On Sunday 27 April 2008 21:43:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
the conversion to XHTML
1.1 (valid now) etc. the patch will be very huge, so I'll just send you the
new file. You can find it here:
http://www.shlomifish.org/perl-timeline-temp/PerlTimeline.html
Excellent work.
All that was said, I
but I'm not really surprised when she
gets her project whipped from under her feet.
No one is stopping any other project from doing anything. Nobody is
taking away any projects from anyone else.
Plurality is the nature of open source, and it's an additive process,
not a subtractive
From: Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plurality is the nature of open source, and it's an additive process,
not a subtractive one. Template Toolkit doesn't take away from
Mason. Devel::*Prof don't take away from Devel::DProf. Perlbuzz
doesn't take away from use.perl.org. Perl 6 doesn't
I wasn't offered my own new
wiki-thread though, maybe I didn't ask the right person...
What do you mean offered my own new wiki-thread? You don't get
offered something on a wiki. You go and start it yourself.
I realise that you had not intended to make this much of an issue
out it, or
On Monday 28 April 2008, Richard Foley wrote:
On Sunday 27 April 2008 21:43:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
the conversion to XHTML
1.1 (valid now) etc. the patch will be very huge, so I'll just send you
the new file. You can find it here:
On Monday 28 April 2008 18:41:00 Andy Lester wrote:
There is no Perl Cabal
There usually is one, somewhere, if you look closely enough...
;-)
I think we're getting a bit off-topic though. This thread was about Elaine's
Timeline, and her right to continue her project as she sees
On Apr 28, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Richard Foley wrote:
I think we're getting a bit off-topic though. This thread was about
Elaine's
Timeline, and her right to continue her project as she sees fit,
rather than
someone else to decide on behalf of the community that her project
should be
On 28 Apr, 2008, at 12:22, Richard Foley wrote:
Well, I started to revise it myself once, but didn't get much of an
answer
from anywhere about how to take it on either. I wasn't offered my
own new
wiki-thread though, maybe I didn't ask the right person...
What, did you have problems
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:49:16PM +0200, Richard Foley wrote:
On Monday 28 April 2008 18:41:00 Andy Lester wrote:
There is no Perl Cabal
There usually is one, somewhere, if you look closely enough...
Only one?
The question is whether the cabal is an array or a scalar. Personally I
On Monday 28 April 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
I wasn't offered my own new
wiki-thread though, maybe I didn't ask the right person...
What do you mean offered my own new wiki-thread? You don't get
offered something on a wiki. You go and start it yourself.
I realise that you had not
Elaine Ashton wrote:
I'll welcome updates.
I'll welcome fixed links and html.
I'll welcome new content.
brian and chromatic have posted a few 'Year in Review' type nodes to
Perlmonks and oreillynet that would likely be helpful if someone were to
work on some updates. Here's the link to
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:41:00 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
What sort of power are you ascribing to these unnamed people-in-
power? There is no power. There is no Perl Cabal [...]
Oh, I beg to differ:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030716002311/perlcabal.com/lwall.html
:-)
--
Peter Scott
12 matches
Mail list logo
