2008

In theory, AD gets backed up with System State. A Microsoft-supported method would probably take a hybrid approach, using their tool to create the files, and then back the files up to TSM. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754472(v=ws.10).aspx You may also consider using Cristie's

Re: IBM Support Portal Search

Hi Angela This is one of the things that HP, I think, does well. Take a look at their Passport portal. One can check all the devices/applications they own or have interest in, and this can act as a filter when receiving alerts (for example, BIOS updates, bug-fixes, etc.) and when it's necessary

Re: TSM/VE and SRM Replication

This warning is a new feature of vSphere 5.x -- prior to 5, you would not get any alert about consolidation being needed. It's possible this was happening before and you just didn't know it...? http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2003638

Re: Exchange 2010 backup performance

I'd like to second the comments by Hans -- Windows servers can perform well -- assuming the infrastructure is there to support it. Our TSM server is running 6.2 on a 64-bit Windows 2003 Server. One 1Gb ethernet nic. Our datamover/proxy is running 6.3 client on a Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) Server.

Re: best/most effecient way to backup a CIFS Share

Install the TSM client on server sxdcfs02, nstead of using backing up the CIFS shares. CIFS is very chatty, bypassing it should greatly improve performance. Mike On Sunday, March 16, 2014, Leonard, Matthew matthew.leon...@atlasair.com wrote: I'm trying to backup multiple CIFS shares and am

Re: best/most effecient way to backup a CIFS Share

Matthew -- Did your VNXe come licensed with block data services? It would be better to mount these filesystems as block-level devices to a TSM proxy node, and back them up as local storage systems. That will get you out of dealing with CIFs and potentially get you a dramatic performance

Re: best/most effecient way to backup a CIFS Share

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Gregor van den Boogaart gregor.booga...@rz.uni-augsburg.de wrote: Hi Mike, do you know, whether the EMC VNXe supports SMB2? If yes, it is switched I personally do not know, Gregor, but I would like to know the answer to your question as well Best regards,

Re: dfs backup issues

Remco The first thing that comes to mind is that when it fails, the backup client is connecting to a namespace's remote folder target remote DFS share that has an exclusion that prevents connection. For example, there could be Share permissions on that remote folder target that exclude

Re: TSM for VE: recommended VSwitch configuration?

Hi Matthew Can you tell us some more about your infrastructure? What kind of disk storage network are you using? iSCSI? FC? block-data? NAS? Are your stated rates for image backups, or file-level incremental? What version of TSM are you using? Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client

Re: TSM for VE: recommended VSwitch configuration?

traffic, be it a fresh full or a subsequent CBT incremental backup. 3) The VMware client is 7.1 and the server version is 6.3.4.200. Thanks! Matthew McGeary Technical Specialist PotashCorp - Saskatoon 306.933.8921 From: Ryder, Michael S michael_s.ry...@roche.com To: ADSM-L

Re: TSM for VE: recommended VSwitch configuration?

nightly backup traffic typically peaks at 350-400 MB/s. Matthew McGeary Technical Specialist PotashCorp - Saskatoon 306.933.8921 From: Ryder, Michael S michael_s.ry...@roche.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 03/20/2014 02:12 PM Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for VE

Question about TSM 7.1 Node Replication

Hello Folks: I've been searching all day, but haven't been able to find an answer on my own yet. Is anyone using Node Replication on TSM 7.1? I am tasked with coming up with some sort of disaster recovery solution for TSM 7.1 -- we are currently running server v6.2, and I want to take this

Re: Question about TSM 7.1 Node Replication

, or migrate data to a target replication server. Source: http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v7r1/topic/com.ibm.itsm.srv.doc/t_repl_dr_failover.html Best regards, Wolfgang On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Ryder, Michael S michael_s.ry...@roche.com wrote: Hello Folks: I've been

Re: V7 Stable?

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Karel Bos tsm@gmail.com wrote: Don't, just don't do 7.1 just yet. Op 3 apr. 2014 15:09 schreef Huebner, Andy andy.hueb...@novartis.com: Well THAT'S a cliff-hanger -- could you describe your experiences with 7.1 and why we shouldn't? Mike

TSM 7.1 upgrade path(s) on Windows

Hello Folks: I'm preparing to upgrade our TSM 6.2.3 server to TSM 7.1 -- both are on Windows. It's a side-by-side upgrade, and if possible I'd like to leave the existing TSM 6.2.3 environment alone during the upgrade, so that I can easily halt the upgrade if I run into any problems. I've been

Re: TSM 7.1 upgrade path(s) on Windows

-03 10:24 GMT-06:00 Ryder, Michael S michael_s.ry...@roche.com: Hello Folks: I'm preparing to upgrade our TSM 6.2.3 server to TSM 7.1 -- both are on Windows. It's a side-by-side upgrade, and if possible I'd like to leave the existing TSM 6.2.3 environment alone during the upgrade, so

Re: tsm tcp for vm versus veeam

The one factor that eliminated VEEAM from my consideration was that it cannot be used to backup physical servers. We prefer to minimize our application portfolio, and therefore continue to use TSM for backup of VMs and physical servers. Best regards, Mike Ryder RMD IT Client Services On Mon,

Re: TSM support for NoSQL database

Ricardo - which NoSQL DB are you concerned about? This article might help: http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/73955584612/quick-links-for-how-to-backup-different-nosql Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ribeiro, Ricardo ricardo.ribe...@schwab.com

Re: When did IBM become so closed (kinder word than I was going to use)?

I don't know, but it's probably within the past 6 months. HP started the same campaign on 1-Jan-2014. It's a ridiculous - you pay for the hardware, and expect to be able to keep at least the firmware up-to-date. Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:40

Backup job status

Folks: What is the best way to track a TSM backup job's status? We are currently using TSM 6.2, working on the upgrade to TSM 7.1, and have a business user that desires a simple interface with which to check status of a backup job. Green-light/red-light sort of display, with the ability to

De-dupe on 7.1

Hello TSM folks... What is the prevailing opinion of TSM de-duplication? I'm in the middle of building out a fresh TSM 7.1.1 install (on RHEL6, x86_64, w/TDP for VE {vsphere}), and the de-dupe feature could really come in handy -- I've already read the documentation and believe I have enough

Job Scheduling Question for VMs

Hello folks: I am polishing off the rough edges of my TSM 7.1.1 installation, and am curious about something. I have noticed that my data-mover (Windows-based) client *still* tries to establish connection-sessions for EVERY VM on the vCenter (including SRM stubs), even though: - I enumerate

Re-hosting

I need to re-host a TSM 7.1.1 server from one physical server to another. It is currently running RHEL 6, and will be on RHEL 6 on the new box. If it helps, I am actually doing this for a pair of servers, that use each other for dbbackup to virtual volumes. Node replication is turned on. Each

Re: LTO5 Tuning

Steve: What is the latency on your intersite connection? Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info wrote: Hi All I have a TSM 6.3.4 server on newish P7 hardware and AIX V7.1. HBAs are all 8Gb. The sans behind

Re: LTO5 Tuning

Steve, is this a TCPIP or FC connection? Mike On Thursday, October 30, 2014, Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info wrote: Thanks for your interest Mike. The san guy tells me it's 380 microseconds which equates to 76 km distance. Regards Steve On 30 Oct 2014 23:50, Ryder, Michael S

Strange Drive-Naming in 7.1.1

Hello All: We've been using TSM 7.1.1 ever since it was released, and we are seeing some strange behavior. The name of the VMs are picked up properly, but the drives have this strange designation in the form of: \\?\vstor2\mntapi20-shared- Worse, each of the VM's drives show up as

Re: Whitepaper: TDP 7.1

Here you go! I don't know why they hide these in IBM Developer Works Wiki... https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/Data%20Protection%20for%20VMware And the main TSM Knowledge Center for 7.1.1:

Includes and Excludes

Everyone's favorite topic! I recently implemented TSM 7.1.1.0, both on the server and client ends. TDP for VE is also running. Everything seems to be working well... except for... my excludes. On just *some *of the VMs. We backup *everything*, and I expected when we implemented 7.1.1, I

Re: Includes and Excludes

of the files excluded by the filesnottobackup registry key and appears with Operating System as source in a dsmc query inclexcl command. Could you post the result of the command above ? Le 4 décembre 2014 16:05:59 CET, Ryder, Michael S michael_s.ry...@roche.com a écrit : Everyone's favorite

Administration Center Future

Folks: Does IBM have some document or website that describes the future of Administration Center? Will it ever be upgraded to keep in lockstep with the TSM version and functionality? Will it's administrative capabilities be moved to Operations Center? I'm trying to decide whether to keep it

Re: TSM issue with RedHat

Or perhaps... could it have something to do with this flash alert I received in my inbox today? http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21696086myns=swgtivmynp=OCSSGSG7mync=Ecm_sp=swgtiv-_-OCSSGSG7-_-E Abstract RHEL 6.6 contains a kernel defect, which can cause Tivoli Storage Manager

Re: [pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from libmanager=QVIP2

Hi Eric: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com wrote: means? There are no additional messages on the server other than the ANR0535W This seems to be related: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21328476 Best regards, Mike, x7942

ANS9397W ... why?

Hello all: I've got TSM EE 7.1.1 installed on RHEL6.6 and everything's working just great. I also have TSM TDP 7.1.1 installed on a Windows 2012 box, but that's registering this funny error, which I am hoping you can help me interpret. ANS9397W TSM application protection cannot protect this

Re: ANS9397W ... why?

, Michael S Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:27 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] ANS9397W ... why? Hello all: I've got TSM EE 7.1.1 installed on RHEL6.6 and everything's working just great. I also have TSM TDP 7.1.1 installed on a Windows 2012 box, but that's registering this funny

Re: Best practices on filesystem for DB and ACTLOG on RHEL7

Robert: According to this document: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.1/com.ibm.itsm.perf.doc/t_perf_diskos_lnx.html - Use Linux Logical Volume Manager (LVM) to create logical volumes on the disk LUNs for all disks that are used for Tivoli Storage Manager

Re: TSM for VE 7.1.1.1 exclude vm question

Here's an excerpt from my datamover's opt file. We use a single opt file and put all our excludes in it, but I would like to hear how other people do it, too. ...snip... EXCLUDE.DIR \\*\*$\...\USMTBackup EXCLUDE.DIR \\server1\T$\Temp EXCLUDE.DIR \\*\*$\...\Program Files\Crystal

Re: How to tell what VM's are running backup in TSM for VE 7.1?

I know that you can see this in vCenter. You should also be able to query the running job in the TDP for VE gui; I believe in the schedule tab... Sorry, I don't have access right now. Mike On Friday, April 24, 2015, Schaub, Steve steve_sch...@bcbst.com wrote: Thanks to everyone who responded,

TSM 7.1.1 and AD-SSL

Folks: I have spent far too much banging my head against my desk on this topic, and thought I would ask you all. I've got TSM 7.1.1 running on RHEL 6.5. Our Microsoft AD servers are WIndows 2008 R2 but running in 2003 mode. I wish to configure TSM to allow ADMIN accounts to be authenticated

Re: tsm and dedup hardware or software or both

Hi Tim We use native TSM deduplication (software). It's generally accepted that you perform one or the other and not both. This is because additional deduplication results in an additional latency and often results in zero or negligible improvements. Deduplication functions as a result of

Re: TDP for VE; CBT backup size versus OS modified file size

It may be worth reading this VMware article about how CBT works - I can't comment on your particular case since you didn't provide any information about your infrastructure, but there are dependencies such as: - Virtual hardware version - ESX version - type of storage (VMFS, RDM, etc.) -

Re: TSM, Linux and VMs

Hello Erwann, thank you for replying. I am not using VCB -- but instead, VADP. It's ridiculous that IBM can't offer the same off-host file-level backup of for Linux VMs that they do for Windows VMs - now I have to deploy and manage an in-guest BA client for every VM? According to this link, it

TSM, Linux and VMs

Folks: Is it possible to perform off-host, file-level incremental backups of Linux VMs from a Linux proxy or data mover? I am using TSM 7.1.1 Server, and have a mix of Windows and Linux VMs (VMware, vSphere 5.5 environment). I have no trouble using my Windows data mover with the BA client to

Re: TSM, Linux and VMs

Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 622.448.310 € SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 From: Ryder, Michael S michael_s.ry...@roche.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 07/01/2015 02:41 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM

Re: Migrating VME from vCenter5 to vCenter6

What is your question or issue? Best regards, Mike , x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:05 AM, David Ehresman < david.ehres...@louisville.edu> wrote: > I have TSM for VE

Re: TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools

o I move from a file devclass stgpool > > to a directory-container pool. And what's the impact on the DB if I do > this? > > I already had multi-site configured for our environment with the > > tools that exist in versions <7.1.3. I'm not getting another 200TB > >

Re: Question about correct settings on Megaraid M5120 controller in IBM xseries with TSM

Stefan Can you provide details on the physical storage? What filesystem is in use? What version of Linux? Did the installer configure and tune OS parameters as indicated by TSM installation documentation? Are you allowed to share the devclass and storage pool definitions? Mike On Friday,

Re: Question about correct settings on Megaraid M5120 controller in IBM xseries with TSM

ong > at 220-300MB/s, but TSM can only do 10-15MB/s to a disk / file based > storage pool. > > I know TSM can use certain flags when writing to storagepools that change > the cache behaviour, what I don't know is what I need to set it to for it > to be fast. :-) > > R

Re: TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools

I am very interested in directory-container storage pools. But... If Migration or Move Data are not options, then how does one transition data from existing primary storage pools to a directory-container storage pool? Mike Best regards, Mike

SRM and TDP/VE?

Folks We use VMware SRM (Site Recovery Manager), where we have 2 vCenters running in an active-active failover scenario. If I failover all my nodes from a source vCenter to another target vcenter, now TDP for VE is "broken" because now the nodes are running under another vCenter and the proxy

Re: TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools

Thank you Deirdre I'm providing this excerpt from FAQ below -- please tell me this is going to be streamlined in the future? (If so, how much longer?) This is a LOT of data movement in order to simply move "sideways" to another storage pool on the same server. I'm fortunate to have a secondary

Re: TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools

he DB if I do > this? > > I already had multi-site configured for our environment with the tools > > that exist in versions <7.1.3. I'm not getting another 200TB array to > > move data to new directory-container pools. > > > > Thanks! > > > > SF > &g

Re: Things I learnt installing a v7.1.4 TSM for VE data mover

Neil this is really disturbing. The excerpt is directly from the VMware document referenced by IBM. Why why WHY would I spend years building and supporting a SAN-backed solution and get kicked-to-the-curb like this? *"A fix is unlikely."* Thanks a lot VMware! The only option then, if I

Re: Strange TSM for VE error

Tom: I had an extremely similar problem, with this same string in my errors -- "ReconfigVM_USCORETask" This is the article I read that helped me to solve my problem. In short... vCenter permissions. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21497028 Good Luck Best regards, Mike Ryder

Re: When can too many disk volumes be detrimental

up with that? They explain why > you should use ext4 for the storage volumes but no details on ext3 for > DB/logs? > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Ryder, Michael S < > michael_s.ry...@roche.com > > wrote: > > > Hi Zoltan > > > > Here is the ref

Re: getting performance from nfs storage over 10 gb link

Hi Gary What performance does Iperf3 get when you run it on your NFS server? There is a lot that is going on that has very much to do with your disk configuration on both your TSM server and the NFS server. Have you looked at a tool like iometer to see what performance you can squeeze out of

Re: When can too many disk volumes be detrimental

, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Ryder, Michael S < > michael_s.ry...@roche.com> wrote: > > > Did you follow the docs and disable RHEL's read-ahead > &

Re: VM backup question

Will this exclude backup of VM metadata? Mike On Sunday, January 31, 2016, Robert Ouzen wrote: > Hi Ray > > Thanks for this input .. > > It is a way to do a general INCLUDE for "Hard Disk 1" (ALL VM needs the > "Hard Disk 1" to be backup) . > > For machines I

Re: When can too many disk volumes be detrimental

y are spread across 2-ext4 filesystems due to the 16TB limit > for ext4. > > Are you saying I should create multiple ext4 filesystems (i.e. 2TB chunks) > vs the 2-big ones I am currently using? I can't split up the RAID5 array > due to loosing too much storage. > > On Mon

Re: What have they done to Passport!

Could it be your browser? I found in the past that I *had* to use Internet Explorer with the PA site, otherwise buttons didn't work... Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Dresang wrote: > Does this link get you where

Re: When can too many disk volumes be detrimental

Zoltan If I read your message correct: - 1TB over 11 hours is ~200Mbits/sec - Dell 6TB drives appear to be 7200rpm SAS drives --- It is likely your 600GB drives were 15000rpm - your TSM server uses a single RAID-5 array for the OS, application, logs and archive logs? is the TSM database on

How many DB2 users should there be?

Hello all Running a pair of TSM 7.1.3 servers here, and use Nagios to monitor our environment. One of the service checks I run watches the number of DB2 users on the TSM database. We see an rise and fall of user connections, and they are all consistently from one user... "dsmserv" Does anyone

Re: How many DB2 users should there be?

' metrics, if anyone is interested in sharing them here. Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Remco Post <r.p...@plcs.nl> wrote: > > On 26 jan. 2016, at 23:37, Ryder, Michael S <michael_s.ry...@roche.com> > wrote: > > > >

Re: When can too many disk volumes be detrimental

there might be > unknown/hidden damages). > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Ryder, Michael S < > michael_s.ry...@roche.com > > wrote: > > > Zoltan > > > > If I read your message correct: > > - 1TB over 11 hours is ~200Mbits/sec > > - Dell 6

Re: Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1 and container pools

Hi Arnaud If IBM made that commitment in black and white, then you should hold their feet to the fire. But I am willing to bet this was a salesman promising "similar performance." There is no technology I know where any deduplication factor can be guaranteed. Perhaps "UP to 4" for certain

Re: TSM Server 7.1.4 woes

PERSISTENCE PAYS OFF! Well done, both of you! Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrew Raibeck wrote: > Hello all, > > Neil took me up on my offer to look at a trace, and thanks to his > persistence, that indeed led to

Re: TSM Server on CentOS Linux

I believe you add a parameter to your call of install.sh like this install.sh -g -vmargs "-DBYPASS_TSM_REQ_CHECKS=true" I haven't tried this in some time... Good luck. Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:50 PM, .Maurizio TERUZZI <

Re: TSM Server on CentOS Linux

Maurizio The goal of CentOS is 100% binary support. It's virtually identical, so drivers SHOULD work unless they do something strange like look for the actual RedHat trademark in the OS. Also, there have been minor differences between same-numbered releases; I don't have a list of those, you

Re: TDP for Mail v.6.4.1. restore to pst file

Remco PST files CAN be and have been larger. In the old days, even though Microsoft definitely recommended against allowing them to get larger than 2GB (because there were no repair tools) we would regularly see people with 2-4GB PST files. This is definitely an OUTLOOK version dependent

Re: Help with DFS backups

Zoltan Have you tried explicitly including each DFS share as a mount point? I've had to do something similar in the past, though I can't remember exactly whether I used the "DOMAIN" "INCLUDE" or BOTH statements. Sorry, that's my best effort - though I would like to hear about the solution you

Re: protect pool plus replicate node equals poor replication efficiencies

Something doesn't make sense. You run a backup - node's data is stored in a pool on server A. Then, you protect pool, and a copy of the de-duped data is sent to the protect pool storage, also on server A. Then, you replnode, and a node is replicated to server B. You are surprised to find that

Re: protect pool plus replicate node equals poor replication efficiencies

oces, but it's representing the data..not actually sending it, it is only > sending metadata of that data. > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Ryder, Michael S < > michael_s.ry...@roche.com > > wrote: > > > Something doesn't make sense. > > > > You run a bac

Re: protect pool plus replicate node equals poor replication efficiencies

; only metadata of the nodes in that storagepool. > If you replicate nodes that have data in other storagepools yes, than it > will replicate that data. > Replicating metadata also puts data on the line of course but it's not > backup data, it's backup metadata. > > On Thu, Sep 15,

Re: protect pool plus replicate node equals poor replication efficiencies

tgpool > is faster in transferring data than the replicate node command was (and is, > you can still use that for both data and meta data). > > On Thursday, 15 September 2016, Ryder, Michael S < > michael_s.ry...@roche.com> > wrote: > > > The protected storage pool can be o

Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Rick Adamson wrote: > Again, how hard could it be? Ha! Have you ever written any software? It means that Cristie is spending a *lot *of time in bed with Microsoft (and Linux as well) to deliver the seamless product needed. Far

Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions

Just piping in here to lend support to TBMR - this has come in very handily, especially for the critical workstations we backup. Pop in the boot CD, answer a few prompts, and then off it goes, restoring directly from TSM/SP back to the local harddrive, along with the functionality to adjust for

Re: 3 Generation (GFS) Backup Schedule setup using TSM

What are you backing up to? tape? disk? purpose-built storage like a Data Domain? Mike Best regards, Mike , x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Tue, Dec 6,

Re: TSM 7.1.7 server CPU behavior

You didn't mention the OS. Have you considered running any diagnostic tools to figure out exactly what process is causing the extra spikes? For example, top or collectl (unix), or perfmon or resource monitor (windows)? Mike On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM <

Re: Influencing order of VM backup.

You can take more control by setting up specific schedules to backup some VMs first. You might use VM folders to control that as well. Do you let VMs backup in parallel with "VMMAXParallel" ? It defaults to 1... You can also have multiple jobs running simultaneously. It's not clear to me, are

Re: Any body knows how to backup SMB share ?

Try just using an SMB path... \\servername\share\ Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:56 AM Genet Begashaw wrote: > Thanks Steven , > > We did map the share drive and run and run using domain id , we still get > permission denied and not able to see

Re: IBM Spectrum Protect wiki replaced with new hosting site

This could have been the perfect time to share a link? Thanks for the update! Best regards, Mike , x7942 RMD IT Client Services On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at

Green fields....

What is the best way to "reset" a Spectrum Protect 8.1.1? This one in particular is a replication target which has all kinds of strange behavior on it and after spending far too many hours trying to repair it, I just want to ZAP it, blow all its data and nodes away and start fresh, without having