Thanks Tim great job.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 07:50:40PM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Anyone doing anything to counter this misconception?
http://www.nautis.com/2007/08/17/cms-review-bricolage/
Note that
On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:49, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 07:50:40PM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Anyone doing anything to counter this misconception?
http://www.nautis.com/2007/08/17/cms-review-bricolage/
Note that blog comments that say, you're wrong! are more harmful
than
To the uninitiated or person considering Perl, seeing articles
averaging 5+ yrs of age, it looks like a ghost town. The reality is that
many of those articles are still relevant. But how can you explain/train
that concept? The parallel is people looking up at sourceforge and like
sites,
Aaron Trevena wrote:
I've been doing Perl almost exclusively since I graduated from uni in
2000 and I'm still surprised by how widely used it is - in fact I
think my last few jobs and contracts have all been in places that your
average Java or Python programmer would say Perl wouldn't work -
19, 2008 11:17 AM
To: advocacy@perl.org
Subject: Re: Perl Going the way of the dinosaur
Q: In the last two weeks how many of us have changed
the way we do anything based on this discussion?
Some reasonable ideas were put forward, I'm must
wondering if anyone is actually altering their
actions
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Steven Lembark wrote:
Q: In the last two weeks how many of us have changed
the way we do anything based on this discussion?
Some reasonable ideas were put forward, I'm must
wondering if anyone is actually altering their
actions based on them.
I've volunteered as
Q: In the last two weeks how many of us have changed
the way we do anything based on this discussion?
Some reasonable ideas were put forward, I'm must
wondering if anyone is actually altering their
actions based on them.
enjoi
--
Steven Lembark +1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Dubois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, brian d foy wrote:
I've been working on some stats about upload activity to CPAN from 1995
Maybe you could upload it to many eyes so people can easily
create and share different visualizations?
Very
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy
Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Jan 2008, at 23:40, brian d foy wrote:
Very interesting. I've created the data set:
http://services.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/data/SmAgULsOtha6j6GvEADnL2-
Many Eyes: CPAN Volume
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:00:26PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:50 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Anyone doing anything to counter this misconception?
http://www.nautis.com/2007/08/17/cms-review-bricolage/
Note that blog comments that say, you're wrong! are more harmful
brian d foy wrote, on Friday, January 25, 2008 12:25 PM:
I think that's related to an earlier assertion:
Even the lead developer, David Wheeler, has not mentioned the project
on his personal blog in two years. For all practical purposes, the
Bricolage project should be considered
Anyone doing anything to counter this misconception?
http://www.nautis.com/2007/08/17/cms-review-bricolage/
Note that blog comments that say, you're wrong! are more harmful
than helpful. I mean is there a report or something with real data to
show otherwise?
Thanks,
David
On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:50 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Anyone doing anything to counter this misconception?
http://www.nautis.com/2007/08/17/cms-review-bricolage/
Note that blog comments that say, you're wrong! are more harmful
than helpful. I mean is there a report or something with real
13 matches
Mail list logo
