Sounds, like the run around. I have to believe PowerBroker can be setup to
have specific pbrun like functions for each thing you need to do. If not,
it is useless product. I suspect pbrun is wide open to run any command as
root.
-Original Message-
From: Cheryl Miller [mailto:[EMAIL
Three strikes and you are out.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: root required to kill TSM daemons?
WELL, if you can't use sudo, and you can't write a C wrapper for the SUID
bit,
Len, you bring up a good point.
NetBackup has a script called bpkillall or something like that. It did a ps
-ef | grep bp looking for what was necessary to kill and issued a kill -9
against each one of the tasks. Why could they just not create a script with
the sticky bit on it that executes
How long are the SCSI Cables, are you sure the termination is ok. Might be
a bad cable. Differential SCSI is really picky.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sparrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3584 amd SDG R03
Hi
You know this started about NetBackup. I am wondering if they are aware
that the same issues that NetBackup has are not issues on TSM. In NetBackup
if the server crashes you have to restart all the media servers to get
things to reconnnect. Maybe they are just presuming that it is the same
I would not put something I wanted to keep that long on doggies little toy
or ate my momma. You get the picture. I do not think DLT and 8mm are
reliable enough to be comfortable that they will be able to be restored that
far out. This is a nasty problem for all of us. LTO is too new to bet on
We have an SGI client with 65/512. Trying to find out if these are
kilobytes or megabytes. The backup fails because it runs out of memory.
MemoryEfficientBackup does not help. -dirsonly does not help.
What are people using on large UNIX filesystem clients for these numbers?
There are probably
The most common reason is for the system to backup itself and many others if
the TSM server is running under root.
-Original Message-
From: Evans, William C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM and sudo
I have
Every product has to have a gimmick strong point to make it sell. Same as
products that do Exchange mailbox level backup/restore, etc. The reality is
this feature sounds good on paper, but in practicality is probably not
useable for corporate users. Just like compression in many cases which
Roll forward mode recovers a database to the point in time of the now versus
normal as of the last backup + incrementals. The other database volumes
still on disk are at current time. To end up with a consistent database you
must have a way to bring all to current. The roll-forward replays the
Distributed Storage Management (DSM)
916-774-2073
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: root required to kill TSM daemons?
You know this started about NetBackup. I am wondering
This is the reason why Tivoli has poured a ton of money into code quality in
the past year that only showed up in recent months with the improved quality
and timeliness of patch fixes. We will see with 5.1 if they have the cycle
fixed. I can tell you this. You would definitely not be happy if
Yeah, the university environment has the mine attitude at the desktop
level. That is just a fact of life. We need those people to educate our
future. But, if they would just spend 1 minute of discussion with the
students that corporate discipline and university creativity are separate
and
This is an excellent way to skin the cat.
-Original Message-
From: Lindsey Thomson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How do you secure the passwd in a TSM admin command run a via
batch script
Hi *,
Saw this posted
Not your significant other at 50.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM and RAID on NT
JBOD = Just a Bunch of Disks
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @
We use the QLA2200F PCI card without any problems. I cannot imagine why
there would be a problem with this. I believe the same driver is used for
both. The real issue is SBUS is going to be MUCH slower than the PCI card
(25mhz vs 66mhz). Yes the IO slot board for PCI is about 10K and you may
van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 02:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sun Solaris and Qlogic QLA2202FS (Sbus) and 3590-EIA
We use the QLA2200F PCI card without any problems. I cannot
EMULEX requires specific driver levels on NT, the latest ones. Otherwise,
it will not work.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000
Could
The estimate is just that an estimate. What actually happens is it uses
that value to calculate the %full when the tape is in a filling status.
Once one is full, then the number changes to that value.
-Original Message-
From: Michel David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
There is nothing special that you as a person have to do except make sure
your IBM people do it right.
1) You can open all the doors and just take the tapes out.
2) IBM will power down the library and deinstall/install it. Movers
move it.
3)Once IBM has reinstalled the library and
I am going to discuss this issue with SGI.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Anyone have bare metal restore instructions for SGI's???
Does anyone have some good bare metal restore
We have been doing some significant testing of the TDP for SAP in a Solaris
8 environment. Backup performance with just 2 tape drives and multiplexing
of 3 has provided backup speeds of 200GB per hour (55MB/sec). Very
successful.
The rub comes during the restore. What we have been able to
Has anyone figured out how to stop the title lines from coming out on when
you issue a select statement?
A common thing to do is pipe the output to a file to post process with a
program. It is a pain to have code around extraneous data.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
Gary,
We are also a Veritas NetBackup user. Thank God TSM has a facility like the
SQL query to search their databases and generate whatever I want already
built in.
I admit I had to learn SQL a few years ago to write a mainframe application
(RMDS extensions) that did some really complex SQL
Could be UNICODE filesystem issues.
-Original Message-
From: Subash, Chandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 12:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Retrieve from archive fails in NT
Hi guys
I am using tsm client 4.2.1.15 on NT . I took a sucessful archive .
You have to call IBM to fix it. Are you absolutely sure that power is
coming to that frame. As long as you have not exceeded the power of the
adjacent frame you should be ok until you can get it fixed, but I would ask
IBM. There are actually 2 power distribution units in the cabinet, as least
I would never install a x.x.x.0 release in production unless Tivoli had
categorical proof that it was absolutely solid. Typically, I wait 3 months
after it is generally available and do some APAR searches to see where the
problems are. I typically wait until x.x.x.2 or .3 before I put in
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000
EMULEX requires specific driver levels on NT, the latest ones. Otherwise,
it will not work
Remember, TSM takes control of the drives with its driver. The Magstar
driver is overridden. The TSM driver is not compatible with NTUTIL to my
knowledge. There are also specific ways the drivers have to be installed.
Have you tried doing this with SCSI drives and NTUTIL and the TSM drivers?
I
First of all, BETAs apply to .0 releases before they are released GA or
patches that we never see as they are tested at selected client sites to
verify the fix test works in a customer environment. These are x.x.x.n
releases are patches on top of the base release, with all inclusive fixes up
to
Absolutely, but you get what you ask for, it may not be what you want.
Typically, where it is used is a primary disk pool with a next pool (tape),
with a next pool (tape), etc. This group of storage would be propogated to
a storage copy pool in order as documented in the manual. There is no
-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000
This really sounds like down level microcode in the drives.
-Original Message-
From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
The character representation of the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is called a TIMESTAMP,
same for any date/time field in TIMESTAMP format. There are many functions
you can use against it to get portions of the field. The functions are:
DATE()
HOUR()
MINUTE()
SECOND()
to
The NODELOCK file is the license authorization file. This has been
discussed before on the list. I believe the discussion was to just delete
the file and reregister your configuration. But, you will need the base CD
that has all of the registration files on it unless you copied them to your
YEPPER, there is a way to do this. This is how.
1. Determine the tapes/volumes the filespace is stored on that contains
the document.
2. Change the include/exclude on the client to exclude that file from
backup. When you do this the file will be expired if you run a backup and
even
select * from events where date(actual_start) = '2002-02-19'
But, it depends on how long you keep
them.
-Original Message-From: Jane Bamberger
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20,
2002 4:26 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: select
staetment
Hi,
Once you get to that point you create a .PST and move/copy the files to the
PST. Ship the PST to the executive or do it for them, move the stuff into
their original mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Consiglio, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:32 PM
Who knows, maybe he is taking care of some END-RUN Accounting.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How do you Shred a document from TSM?
My feeling is that backups are required to
IBM does not support same disk and tape across the same HBA on Windows.
Basically, for optimal performance the disk and tape need different values
for a couple of items and they are not testing both disk and tape on the
same HBA.
Here is the reality. I have been running disk and tape on the
Numbers of servers means very little.
What kind of network attachment infrastructure. What do the clients have?
How much data on the clients?
What is the backup windows?
How any copy pools for offsite and onsite recovery?
-Original Message-
From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL
I think Tivoli is waiting until Veritas buys everything, then they will buy
the last one. Saves on all that acquisition cost.
-Original Message-
From: Brown, Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Legato to Buy OTG in
If you loaded down 4.2.1.10 prior to February 5th at 10:00am it will show as
4.2.1.9. According to support it really is 4.2.1.10 otherwise.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
There is a new one out that supports all three on copper, believe it or not.
IBM accidently shipped one to us instead of a fiber one. I believe that you
do not do anything but hook it up because by default 1GB can only be full
duplex. The others are just ignored.
-Original Message-
How does it know it is really its own file?
You have to exclude it if you do not want TSM to try.
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM trying to backup its own, open
Yes, it is very possible. These are most of the supported verbs from the
help. There are predicates that are not listed here. If you do a HELP
SELECT you get this:
The SELECT command supports the following expressions, clauses, functions,
and predicates:
ALL
You use the ARCHIVE command. If you want to delete the files after they
archive you have to specify for it to do so.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to define archive in
An OUTER join really does not apply to an application like TSM. There is a
right, left and plain. An OUTER basically keeps the left or right select
(or both) and joins what it can with the items that do not match having null
results.
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda
Have you turned in a problem on this to Tivoli?
Second, we need more information. What type of server and client and what
levels of code?
-Original Message-
From: Glass, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: when to
I cannot find any reason why the inclexcl dsm.sys cannot have the
include.encrypt used for TDP for Oracle. The dsm.sys is used by the TDP for
Oracle.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Canan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Is this RMAN Oracle?
-Original Message-
From: Terence Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM expiration problem
Hi,
I can set the retention of inactive files in TSM, can I set the retention
period for backup files
Right now we do a lot of our database backups offline without a TDP. Many
of these will stay that way because they are very small databases and
setting up the TDP is just too much work and cost. However, we are
concerned about what this means from a filespace and backups point of view.
First
You should use the latest no matter what.
-Original Message-
From: Sean M English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Atape driver level for 4.2 TSM Server
*SMers,
Does anyone know what Atape level I need to be at or what
Storage Administrator
Freightliner, LLC
(503) 745-6850 phone/vmail
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DataBase File Spaces and Selective Backups
Right now we do a lot of our database backups
to the latest Atape atldd please. (Is there a
web-side for it?) Thanks. Hoa.
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Atape driver level for 4.2 TSM Server
You should use the latest no matter what
-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DataBase File Spaces and Selective Backups
Actually, the question is, if the include is not there will an incremental
backup expire our selective backups that specified what
Ike,
I have done this a little differently. What I do is identify all the cost
associated with the backup process, backup servers, additional switch
capacity, disk pools, tape drives, and libraries and add that up to a total
dollar number. Tapes are figured separately. This infrastructure will
Please put subjects on your questions so we can follow the discussion.
OK,
Native storage versus compressed numbers are a marketing game. The Magstar
K-Tape is a 40GB native (120GB compressed), yet I see data stored as low as
75GB and as high as 240GB. It just depends on how compressable the
Are the 3584 drives dual ported?
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover
I notice that the Atape driver 7.0.3.0 supports Auto failover for tape
devices on
The 3590 is a dual ported device. It actually has two fiber port WWPNs.
AIX actually is talking to both ports all the time but only sends out
primary IO right now to whichever is the current primary. What is coming is
load balancing based on what I know. This way the ES-1000s will have
We use Control-M, but Tivoli's tool works too.
Basically, it is just like any other .bat or .sh or .pl file executing a
dsmadmc command.
Typically, what I do is put the dsmadmc command in a file and call it using.
dsmadmc -id=xxx -pa=xxx macro /the_file_to_execute
or
dsmadmc -id=xxx -pa=xxx
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/IBM_scsi_tape_IUG.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Thomas, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nt tape utilities
*SMers,
Could anyone point me toward some good documentation
Joseph,
The reasons you are doing this are probably different than ours. We have
production processes that need the backups synchronized with them. The
production control department must be able to hold backups if things are
running late or reschedule at a 5 minute notice. Or hold everything
OK,
I understand the requirement, but I doubt many people would use it because
it essentially requires a duplicate copy of your used disk space on each
client that is involved. Run this select. It will give you an answer in MB
of the space required to do what you are asking. You can add where
There are some guys down in the AIX support area that answer TSM questions
occasionally. Boy, you can get some wild stuff from them. He is confusing a
shell script with a TSM script. My guess is he did not even read all of you
problem before answering it. That is typically what I feel happens.
What country/state/province might be helpful.
-Original Message-
From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need 3590 tapes!
Good evening, SMers!
Does anyone know of a wholesale place where I can
Create a dummy management class and storage pool with what you want.
Set the files in your exclude list to that management class.
They will get trimmed. Then remove the management class and they return the
way you want.
However, if they are deleted already then they just hang around until the
Did you specify LANFREEENABLE in the DSM.SYS/DSM.OPT.
-Original Message-
From: Leijnse, Finn F SITI-ITDSES31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lanfree not lan free
Hi guys,
In a totally AIX environment I have set up my
tapes!
Sorry
USA/Texas
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need 3590 tapes!
What country/state/province might be helpful.
-Original Message-
From: Malbrough
The volumes are in a couple of places.
LIBVOLUMES Table
DRMEDIA Table
VOLUMES Table
VOLHISTORY Table
It is a long explanation of how these tables are intertwined.
First check to see if you have a limit on the time of database backups by
doing a query DRMSTATUS.
Second, look at volumes in the
You can also specify a macro file on the server or your desktop as input to
the dsmadmc command with the pipe command on the select or whatever
command. The beauty of the macro xx call is that it can do a lot of
things and anyone can execute it. Scripts require that you be a system
This is more of a security issue than anything. If you allow TSM to spawn
scripts, the child process inherits the same security. Which is typically
root. In their glory, they simply said no rather than opening up the OS I
guess. They definitely are not explaining themselves well.
EXMERGE is not nirvana either. It does not handle inbox processing rules or
the public folders. Do a search on Google for EXMERGE and read some of the
issues.
I fully understand why MS does not support bricklevel restore. Exchange is
just not robust enough for enterprise computing yet.
Heck, 4.2.1.11 is out.
-Original Message-
From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.10 Release to public
For AIX patch 4.2.1.10 is already released as of 02/01/02...
related from inside the TSM administrative client.
The security issue is bunk. Other IBM products can access the O.S.
just fine (like DB2).
Steffan
- Original Message -
From: Seay, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:20 PM
Subject: Re
We just exported/imported a ton of stuff from W2K to AIX TSMSERVER with no
problems on Magstar Tape. The issue is the drivers between platforms may
not be recording the data the same way. Magstar, that is not a problem.
-Original Message-
From: Robin Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
We have the backup running just fine and the backups table finds the stuff
We implemented the virtualmountpoint But, the restore cannot find the
files Anyone else experienced this problem It acts like it cannot find a
match between the virtual mount point and the filespaces
Paul D Seay, Jr
Corporate parents redefine the word control freaks.
-Original Message-
From: Robin Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Server Migration - AIX to HP
In our case, it was a combination of company policy and $$$. We
I am doing a session on Wednesday for SELECT statements
We are collecting stuff to put in the presentation
Send me your favorite 3 statements by end-of day 3/5 Thanks
Paul D Seay, Jr
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
Tivoli has sold so few copies of this that they have no justification to
develop the other options right now. I need the ESS/Solaris option. Maybe
the prevalence of SAN now will change this story. I will talk to the
product development manager again tomorrow about this issue.
-Original
Do you have ENABLELANFREE YES turned on?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Free backups
I am having some problems with the LAN Free backups. Server is 4.2.1.12
(Windows 2000),
If you want a copy of the presentation, please let me know.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
Joe,
If you are talking about the default management class of a policy domain
this is a reasonable SQL statement, but if you are trying to figure out what
management classes are being used by a client that requires an entire scan
of the backups table which would take forever unless you limit it
The problem for the industry analyst many times is if the recommend IBM
every time, then why do we need them. They make a lot of money being
courted by vendors. If this was written by Stan Zaffos, then it is a
straight up view of the solutions based on his perception, but as always,
these views
Virus software takes a lot of memory and can really slow things down if it
is checking the system at the time of the backup.
-Original Message-
From: William Rosette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Session limiitation
I
Do you see messages in the log saying it retries 4 times? If not your
CHANGINGRETRIES is not what you think it is. If you do see it, then they
need to slow down how often they update the file or you need to put it on
faster disk, faster network connection, etc so that you can save it faster.
Tivoli is going to deliver Check Sum support in a future release. But, you
have no way to read the tape back to verify the tape is good based on my
understanding of the solution provided. The checksum is verified during the
restore process or a copy from one storage pool to another. So, if you
) has this in the dsm.opt file. I
dont believe there is an option for the storage agent to indicate LANFREE
usage though.
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 3/6/2002 3:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
I do not know how this perception got going, but I will see if I can
straighten it out. The TDP for Solaris/EMC for Oracle has nothing to do
with the TSM Server OS. The TDP runs on the Solaris machine and uses either
the LAN client to send the data over the network to the TSM server or the
SAN
We are going to submit a requirement to Tivoli to provide a SQL Statements
Manual solution.
-Original Message-
From: ARhoads [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Select Stmts. in TSM
Holly,
I use the DB2 SQL docs from the
Yes, if they have a zone configuration that allows them to be seen by the
client server.
-Original Message-
From: Selva, Perpetua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SAN , fibre drives
Hi
Can someone pls tell me , how this
This was not what was presented at Share. I believe Joshua is correct.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LAN Free backups
I do not believe that is the case...
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Yes, if it is still an active file (both active and inactive versions will
be rebound). Inactive (deleted) files do not get rebound.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about
When you use RMAN, RMAN is totally in charge of the objects. Unfortunately,
the Oracle Media Management API is limited in what it does. It basically
announces an object to the interface provided by the backup vendor and pours
the data down the pipe.
This subject has been discussed a lot on the
Built in EXPORT/IMPORT in a single command without an intermediate tape.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Dawes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.1
what is move nodedata?
Andy Carlson
This is the journaling feature that came in 4.2 only for Windows at this
time.
-Original Message-
From: MUSTAFA BAYTAR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: backup fails because inspection process takes too long.
Hi John,
Look here:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/td/StorageManage
rClient4.2.1.html
There are a number of options, what you want is the Windows client.
-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL
for this upgrade but want to be careful.
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.1
Built in EXPORT/IMPORT in a single command without an intermediate tape.
-Original Message
The database is blocked at 4K. I doubt what you are saying is true.
Simply, the database disk will never run at 33MB/sec. It really depends on
how your tape and disk are configured.
-Original Message-
From: Michael, Monte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:26
No, you cannot without creating a mess. In fact the way the mount of a
scratch works is not by volume. There is a category mask set for the tape
drive and the library is just told to pick a tape in the category and mount
it in the drive. The privates could be the same I suppose, but it would
I guess I do not understand why you made the 5 SAN clients SAN if you are
not going to go directly to tape. How big is the Exchange Server. 2 Hours
sounds like a long time for SAN attached 3590s.
The only possible way to do this may be with SANErgy, but I cannot think of
way to share the disk
1 - 100 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
