The SIAI videos which are up on google so far look ok. I didn't know
that they were actually trying to *build* an AI, as opposed to just
raising the generally relevant issues.
To the layman this will just look like bunk, since many of these
issues aren't yet within the popular zeitgeist. If I
Matt,
Shane Legg's definition of universal intelligence requires (I believe)
complexity but not adaptability.
In a universal intelligence test the agent never knows what the environment
it is facing is. It can only try to learn from experience and adapt in
order to
perform well. This means
Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
I think there is a different role for chaos theory. Richard Loosemore
describes a system as intelligent if it is complex and adaptive.
NO, no no no no!
I already denied this.
Misunderstanding: I do
Richard,
I agree with you that intelligence currently has no
classical/objective/true/formal definition.
However, I hope your opinion (given the title of the post) won't be
understood as you can take intelligence to mean whatever you want,
and since the term has no definition, all attempts
Pei Wang wrote:
Richard,
I agree with you that intelligence currently has no
classical/objective/true/formal definition.
However, I hope your opinion (given the title of the post) won't be
understood as you can take intelligence to mean whatever you want,
and since the term has no definition,
Richard,
It seems that the major difference between you and me is not on the
definition of intelligence, but on the definition of definition.
:)
Pei
On 5/21/07, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pei Wang wrote:
Richard,
I agree with you that intelligence currently has no
So the first AGI gets built and is running for a few months and absorbs
copies of all the bits on the internet. Then the AGI designer poses a
question to the AGI:
What is the definition of intelligence?
AGI: Listen pop, I'm just doing my job and minding my own business.
Designer: so.. you're
The best definition of intelligence comes from (of all people) Hugh Loebner:
It's like pornography -- I can't define it exactly, but I like it when I see
it.
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
Attention Mizar users:
As I think some people on this list are interested in Mizar,
http://www.ags.uni-sb.de/~cebrown/mizar-texmacs/mizar-texmacs-tutorial.html
Well, TeXmacs vs. Emacs is still an open problem for me. I am all for
WYSIWYM, it is essential to look at structural mathematical
On 5/22/07, Lukasz Stafiniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more collective wisdom. But at the level of principles, TeXmacs is
[wisdom == knowledge]
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
Any opinions on Operator Grammar vs. Link Grammar?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator_Grammar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_grammar
Link Grammar seems to have spawned practical software, but Operator
Grammar has some compelling ideas including coherent selection,
information content and
Handling syntax separately from semantics and pragmatics is hacky
and non-AGI-ish ... but, makes it easier to get NLP systems working at a
primitive level in a non-embodied context
Operator grammar mixes syntax and semantics which is philosophically
correct, but makes things harder
Link grammar
On 5/22/07, Chuck Esterbrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any opinions on Operator Grammar vs. Link Grammar?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator_Grammar
If you are intrested in Operator Grammar, perhaps you would also want
to take a look at Grammatical Framework:
13 matches
Mail list logo
