There is one further point which is absolutely fundamental
in operating system/compiler theory. The user should be unaware of how the
work is divided up. A robot may simply have a WiFi router and very little
else, or it might have considerable on board processing. The user should not
be aware of
like this ( the Genome Project):
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/health/research/13alzheimer.html?_r=1themc=th
should become an ever bigger part of sci. tech. Of course, with Alzheimer's
there is a great deal of commonly recognized ground. Not so with AGI. It might
be interesting to
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:40 AM, John G. Rose johnr...@polyplexic.comwrote:
The ideological would still need be expressed mathematically.
I don't understand this. Computers can represent related data objects that
may be best considered without using mathematical terms (or with only
It would be easy to relativize a weighted network so that it could be used
to include ideas that can effectively reshape the network (or at least
reshape the virtual network) but it is not easy to see how this could be
done intelligently enough to produce actual intelligence. But maybe I
should
Single Neurons Can Detect Sequences
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100812151632.htm
---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
I suppose that part of the work that it does is making people feel good
and being a neat conversation piece.
Interoperability and communications protocols can facilitate the path to
AGI. Just like the many protocols used on the internet. I haven't looked at
any for robotics specifically though
-Original Message-
From: Jim Bromer [mailto:jimbro...@gmail.com]
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:40 AM, John G. Rose johnr...@polyplexic.com
wrote:
The ideological would still need be expressed mathematically.
I don't understand this. Computers can represent related data objects
